Rex
18+
My game IDs if you want to add me
Limbus : D57721364
Since I have been consumed again; pokemon masters ex: 1348-4834-3352-8331
Reverse 1999: 412982269
Also go watch this. Just do it.
almost home
Today's Document
wallacepolsom
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Noah Kahan

tannertan36
Fai_Ryy
NASA
Xuebing Du

izzy's playlists!
art blog(derogatory)
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Keni

★
noise dept.
will byers stan first human second
𓃗
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

seen from South Africa
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from Sweden

seen from Russia
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Ireland
seen from United States

seen from Nigeria

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Poland
@shash-o
Rex
18+
My game IDs if you want to add me
Limbus : D57721364
Since I have been consumed again; pokemon masters ex: 1348-4834-3352-8331
Reverse 1999: 412982269
Also go watch this. Just do it.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Reminded that “socialization” theory, or whichever name you want to call it by, is the way the modern feminist movement managed to argue (for the first time in human history) that the oppression of women was not rooted in nature but in nurture in a misogynisitic culture.
Like I cannot stress enough how being asked to drop the idea that being assigned and raised female socializes you in a certain way is not just to ask people to close an eye and say a small white lie in order to spare people’s feelings, it is to drop a bomb that has the power to undo all of feminism on a molecular level.
So many people calling their analysis “materialism” when what they’re doing is examining one particular scenario and then applying that to all adjacent scenarios. Because they’ve found “the material reality of it,” no matter what anyone else might claim to experience. And that’s not materialism.
Like. I think these people need to stop calling themselves materialists.
They say they’re interested in the material reality of things, but only ever dismiss the lived realities of people who don’t fit their narratives.
If anything, they’re “truism universalists” or something like that. They use their own experiences or experiences which are convenient to them to create “universal truths” that everything must work like, regardless of anyone else’s lived reality, because if their lived reality doesn’t conform to the “universal truths” these people have arrived at then it can’t be material reality, checkmate liars. *sighs*
also the thing about "we need to focus on the people most vulnerable, and transmascs may be vulnerable but not more than trans women!" is that it doesn't consider transmasc erasure as an active force.
its a take from the perspective that trans men are "vulnerable" is some vague abstract generalized way, not in a way which would behoove anyone to adjust their behavior or take action on their behalf. its the erasure of erasure; the assumption is that trans men probably have enough resources and support anyways, which could not be farther from the truth. some local communities may have more transmasc-focused resources, but many others do not. transmasculine people are left out of vital conversations, are excluded from vital resources, are ignored and forgotten when they are abused and killed.
it treats transmasc erasure as something which is passive in itself and which can be solved passively. which is erasure itself in action. i do not really give a fuck about "who has it worse," it is not about that. it is about the fact that if YOU do not make an ACTIVE EFFORT to advocate for transmascs, to make transmasc suffering and oppression visible and legible, it will not happen. it simply will not happen.
erasure is an active force. we all internalize transmasculine erasure and we can all easily contribute to it; we are expected to contribute to it. trans men&mascs cannot afford the model of "well we only need to raise awareness for the most vulnerable" because our vulnerability is defined by being ignored.
this is why unlearning anti transmasculinity has to start from (un)learning erasure. once you start to see it as an active force/tool of the patriarchy you realize it is the lynchpin that holds so much (especially intercommunity) anti-transmasculinity together. transmaculine absence is so normalized people experience our presence as an intrusion, and people genuinely do not understand why we would ever need to be more visible than we are. it is fucking everywhere.
like idk i remember reading about a trans man in India who, after he came out to his family, was literally locked in a room in their house. just shut up in a basement somewhere, out of sight and out of mind, until he managed to escape (and even then, there's also a trans man in India whose parents sent the police to track him down and kidnap him from a shelter meant specifically for trans people).
or trans men like Sophie Lederer, who was only 19 when he was arrested for "talking silly and claiming to be a boy" in the early 20th century, and the only other thing I know about him is that he spent the rest of his life, over a decade, institutionalized for his transmasculinity. god only fucking knows what was done to him in those years by his wardens.
that is the image of transmasculine erasure. it is boys and men locked in closets and basements and prison cells disguised as hospital rooms for years until they are dead and buried as women. if they even get a headstone at all. it is dead-eyed mothers with three children who have no income or job experience and are married to a cis man ten years older than them who they know would kill them, and possibly their children, if they even mentioned being trans. if you think of transmasc erasure or "invisibility" and imagine a white cis-passing guy working stealth at his office job, congrats! transmasculine erasure is already living like a fungus in your mind. i am trying to make you feel the horror the patriarchy has trained you out of feeling about the state of transmasculine oppression.
if you've followed me for any length of time you've likely already seen this quote, but i wanna talk about it in this context again:
"Unless they present hyperfeminine, butches don’t have access to the job market. You will not be considered if you don’t wear nice women’s clothes. If you set up catering, you will get told, “I am disgusted; a woman who thinks she’s a man is cooking for me.” So butch lesbians normally have an assistant, or their femme partner if they have one, who is more feminine-looking to run the front so customers don’t know a masculine-presenting person is cooking behind the curtains. Many of us become sex workers [due to lack of job opportunities].… But then when police raid brothels and homes, the masculine lesbians get treated “like men.” This means more forceful handcuffing, kneeling, and stripping their shirts off." – Rosa, lesbian and sex worker rights defender El Salvador
i was thinking about this when it comes to how we describe vulnerability in our community, specifically mentioning someone is a "femme" to indicate their need for extra support. i don't know i've ever seen the same be done for butches. i genuinely cannot remember ever really seeing people talk about butches and their economic and social vulnerability, the way i see people talk about femmes.
its not that being feminine doesn't cause genuine vulnerability! but because people have such a binary attitude towards gender (and more broadly), the way we talk about gendered vulnerability leads to this view that feminine people are always more vulnerable than masculine people, that "this femme needs help" to many queers and feminists feels more urgent than "this butch needs help."
the erasure of anti-transmasculinity is so pervasive and harmful and the erasure itself is then erased. and the thing is, the nature of benevolent sexism has always made it that femininity (mediated by race and class and social belonging, amongst other things, Its More Complicated Than That) is seen as inherently vulnerable. people seen as masculine lesbians are "treated like men" in the sense of being treated harsher with more physical violence, while still being subjected to sexual violence out of both misogyny and queerphobia, and also being economically vulnerable because of the disgust aimed at people perceived as masculine women. and who talks about it? not the people who refuse to understand gender oppression through anything other than a binary lens (while pretending that's not what they are doing).
honestly i think on a broader level, we have been seeing the erosion of genuine queer/trans theory for a while in favor of this idea that queerphobia is reducible down to misogyny. & i do think all queerphobia does innately involve misogyny. but i feel there's been this growing aversion to attributing anything to a hostility to gender non-conformity/genderqueerness itself, in favor of attributing it to a hatred of femininity. there is no true analysis of transphobia or misandrogyny as their own forces, its just a side effect of the hatred of femininity.
this is where we get the constant refrain of "the patriarchy likes masculinity, so masculine people are always seen as better than feminine people" & why people may find it incomprehensible that there may be situations where being feminine may be a protective factor in comparison to being masculine.
another example of this from this article:
The trio made their way down a busy street in the Santiago suburb of Pudahuel, close to where Carolina lived with her mother and father. Carolina and Estefania chose not to hold hands to avoid offending anyone. Suddenly, Carolina felt a force to the back of her head. Then darkness. She had fallen unconscious, and would remain in a coma for a week. She suffered a fractured skull, a broken nose, internal bleeding and permanent damage to her hearing. There were two male attackers. One had used a large wooden pole to hit her repeatedly on the back of her head, only stopping when Estefania threw herself on top of Carolina, using her body as a shield. This is significant, says Carolina's mother, Mariela. Because unlike Carolina, who identifies as a camiona and dresses accordingly, Estefania is femme - a more feminine lesbian identity. The attackers targeted Carolina and not Estefania, says Mariela, because she represented an "unacceptable" face of womanhood. It was not just her sexual orientation that prompted violence, it was her appearance as a camiona. "I want to make it very clear they were trying to kill her," she adds. "There is no other way of looking at it. The fact that she is here is a miracle." Carolina knew one of her alleged attackers. "Before this attack he threatened me. He said, 'I am going to kill you.' He said he was going to shoot me with a gun. He called me a lesbian and swore at me. He said, 'Why do you dress like a man?'"
there are people who have been nearly (or successfully) violently murdered for being seen as a masculine woman, while their femme girlfriends were not targeted or were not the main target. but if you reduce everything in patriarchy down to "m > f" you will miss this. and
even in this article, the discussion of violence focuses on lesbianism and misogyny - which, while clearly central to the violence, one has to wonder what becomes of transmasculine individuals who are targeted by this same transphobic lesbophobia, the same transphobic misogyny, whose experiences with violence cannot be made legible through the same narratives as those who identify as women? who cannot appeal to the terms "femicide" and traditional feminist narratives as easily?
i feel like the fact that there is virtually no discussion of how trans men are affected by femicide even when including trans women in the conversation, and how basically every study or systemic review of studies looking at violence against trans men will discuss how little research has been done on this topic, and how the largest global review of studies on violence against transgender people (94 studies, 65,608 participants) found that while nearly all (96%) of the studies included transgender women, just half (49%) included transgender men and less than half (37%) included nonbinary people, should lead us to understand that the picture of how transmasculine people are impacted by transphobic and misogynistic violence is itself violently incomplete.
reminder that i, as an anarchist and an agnostic, am firmly against anti-theism (the stance that religion is inherently bad and should be abolished). spirituality and religion are normal parts of humanity. they are things that we make and will continue to make. some people do really just have an innate sense/desire for Something Beyond Them and that's not just going to go away Because Marxism. if anything you are throwing away a powerful organizing force that can and has been used for leftist goals, yes, even christianity. there is no part of human society that cannot be used to harm people, there is no social system that cannot be used to exploit people, there is no social construct that cannot be used to justify that harm and exploitation.
the ways in which we think of religion as a concept have been fundamentally shaped by systems of exploitative power. that does not mean this is the only possible way to think of or engage in religion/spirituality. religion has been a major push factor for many to socialism and anarchism. im so sick and tired of y'all. it's not my revolution if i must sever a core part of how i understand myself and the world or else be named an enemy.
#and there is no way to abolish religion that doesnt involve genocide. people dont want to hear this but its true #<-#prev #there’s no way to abolish religion without cultural genocide too #there’s no way to do it without it getting insanely racist real fast #there’s a conception that My Experience of X Is Universal #and all Christianity in the whole world takes the form of white American evangelism #I’m not saying other forms of Christianity are all better or faultless #but I am saying they’re different and they’re practiced by different people #and you can’t be making blanket statements about Christianity when you’re talking about the specific Christian experience you had #‘but obviously I mean -‘ I don’t care SAY that then #everyone here is able to recognise that the words you use are an important part of shaping your thought process #until it’s about something you cant be arsed about via @teacupsandcyanide
#fascinating that OP equates atheism with being actively against religion#I’m atheist but that’s only for me. people can express their desire for/belief in Something Else#all they want as long as they don’t insist that I do the same#I also don’t think that religion should be abolished
anti-theism =/= atheism.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Cannot believe there’s fucking defence of AGAB-only spaces going on in the transandrophobia tag. It’s disgusting, because we don’t need to be perpetuating transmisogyny to speak on the issues that affect us. (And also perpetuating things which harm trans men considering we aren’t universally accepted into
The reaction to there being a group of people who’ve decided to dismiss the claims of and harass any and all people who claim to have been harmed individually by a trans woman is not to start throwing transmisogyny around. You’re just hurting people because you’re hurting. And by roping the idea of transandrophobia into your transmisogynistic crash out you give people more reason to dismiss the harm we go through—including the harm you yourself want recognized.
Even more broadly, AGAB-segregated and gender-segregated spaces are not trans-friendly in general and are broadly exorsexist and intersexist. They rely on the idea that you're less safe around people because of an assignment at birth or because of their gender. Neither of those things inherently predisposes someone to being more dangerous; no that's not how statistics work.
I wish people would get that when bigots say they "don't have a problem" with trans men, nonbinary or genderqueer people, or intersex people in sports, taking horomones, in bathrooms, being free to make decisions about their bodies, etc., they are lying. They are very obviously lying about what they believe. Time and time again they demonstrate what they actually believe, in the enviroments they create, the bills they pass and vote for, the books the write, the things they say in public and private. You are falling for really obvious lies and at this point it's really fucking embarassing.
the reason I'm so very certain that I'm on the right side of history is that I've seen this pattern play out several times by now
remember ace discourse? remember how people got really comfortable just openly mocking ace people, saying they were all homophobic, claiming they weren't really lgbt...
if you remember how poorly ace discourse aged, look at how transmascs are being treated right now and tell me it's not the exact same phenomenon
my theory is that this happens every time a group becomes more visible. immediate backlash. people get swept up in this embarassing trend because there's suddenly an acceptable target to bully. group mockery is fun, if you're susceptible to ingroup/outgroup thinking
unfortunately, this might just be growing pains. give it three to five years and the people who took part in this will be ashamed of it
Unfortunately, the 'discourse' around trans men has been happening for at least 12-14 years (back when I remember first being involved in it), the widespread exorsexism at least that long as well if not longer, and the vast majority of people I saw participate in that And the ace discourse And the bi discourse don't think any differently now than they did then.
"Growing pains" don't last a decade and a half, and frankly is too generous and mild a word for what's been happening and keeps happening.
Call it what it is. It's bigotry, from toe to tip.
one of the tweets of all time to me
mustard snob canon
relational trauma has to be healed relationally. the best way to practice having relatively "safe" interactions with ppl is joining a hobby group/club/whatever. I've recently joined like ten Fancy Leather Bag groups on fb out of deep curiosity and interest and the communities ppl will build around literally everything I swear to god. I've seen multiple ladies in these purse groups being like "thank you everyone in this hobby for getting me through my chemotherapy" like ... sometimes we dismiss the middle aged purse lady demographic but you know what they have got is a functional community where they support each other that just happens to be centered around purses. having now read many posts from these groups for several weeks I can see that the object being collected IS important, and is certainly the superifival draw into the space as well as something that provides an immediate shared interest, the actual benefit of localish hobby/collecting spaces is largely community and social support.
those of us who are Very Online Only could stand to learn from this sort of thing I think. it doesn't have to be purses it could be anything. but like. (gestures at the purse ladies who are getting each other through chemotherapy) Shared Interest Facebook Group And/Or Subreddit has it for you. i think.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
insane how sexism damaged how we research (and what we know about) animals. did you grow up being taught that only male birds sing? you may be entitled to financial compensation
we’ve intentionally avoided giving more thought to animals who have matriarchal societies for this reason or they’re (hyenas) characterized as villainous and/or ‘unnatural’ when in reality there’s not a wrong way to be an animal
this is an ❌❌ anti “boy cat”/“girl cat” zone ❌❌ your neutered male cat is not sitting on your chest and purring because he gives a shit about being a boy. he’s doing that because he’s a domestic animal that you house and feed and pet
Imagine being so braindead that you think the UK being one of the most nature-depleted countries in the world is a good thing 🤡
wtf are you talking about, they didn't "deplete" the nature of their country, they cultivated their wilderness over centuries into some of the most idyllic pastoral landscapes in the entire world. And they did such a good job of it that the phrase "English countryside" is now synonymous with beauty and serenity and peacefulness. They didn't destroy their country's nature, they became its caretaker, they're right to be proud of it. All you're doing is pretending that the only kind of nature that should count is whatever is completely untouched by human hands.
The UK is literally ranked in the bottom 10% of most nature-depleted countries in the world. The 2023 State of Nature report shows just how dire the situation is. A third of UK bird species have declined since the 1990s, 97% of the UK's wildflower meadows have been lost since the 1930s, raw sewage is constantly being pumped into our rivers and seas with agricultural slurry also causing massive damage to rivers, three quarters of Britain's hedgehogs have been lost in the past 20 years and UK butterfly numbers are at their lowest ever, a sign of impending ecosystem collapse. Plus people in Britain are the most disconnected from nature in Europe.
Not to mention over populated deer destroying what little is left due to a lack of predators, 60 million non-native birds released for sport shooting every year, plus huge amounts of wildlife crime, including large numbers of birds of prey being shot/poisoned.
There is nothing beautiful about a sterile, ecologically damaged landscape that contains nothing but sheep and deer. Don't comment on something you clearly know nothing about. I live in England. I can see first hand just how dire the situation is.
REBLOG TO ADD WE ARE NOW IN THE
BOTTOM 5%.
:)
I really am sick of perisex people stamping their feet and throwing a tantrum if they don’t have a catch-all term for Female Body and Male Body. Stop expecting intersex people to do emotional labor in the form of babying you because you can’t get over the sex binary that has oppressed us since the beginning of time.
It will not kill you to just name medical conditions and anatomy for what you want to talk about. I know damn well you’re trying to ask intersex people permission to use some other binary that sounds more progressive (Like Mullerian/Wolfian, I see you that shit is also intersexist)
“Transmascs always have the opportunity to re-closet themselves and be welcomed with open arms by AFAB-only types. Even if that’s an awful way to live, at least you won’t be dying on the street like transfems.”
Uh…
Why is it taken as fact that transmascs, as a whole, can easily detransition and be re-welcomed?
If you listen to transmascs talk about our transitions, when we hit a certain stage in that transition we’re going to have the same sorts of problems transfems have in passing as a cis woman. And no, that doesn’t necessarily translate into ease passing for a cis man, as I’m sure trans women are well aware of (by that I mean aware of the strategy of simply trying to look enough like a cis man, even with cis-man-hormone-levels can still be a situation where you can be clocked).
Like genuinely. Why are the effects of testosterone a permanent thing that these supposed transfeminists spiral about never being able to escape because its effects are so much more permanent than those of an estrogen-dominant puberty, but transmascs’ testosterone puberty is just supposedly easy to still pass as cis from? And why is it that these same people claim that testosterone is so powerful that transmascs pass so much more quickly and easily than transfems?
It’s all contradictory bullshit because they’re picking whatever narrative best suits them depending on the situation. They treat us like uncontrollable, violent, rape-hungry man-beasts when that’s most convenient to them, and otherwise they treat us like stupid, ignorant, whiny, hysterical *foids* (and yes I specifically use that word because I’ve seen it used). It’s the same as all transphobes.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Perisex people need to start using socially imposed gender alongside intersex people more
Because you guys* keep using gender assignment as a faux progressive way to refer to Male Or Female in a way that makes cis people understand your transition. Because “I was assigned x at birth but i’m y” prevents people from using the concept of a sex binary against you, but us as trans people still say things like we’re becoming x gender or transitioning from one to the other (we still use ftm/mtf in trans circles)
You have a gender socially imposed on you when you grow up and it is the cause for all of the social dysphoria you have. Body dysphoria can be but isn’t always linked and it is insulting to intersex, varsex and non-medically transitioning trans people to assume otherwise.
*You guys as in perisex trans people. I’m also trans obviously.
Happy #InternationalZebraDay 🦓
Charley Harper (USA, 1922-2007)
Serengheti Spaghetti, 1979
Serigraph, Image: 18″x 24″