no offence but literally no one gives a fuck if you donât feel included, sometimes certain spaces need to practice exclusion, this is not oppression and if it makes you feel invalidated then thatâs a personal problem you must deal with
They also donât include demanding that other people adopt your beliefs (especially when those beliefs are religious or metaphysical), demanding other people perceive you a certain way, or validation.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I wonder when society is gonna realize that sending abusive men to therapy does nothing but equip them with new official sounding therapyspeak terms to use when guilt tripping their victims
I hate how âdaddy issuesâ is used to call women crazy and un-datable rather than bring up the fact so many fathers are abusing their daughters to the point of emotional breakdown
And then men turn it into a fetish. âDaddy issuesâ is something hot and desirable in a partner. Thereâs an innate evil to thinking mental trauma from child abuse is sexy
Stained-glass window and tiled wall section from the Torre Bellesguard, also known as Casa Figueres, designed by Antoni GaudĂ in Barcelona. The building was constructed between 1900 and 1909 and blends Modernism with Gothic architectural styles.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
the right: i want a woman to cook and clean and fuck
the left: omgâŚ..girls?????? girls are soooooo softâŚâŚand soo good at organizing??? god i love how they organize their closets itâs soo cuteâŚi justâŚwowâŚugh date a girl whoâs cute and soft and cooks for you
The right: blue for boys, pink for girls- thatâs the way God intended
The left: I dunno I just feel likeâŚ..to me, pink is for the girlies? Like if you really like pink you might be a girl? Like itâs worth exploring your girlhood and feminity if that resonates with your authentic self. And blue?? It gives off a masculine vibe. Like if pink is not your vibe and blue feels right to you, youâre probably just a dude. Go forth my guy.
It's very interesting to listen to history lectures that first say that there was no slavery at a certain period of time, and then follow it up with something like: "women didn't have the right to marry at their free will, property was passed down from father to son..." and so on.
you are absolutely sure that there was no slavery, right?
Just because women were working doesn't mean they had much input on who they married.
Can't comment on other cultures but at least in mine who a woman could marry has up until very recently been controlled by family. This has held true regardless of class. Also women weren't allowed to own property until very recently either (depends on religion â Hindu Succession Act allowed women to become direct heirs and get equal shares. Travancore Christian Succession Act of 1916 which governed the Kerala christians did not let daughters inherit until it was overturned in 1986).
It also doesn't mean they were earning money. Yes, most women have always been expected to work, but they weren't necessarily paid. Slaves are also expected to work.* And even when women's work generated any kind of income, they didn't necessarily have any control over or rights to the money they earned.
To give just one example, in England, prior to the Married Women's Property Act of 1870, any income which a woman earned legally belonged to her husband. In fact a married woman, rich or poor, did not even exist as a separate legal entity.
Caroline Norton, who was instrumental in gerting this Act passed, also campaigned successfully for divorce reform. The following is an excerpt from her testimony to Parliament.
And while English women did gain some property rights in the 1870s, it wasn't until 100 years later that the Sex Discrimination Act actually made it illegal for banks to refuse to let a woman open an account without a man's signature.
Of course, this doesn't even touch on all of the unpaid work which women in nearly every time and place have been expected to do for their husbands. Including providing him with children.
*The whole premise that 'expected to work and earn money' = 'not a slave' is a pretty embarrassing argument to make in the first place. Slaves are absolutely expected to work. And indeed to earn money, albeit not for themselves. Though in the Roman world, for instance, it was also common for slaves to earn a small amount of money which they were allowed to hold and manage as if it were their own.
I want to add this is a huge part of why Iâm worried about men being moderators of content for companies (now thereâs A.I doing the majority of it of course, but Iâve always worried it might give men thoughts and ideas to replicate the violence or even use it as justification to be a certain way whilst dismissing any bad thing they do because at least theyâre not an evil child abuser). Men are a huge reason why certain content exists and is created.
TRAs are truly TERRIFIED of detransitioners! It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. You people are genuinely so afraid to confront your own biases and it makes you blind!!
The mere existence of detransitioners, even ones who aren't gender critical, blows their ideology to pieces. The best defence they can muster is "oh, don't listen to those people, they were never *really* trans." Which raises the question of why people who aren't *really* trans are transitioning and being medicalised.
The sane response to this is to say that there should be more gatekeeping. And there are corners of the trans community who advocate for this. But then the question arises of how are you supposed to tell if someone *really* is trans in order to separate them from the fake trans people who you want to gatekeep transition from. And that's a dilemma most of them are too scared to grapple with.
So the best they can come up with is "anyone who identifies as trans is 100% trans up to the very moment they claim to no longer be trans, at which point they retroactively never were trans." There is no way of knowing who is going to detransition in the future, so this means that a lot of the people they are saying we must affirm the identities of are, in the future, going to be revealed to have never been trans to begin with.
I can only conclude that every trans identified person is in a sort of limbo state of being 100% trans and never having been trans to begin with. And the superposition will not collapse until they either detransition, or die. SchrĂśdinger's trans.
Plus, if you're very invested in the idea that you need "transition" to be your true self and you can never be happy unless you do, especially if you've put in a lot of money, effort, and made personal sacrifices for the sake of transitioning, the thought that you could be wrong and it was all for nothing is terrifying. Detransitioners represent that possibility.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Men can not be rehabilitated, as psychologist Rebecca Myers found out after many years of hard work.
Rebecca Myers has dedicated her life to trying to change the most brutal of Britainâs serial rapists and abusers. When people hear that, they always want her to reveal the âworstâ thing she has heard.
Go on, they say, as though itâs an episode of The Killing or CSI. Myers, who is a forensic psychologist working with deviant criminals, will give away a few things, such as the fact that she canât look at a table knife casually left in the butter over breakfast after her prison housed a man who stabbed his girlfriend in the bath and left the knife behind, stuck in. Or that the theme tune to Coronation Street gives her chills. One of her first cases was a man who went on a three-year raping spree, breaking into the homes of single women while wearing an animal mask. On one occasion he hid behind the sofa of his next victim in his terrifying costume as she, oblivious and happy, watched her favourite soap opera.
The actual worst thing? She wonât tell me that â she is scared it will contaminate me too. âI have never told a soul, and never will.â Thatâs her job, to suffer so that others donât, to save other women.
One of the worst things she has heard wasnât exactly a crime. It was after a lifetime of getting into the heads of these men through a gruelling and expensive rehabilitation programme for sex offenders that thousands of male prisoners in this country undertook over a two-decade period, at a taxpayer cost of an estimated ÂŁ100 million. She personally started working with the Sex Offender Treatment Programme (SOTP) when she was 22, soon after she joined one of Britainâs most notorious prisons, known for the number of inmates convicted for sexual or violent offences. She worked with them, including the mask-wearing rapist, out of idealism and trust.
Then, in 2017, after Myers had spent 16 years on the front line of the SOTP, the results of a national evaluation came in. The SOTP didnât work. It was abruptly abandoned. She had spent so long attempting to change people who had done horrible things, and when they were released they went out and did them again at just the same rate as the men who hadnât attempted any change.
âIt was gutting,â Myers, now 49, says to me. âJust shocking. A massive disappointment to so many people that had invested decades of their lives, totally and utterly driven by wanting to stop these people from doing it again.â
The worst thing she has heard was not a murder. It was this news that seemed to kill hope. The costs, emotional and financial, hadnât been worth it. Her memoir Inside Job gives the reader an authentic account of what it is like to work with maximum-security prisoners, including when a headless pigeon is lobbed at her from one of the cells (ripped off with the manâs teeth?), splattering her shoes with blood. âWhore!â the prisoner shouts as Myers stares at the pigeonâs still-flapping body, its spinal cord protruding. âSlut!â
She will never know who did it, whether it was because she gave them an unfavourable parole recommendation or it was just a man who hates women. âThere are plenty of them about.â
When I meet Myers over Zoom I can tell how she holds her own as one of the few women in such a hostile environment. She speaks in the North Yorkshire accent of her home town with seriousness and common sense. She began in prisons months after graduating from a psychology degree. She was, she describes, âslim and blondeâ, and understandably naive. She was given a tour of the prison officersâ quarters, with pictures of topless women on the walls, their breasts covered with NSPCC stickers.
Sinister disembodied eyes press against each cellâs viewing holes as she passes. âI wish I had not worn a skirt,â she writes, and she never made that mistake again, switching for ever to work in a baggy outfit of loose trousers and poloneck covered up by a jacket, even in summer. âMy face and hands are the only flesh I allow them to see.â Her psychological armour in prison is represented by her perfect nail polish, which she wears to see me too.
We agree that it seems strange, with hindsight, to think that such a young woman was the right fit for the job. Myers explains that forensic psychologists are not usually like Robbie Coltrane in Cracker â in the UK 80 per cent of them are female. In the 1990s money flooded into prison rehabilitation programmes with a surge of Blairite optimism. Britainâs sex offender rehab became an international flagship, she says. In practice, that meant an âinflux of fresh young female psychologists straight out of university entering the prison to deliver programmesâ.
âItâs an interesting notion isnât it?â Myers says, pondering. âThe damage is done to women yet it is mostly women trying to fix it.â
The Silence of the Lambs, featuring Jodie Foster as a student psychologist at the FBI Academy trying to outsmart Hannibal Lecter was how some of Myersâ friends conceived of her job. âIt was the cool thing at the time,â she tells me. âBut now I completely steer away from anything of that nature. I find crime on TV distasteful. I worry about it being glamorised. Itâs as far from glamorous as you can get.
âClarice Starling I am not,â she writes in her book. âReal-life serial killers are far less exciting and more stubborn and smelly than those portrayed in the films.â
Almost immediately she was left alone with them in unguarded rooms. âIn terms of how things are portrayed on television, that is one of the biggest misconceptions,â she says. âThat the men would be handcuffed, that there would be officers there. There simply werenât. You were left on your own. I was surprised at the time.â
Was that because it was considered low risk? âI donât think itâs low risk. In the book I describe a hostage situation with a female prison officer.â
This hostage-taking goes on for 12 hours, the âdecent, kind-heartedâ woman held at knifepoint in a cell by a man who had been a serial rapist of elderly women in their homes. Myers is rushed to the scene in the middle of the night and helps to assess the man as highly unlikely to surrender. The officers charge in when he begins an assault on the prison officer. âSo itâs not low risk,â she says. âYou never turn your back. But I didnât question it, I just followed the culture.â
The book follows closely her first treatment group of sex offenders, including the masked rapist she names âWayneâ in the book. She is not allowed to name the prison for legal reasons, and she blurs identifying details for the sake of the victimsâ families. When she first reads through Wayneâs crimes she has to vomit in the toilets. In person, though, he presents as a polite, even endearing man who likes custard creams dunked in his tea. This is a hard lesson society is still learning: sex offenders are husbands, dads, people holding down respectable jobs. Even police officers, as the Sarah Everard case showed.
Each psychologist was paired with a prison officer or two for the treatment programme, which took groups of nine men through more than 200 hours of therapy that lasted up to a year. In a twist that makes her book seem even more like a Jed Mercurio TV drama, a young Myers falls in love with the prison officer she is paired with on her first treatment programme. Itâs an ill-advised romance that begins and ends in the dark hours they spend debriefing each other on what they have heard about the rape and torture of women.
Itâs wrong to say the treatment had no effect, because it certainly affected the staff. Myers is covert about her personal life, but she has two children and is often talked out of overprotective parenting by her husband, who does not work in the same world. âHe says: âItâs fine, theyâre going to be OK.â â
A serial killer once made a joke to her about picnic blankets, how they are useful to roll up bodies. She is for ever sent into high alert by lone male picnickers. The two male prison officers she worked with are mentally scarred too. One stopped being able to give his little daughter a bath. The other, then her boyfriend, couldnât drive past a lone woman on the street without fretting over her safety. The pair would wake up together after âmurder dreamsâ.
One core aspect of the SOTP was trying to awaken empathy with victims, to the extent of asking the perpetrators to re-enact their crimes from the victimâs point of view. Theyâd use pens in place of penises, and flick water instead of urine, blood or semen. It sounds like highly risky territory. Indeed, in that first group Myers is aware that one of the criminals is becoming sexually aroused by the re-enactment.
âThey were very powerful, but I think they also had the potential to be shaming, difficult and potentially dangerous,â Myers says of the exercises. âWe started to see from the research that an increase in victim empathy didnât necessarily decrease recidivism.â She spent more than 200 hours with one man who was in jail after a rape and hammer attack. He told her all the right things, and she marked him down as a success. Later she saw the man on the news, convicted of a rape and hammer attack.
âI donât know what the answer is to stopping male violence. I wish I did,â she says.
It is a minority of released sex offenders who reoffend, but each one feels like too many. The sex offender rehabilitation schemes that replaced the SOTP have yet to be evaluated. Myers is no longer involved in frontline treatment. This gets us to the question that hangs over this book. Does she despair? Why not just give up?
âNo, because we canât just do nothing. We donât have the death penalty, we release people. Weâve got to carry on.
âI know the research showed what it showed, but I like to believe that I have averted crimes. I have to believe that over the last 25 years I have made a difference. I have to believe that or I couldnât keep doing it.â
That gives meaning to your life? She sets her face with determination.
âAbsolutely. I do believe that people can change,â she says. She can never know a woman she saved from being attacked, she says. It could be me, it could be her even, but she hopes they exist, and this hope is the best thing about her job â which, by the way, is a question few ask. âI canât think of anything more worthwhile.â
Inside Job: Treating Murderers and Sex Offenders. The Life of a Prison Psychologist by Dr Rebecca Myers is published by HarperCollins, ÂŁ8.99
I find it more than a little ridiculous that we are treated to this statement regarding Myers' work "Thatâs her job, to suffer so that others donât, to save other women."
Only to conclude with the following statements from her:
âNo, because we canât just do nothing. We donât have the death penalty, we release people. Weâve got to carry on.
âI know the research showed what it showed, but I like to believe that I have averted crimes. I have to believe that over the last 25 years I have made a difference. I have to believe that or I couldnât keep doing it.â
I'm sorry, but that sounds like profound intellectual dishonesty for the sake of preserving her own feelings about men. Many women know that predatory men cannot be fixed or saved, not from study or interviews or gathering police data, but from lived experiences with these men, being hurt by them, watching other women be tortured and murdered. I do not think highly of the priorities of a woman who has the opportunity to study the depth of this issue, draw the conclusion from the facts, and persist in supporting these programs and release of "reformed" predators back into the public because "we have to carry on". That is not "suffering to protect women", that's upholding the status quo of valuing men's "potential" over the lives and safety of women.
people really do care more about racism than misogyny. you have to "respect" culture and religion that dehumanizes and oppresses half the human population, respect a country thats so rampant with rape that women are warned not to even go there. or you get called a racist. but dont you dare call their culture misogynistic
& honestly there's no debate to be had the zendaya earrings are orders of magnitude worse than kim kardashian wearing that marilyn dress. yes that piece was a one of a kind unique textile made so specifically for marilyn monroe she had to be sewn into it. at the end of the day it was a ~70 year old usamerican cultural artefact being repurposed by an american for an american cultural event and everyone involved knows exactly where the dress came from + what happened to it + where it went afterwards. zendaya is wearing the looted (or forged) cultural heritage of a people her government is currently bombing & whose lives they have been deliberately making unliveable for decades to a movie premiere that has fuck all to do with iran. we don't know where those discs came from where they were found or by whom & we never will. AND the jeweller appears to have altered them substantially from their original condition. destroying a people's cultural heritage at the same time you destroy their country + their lives so you can look good on a red carpet One Time i want to fucking hurl
The earrings, worn by Zendaya at The Odyssey press tour, are believed to be 2,000-3,000 years old and come at a time when the US is bombing
An archaeologist quoted in the article says "the point of these earrings is not to showcase legitimate ancient artistry, it is to fetishize the past, to be a commodity, stolen from the elite, circulated illegally, and immorallyâŚthis is about class signalling."
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
To be male and have such an intense lesbian fetish that you spend all your waking hours pretending you actually are one... that's honestly terrifying, disturbed behaviour. Acting out your fetish in public and forcing people to play along for your gratification is already reprehensible, but the added element of using an incredibly marginalized group of women to do it? Just completely revolting and unforgivable.
Itâs nothing short of psychotic behavior and itâs incredibly dangerous that these men are handed access to whatever they want while being seen as twee little victims just fighting to exist without a hurt feeling.
Love to see all the genderists outing themselves as knowing who is male and who isnât and getting mad at someone for pointing out the dangers of male entitlement of fetishizing lesbians (who are at risk of corrective rape and assault by these males who think they can âfixâ homosexuality)
Alive in the Morgue @aliveinthemorgue - Tumblr Blog | Tumlook