A Little Lunatic´s Diary

Following a breakup and job loss, Mimi receives devastating news of her grandmother's demise. She leaves the city and head to Dordogne, clearing out her grandma's old house while also embarking on a personal journey of self-discovery...

Experience the journey as both a young and grown-up Mimi, delving into the cherished memories of her childhood and the moments spent with her late grandmother. Recall the moments, the landscapes, the scents, the sounds, and the sensations...

Explore Dordogne within amazing watercolor environments. As past meets present, confront grown-up Mimi's choices with fond childhood memories to uncover family secrets.

as Mimi's grandma said:

"Places, Objects, People have many different lives. Life is a long and precious story, so you have to write your own. Take a deep breath before every challenge and after every success. Tell everyone about life. About the highs. About the lows. Share it without holding back."

SCIENTIFIC INTEREST - a Fitzloved Modern AU, M, multichapter

Fitz is a disgruntled live-in groundskeeper at the historical site of one of the Elderling statues of old, and he quite enjoys the monotony of the job - keeping the lawn mowed, yelling at tourists to pick up their trash, dealing with the occasional teenager trying to scale the damn dragon... It's all good, until someone decides to spray paint a bright pink dick onto an important historical monument the day before some weirdo Professor is set to arrive to evaluate it. The statue, not the dick. His problems only get more bizzare from there.

heya!

this right here?

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY NOT REAL.

the "@staff" is just the bio text.

tumblr staff will not contact you through anything other than email or their official accounts, which will all have this badge:

DO NOT ENGAGE WITH THIS OR SIMILAR ACCOUNTS AND ABSOLUTELY DO NOT CLICK ANY LINKS FROM IT.

report and block. i'd also appreciate it if you shared this post, bc that blog was JUST created and was already tagging a LOT of people, and i know not everyone has the scam-sensing instinct, even if this might seem obvious to some.

SCIENTIFIC INTEREST - a Fitzloved Modern AU, M, multichapter

Fitz is a disgruntled live-in groundskeeper at the historical site of one of the Elderling statues of old, and he quite enjoys the monotony of the job - keeping the lawn mowed, yelling at tourists to pick up their trash, dealing with the occasional teenager trying to scale the damn dragon... It's all good, until someone decides to spray paint a bright pink dick onto an important historical monument the day before some weirdo Professor is set to arrive to evaluate it. The statue, not the dick. His problems only get more bizzare from there.

QUEER IS NOT A SLUR

We reclaimed it way back in the 1980's. It is the accepted term used in academia, in colleges and universities ALL OVER THE PLACE.

They'd go through the tags and search, and just attack anyone who used the word queer -- reblogs, asks, they'd keep repeating what they wanted to sell until people forgot it wasn't the truth. One minute it was "oh we're not saying you can't use it for yourself but you're evil to use it for anyone else" and the next minute it was "how dare you use it for yourself".

That was a coordinated campaign for trans exclusion, a first big step in the extreme transphobia we're dealing with now; it caught bi/pan and aro/ace queers in the crossfire, and that sure wasn't a drawback for its proponents either. They wanted (and still want) only cis, allo, gold star gays and lesbians to be the acceptable not-straights.

Last week, the Trump administration quietly released a sweeping new federal rule that would use funding threats to force institutions across the country to reject transgender people. The 400-page proposed regulation would codify the administration's anti-trans executive orders into binding federal policy, imposing a blanket prohibition on federal funds going toward "gender ideology"

The proposed rule, formally titled "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," rewrites the government-wide framework governing all federal grants across every agency. Among its most consequential provisions, it requires that before a federal grant recipient can receive money, the award must pass a "pre-issuance review" conducted by a political appointee—not a career expert or peer reviewer—to ensure it is "consistent with applicable law, Federal agency priorities, and the national interest." The regulation explicitly instructs these appointees to screen for "denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans or the notion that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic." [...] An institution that acknowledges transgender people exist—through its policies, its training, its healthcare, its bathroom access, its HR procedures, its name-change processes—could be deemed to "deny the sex binary" or to “support the notion that sex is mutable” and have its federal funding blocked.

This torches everything. And I do mean everything.

A very abbreviated list of its ramifications include (but are not limited to):

ending funding for ALL DEI related initiatives

allowing the government to terminate grants at any point for any reason

preventing researchers from publishing, going to conferences, and being part of academic societies

requiring that topics must support the president’s agenda.

What this means, and if anything I’m under selling it, is the death of science and research in America. It allows the government to restrict any topic they please at a whims notice, putting officials who have no background in the topic in charge of deciding funding continuity. It controls what gets researched and if/how researchers are allowed to share their discoveries. There are no books to burn if the government never allows them to be written. This is fascism plain and simple.

Public comments are not a vote, it is a chance for you to say "here is an issue with this law I think you need to address" and provide justification for legal challenges if it goes forward:

"Comments raise the bar that agencies have to meet when making a rule; “if an agency fails to adequately respond to significant, relevant comments in a final rule, members of the public may seek to challenge the rule in court on that basis and claim it could be struck down.ˮ"