Necromancer

"50 years" is more a rough simplified estimate than an actual timeframe, but yes, up until the extinction of the great auk, many humans genuinely didn't believe their god would let one of his creations go extinct. I can only really speak on the perspective of Western (predominantly Christian) scientists, but it was widely believed that extinction was simply impossible. You have to remember that the theory of spontaneous generation wasn't definitively disproven until the mid-1800s.

Allow me to quote wikipedia for a second, because the editors did a great job of summarizing this worldview:

Prior to the 19th century, much of Western society adhered to the belief that the world was created by God and as such was complete and perfect. This concept reached its heyday in the 1700s with the peak popularity of a theological concept called the great chain of being, in which all life on earth, from the tiniest microorganism to God, is linked in a continuous chain. The extinction of a species was impossible under this model, as it would create gaps or missing links in the chain and destroy the natural order. Thomas Jefferson was a firm supporter of the great chain of being and an opponent of extinction, famously denying the extinction of the woolly mammoth on the grounds that nature never allows a race of animals to become extinct.

The article goes on:

Similarly, in 1695, Sir Thomas Molyneux published an account of enormous antlers found in Ireland that did not belong to any extant taxa in that area. Molyneux reasoned that they came from the North American moose and that the animal had once been common on the British Isles. Rather than suggest that this indicated the possibility of species going extinct, he argued that although organisms could become locally extinct, they could never be entirely lost and would continue to exist in some unknown region of the globe. The antlers were later confirmed to be from the extinct deer Megaloceros. Hooke and Molyneux's line of thinking was difficult to disprove. When parts of the world had not been thoroughly examined and charted, scientists could not rule out that animals found only in the fossil record were not simply "hiding" in unexplored regions of the Earth.

Of course there were naturalists proposing the concept of extinction as early as 1796, but a proposal of a concept is not the same as widespread societal acceptance of a concept.

Someone in the comments of this post brough up the dodo bird as an example of a more recently extinct animal that 'proves' that humans ought to know about extinction. After all, there were written accounts, paintings, and even body parts to prove its former existence.

But to that I raise you the Jenny Haniver:

Jenny Hanivers are skates or rays preserved to look like dragons or devils. They've been sold as hoaxes since at least the 1500s, and naturalists have warned people of their fraudulent nature for just as long. People knew about hoaxes and misrepresentations. We've all heard the story of how the first platypus body to reach London was thought to be a clever hoax.

By the 1700s, one taxidermy dodo was known to exist. It was donated to the Oxford Museum, which burned it in 1755 because it had decayed considerably, meaning it was unfit for study and display, plus it was putting their other taxidermy specimens at risk. Taxidermy back then mostly just involved drying the skin on a base without preservatives, leaving the specimen vulnerable to pests and fungi. Only the mummified head and foot were saved and thrown in a drawer where they were more or less forgotten about.

So by the year 1800, naturalists had no evidence that the dodo was real, and enough evidence that it was a fraud. According to "Panati’s Extraordinary Endings of Practically Everything and Everybody" (1989), p. 203:

Only a hundred years after the dodo was officially declared extinct, Europeans refused to believe such a fantastical creature had ever existed. It became a myth like the unicorn. By 1800, professional naturalists were casting doubt on written descriptions of the bird, as well as on extant drawings, many of which did display striking inconsistencies. It became scientific vogue to deny the bird’s existence and to challenge the Oxford head and foot as fakes. Why, skeptics asked, had no one preserved a skeleton? Unless there had never been a dodo. Skepticism was so strong by 1850 that a group of zoologists journeyed to Mauritius in search of dodo bones.

Dodo bones wouldn't be discovered on Mauritius until 1863, but even after the dodo was proven to have existed, people still needed to be convinced that it's extinction was 1) a total extinction, 2) not a fluke, and 3) preventable.

By 1830, naturalists were aware that the great auk could soon be extinct (at least locally), but instead of calling for the protection of great auks, they called for specimens to be collected while they still had the chance. Conservation of a dying population was simply incoceivable to them. The last two known great auks were killed by an ornithologist in 1844.

It wasn't until the mid-1800s that extinction was really understood as a possibility, and it wasn't until the early 1900s that the conservationist movement as we know it took form. This was thanks in large part to everyone's favorite rampantly racist anti-indigenous animal lover, Theodore Roosevelt, who laid the groundworks of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and created wildlife preserves and national forests out of land stolen from Native Americans (but that's a story for another day).

Prior to the mid-1800s, we lost the mammoth, aurochs, European wild horse, moa, dodo, Steller's sea cow, Malagasy hippo, great auk, quagga, bluebuck, Falkland Islands wolf, huia, and many more megafauna, as well as countless rodents, bats, marsupials, and subspecies due to overhunting. We have lost many species since, but very few were due to malicious/targeted hunting. Most were due to ignorance, carelessness, or desperation. And every megafauna extinction has been fought by a conservation movement that is now, more often than not, succesful.

Funkciók amik biztosan csökkentik egy termék élettartalmát: cloud wifi integráció

Funckiók amikre az onokáknak biztosan nincs szüksége: cloud wifi integráció

Fumkciók amik nélkül nem árulnak ma 10kg kapacitás feletti Miele mosógépet: cloud wifi integráció

>look inside

(Ezt a dolgot ne áruljátok el senkinek, mert még több turista fog idejönni!)

Sokan azt hiszik, hogy a hobbitok csak a fantasy irodalomban léteztek, és Tolkien találta ki őket. Tudom, hogy ez sok ember álmát lerombolja, de a Gyűrűk ura szerzője csak annyit tett hozzá a történethez, hogy az ajtajaik kör alakúak voltak. A hobbitok valójában a harmadkorban a mai Portugália területén élő csodás lények voltak, a legnagyobb hősök a történelem során. Létezésükről a mai napig tanúskodnak az általuk épített, és a mai napig fennmaradt házak ajtajainak méretei, még akkor is, ha a későbbi brutális átépítésekkel megpróbálták elfedni a nyomokat. A hivatalos történetírás évszázadok óta ugyanazt a kényelmes narratívát ismételgeti. A tankönyvek lapjain föníciai kereskedők, római légiók és mór hódítók váltják egymást, mintha a Tejo folyó torkolata csupán az emberi civilizációk szokványos helyszíne lett volna. Ám az akadémiai kánon mögött mindig is ott lappangott az elhallgatott igazság, amelyet a városvezetés és a történészek próbáltak a feledés homályában tartani. Ez a fotográfia azonban végre lerántja a leplet az emberiség egyik legnagyobb hazug mítoszáról:

I refer, of course, to the time Buzz Aldrin (age 72 at the time) cold-cocked a moon landing conspiracy theorist straight in his smug face after being accused of being a coward, liar, and thief.

Yes, someone was indeed dumb enough to tell a man so unafraid of death that he was willing to go into the void on a fragile explosive rocket, a coward.

Said dumbass was filming this confrontation as some sort of proof of moon fraud, but has instead captured this glorious moment of near-cosmic justice for us to loop for all time.

like, for me the heart and soul of lotr is the hobbits, and it always bemuses me to see how underrated they can be in fics or fandom like?? you have these funky little fuckers who are really brave and kind and loyal but also have oddball forms of government and eat and party a lot and get into scrapes and have all these hobbit pals and there's all sorts of shipping options and they have interesting nuanced social politics and second breakfast and pipeweed and they give presents on their birthday instead of the other way around so they're always getting presents and they're hilariously weird about their family trees and they led full-scale guerrilla warfare against these bastards who invaded their homeland but also all they want to do is chill and have nice gardens and probably judge vegetable growing competitions and have pretty dances

“Ghosts aren’t real” it’s very fair and rational that you believe that

“Ghosts aren’t real anymore” I’m about to hear a poem or very sad story

Upper Slaughter, Gloucestershire, England

Dear David Attenborough,

Congratulations on reaching your 100th lap around the sun, young man!

Thank you for sharing the wonders of our world with such care and curiosity.

Here’s to many more years, slow and steady wins the race!