Cosmic Funnies

izzy's playlists!

JVL
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
$LAYYYTER
todays bird
Today's Document

pixel skylines

⁂
DEAR READER

Janaina Medeiros
ojovivo

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
noise dept.
Three Goblin Art
YOU ARE THE REASON

Product Placement
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
occasionally subtle
Mike Driver

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Austria
seen from United States
seen from Austria
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United States
@xcal1bur25

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Steel should be weak to poison. Because gallium.
@pockyneedssleep
there isn't gallium in steel though
We were maybe not very lucid when we made that post
No, you got a point. Gallium is a poison to steel, and even more so to aluminium. Lots of metal are also super weak to the salt and water as well
Perhaps there should be a specific poison move that hits steel for super effective. Like Freeze-Dry, an ice type move that hits water for super effective, despite water usually resisting ice.
a notion that people are sometimes reluctant to accept is the idea that your life can be made worse by someone else’s choices without that in any way implying they did something wrong
obviously your life can be made worse if someone runs you over with a car, and we all understand they should not have run you over with a car. and so if your favourite part of your morning routine is getting coffee at a particular shop and that shop closes and now your every morning is worse than it used to be, it can be tempting to think that someone has wronged you. the coffee shop owner for deciding to close their business, or people in your area for not liking that shop enough to make it a profitable, or the government for making taxes too high and not subsidising your particular lifestyle. your life is worse, therefore someone, somewhere is at fault.
but no. we live in a world where the effects of our actions can reach distant strangers while our obligations towards them are limited, and that is as it should be. the alternative would be so much worse.
What Trump offers is an easy escape from the pain. To every complex problem, he promises a simple solution. He can bring jobs back simply by punishing offshoring companies into submission. As he told a New Hampshire crowd—folks all too familiar with the opioid scourge—he can cure the addiction epidemic by building a Mexican wall and keeping the cartels out. He will spare the United States from humiliation and military defeat with indiscriminate bombing. It doesn’t matter that no credible military leader has endorsed his plan. He never offers details for how these plans will work, because he can’t. Trump’s promises are the needle in America’s collective vein.
The great tragedy is that many of the problems Trump identifies are real, and so many of the hurts he exploits demand serious thought and measured action—from governments, yes, but also from community leaders and individuals. Yet so long as people rely on that quick high, so long as wolves point their fingers at everyone but themselves, the nation delays a necessary reckoning. There is no self-reflection in the midst of a false euphoria. Trump is cultural heroin. He makes some feel better for a bit. But he cannot fix what ails them, and one day they’ll realize it.
his article in The Atlantic, 2016
This is why I think Vance is a sociopath. There's zero chance Trump actually convinced him that the border wall actually will stop the Mexican cartels and this will fix the opiod epidemic.
Trump is... Okay he's not honest but he does come off as genuinely too stupid, selfish and complacent to believe that anything he does has real consequences for the country.
Sure he'll brutalize individual people but there's some level on which he thinks that the only reason we have problems is that the cucks haven't bothered to show everyone who's boss, that America is invincible and eternal and nothing can hurt us so why should we bother thinking through our actions? It's not like they'll have any consequences!
Vance has spent a lot of time cogently and logically articulating exactly why the things he is doing right now are tremendously destructive for the country, not merely for individual people but for the long term health of the country as a whole, and he's doing them anyway.
I really think he might be one of the evilest politicians I have ever seen.
AAA video game publisher voice: "Look. The goose layed a golden egg, and that's nice! Everyone loved that egg. But keeping the golden goose means paying for bird feed and I don't want to, so I killed the goose."

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
This distinction between the passive resistance of nature and the active resistance of an opponent suggests a distinction between the research scientist and the warrior or the game player. The research physicist has all the time in the world to carry out his experiments, and he need not fear that nature will in time discover his tricks and method and change her policy. Therefore, his work is governed by his best moments, whereas a chess player cannot make one mistake without finding an alert adversary ready to take advantage of it and to defeat him. Thus the chess player is governed more by his worst moments than by his best moments. I may prejudiced about this claim: for I have found it possible myself to do effective work in science, while my chess has been continually vitiated by my carelessness at critical instants. The scientist is thus disposed to regard his opponent as an honorable enemy. This attitude is necessary for his effectiveness as a scientist, but tends to make him the dupe of unprincipled people in war and in politics. It also has the effect of making it hard for the general public to understand him, for the general public is much more concerned with personal antagonists than with nature as an antagonist.
Important as I think anti-imperialism is, a lot of people take it too far and act like all progress and social safety and comfort in the West is all wholly dependant on exploitation in the global south. I don't think they even realize that they are essentially making a pro-imperialism argument there in the eyes of most Westerners. But regardless, it is simply untrue. Productivity has in fact increased, and we can have a lot more stuff now. It is distibuted unfairly, and that is a problem, but it does not depend on the unfair distribution.
And a lot of the imperialistic bullshit that is done doesn’t even benefit the west in the first place?
Case in point: the current war in Iran. Massive self-own on America’s part for no reason and no benefit.
my controversial opinion is I don’t think Zuko was confused by “my first girlfriend turned into the moon”
he was there during siege of the North. he infiltrated the spirit oasis. he has an uncle who studies spirits and the spirit world. he watched the sky go dark then the moon suddenly reappear like everyone else in the entire world did. and most importantly he watched zhao get eaten by a giant godzilla fish spirit.
his entire life since he saw that beam of blue-white light in the south pole has been ‘this day has already been so goddamn weird’
The only really new information was that that was Sokka’s girlfriend
Important opinion in the tags that I need to have be part of the post:
Also, Iroh was there? He literally watched Sokka make out with the moon spirit. And you want to tell me that a romantic sap like him would not have immediately told Zuko about this romantic tragedy? Please, Zuko has known about this for ages, he just knows that this is not an acceptable situation in which to say “yeah, I know.”
Sokka: “My girlfriend turned into the moon.”
Zuko: “I know.” “Yes.” “She sure did.” “Uh huh.” “Tell me something new.” “Are we still talking about that?” “That’s rough, buddy.”
[image: tags by samwisethebold: #it’s not that he doesn’t get what sokka means #it’s that how on earth do you respond to that]
When you put it like that, this is actually a legendary display of tact on Zuko’s part
why does his son have to be good at posting
This is basically the state of some of y’all’s controllers regardless. This is your reminder today to wipe down your electronics.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
maybe the problem is that people care about other people too much. so if you say, here's a political agenda that'll make you rich, they'll be like, wait, won't this also make other people rich? i don't want that. i'd rather have the other people be poor. i'm very sensitive to the condition of other people, you understand, such as people i read about in the newspaper, and people i hear about on tiktok – and i want them to be poor! ideally i'd be put in charge of making sure that the other people are poor, but someone's got to do it. whereas if you don't care about other people you're like, shit, i want to be rich! sign me up! what's the next thing that's as useful as the refrigerator, i want that. why isn't energy too cheap to meter, i want energy too cheap to meter. i want every disease to be cured because otherwise i might get one, et cetera. and the most politically viable way for me to get what i want is for the political order to make everyone else rich also, which i don't care about
I think if you are anti renewable energy, especially because it "costs more" and "pushes electricity prices up" you are legitimately so stupid that you should be in state care and have an appointed legal guardian. quite possibly the dumbest counterfactual it is possible to believe in 2026. you are a danger to yourself and others and can't be trusted to keep the fork out of the socket!
I know I should control this reflex but every time I read a "rural people aren't stupid: here are their real concerns" I give it a fair shake and their real concerns are stupid as fuck. oh my god they're worried about solar panels? the ones the government pays them to put up as a subsidy to cushion their agricultural business? and they seem to believe, somehow, that the urban centres are being subsidised by the regions? that urban centres don't have solar or power plants or, sin of sins, transmission lines?
The fact that you can’t raise taxes on billionaires even slightly without them pouring money into fascist political movements is, of itself, evidence that billionaires as a class shouldn’t be allowed to exist in the first place.
I’d just like to point out that every single thing that has happened in the 6 years since I created this post has only reinscribed its absolute moral correctness in my mind.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
So a lot of people have got the idea that they have a fundamental right for the world around them to be the way it was like when they were kids forever. Because a lot of these people are close-minded, which is to say authoritarian, they believe that the world not being as it was has to be the result of a foreign and malicous entity.
Now they are somewhat correct in that part of the reason the world is not as it was is when they were kids is because of international trade. Unfortunately, for anyone alive today, the world as they were kids was also the way it was due to international trade. So as long as the rest of the world has a vote, can't really fix things so the world is at it was when you were a kid .
This still sounds very pessimistic along the lines of "therefore we shouldn't try to keep things from getting constantly worse".
(Am I that unique in not liking things from my own youth that much except for certain aspects (but not others) of computers? A lot of things I like are from long before I was born.)
To clarify, the point is that it is not fixable merely through purging a minority of "bad actors" and that, while things can be fixed for the better, you cannot simply "go back" there is complexity there.
Yeah, to take this in a slightly different direction, I've noticed that this is central to the NIMBY mindset also: people live in a place all their life, and structure their entire financial and social existence arund the requirements to do so, and so they quite understandably want it to stay the same place into which they invested all that time and money and emotion, so they're resistant to change. But their mistake is in imagining that staying the same is the "default", that change is something done consciously and if they can simply block those efforts, it won't happen, when in reality it takes constant effort and ingenuity to stand still in a changing world. And so when I look at the communities that have most effectively blocked change, on the one hand there's gentrified to the point of mummification, alienated from their surrounding context and unable to sustain cultural or economic vibrancy, and on the other hand there's rural communities in steady decline, with fewer people and fewer prospects every year.
I don't know how important it ultimately is that the thing they're nostalgic for was also created by international trade. It's certainly a key detail in the context of American isolationism, but I don't think all this becomes completely different if the nostalgic childhood era was autarkic. The deeper issue is just that the world encroaches regardless -- you can't stay the same forever while the rest of the world is changing around you.
I do find all this rather pessimistic, because it means that even in a very long-lived society, the things that you find familiar and comfortable and uplifting about that society are "mortal" on a shorter scale than you yourself. But without the nostalgia goggles, this doesn't require that things get worse (even if they'll always be worse in some ways) -- it's a lot easier to adapt modern constraints to a pretty-good society if we don't insist on it being recognizably the society of our youth.
Also like, the world that these people grew up in was not the world their parents grew up in, nor the world their grandparents grew up in.
Like it or not, constant change is the default. The world will change beneath your feet, no matter what you do. That's simply the course of history. It's understandable, to a degree, to be frustrated by that, but it's inevitable, and trying to deny it instead of adapting to it will only cause hardship, and will still fail regardless.
The Civil War Dads would like to remind us that it’s Pickett’s Charge Day, when a nation of the people, for the people, by the people did not perish from the earth because its defenders were heroic and its enemies were arrogant and kind of dumb. May it always be so.
Although some Confederates were able to breach the low stone wall that shielded many of the Union defenders, they could not maintain their hold and were repelled with over 50 percent casualties.
Pickett's Charge - Wikipedia
The assault was aimed at the center of the Union Army's position on Cemetery Ridge, which was believed to be a vulnerable point in the Union defenses. As the Confederate troops marched across nearly a mile of open ground, they came under heavy artillery and rifle fire from entrenched Union forces. The open terrain offered little cover, making the Confederate soldiers easy targets, and their ranks were quickly decimated.
they marched 12,500 men across a mile of open ground under heavy fire. that certainly is one of the greatest white-supremacist self-owns I've heard about, so far.
Pickett's Charge marked the climax of the Battle of Gettysburg, and its furthest advance is called the "high-water mark of the Confederacy". The failure of the charge crushed the Confederate Army's hopes of winning a decisive victory in the North and forced General Lee to retreat back to Virginia.