Iâm reading a book called âNothing Natural is Shameful: Sodomy and Science in Late Medieval Europeâ and its about how natural philosophers approached why people engaged in sodomy (specifically anal in this case; the definition of sodomy in the middle ages is ever-shifting). Thereâs a manuscript of Evrart de Contyâs commentary on Aristotleâs Problemata (Thuringer El.f.81) with a first page illumination of Aristotle teaching to representative figures of different disciplines (1r). Opposite of Aristotle is a naked man with a golden bowl, which the author thinks might represent the occult sciences. Have you ever heard of anything like that before?
Oh interesting. Yk I'm not sure if need to know more about the context of the drawing to say for sure but that could be true. Pseudo-Aristotle was often used as a vehicle for esoteric writing, and the author could have been influenced by Lazzarelli's Crater Hermetis imagery, or be referring to the Greek practice of hydromancy, which often involved using a young boy. But this isn't really a common symbol for western esotericism off the top of my head. Lots of people drank from cool bowls. I'd want to know more.
This is the miniature @wildgingerofnyc is talking about. The manuscript (containing Evrart de Conty's Problèmes d'Aristote, as they said) was created in Paris, c. 1400.
Jena, Thßringer Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek, Ms. El. f. 81, fol. 2r.
Here's the catalogue description of the manuscript, which also mentions the reading of the naked person as "potentially a hermaphrodite, symbol for hermeticism, representing magic or alchemy" (rough translation by me).


























