i love how much all the nerds on here like making graphs and diagrams
I have to say that when I read this bit in System Collapse I felt SO VINDICATED!
I ran a quick query on hatch shape in my media storage, focusing on popular adventure and suspense/horror dramas and the high incidence of hazardous fauna, raiders, human and/or bot murderers, and/or magical fauna, unidentified but terrifying dark presences, and straight up monsters associated with round hatches. I sent the results into the team feed.
ART-drone said, You wasted processing space on that?
“Eighty percent,” Ratthi said, genuinely shocked. “I thought I was making a joke.”
because (yeah Ratthi!) when I started with the fuck density stuff I too thought I was making a bit of a joke…but now that we have System Collapse data:
The original short fic, Linguistics (actually thinly disguised meta) now has multiple chapters updating the graph to System Collapse (94 fucks!)
An Archive of Our Own, a project of the Organization for Transformative Works
Hi all! Thank you everyone who gave me a nudge! Here is the preliminary fuck density* of Platform Decay and at 238.2 it’s the highest yet for any book in the series! Beating a previous high of 150.4 for System Collapse!
The count is 92 fucks, which is exceeded by the 94 of System Collapse—but the word count of Platform Decay is just 62% of System Collapse… I shall be updating Linguistics on Archive of our Own (the little fic which spawned the fuck density chart series) shortly… Thank you all for giving me the little push I needed to do this! 🥰🥰🥰 Also—there may be errors on the graph (it’s first thing on a bank holiday Sunday so I may have messed up!) CORRECTIONS WELCOME!
🖤🖤🖤I will be adding the data to Linguistics shortly— Linguistics is the fic/meta which is home to the fuck density data 🖤🖤🖤
*NB—I started calculating fucks per page, but that inaccurate as the books can vary in font size etc so I have what I believe to be reasonably accurate word counts for the books. I am always open to improving the data! Just let me know! Then the fuck count is all fucks, fucking, fuckers etc and it can be, for example, reported speech or MB’s narrative—anything goes! The number of fuck/word number gives unwieldy decimals (0.000095 etc) so I then multiply by 100,000 to give a more human accessible number (9.5 for ASR)
Okay—I am not editing or trying to cover up or anything as frankly I have ZERO idea how the wrong word count ended up in the chart—I am fucking baffled! It’s not like it’s a duplication of another book’s word count or anything?
Okay—so here it is:
Bugger! Need to go and correct elsewhere too! At least I spotted it today!
But:
FUCK!
























