#crimethink

Attention Tumblrinas,

I have not done a study on the Daily Stormer. I don’t know about them. But their position, that Jews are the only problem, is a classic fallback of a treasonous ruling class. They hire Jews to do their dirty work, and when the proverbial hits the fan, throw their servants to the wolves. Mueller’s dancing Israelis was a move in that direction coming straight from the center of the deep state. (When the photos came out, decades later, they were not dancing or high fiving, and there was nothing inappropriate in their demeanor to the occasion, contrary to what Mueller’s FBI claimed about the photos.) The most critical problem of the white race, and all the higher races, is subreplacement fertility, dysgenic female fertility, and failure of elite reproduction. The WQ, not the JQ, is the biggest issue. Troofers are obvious entryists, because they tell us “Don’t look at the man behind the curtain” – they will blame the US military, but never mention the at best grossly negligent, and at worst actively conspiratorial, misconduct of Mueller and the FBI, deep state central. And they are obviously enemy controlled and supervised, for they will never commit a thought crime. Controlled opposition is controlled, in that though it will flirt with the Red Pill and thought crime, it will never actually go there. That is control. Jordan Peterson is controlled opposition. Cleaning up your room and standing straight with your shoulders back is not going to make you a man. Owning a woman is going to make you a man. He is just Scott Alexander and Slate Star Codex on steroids. Real opposition commits thought crimes. The big important redistribution is not the redistribution of wealth, but pussy. We need to ensure that every man who supports order and prosperity by working, paying taxes, and fighting enemies internal and external, gets a young virginal wife, and gets to keep her and his children, and gets property enough to raise those children on. Redistribution of wealth never works, because it is the merchant class that is most vulnerable, and if you keep them down, you have to interfere grossly with production and distribution, and wealth, instead of sticking to the fingers of those organizing production and distribution, sticks to the fingers of those disrupting production and distribution. The most drastic and intrusive censorship is that no one gets to accurately depict the courtship dance. In real life, men conquer and women surrender, but men perform and women choose. Every movie, every television show, where men and women get together in an egalitarian fashion is hostile propaganda. Every marriage ceremony with symmetric vows is a hostile psyop. Which goes all the way back to the eleventh century and the Romance movement, as Dalrock is fond of telling us, but only took a turn for the worse, much worse, in the twentieth century.

So forget about whether “the” revolution will ever happen — the best reason to be a revolutionary is simply that it is a better way to live. It offers you a chance to lead a life that matters, gives you a relationship to injustice so you don’t have to deny your own grief and outrage, keeps you conscious of the give and take always going on between individual and institution, self and community, one and all. No institution can offer you freedom — but you can experience it in challenging and reinventing institutions. When school children make up their own words to the songs they are taught, when people show up by the tens of thousands to interfere with a closed-door meeting of expert economists discussing their lives, that’s what they’re up to: rediscovering that self-determination, like power, belongs only to the ones who exercise it.

the problem is government Governments promise rights, but they can only take liberties. The idea of rights implies a central power to grant and guard them. Yet anything the state is powerful enough to guarantee, it is powerful enough to take away; empowering government to solve one problem only opens the door for it to create more problems. And governments do not generate power out of thin air—that’s our power that they wield, which we can employ far more effectively without the Rube Goldberg machine of representation.