(link)
wallacepolsom

oozey mess

@theartofmadeline
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Jules of Nature
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Peter Solarz
Claire Keane

Kaledo Art


Origami Around

ā
Sweet Seals For You, Always

ellievsbear
I'd rather be in outer space šø
taylor price

PR's Tumblrdome
KIROKAZE
h

⣠Chile in a Photography ā£

seen from Finland
seen from Australia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Iraq
seen from Malaysia
@arcticdementor
(link)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
LMAO the Parasite in Chief in his idiot hat is back with his nonsense
hey dipshit @qin-shi-huang-di why the fuck is confucianism AND legalism both on your dni??? first of all, aren't they inherently contradictory philosophies? legalists believe all people are inherently evil and self-serving, so punitive justice is the only thing keeping society in order, but confucians believe all people are born good and the leader should set a benevolent example with minimal interference so the people "bend like grass before the wind" so like, what? do you just advocate the government does NOTHING and let things run their natural course? WELL THAT WOULD MAKE YOU A FUCKING DAOIST. WHICH IS ALSO ON THE DNI.
BY THE WAY DIDN'T YOU ADOPT LEGALISM AS THE STATE PHILOSOPHY??? you're literally following @therealhanfeizi make it make sense
his royal highness will not waste his time bandying words with a failed assassin. if you spent less time playing with your sword all day, you'd know that @therealhanfeizi has been CANCELED for his PROBLEMATIC behavior. you can read @mod-li-si's call out post here
actually on second thought i think i might have overacted a bit. tbh i didn't even read the whole thing, i mainly thought his taste in media was cringe. @mod-li-si go reinstate @therealhanfeizi's acccount
uh oh
wow, the people on this site are so toxic! i can't believe how everyone unfairly DOGPILED my best friend han feizi. you peons should all be ashamed of yourself! we've lost the brightest mind in the warring states thanks to you!
Motivation.
My list of links, quotes, & screenshots to post here has grown to over 200 entries. And yet, my motivation to try to whittle that down ā like my motivation to do anything lately ā is rather low.
Like with so many other things, the recurring question that echoes through my mind is "why bother?"
Couting down the days to go
It just ain't living
I wish I could sleep forever

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
reading a historical romance novel and reflecting on the way these stories often present woke nobility for the contemporary reader. a big thing is servants. you canāt not have servants in those times but many modern readers think ābut I would never have servants. it would be so weird to have servantsā and in order to make the protagonists of the story more relatable they are actually friends with the servants. but flip your perspective and think of it from the side of the servants. wouldnāt it be so awful if your boss was always trying to be friends with you. a really common thing youāll see is the woke baronet having tea in the kitchen with the servants bc heās not like other baronets. but what if your boss wanted to hang out and talk during your lunch break every day. not so charming when you think about it that way
#okay but now what is the optimal way to be a good boss in this situation i genuinely wanna know#its easy to guess what makes a bad boss or a mid boss. but what is a good boss#specifically in such a highly structured hierarchal situation (via @rainbowroach)
HELLO you are asking questions that literature and poetry THROUGHOUT the middle ages has asked, and it is from this questioning that we derive things like the Codes of Chivalry (which is not "how to treat a noble lady really nice" but is actually "how to be an ethical person when you're rich and you own a horse" and includes such things as "don't run people over with your horse")
In fact I daresay you already know instinctively just from cultural osmosis what a good boss -- a good liege lord -- is and does based on the tropes that have survived to the current day and the kinds of things that get Hugely Praised in things like legends of King Arthur.
A good boss (liege lord) is:
Merciful. He is not having his peasants killed for things like poaching rabbits during a famine. In fact, he is working to mitigate famine. During times of individual hardship, he might negotiate with a peasant for a payment plan on their annual rent.
Patient. He is not impulsive, he does not lose his temper.
Prudent. He makes choices that are thoughtful, considered, conservative (in the sense of not needlessly risky--he's not investing his entire fortune in having everyone plant an unproven crop). He is making sure local infrastructure like roads and public buildings are maintained and kept in good nick.
Gentle. He doesn't haul off and slap a servant or a tenant for breaking a dish or making a mistake. He doesn't abuse animals, his wife or children, or his employees. He doesn't rape the servants.
Generous (both in money and in spirit). He is not extorting the peasants for an amount of rent that is beyond their means, he is not raising taxes every year to cover his own lavish lifestyle. He is paying his servants a living wage (or, if wages are low, he's giving them room/board/clothing to make up the difference). If someone in a tenant's family dies, the lord is sending a gift of condolence, or helping to pay for the funeral, or possibly even ATTENDING the funeral and speaking a few kind words about the deceased, ESPECIALLY if they were a really upstanding and important member of the community. If one of his tenants is gravely sick, the lord is sending a basket of food or paying for a doctor. He is giving charitably (generally this will be, like, a bequest to the church so that they can run a hospital or an orphanage or a school for the local village children).
Pious. This classically means "goes to church, submits with humility to God" but to me this quality is subtextually standing in for "maintaining an ongoing sense of Perspective that HE'S not god, that there are higher powers he is Accountable to, that he too can be Judged, etc, so that he doesn't end up going on a weird fucked up power trip"
Humble. One of the most admiring things you hear about a lord doing in literature and epic poetry is, "He ate off of wooden plates while his followers ate off of gold and silver." Humility isn't about being meek, it's just about not thinking so much of yourself that you turn your nose up and sneer at what "lesser" people do. In other words: Don't be a fucking diva. If your carriage gets stuck in the mud, climb out and help everybody else push, you're not gonna die from getting mud on your shoes.
Condescending. This word has changed wildly in meaning/tone over the last couple centuries -- it's now a rude thing to do (because we've done away with legal social hierarchies, so someone acting like they're lowering themselves to your level IS insulting), but in older times, a high-ranking person "condescending" to a servant was worthy of praise and admiration: it means they were setting aside rank and privilege to speak to them with the easygoing, friendly respect and compassion they'd give a peer. This is things like... Treats those beneath him with courtesy and respect (ie: listens soberly and attentively when one of his servants or tenants comes to complain about a problem). Having a sense of humor and kindness about it when the lord and a servant both come around a corner at the same time and run into each other and the servant gets knocked to the ground and starts babbling apologies--the condescending (positive) lord helps them to their feet with his own hands and cracks a joke to show them that it's ok (as opposed to just walking off without a word or insulting/scolding them). This is also things like trusting a farmer, woodcutter, or artisan to speak with expertise about their own livelihood and taking their advice into consideration if they tell the lord that one of his ideas won't work.
Good boundaries. The ethical liege lord knows that it's normal for the staff to probably be softly bitching about him in private (even with a really good boss, we all grumble from time to time). He's not eavesdropping on them, he's not going into the staff areas where they should reasonably expect to have a degree of privacy, etc.
Righteous and protective of "the weak". The "weak" here doesn't necessarily mean physically weak, this is often used in the sense of someone politically or socially weak, aka The Marginalized -- the poor, the disabled, women, children, the elderly, etc. If a lord sees someone like this being mistreated or abused, he's supposed to step in and put a stop to that.
Committed to reciprocity. In a highly hierarchical system like feudalism, every person (from the lowest peasant all the way up to the crown prince) legally OWES their liege lord certain things (taxes, labor, service, loyalty, etc). A good liege remembers and takes very seriously the idea that this should be a balanced and reciprocal relationship -- in other words, he owes something BACK. Feudalism is modeled very strongly on the family system: If children owe their parents obedience and service, then parents owe their children care and protection. This still applies when the "child" is a farmer and the "parent" is a local baron. Or when the "child" is a duke and the "parent" is the king.
Basically, we get so caught up in the aesthetics of nobility that we forget that it literally is a managerial position that comes with responsibilities that were... very similar back in the day to the same ones we have now. Humans have not changed all that much. At the end of the day, a really good boss in the 1400s versus in one from the 2020s displays most of the same qualities of personality, even if the details of execution are different.
The next question is, of course, "well, but this theoretical liege lord is HIGHLY idealized -- how often did that actually HAPPEN? Wasn't it more likely that everyone was exploited all the time?" and to that I say: Well, maybe. But again, I don't think humans have changed all that much. Just like the bosses of today, there's a SPECTRUM: A really really good boss is rare and precious and one that you tell stories about for years after you've left that job, but a truly, genuinely, homicidally nightmarish boss is also pretty rare. Most bosses are sort of meh -- they have their good moments, they have their shitty moments, but they're tolerable and you can get along with them well enough to do your job, and then you roll your eyes at them behind their back. Generally, humans don't take outright exploitation lying down. Being a bad boss in the historical period is how you get peasant uprisings and revolts, and you know that to be true because your parents raised you with that knowledge, so unless you are very stupid or inbred or an egomaniac, there is literal personal incentive to at minimum be a Tolerable liege lord. And that means hitting at least SOME of the above bullet points.
TL;DR: In the words of Honore de Balzac, "Everything I have just told you can be summarized by an old word: noblesse oblige!"
(for more discussions of the ethics of fealty and what it means to be a good boss when you are an exquisitely beautiful twink of a prince with a hot beefy bodyguard.... [fingerguns] read A Taste of Gold and Iron)
modernism and poly
Have I ever mentioned that it's polyamory that is the gray, bureaucratic paste of romance in the future? It's a baseline assumption for me, but I may not have described it.
We've all read James Scott at this point, or are aware of Seeing Like a State, and the ubiquitious theme that forward progress smooths out injustices and deprivations of the past, but structures a world in a way that is less impassioned, and harder to put in words or numbers, but is much more conveniently legible for others. Think about finance moving from deals on the golf courses and steak restaurants, to just spreadsheets and quants from MIT.
And this is not an unmitigated good. Almost always the modernist progress is better in many ways, in all the ways you can measure, but something IS lost. Talk about NYC 30 or 40 years ago compared to now.
Anyway.
Because of the current cultural groups, monogamy comes across as "the normal, boring thing to do, done by conformists" and polyamory comes across as the "young, exciting, make-poor-decisions-by-the-seat-of-your-hormones option." But what matters is actually the other way around.
Monogamous marriage is the idealistic belief that one person can be your everything, and when you meet them in your twenties you're ready to be attached to them for the rest of your life. (And earlier on, that it's only possible between one man and one woman.) These things, practically speaking, are foolish absolutes that fence our lives in.
It is much more *reasonable* that you have multiple partners, each one of which satisfies different needs, and none of you are stuck if your feelings change, and that anyone is a possible romantic option, not just one gender or culture. It's the romance that would be designed by any good city planner.
Monogamy, in comparison, sounds more like an essentially fantasy story. Cue Zizek on monogamy, and any polycule on how "sensible" their lifestyle is. Monogamy is just the thing that feels more "magical" in the good and bad connotations of the word.
Not that individuals can't make their own magic, just the "one partner, other gender, rest of your life" is the one that brings Culturally Supported Magic without you having to look for it.
Magical: you cheated on me and now I will kms
Non-magical: you slept with her but I have a boyfriend too so why should I mind.
This is the same divide as "I hunted down this animal in the forest and ripped blood from its veins with my own bare hands" vs "we plant the wheat here once a year and harvest it once a year and we don't have to move constantly." It's kings vs legislatures. And that's why royalty is such a common theme of romances - not because of class aspirations, but because royalty and monogamous marriage are running on the same metaphysics.
It's the arrow of modernism, and on paper it's obvious which one is more rational. And going forward I think that is where more of the divide will come from, rather than social conformism vs not.
Mmm, I think you missed your own obvious conclusion; in Ye Olde Days, men fucked prostitutes and enthusiastic amateurs while traveling, and often had longer term relationships with mistresses and camp followers and so on, while wives less often but never-less had boyfriends and āJodyā and so on. And of course, both husbands and wives might have close same gender relationships that were actually sexual. But all these relationships were supposed to be kept under wraps, at least it was considered gauche to be too public about any of them. Plenty of Olde Tyme marriages were āopen relationshipsā or actually triads by modern standards, but it was supposed to be kept private.
The 1997 publication of The Ethical Slut was a call for the end of this kafabe. It is extremely important to understand that āpolyamory/ethical non monogamyā was born in the BDSM community; the authors of The Ethical Slut had previously authored seminal BDSM books, The Topping Book and The Bottoming Book. Not to downplay the impact of the 2002 Jack McGeorge incident in public alternative heterosexual sexualities/relationship formats) Now the only law was honesty⦠and tbh, both the economic realities of the Recession and the ongoing social repercussions of the AIDS crisis and the āoutingā of homosexuality in general, because now adventurous horny mostly straight people were seeing what types of relationships had been proven to be possible by gay and lesbian and bisexual couples.
It's absolutely true that this generation did not invent open relationships, and people have been fucking around since fucking was around. But the formalities around it do matter, in particular I think many of the examples you are discussing did not at all have the same attitudes towards men vs women doing this.
An ethic of free-divorce or even "why bother with legal recognition" and also "every person in your community is a potential legitimate partner" and disdaining any hierarchy in partners is, relatively more rarer.
But also like, modernism is not one linear slope. A lot of cultures have modernized (ie, city-fied) and then reversed. The city is conquered, there's a new wave of religion, libraries burn. A better word would be legiblized, but people don't recognize that as much as modernization. So yeah, there have been times in the past where sexual partners were more approaching this more, but that doesn't mean it's not modernism.
Oh I have no disagreement about it being modernism/city-ism/legiblism. Itās middle class-ification of the thing.
An interesting counterpoint to oh so trendy and enlightened upper middle class White polyamory is the āside hoā system of urban Black relationships, (gender ratio imbalances due to increased male mortality and incarceration and welfare systems punishing marriages are material factors there, as is independent income and trust funds for polyamory).
I thought most of it was "who inherits?"
Bold of you to assume anyone is reproducing, or has any stuff that could be inherited. Like, we have reliable birth control for women And reliable vasectomies for men now.
The folks who do have kids and stuff are just leaving it to the wife and kids as usual.
A poll for Tumblr:
How best to de-nazify America of fascist Trump voters, once a Democratic politician is in the White House in 2029:
Truth & Reconciliation Commission and Mandatory Community Service
Mandatory Nationwide Civic Re-Education
Aggressive Disenfranchisement
Deportation & Relocation
Bans from Running for Public Office
Other (in replies)
When you're right, you're right.
Man, the whole conquest of advertising by vibes is so frustrating and excessive it really is kinda notable when you see an advertisement that just, like, describes with some detail and accuracy what the product is and why you should care.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
PSA
If you work any kind of industrial job, where there's lots of dust in the workplace that settles on horizontal objects and doesn't get cleaned up (beams, tops of pipes, tops of machines above eye level, even inside a drop ceiling, etc) and it's something even vaguely able to burn (sugar, flour, metal dust, plastic dust, etc)...
Run and call OSHA. Your workplace may be a giant bomb. This is one of the few things that still kills a dozen people in a single industrial accident in first-world countries.
wow i wonder what the video shows
... yeah i can see why the cops don't want that getting around, holy shit
there's no way she didn't see what happened, right?
Why the hell were there police and a guy already filming on the scene? Why the hell would you try to beat a guy up in front of police and on camera?
Is āthe criminal is the White guy getting hit by brown guysā really is the default policy of the police across the pond or does it just look like that?
Yes, UK Race Action Plans say something like that under a cloud of squid ink words.
There is an enormous markedness problem here that could get its own essay. This "anti-racist" Race Action Plan is favoring one race, Curse of Babel be upon them, their speech is confused.
The words I want to highlight as relevant to @isaacsapphire's question are "disproportionate" and "inequalities" and "Equality Impact Assessment". These are linked to the UK Equality Act which borrowed the US Civil Rights Act model of disparate impact: policies that are in principle race-neutral can still be illegal if those policies in practice affect one race more than another.
Psyop Anime is a fascinating cultural artifact of our times. The idea that a natural idiom for expressing edgy right-wing self-consciously pro-America content is AI-generated animation designed to appear as much as possible like your favorite subtitled anime with Japanese dialog, is pretty crazy when you think about it.
Every Reddit Advice Post
As a teenager (M15) my grandmother (F71) and I attended a speech by the Prime Minister (M55). Just as it started, terrorists (M21, M28, F22) opened fire (M14) but they were quickly gunned down (MP5k) by the Prime Ministers bodyguard (M38). On the way home (M1) we were silent. The memory still makes me wake up at night (1AM) feeling too hot (100F). I need to change because I sweat all through my pajamas (1XS).
Reddit, is my girlfriend (34DD) cheating on me with Sherlock Holmes (221B)?
Not sure why I didnāt notice before, but Iāve just realized that my key ask re cultural drift, namely letās try to save cherished parts of o
Not sure why I didnāt notice before, but Iāve just realized that my key ask re cultural drift, namely letās try to save cherished parts of our culture from being discarded by successor civs, violates key modern taboos! While it is okay to fiercely resist the immediate decline of a cherished value today, like say democracy or gender-equality, 3 topĀ LLMs agree that is now taboo to explicitly work to help your culture persist, reproduce, and have continued influence centuries into the future. To most, this seems tribal, anti-universalist, nationalistic, exclusionary, anti-progress, and like wanting to control future people.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
We donāt hate the French revolution enough. We think we do, but we donāt. ļæ¼
B... But didn't you know that the French Revolution only killed the right people, aka the rich and powerful, and totally didn't start going after everyone who they didn't like?
For all my guillotine gifs, this is my biggest "hold up" with revolution. As the Twelfth Doctor once said, what saves your glorious revolution from the next one? Once you open that door, it's hard as hell to close and Madame Guillotine is a thirsty one.
Which was why SO MANY offramps to avoid tyranny were built into the American system.
And the Billionaires have blown past every. Single. One.
And I hope an election can staunch the bleeding, but the compromised Supreme Court ended that hope pretty well this week.
So it's Balkanization or Guillotines (which is America is the time-honored "Second Amendment Solution I fear so much).
Or it's live under tyranny.
Fuck.
It's a tad ironic that you want to blame the billionaires when the people who hate billionaires and spread most of the lies about them...frequently idolize the French revolution and want to bring back the guillotines and want more centralized, authoritarian government power.
.
It sure isā¦interesting that you joined a thread pointing out how a famously left-wing government killed an innocent man, contrary to leftist claimsā¦to change the subject to more leftist claims, barely even acknowledging the original point.
The US's built-in checks and balances are on the government, not people with 10 or more digits of net worth.
You know "tyranny" almost always refers to government actions, right?
Not your. Dramatic. Vagueposting. About. Billionaires.
well if the ai generated banana seal from the tumblr ad says i have to eat 40 pounds of carbs a day then i guess i have no choice
#I stg tumblr ads are on a different level#the most batshit things I see on a daily basis