꯱ฯ𝔩ง𝔦𝔞

do you think these so-called liberals ever notice that they just hate feminism? any insinuation of female oppression puts them on edge. any mention of men as an oppressive force makes them distrustful. they comb through women's blogs, searching keywords like "feminism" and "sexism" for proof that we're "terfy". it's "terfy" if you say women are often innocent victims of abuse, it's "terfy" to say men are overwhelmingly our abusers, and what they really mean is it's uncomfortably feminist. what they really mean is they view feminism as unnecessary and feminists as the enemy. do you think they realize?

#the left has just as much contempt for feminism as the right & they always have#i think many of them do not realize this bc they have convinced themselves that they're virtuous progressives (via bittermarching)

i know this is a whole load of nonsense i shouldn't be taking seriously but i can't switch my brain off ig. "the aesthetic of being a feminized figure has been mobilized to dodge the labor of being a feminized figure" makes no sense bc the "feminized figure" (femininity) has always MARKED (through dress, socialised behaviours etc.) women as people to perform what has been designated women's labour. that's the whole point of feminine clothing, to mark women as the subjugated class. appearing delicate and feminine never protected women from the exploitation of our labour, if anything it reinforced that this kind of labour was all we were fit for. this guy is trying to treat his bad relationship (and his bad relationship is of his own making, what happens when you treat aesthetics as the core of your identity as they are all doing as "trans women". he just doesn't like that trans identity was finally weaponised against him & his own) like some microcosm of marxist feminist theory but it doesn't apply. first of all there are no women to even apply it to but most crucially the fucked up dynamics of your polyamorous relationship is not the unit around which our economy is organised!! capitalism didn't intend for puppygirl to exploit your labour the way it intends for the male exploitation of women's labour, this is just bullshit of your own doing!!!

and the research was led by a woman!! dr. ju young lee, thank you :'))) her website is linked in the first article, but here it is again.

female hair removal culture is crazy actually bc why are we pressuring half the population into bald mammal cosplay

“i do not dream of labor” yes u do. labor is fulfilling. u dream of a world where ur labor isnt exploited and its that or starvation. i guarantee u dream of labor. labor is a necessity and in and of itself is a good thing.

if u dream of having a garden, of painting murals, cooking or baking for people, researching in a lab, or writing stories, u dream of labor. which is good! we all jus hate having our labor exploited and being underpaid for the value of our work. nobody wants to just sit at home and do NOTHING as quarantine proved! in and of itself labor is fulfilling and contributes to the betterment and advancement of society, too many people are just barred by arbitrary divides (class, education) and unable to perform labor they’d be best suited for, or that type of labor (arts, service industry) is undervalued and underpaid.

people crying misandry over women being allowed to wear masculine clothing but men not being allowed to wear feminine clothing are dumb as rocks because they fail to consider that womens fashion is primarily focused on the objectification of the female body while mens fashion is primarily focused on function. obviously women are incentivized to seek the right to wear comfortable clothes. why the fuck would men fight for the “right” to be sexualized and uncomfortable

And like are we supposed to feel bad that empty breast cups flapping around and plunging necklines meant to frame something they don’t have don’t look good on men. you are not getting reverse sexism’d upon for wearing clothes that look weird because they don’t fit because they were made to objectify women.