Matt Walsh is a craven fool of course, but he's repeating the kind of fucked up shit that is sadly common these days; the stupid thing is if he wants America to "resemble" the country his (??) ancestors established then he might want the population to be 15% foreign born like it was in 1870, or 15% foreign born like it was in 1910, or maybe even 15% foreign born like it was in 2024, who knows!
man in the end doesn't this all just sum out to be a protest against the existence of "time"
In general 15 percent foreign born is a bit over the threshold where people historically consider to be too much immigration at once.
I think a general immigration policy aimed at keeping the foreign born percentage (a loose proxy for a complex set of statistics) under 10 percent most of the time would be reasonable. Of course if we somehow came by another few hundred thousand square miles of land it would make sense to accelerate immigration to settle it.
I find this kind of commentary from Walsh pretty incompatible with the American Constitution and to some degree tradition.
However, it's not insane to think that a society would try to control and limit (negative) change.
Also, at least if Wikipedia is to be believed, birthright citizenship was written into the Constitution in 1868 and the "anyone born on US soil is a US citizen" interpretation has been the Supreme Court's standard reading since 1898. What the heck does Matt Walsh mean by "now"?


















