Just had TWINS! Any help would be greatly appreciated. Please signal boost!
Fai_Ryy
Doug Jones
Color Me Curious

titsay
One Nice Bug Per Day

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
almost home
Show & Tell
The Stonewall Inn

Origami Around
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
todays bird
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă
Fieri Frames
𩵠avery cochrane đŠľ
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Game of Thrones Daily


#extradirty
seen from United States
seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore
seen from Qatar

seen from Russia
seen from India
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Chile

seen from Australia
seen from Brazil

seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Kenya
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
@anachrolady
Just had TWINS! Any help would be greatly appreciated. Please signal boost!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Mike Rowe said if the Democratic Socialists of America "continue to grow in popularity, and the Democrats actually campaign on their behalf,
This is your reminder today that Irene Adler in the original Conan Doyle story is literally not a criminal. She never commits a crime.
Nor is she a seductress in any kind of negative or manipulative sense - she has a mutual relationship with a powerful man who then breaks up with her, and afterwards she keeps protection against him in the form of evidence that the relationship existed. She HAS blackmail material, she even waves it at him threateningly because he treated her like shit, but she never even uses it.
Irene Adler is not a thief, femme fatale, or blackmailer. She's just a cool lady that wants to be left alone.
@delphi-star You do recall correctly!! She does not give a shit about that man! She's happily married! She tipped him for being a witness at her wedding!
If your Sherlock Holmes adaptation has a character whose identifying qualities are that she is a seductive criminal in love with Holmes, you have created a character that is basically the literal opposite of Irene Adler and you should name her something else.
She's also -- and I cannot stress this enough -- from New Jersey. IMO this is the single most important detail missing from all the adaptations -- IRENE ADLER IS FROM NEW JERSEY.
Please just once in my life I would like to see this adapted faithfully it would be the funniest fucking thing ever.
My ideal adaptation would be one where the king builds her up with the usual adaptation nonsense. She's a thief, a femme fatale, she'll seduce anyone!!!!
Smashcut to a New Jersey opera singer happily engaged to the most boring person you've also met (also from New Jersey).
I would fund that adaptation on kickstarter in a heartbeat. (the Jeremy Brett adaptation is actually really good and can be found on youtube, but I have to deduct points for the lack of a Joisey accent đ)
Please return us to a world where Notp and squick are used for a ship you donât like instead of just making up a load of bullshit about how immoral it is or w/e lolÂ
a short selection of concepts and phrases that used to be commonplace in fandom and weâd really benefit from making that a thing again:
NOTP: the opposite of an OTP (One True Pairing). It is a ship a fan strongly dislikes. The word is a portmanteau of ânoâ and âOTPâ and thus is not a contraction of any particular phrase.
Squick: anything that is a deep-seated, visceral turn-off. Squicks may be shared by many fans or be specific to one; one personâs kink may be another personâs squick.
YKINMKATO, or kink-tomato: Your Kink Is Not My Kink, And Thatâs Okay: used to indicate support for fannish diversity and to distinguish between disapproval or kink shaming and simply having different taste.
DLDR: Donât Like, Donât Read: a phrase used to warn against complaints about an aspect of fic or meta. A âlive and let liveâ philosophy of fandom, which places the responsability for avoiding content one doesnât want to see on the side of the fanwork consumer, rather that on the creatorâs.
SALS: Ship And Let Ship: similar to the above specifically about shipping tastes.
YMMV: Your Mileage May Vary: a phrase used to acknowledge that any given individualâs personal opinion on the topic at hand may differ due to their own tastes, standards, values, experiences, etc.
As the OP points out, all of these crucially imply no moral judgment of what theyâre designing.
(definitions lifted more or less wholesale from fanloreâs relevant pages)
bring the healthy fun back to fandom!
Ngl I totally forgot fandom discourse was a thing. I donât care man, I have car payments
starting a collection
If I may submit:

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Stay engaged.
I reblogged this last month, tagged it, and said âmight as well see if it works.â I used this video as a reference to find all the forms that i needed (which is A LOT, especially if youâre a dependent) and sent them through the mail, not really allowing myself to hope.
dude.
$2,714 of medical debt from my top surgery - gone. im shaking this was such a weight on me for 2 years and it fucking worked. what the fuck.
This is huge. Sharing for my US friendos.
Hospitals like to hide these policies under a lot of successive links in obscure places, so if you don't see anything right away, keep looking! Get friends to help! Make it a scavenger hunt. A game where you're assassins sent to slit capitalism's throat
KOSA again, with a different name⌠and theyâre trying to sneak it past you before July 4th. CALL YOUR REPS!
Buried inside the KIDS Act are provisions that will push online services to verify all usersâ ages, require government-directed moderation p
Like the man saidâŚthe shadow takes another form and ruses again. Time to make some calls and let them know weâre watching.
At least 104 Democrats vote yea to pass HR 7757. The bill passes 267-117. It now moves to the Senate, which is out until July 13th. Will
Bully the fuck outta your Senators because the House passed it. THESE MORONS WANT TO CENSOR THE INTERNET.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
"By getting rid of paper archives and replacing them with digital archives, they can erase history. One day, you'll encounter the message "the page does not exist," and the next day, you'll see them deny that it ever really happened. " - Julian Assange
Absolutely no one and nothing needs an IMMEDIATE response unless itâs an emergency or a work related situation (focus modes exist that allow only certain notifications to go through for this purpose)
Getting to a text or notification in 15 minutes versus 2 hours changes absolutely nothing about the outcome of a situation
You forget 80% of what you scrolled through at the end of the day
Thereâs absolutely no image on Pinterest, no post on Tumblr, no story on Instagram that could be as novel as reading a book youâve never read and the dopamine release from finishing it and soaking it in
it can literally wait. Itâs not the end of the world. Your brain will make it seem that way but itâs not
Phones are built like slot machines (same exact mechanism) so donât be too hard on yourself
But also consider how much progress youâd make in your goals if you siphoned some of that screen time into whatever goals youâve had forever
you donât need to live a no phone lifestyle, itâs about portions
it will feel so fulfilling when itâs under moderation
If you believe that only white people can be racist, guess what? You are racist.
Racism is to hate someone based on their race. So if you genuinely believe that only white people can be racist, you are automatically racist because you're hating on someone or slapping an identity onto them BECAUSE OF THEIR RACE.
Black people can be racist. Asians can be racist. Hispanics can be racist. Middle Eastern people can be racist, etc. Literally any group you can think of can be racist as well. So if you only think it's one group, you are racist for even believing that.
Fighting fire with fire never works---it literally only makes more fire. Being racist just because you've have bad experiences is like trying to fight fire by pouring gasoline on it.
Racism is never justified and it is bad. But if you really think you're justified hating white people just because they're white, sorry honey. You're racist. That's the definition of racism. Hating someone because of their RACE.
"Problematic" is a vague accusation. Generally, it's used to say "this is bad, but I don't want to bother explaining why for some reason."
It can be a case of "I just don't like it, but want to treat my dislike as an objective flaw." or sometimes. "I can't really make a good case for why I oppose it, so I'm making my accusations vague."

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The rule could have heavy impacts towards trans people across society.
Last week, the Trump administration quietly released a sweeping new federal rule that would use funding threats to force institutions across the country to reject transgender people. The 400-page proposed regulation would codify the administration's anti-trans executive orders into binding federal policy, imposing a blanket prohibition on federal funds going toward "gender ideology"
The proposed rule, formally titled "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," rewrites the government-wide framework governing all federal grants across every agency. Among its most consequential provisions, it requires that before a federal grant recipient can receive money, the award must pass a "pre-issuance review" conducted by a political appointeeânot a career expert or peer reviewerâto ensure it is "consistent with applicable law, Federal agency priorities, and the national interest." The regulation explicitly instructs these appointees to screen for "denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans or the notion that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic." [...] An institution that acknowledges transgender people existâthrough its policies, its training, its healthcare, its bathroom access, its HR procedures, its name-change processesâcould be deemed to "deny the sex binary" or to âsupport the notion that sex is mutableâ and have its federal funding blocked.
Importantly, the gender ideology prohibition has no age limitationâhospitals could be targeted not just for providing care to minors but for providing gender-affirming care to adults, because prescribing hormone therapy to a transgender patient of any age could be deemed promoting the belief that "sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic."
THIS IS OPEN TO COMMENT UNTIL JULY 13, 2026
This is all very bad and horrible, but I want to be clear that itâs worse and more sweeping than just eliminating trans research.
This torches everything. And I do mean everything.
A very abbreviated list of its ramifications include (but are not limited to):
ending funding for ALL DEI related initiatives
allowing the government to terminate grants at any point for any reason
preventing researchers from publishing, going to conferences, and being part of academic societies
requiring that topics must support the presidentâs agenda.
What this means, and if anything Iâm under selling it, is the death of science and research in America. It allows the government to restrict any topic they please at a whims notice, putting officials who have no background in the topic in charge of deciding funding continuity. It controls what gets researched and if/how researchers are allowed to share their discoveries. There are no books to burn if the government never allows them to be written. This is fascism plain and simple.
Please, if you only ever write one public comment, this is the one to do.
Bringing back this guide to writing an effective public comment. This gives you the basics you need to know, what you need to include, a basic outline you can follow, etc.
Public comments are not a vote, it is a chance for you to say "here is an issue with this law I think you need to address" and provide justification for legal challenges if it goes forward:
"Comments raise the bar that agencies have to meet when making a rule; âif an agency fails to adequately respond to significant, relevant comments in a final rule, members of the public may seek to challenge the rule in court on that basis and claim it could be struck down.ËŽ"
But also, if possible, don't stop at writing a comment. Don't stop at calling your representatives. You should ideally be talking to people in your community about this and organizing resistance on-the-ground; there is a good chance people are already doing that even if you aren't hearing about it.
Some added 101-level context from someone (me) whoâs worked in federal grantmaking for 20 years and is literally certified on this document - this is a document that governs all federal grantmaking. Itâs been around for over a decade and is a mega-document that combine multiple previous smaller documents that have been around for ages. It is updated every few years and generally the updates are minor - a notable change in the previous update was raising the small procurement threshold from $10,000 to $15,000 for example. Deeply dry boring minutiae that no one outside of federal grantmakers need concern themselves with. It was also federal GUIDELINES, which means there was flexibility.
This yearâs is different. They are now federal REQUIREMENTS, which means thereâs no flexibility. As was said previously, the 400 pages are not singularly devoted to being absolute shitheads to trans people. Theres a lot of stuff in there, some of which is the standard dry boring grants stuff, some of which is the horrible ideological warfare outlined above.
This document is issued by the OMB, the Office of Management and Budget, which is currently lead by fucking Russell Vought, the principal architect of Project 2025. This is how theyâre going to implement all the horrible shit in there that wasnât covered by Executive Order. Russell Vought is actively coming for my job, my marriage, and my kid, and most of my friends lost their jobs last year because of him. He is the fucking arch villain behind the heinous shit the current regime is doing.
So yes, please comment. You donât have to read all 400 pages before doing so, itâs dry and dense as fuck, but I thought this information might be helpful. Also, while there is a public comment period, this isnât voted on by Congress. The OMB just fucking issues it. Pressuring your elected officials into publicly saying âhey what the fuck are you doing hereâ is good, though.
Please note the comment period is open through JULY 13th, not JUNE 13th. I saw a lot of relogs yesterday saying "last day!" and I just want to say it is very much not too late.
âNo one remembered my birthday-â Well, but did YOU tell anyone it was coming up and you wanted to celebrate it with them?
âI wish someone would see through it when I tell people Iâm fine-â Well, but have YOU considered not lying when people ask you how youâre doing?
âI am so resentful of my friend because they keep doing this thing that really bothers me-â Well, but have YOU directly communicated that the thing is bothering you?
âI am burning out because my friend keeps expecting me to help them with serious struggles-â Well, but have YOU tried to establish the boundaries you need to feel okay?
âNo one ever asks me about this thing I really care about-â Well, but have YOU brought it up yourself?
âI miss my friend but they havenât texted me-â Well, but have YOU been reaching out to them?
Sometimes people are mean, uncaring assholes, in which case you get to be mad. But sometimes you just need to communicate better. Try communication before you assume someone doesnât care!
Having someone who knows you on such a deep level that they see past your mask, or sense you need a check in is such a deep satisfying fantasy. Itâs up there with living in a cottagecore farm, or buying all your friends houses when you win the lottery. But you have to make peace with the fact that this is also a fantasy. It is unfair to expect people to âjust knowâ when to respect your boundaries or to push them.
Being cared for is not a fantasy. But you have to let people know you need it. And you have to understand that sometimes they will let you down. Just like you totally could live in a cute farm, but you still have to shovel shit, and the crops sometimes die anyway. Or maybe you win the lottery, but you still have to manage your money and learn real estate law.
The fantasy isnât the caring, the fantasy is not having to do the work. And it sucks. Itâs embarrassing. But like the meme says, itâs not rotten if itâs YOU. So do it for yourself.
âThe fantasy isnât the caring, the fantasy is not having to do the workâ! Thank you for that addition. Because itâs not a naive expectation to want someone to care to treat you right. But it requires communication and mutual effort to actually get there
Oh yes. This is spot on.
How often do we find ourselves wishing that other people would just âknowâ what we want, without us needing to tell them.
And yes, itâs true. Not only is this just not how the world works, but itâs also us not wanting to make the effort to communicate our needs.