i'm the coolest

Just to make a point, every time I finished a panel of this I would export it as a PNG on the perceptual setting and use it as a color reference for the next panel

IT'S BAD

PLEASE CHECK YOUR COLOR SETTINGS

From CSP:

"Perceptual preserves the visual relationship between colors so that colors are perceived as natural even when color values are changed. Saturation compares the maximum highlight in the source color space with the maximum highlight in the destination color space, and shifts the difference. Relative Colorimetric tries to reproduce vivid colors, even at the expense of color accuracy. Absolute Colorimetric does not change colors that fall within the destination gamut, but changes out-of-gamut colors."

The article linked explaining the two options we are discussing (but also explains the other options on this drop down) :

Perceptual - A perceptual rendering intent preserves the overall color appearance by changing all colors in the source space to fit the destination space. The perceptual rendering intent is favored for images that contain many out-of-gamut colors.

Saturation - A Saturation rendering intent converts saturated colors in the source space to saturated colors in the destination space. It favors reproducing vibrant colors and will do so at the expense of reproducing hue or luminosity accurately. The saturation rendering intent is useful for reproducing graphics with high color impact.

TLDR, the options are to make it so that if you are to print the artwork to a physical copy, the colors are reproduced better and are still accurate to your art.

If you don't understand what color gamut is, its basically the colors that a printer is capable of reproducing and if you want accurate looking colors in print you need to consider how the piece is actually going to be reproduced by the printer.

This is bat friendly street lighting, which not only looks sick as fuck but allows bats to pass through without disturbance, as they cannot see red.

can a black hole destroy the earth?

no, you idiot.

black holes aren’t planet gluttons, you bitch.

and the earth isn’t some weak-ass planet that would just fall in to a black hole like a sucker.

and that dumbass sun that we’ve got isn’t big enough to make a black hole like other stars.

she wanted us to focus on the art, on the innovation of heated plumbing, on the tiles and decorations of the bathhouses, and all we wanted to do was learn more about the people under the floors. and she didn't know anything more about that. in fact, she said she thought we were focusing too much on superfluous details.

it feels almost hokey to put too fine a point on the idea im getting at here but i will anyway: There are a lot of people who are still under the floors. all these beautiful, convenient, brilliant innovations of modern society (think fast fashion, chatgpt, uber, doordash) are still powered by people working in inhumane, untenable conditions.