Pusillanimous comes from Latin pusillus ("very small") + animus ("spirit, courage"), literally meaning "small-spirited" or cowardly.

Pussy has a much more complicated etymology. Historically, it was a pet name for a cat (attested since the 1500s), and later became a slang term for female genitalia (attested by at least the late 1600s).

When pussy came to mean "a coward" (mainly in American English in the late 19th and early 20th centuries), linguists disagree about the precise pathway:

It may have developed from the sense of "cat" (suggesting someone timid or easily frightened, like a scared cat).

It may have been influenced by the vulgar term for female genitalia, reflecting sexist stereotypes that associate femininity with weakness.

Some scholars think both meanings reinforced each other.

What there is no evidence for is that the cowardly sense is derived from "pusillanimous."

The resemblance between pussy and pusillanimous is almost certainly coincidental. Etymologists do not trace one word to the other, and major dictionaries such as the Oxford English Dictionary and the Merriam-Webster do not derive pussy from pusillanimous.

The post he’s responding to/defending is under the read more because it contains genuinely disturbing art depicting violence against women:

Womontown: A Radical Lesbian Neighborhood in the 90s

A story about an intentional urban lesbian community in Kansas City, Missouri told by the women who founded it and lived there. Organized in 1990, and transforming 14 city blocks in the Longfellow neighborhood into a revolutionary community by and for women.

It's only about 30 minutes long and very cool so I recommend taking the time to watch it🌷 There's lots of cool stories and pictures from the women who lived there. Also, you can have a crisis thinking about how they paid $250 a month for a two bedroom apartment.

It's the rainbow flag, get the fuck over it

BRUH

I have told him multiple times that she doesn't want to be pet, she has a history of abuse and he completely ignores it. Sometimes this guy has a friend outside with him, and I have said to his friend IN FRONT OF HIM, that my dog is afraid of men because of abuse history.

This guy literally said, "It's okay I'm a girl". (he literally said girl btw, not even woman). And he continues to keep trying to talk my dog and bother her to the point I've now had to go completely out of my way by 15 minutes to get to the park.

And it's just funny because my dog obviously doesn't know what a fucking transgender is. She is following her natural instincts based of past experiences. She recognizes a man and is afraid because she has been hurt by men before. And it's no different than women recognizing potentional danger.

Everytime they try to force and convince us they are women, they are trying to get women to ignore their natural instincts. Natural instincts that keep us safe. I find it even more dangerous when I think of little girls who are now being taught to ignore their instincts from the get-go because they are being lied to about what a man is and what a woman is. Trans activists are teaching them to be disconnected from their feelings, intuition, and reality.

When I was little girl I was left alone by my grandmother in the book isle of the grocery store because I was well behaved and liked to read. A strange man came up to me and I remember feeling immediatly nervous and uneasy. I was a kid so I never would have been able to articulate why I automatically felt that way. But I was right because he started showing me porn from a book and asking me if I knew what that was. I had no idea what that was, but I knew he felt wrong and I ran away to find my grandmother.

I had never felt this unease around stranger women, but this is just one example of where as a child I felt uneasy around a man and when I followed that instinct I protected myself.

So imagine what it's doing to these girls when trans activists tell them, no that's not a man, that's a woman. You know women are safe and that's actually a woman.

And it frustrates me so badly because trans activists say that kids are so accepting, they don't complicate things like adults do. You see this often with the teachers who teach trans ideology. They tell us how little kids are so understanding and just go with it when it's explained to them. News flash, they aren't "understanding and accepting", they're taking everything you say at face value because they are children and easy to manipulate and lie to.

This is what we mean we say trans identified people and trans activists are grooming children. Groomers teach a child to ignore their gut instincts and feelings, they trick them and gain their trust.

I usually just talk about trans identified males and all their bullshit, but the women who take part in this are just as responsible for grooming a generation of little girls.

Now they're saying that langauge the trans lobby invented was imposed on THEM by regular people lol

Imagine its 2007 and you're trying to explain to a normie why the fully grown adult male standing in front of them is a really a "girl" because he said so. Pretty impossible to do without lanagauge like identifies as and preffered pronouns.

I feel like they constantly switch up to maintain the illusion that they’re the underdogs up against Big Cis.

After this language convention (which they obviously invented) was formally adopted with lightening speed by thousands of elite and established institutions under pressure from activist groups- now, it’s suddenly cishet trash imposed from The Top.

The corporate sheen of their ideology is making it lose its cachet and coolness. So now they’re mimicking antiestablishment /grassroots ideas.

I’ve said constantly on here how the language of “identify as” is soulless corpo-slop to make you think the unstable and sexist social roles created by sociopathic patriarchal environments is the primary essence of your being. And that the language of “I am” represents your divine being as a human- unchanging and uninfluenced by social perception.

Now, we have trannies saying they’re dropping the “identify as” and saying I am and speaking about their being. Which is totally incompatible with their obsession with external perception & validation.

It wasn't. The trans community invented it, used it, stressed its importance... until they suddenly didn't.

Or the conversation about "sterilization" in my country. In the Finnish law, you could only change the sex marker on your ID if you actually transitioned and you had the documentation for the whole process (including a time period where you lived "socially" as the other sex as proof that this was a permanent choice), and this was not seen as an issue by anyone for decades, because that was what trans people themselves advocated for. They wanted an access to trans treatments, they thought they were imperative. They thought they were life-saving. Until one day, when they started claiming that the existing law "forced them to get sterile" (read: medically transition) and was therefore horrifically transphobic, because you should never consider transitioning as a prerequisite for a group of people that... seeks to transition? As in... "don't you DARE assume that my transitioning should be the reason I am seen as trans!" Or else you're a bigot and you mean to FORCEFULLY sterilize me!!"