Our liberation lies in women's land, female separatism and lesbian separatism. We can only exit oppressive structures if we build viable alternative communities. We can only change society by revoking women's labor, on which the whole world depends, and using it to build a better one.
Patriarchy does not understand words, thoughts or theory. Only human beings theorize, say words, have thoughts. Woman has no humanity here. Patriarchy only understands action. Take action in whatever ways you can, either offensive or defensive. No more communication, only consequences.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
This is what the judicial system is like under patriarchy lol. Like this is how judges and defendants see themselves I feel. Young men raping with abandon are just widdle puppies who had an accident. It's part of their natural development #growth
This is a blatant act of violent colonialism that undos decades of legal precedent that protected the civil rights of Native Americans. This is an unspeakable and deeply violent tragedy.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Killing someone who raped you or who is attempting to rape you is a completely level-headed response.
That extends to date rape. That extends to rape by deception.
Women are justified in killing their rapists. Men are justified in killing their rapists. No matter who the rapist is, they agree to be killed the minute they decide to rape. If they don't want to be killed, they shouldn't decide to rape.
âOn 24 October, no woman in Iceland would do a lick of work. No paid work, but also no cooking, no cleaning, no child care. Let the men of Iceland see how they coped without the invisible work women did every day to keep the country moving.
Ninety per cent of Icelandic women took part in the strike. Twenty-five thousand women gathered for a rally (the largest of more than twenty to take place throughout the country) in ReykjavĂkâs Downtown Square â a staggering figure in a country of then only 220,000 people. A year later, in 1976, Iceland passed the Gender Equality Act, which outlawed sex discrimination in workplaces and schools. Five years later, VigdĂs Finnbogadòttir beat three men to become the worldâs first democratically elected female head of state. And today, Iceland has the most gender-equal parliament in the world without a quota system. In 2017 the country topped the World Economic Forumâs Global Gender Gap Index for the eighth year running.
Iceland has also been named by The Economist as the best country to be a working woman. And while this is of course something to celebrate, there is also reason to take issue with The Economistâs phrasing, because if Icelandâs strike does anything it is surely to expose the term âworking womanâ as a tautology. There is no such thing as a woman who doesnât work. There is only a woman who isnât paid for her work.â
-Caroline Criado-Perez, Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men
I also see a weirdly patronizing attitude towards decorated architecture and furniture
like. I was actually told by someone on here that preferring Art Nouveau design to modernism is a sign of immaturity. no joke
so thereâs this strange idea we seem to have in the back of our collective mind now that detailed/decorated = childish?
(I agree, though, with the take in the notes that itâs less because we have nothing to say and more because a blank and unremarkable slate is easier to put up quickly and wipe clean as needed for Runaway Capitalism Purposes)
Maybe this is too conspiracy theory but I think living in a blank slate world forces people further into individualism/consumerism. If you can't express your preferences in your chosen venue then you have to do it with your person. If you can't be stimulated in public then you must do it in private. Of course, in order to achieve your desired aesthetic, you have to spend your own money on art dĂŠco home furnishings and jewelry, rather than take a stroll through a lovingly preserved art dĂŠco neighborhood. Style, taste and character is your personal burden and responsibility.
Exclusive: âI find raising children in this environment very scary,â says woman living on military estate
A whistleblower has said orgies in the army are fairly common as she warned the recent incident at Merlville Baracks points to a wider culture of misogyny in the armed forces which views women as âlesser beingsâ.
Speaking exclusively to The Independent , the woman, who previously worked in recruitment for the British Army, said the institution often felt like a throwback to the 1950s.
It comes after a group of paratroopers were put under military police investigation after footage surfaced of them having an orgy with a civilian woman at Merville Barracks - a military base in Colchester.
Video clips, seen by The Independent, show a woman having sex with troops from 16 Air Assault Brigade while others watched. Some of the soldiers can be seen laughing.
In other clip, a man asks âhave you had a go yet?â, while another troop salutes while having sex. The video, which includes some half-naked and fully naked soldiers, shows sexual acts occurring in both communal places and private rooms, but it is not immediately clear when it happened.
Talking to The Independent from a military estate where she lives with her husband who is in the army, the woman said an ex-soldier, who she hadnât heard from in months, had sent her 11 unsolicited highly graphic videos of the incident at Merlville.
She found the footage âextremely distressing and disturbingâ and said it gave her nightmares, explaining that even if the encounter was consensual, the fact the soldiers can be heard âlaughingâ and mocking the woman was âdegradingâ.
âIt is misogynistic,â she added. âIt is an embarrassment to the army. It shows a serious lack of professionalism and decent human behaviour in general.â
Her comments come as General Sir Patrick Sanders, the armyâs new head, announced hundreds of paratroops were barred from a Nato deployment to the Balkans following the incident, because he was unwilling to ârisk the mission or the reputation of the British armyâ by sending the troops abroad.Â
But the whistleblower said stories of group sex similar to what occurred at Merlville, were commonpace in the army, claiming some soldiers would say such incidents were ânormalâ, insisting âit is just boys being boysâ.
She added: âI find raising children in this environment very scary. Among many men in the army, there is the assumption women are joining the army for sex, or at least they must expect that to happen if they do join.
âIâve seen a lot of slut-shaming. In general it is assumed that females in the military must be sleeping with multiple members of the Battalion.â
She described the armed forces as having a âvery sexually charged cultureâ plagued with the commonly held view that women are âobjects for the pleasure of menâ.
The whistleblower said: âIn my experience, the sexual culture is really rife when soldiers are young and living in the block. Sometimes women are snuck in inside the boot of peopleâs cars. The drinking culture is something else.
âYou hear stories of single soldiers living on the block drinking every weekend, fights consistently happening, and property being damaged. When soldiers get married then it can move into swinging.â
Discussing her own negative experiences of working in military recruitment, she said she stepped down after facing sexual harassment, sexism and gender-based discrimination.
She said it felt âhyprocriticalâ being asked to encourage women to join the army given her own experiences.
The whistleblower added: âIâm not surprised women face sexual harassment and assault in the army given it starts in the recruitment process.
âThe people who are doing the recruitment process are biased. They have judgements about women being in the army, they donât believe they can do it. They refer to women in derogatory ways. They think the standards for women arenât as high. They talk about the fact women have their periods.â
She claimed most of the male soldiers she encountered did not believe women should be in the army. The whisteblower said she was aware of around half a dozen women submitting complaints about sexual harssment, sexism and gender-based discrimination at one recruitment centre in particular
The whistleblower said she had met five women who say they were raped while serving in the military. She said women in senior roles were often referred to as having got their position âby sleeping their way thereâ, and explained when she made âan effortâ with her appearance she was subjected to degrading sexual comments.
âAlthough the army has made all roles open to women, the army itself is not open to women,â she concluded. âYou have to be willing to act like a man to be accepted. This means put up with discrimination, sexism, sexual harassment, and misogynistic jokes and banter about rape.â
She said the army fostered a culture where soldiers are expected to keep their wives or partners in line and tell them what to do. While her husband loves his job, he also thinks army attitudes towards women - both military and civilian - are outdated, the whistleblower said.
She added: âHe will tell me before we go to a function, if higher ranking men are doing a speech, I must not go to the toilet, otherwise he could be given extra duties - which means getting crap jobs to do.
âWhen my husband helps with parenting, he is commonly told this should be my job and he is mocked and fellow soldiers question my motherhood skills.â
Issues within the army are easily concealed due to it being an insular environment, the whistleblower added, noting the armed forces take on many young men and women who are escaping difficult backgrounds.
She added: âIt can be make or break. That environment can save them. But it is also very easy to teach an unacceptable culture rather than nurture them into decent human beings.Â
âIf you are brought up in an environment where abuse was normal, and then you join the army and nobody is saying: âNo that is not okayâ, or are actually actively allowing bad behaviour or not taking it seriously, it is very damaging to the soldiers.â
The womanâs comments come after senior figures previously told The Independent progress on tackling sexism and sexual harassment in the armed forces has been too slow and women in the military often face a sexist culture of âladdish behaviourâ. Meanwhile, MPs have rasied concern that convictions rates for rape and sexual assault cases remain âshamefully lowâ in the military.
A troubling report released last year found sexual harassment, bullying and physical assault of women is prevalent in the armed forces.
Researchers, who polled 750 women veterans, discovered almost a quarter reported having experienced sexual harassment, while almost a quarter said they had been subjected to emotional bullying. The report, published in BMJ Military Health, found five per cent were sexually assaulted and three per cent physically assaulted.
Women make up around 11 per cent of the armed forces in the UK, according to Ministry of Defence data.
The army did not want to comment on the whisleblowerâs allegations.
But in response to the Merlville incident, General Sanders said: âThe recent conduct of some members of the battalion has fallen short of that which we all expect of our armyâ.
A spokesperson for the army added: âThe army expects the highest standards of behaviour from all their personnel. Anyone not maintaining these standards will be investigated and appropriate action will be taken against them. The army is clear that all forms of unacceptable behaviour, including those of a sexual nature, have no place in an inclusive and respectful armed forces.â
This misogynistic culture thatâs being perpetuated impacts all troops and partners of troops, but it obviously also impacts women and girls in the areas where our army is deployed.
Misogynists being given weapons and power⌠itâs bad for everyone.
Iâm getting fed up with this whole âfeminism as an identityâ thing. Time for âfeminism as an action.â
So instead of asking âcan a feminist do x?â ask âis doing x a feminist action!â
Can a feminist take her husbandâs last name? Mu. Null. Question un-valid, please un-ask question.
Is taking your husbandâs last name a feminist action? No it isnât. It doesnât challenge the patriarchy in anyway, it is the status quo thing to do, it is what is expected of women, and it carries a lot of historical baggage about ownership and shit like that.
But thatâs okay, your life choices donât have to be 100% dictated by your politics unless you want them to. And itâs okay to really want to take his name while recognizing that you also want to do the feminist thing and keep your own, and itâs okay to feel conflicted and have a hard time making the choice. But no more of this enabling âas long as I made the choice myself it is a feminist choiceâ -bullshit. Own your choices, even the ones that arenât informed by your feminist politics. You are still a human being and people do shit that contradicts their politics and even interests all the time. Just stop pretending that everything you do is feminist because you are a feminist, thatâs not how it works.
^^this is why bell hooks challenges us to say âi support feminist movementâ or âi support feminist actionâ rather than âi am a feminist.â she says that once we say âi am a feministâ and make âfeministâ an identity rather than a political movement or a set of beliefs and the actions resulting from those beliefs, we can become complacent and think the battle is over.Â
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I think a lot of people need to realize how intentionally orchestrated recent events are. The US judges didnt do this when Trump was president. They waited for Bidenâs presidency. They waited for a chance to make his supporters blame him. They waited to do it right before the midterm elections, with enough time to drive people apart but not enough time to distribute voting resources and pull them back together.
They couldâve done this a lot sooner. This was planned and intentional in order to drive their opposition apart, and if you spend your time ranting about how this is Democratsâ fault or that voting blue is useless you are falling perfectly into their plan.
In light of recent events, I would like to remind everyone that the correct pro choice talking point that will actually pull people to our side is NOT whether a fetus is human or not because you'll never win. The correct argument is how the state should never have the power to force you to give up physical autonomy for the sake of any other being.
if the state can't force you to be an organ donor after your death, it shouldn't be able to force you to be an organ donor before your death. if you can't be forced to give even a pint of blood for half an hour, you shouldn't be forced to give up your uterus for nine months. if your alcoholic father can't demand you give him half your liver, if the red cross can't just demand your blood, if those wig making companies can't demand your hair, no one should be able to demand your reproductive system.
even if a fertilized egg is exactly as much of a person as a twenty one year old citizen, no one else in the world should have a legal right to make use of your body parts without your express consent.
When you start to argue whether or not the fetus is a person, you're basically giving them the ground that if it is a person, then a woman owes her body and servitude to it.
When you argue that women need abortions for medical reasons or because of rape, you argue that women are resources to be owned unless they have a good enough reason to become exempt.
Het women still mommying their husbands and boyfriends and not wanting to hurt their poor poor feelings post roe v wade rollbacks are holding back women as a class. All the whining about sex strikes is embarrassing. Deeds not words. You choosing to coddle men speaks volumes.
Can you imagine if no woman reproduced with a prolifer ever again? They would die out within a generation. For all the rhetoric on empowerment and choice feminism, most women throw away the one choice in life that gives them the most power- when and with whom they marry, reproduce, and have sex- including the power to say no to all of the above. Patriarchy's whole raison d'ĂŞtre is to wrest that choice from women, and yet even the ones who have gained it back don't appreciate its value or exercise its power. Tragic to see women lose their lives through violence or attrition because they chose a parasitic man and keep choosing him every day.
like god forbid we take effective action for once. itâs not about limiting womenâs sexual freedom lmfao yâall have it all wrong. the majority of heterosexual men only value women based on our bodies. not allowing them access to you sexually is a power move. buy a fucking vibrator. none of these men deserve to be touched anyway lmfao.
It's because for decades, women have swallowed the lie that sexual freedom = having more sex, and that sexual activity/availability was empowering. The realization that they've been scammed (and helped men scam other women) is just too painful. Imagine the cognitive bias the "ho tips" crowd and facebook feminists are going through right now. To acknowledge the effectiveness of a PIV sex strike is to admit that sex with men is frequently traumatizing, always risky, and never empowering.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
guys why didnât we think of just putting this on the women? demand that they make sacrifices to end their own oppression?! god thatâs brilliant we must be idiots
going to put this quote from @dementeddionneâ here because i think she sums it up really well:
when you have sex with men, as a woman, youâre not only sleeping with your oppressor, youâre opening yourself up to a huge risk that forms the basis of your oppression: pregnancy. in a time of restricted access to abortion, or any time at all, women need to take that risk seriously. heterosexual sex isnât an apolitical act for women, not when sex-based oppression exists and women are exploited via reproductive ability. itâs not just a âfunâ sexy time. even in a world without any kind of female oppression, heterosexual sex still wouldnât be an equal act; women still bear almost the entirety of the risk. if you donât want to deal with that fact, if you still just want to have sex with men like its an equal exchange, then no oneâs stopping you. definitely not me, making a post on the internet urging women to be cautious.Â
Men Don't Matter @parttimepup - Tumblr Blog | Tumlook