Aug 7, 2024
what are some topics you think are under-discussed in the plural community?
Loading...
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from North Macedonia
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Singapore
seen from South Africa
seen from South Africa
seen from Singapore
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Poland
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
what are some topics you think are under-discussed in the plural community?
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Hello and welcome to factfessions! We've seen that there are a lot of spaces for fictives specifically to come and talk about their source and lives, but comparatively little for factives. So heres to fixing that.
Some information:
-We will not be allowing syscourse or origincourse on this blog, and related asks will be deleted. We are pro-endogenic and partially endogenic ourselves.
-We will be allowing custom tags, but ask you to try and stay away from emojis.
-We allow factives from all sorts of sources.
-We will tag basic triggers (dth, sh, etc) and more as asked.
-We will tag typing quirks and ask if possible to have a translation. If there is not one provided or you are incapable, we'll make one ourselves.
Currently this is run by two mods (in the same system), Mod Elsen and Mod Kris. We will be updating this post if anything changes
(7/7/22)
There's not enough posts about the complex relationships that can cross wires in a system between headmates. But there's even less about how many ways partner systems can entangle even more.
Yes we're dating, yes I have dads in both our systems, yes we have siblings in our partner system, yes there's at least five different couples between us, yes there's lifelong friends who've known each other most of their lives, yes there's occasional snark and animosity for their writer, and we wouldn't have it any other way
New Protector Subtype !
Activist ; A protector who protects specifically from sysmeds and fakeclaimers
flag and term by us !
(UIL, UYL)
I see a lot of arguing about the differences between persecutors and malicitors, which for the purposes of this post are different in that persecutors harm the system out of a sense of lashing out, confusion, or other situation and malicitors are genuinely malicious. The knee jerk reaction is often against the term malicitor—persecutors are often already unfairly judged and mistreated in many systems in the first place and persecutors seem far more common than malicitors (if they are an existing role in more than one system). However, malicitors, after much research, do seem to exist a non-miniscule number of times. Perhaps this is a little broad but I’ve read multiple cases of medically defined systems having persecutors who are rejected wholesale, etc etc.
It’s another case, as it happens many times, of terms and advice that don’t apply to everyone. The unfortunate truth exists that you or I may see other experiences that don’t necessarily line up to our own and make assumptions that could hurt ourselves or others. It’s not a fault of the term. The solution I propose is to not rail against malicitor as a term and demand all plurals to get in touch with their persecutors immediately and cut them some slack—through experience I know urging too eagerly can cause belligerence and reluctant attitudes—but try and encourage more accepting attitudes for every member in the system. I did also want to note somewhere that some plurals are incapable of rejecting any member.
And I don’t believe malicitors are inherently incapable of change either. Most, or at least I, associate malicitors with members who are rejected or fall dormant instead of joining the system, is that oftentimes they refuse to choose to change. That isn’t a factor in some systems at all, and they very well can change. I know a lot of hurt people will be reactive to this idea, but it’s not an impossibility. Perhaps this association itself is part of the reason for the terms bad reputation. It’s usage as a description of motivation might be more useful than its association with the varied solutions.
Ultimately, like most things, YMM. Be patient with yourselves and others.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I do worry that the urgency I see people put on source separation is not wanting to make a better life for themselves as of now, deal with their source better or better themselves or the variety of other reasons, but because of sanism and ‘thinking you’re something else is Bad because it’s Not Normal.’ Source separation can be an achievable and helpful goal but I don’t think it should be considered the only option for introjects ‘because it’s how to be normal’.
I’ve been reading a lot of older plural blogs and seeing the empowered multiple community and those fighting for acceptance of endogenic and other forms of plurality has been nice. I’ll collect some of these writings sometime and post them here.
Daydreaming about creating stuff specifically as a plural person, about a SI of us as a system, a lil interactive twine where you just talk to some of us, writing down stories of what happens in the headspace and sharing it, writing down our canons and conversations and everything.......just fun things, to connect and show the world.