josie

SO, in this setting, the cap exists, and Montreal (the gay hockey capital of the world) doesn't give a shit about the Shane Hollander (gay hockey Jesus) being run out of their team, and in HR Ilya purposely doesn't consider going to Montreal because he wants to be paid what he's worth and keep his captaincy and have his career + citizenship, while in TLG that choice is rewritten as if he did it for "love" only. The first time that Ottawa is brought up as a terrible team is in My Dinner With Hayden, by the way.

And when Shane does the same thing with wanting to stay in Montreal for his career and keep his captaincy - well - you are such a selfish pos for that, ofc; how could you not choose the man you love over being seen as a diversity hire who got too diverse and needed to hide behind your boyfriend, haha.

And obviously Shane didn't go through any actual terrible homophobia from his team until the tripping incident; that's why we don't get a Shane POV of him coming out to the team, or anything about how his coach took it, or the staff in the entire Montreal organization. If there wasn't any big problem, then why is Shane so jumpy about being outed? Well, it's just because he is such a high-strung guy and a bad boyfriend, ofc. Shane doesn't have trauma; only Ilya does (RR said it!), which obviously means that racism and the entirety of Canadian junior hockey doesn't fucking exist in this universe, haha.

It's really not important, after all; Ilya is going through such a terrible time with depression, guys. Shane is holding out on him on purpose to make sure Ilya is suffering as much as possible!! You don't understand; it's not like Shane actively dissociates to ensure that he is able to Get Through the Hard Times. It's not like he believed his boyfriend when Ilya lied to his face and made Shane doubt his own intuition that the signs of his depression were actually a big deal haha.

-----

RR's list of character traits for Ilya and Shane also contributes to how disgustingly TLG is written btw.

An excellent blog that talks about the sheer insanity of what happens to Shane (and Ilya's characterization) in TLG is @polysyndetonaddictsupportgroup from one of Syn's posts: ["One of the many Rachel Reid controversies around the writing of these books is that she posted a list of character traits that were the core guidelines of writing Shane and Ilya. Most of shane’s traits were just defined as like, the absence of whatever Ilya’s trait was. “Ilya is cool, Shane is not. Ilya carries grief and trauma, Shane does not. Ilya is very intelligent, Shane is not,” etc. Shane got a few actual traits though. One was that he was obsessed with hockey, whereas Ilya was not. He was described as being very private and cautious about letting people in, whereas Ilya seeks intimacy from everyone. And Ilya is extremely perceptive, whereas Shane barely notices his own feelings."]

So, all the signs that Shane was observant enough to catch in HR & TLG whenever Ilya couldn't explain his feelings out loud, but RR needed Shane to figure out how Ilya was feeling, apparently don't matter enough to his characterization because in the second half of TLG, Shane randomly turns unobservant and "stupid". Because Shane is not intelligent, Ilya is. And Shane is not cool; Ilya is. Shane is not selfless; Ilya is. Shane is not white or neurotypical or the author's special little sad boi.

Shane has so few characteristics that are just about him, and not just that he is the absence of Ilya's traits. He gets: love of hockey, love of privacy, being cautious with his trust (which makes it more precious that he gave Ilya his trust - and annoys me when RR uses Hayden as a conflict starter for no reason), and he is characterized as a person who, once he understands exactly what he wants, makes sure it happens.

So in total, we have: hockey lover, privacy lover, cautious dude, go-getter. This is Rachel Reid's Shane Hollander, everybody.

So in a Watsonian analysis: TLG is a fucking mess.

-----

And Harris being with Troy and doing all that cute PDA together in TLG. How cute it is, especially in front of all of their coworkers and in their professional lives. But ofc Hollanov would be the ones who need a PDA jar in fanfic. right. right. And Shane, Mr. Professional, Mr. I Do Not Want Others To Perceive Me Or My Relationships, would be so not embarrassed of this and super comfy with his husband's team he had to sign with after his entire professional career was blown up because it's his HEA. right.

And also, Troy Barrett definitely never said or agreed with anything racist said around him because it was never written into the books; only homophobia exists in this universe, DUH... which ofc means that there is no reason for Shane to be a little wary of Ilya randomly coming out to Troy in TLG. He is just a jealous little guy haha.

Because Troy (white + rehabilitated image like crazy style) and Harris (white + the one who dedicated his time to rehabilitate Troy's image crazy style) get their HEA after Troy comes out and Harris is promoted.

Because Scott (white + rich) and Kip (white + educated) get their HEA where they are The Gay Couple of hockey.

Because Ryan (white + retired) and Fabian (Lebanese-Canadian + "glamourous") get their HEA after making up and escaping hockey.

(Also, Fabian barely gets any attention to his race either; it's mostly an excuse to have him be “beautiful” and “golden-skinned.”)

Because Eric (white + retired) and Kyle (white + non-hockey) get their HEA after figuring out how to trust each other.

So happy ever afters that are kind to both halves of a couple exist.

-----

Ilya Rozanov (white with a background apparently excellently researched and written + a known, successful captain who led his former team to the Stanley Cup once and rebuilt Ottawa to proper playoff contenders in 2-3 years) helps each of these couples understand themselves or sees their struggles in a crucial moment several times, as he is characterized as an empath.

And yet, he suddenly lost all of that empathy when he said he was happy his husband's, Shane Hollander (Asian-Canadian + very successful captain who led his team to 3 Stanley Cups), career was blown up, with several jokes being made about it. What the actual fuck happened in RR's fingertips for this bullshit to be written and brushed off because "its just a romance book" & "you shouldn't take things so seriously in this genre."

No. I'm going to take it seriously.

If this book is supposed to be escapism, then who can escape when Shane is hatecrimed and gaslit, Ilya becomes a terrible partner, Hayden is just a plot device to make you think that Ilya has a terrible reputation that no one can use their brain to look through, Galina is a plot device to make Ilya look like he's trying to get better & to put the "would Shane choose you over hockey" question into his head, and JJ is a black man who apparently doesn't understand why his Asian-Canadian captain doesn't want to put more diversity into his image???

And @lesbianroselandry had a great July 4 post where they said TLG "...includes multiple passages in which rachel reid posits that a bunch of white queer people understand bigotry in hockey culture better than a qpoc in hockey (because he's, like, too autistic to get it or something??),..." which also brings me back to Ilya for some reason (*cough* RR *cough*) thinks that Shane doesn't understand the dark side of hockey.

Pardon? Shane Hollander, who grew up as Canada's golden Hockey Jesus, doesn't know the dark side of Canadian Hockey? Just fucking kill me already.

-----

Shane Hollander did not get a HEA by the end of TLG, and no one will be able to brainwash me into thinking that he did. He can be written to tell himself to accept that what he got is the best he can get in the book-universe, but he is not a person - he is a character. I am a person who can read everything in that series and think critically about how the minority character - who is in a rivalry and relationship with the white man who benefits from his slashed career - is the one who got cheated out of a HEA. Because even in a fucking unrealistic universe where hockey doesn't work like that, racism fucking prevails. He is the one who had to settle. He is the one who didn't get what he wanted (his jersey in the rafters, his team supporting him, and Ilya as his husband). He gets a paltry fate as a second-liner, with a rookie and Tanner Dillon (who has been said to suck as a winger). He gets jokes about how he'll never get the C, even though he will always have more Cups than the fucker who laughed at that joke. He doesn't even get the A. Are you kidding me? His pay is cut. "Good thing that your husband can take care of you as the breadwinner 😂" No. Absolutely not. Shane is literally being forced into the wife role. He is being destroyed in his career, moving to his husband's gay utopia where they laugh at him too, and whenever he brings up feeling a bit sad, his empathetic husband talks about fucking the bad feelings out of him. What the fuck.

-----

Also?

SHANE IS A GREAT CAPTAIN. No, he isn't written as someone screaming speeches at his team to hype them up, but you know what he did do? He is trusted and liked by his team, so he is invited out again and again, despite however many times he declines. He is a hard worker, diligent, particular, and a great hockey player who elevates the game. He put together a team of large egos, mostly white teammates who undoubtedly gave him a hard time, dealt with an old-fashioned coach, and dragged them to the playoffs every year he was a captain. He is Ilya Rozanov's equal on every level, at minimum, not just what people want to pick and choose from.

No, the fact that Shane's teammates turned on him doesn't mean he didn't cultivate enough good-fucking-will in the locker room. It means they were homophobic enough to betray the person who toiled over their progress and work ethic and brought them to a level of excellence that got them 3 fucking Cups. Stop blaming the gay guy for the homophobia of the people around him. Parents will abandon their children on the streets, send their children to conversion camps, and allow their children to be raped or tortured because of homophobia. The Montreal Voyageurs loved Shane Hollander when they thought he was a great leader and straight. They allowed their homophobia to destroy that. If loving someone enough could stop homophobes, then the fucking closet wouldn't be a thing. Stop acting like Shane was in the wrong for any of that, including trusting the men he loved like family for 10 years.

-----

I have so much more to say (not even including side character 😭, and especially about how Yuna is also turned into a plot device to make Shane look super selfish after Ryan Price catches Shane & Ilya, but I'm actually steaming right now, so I'll reblog this with more when I can.

A final word would be that @ravenbytes had a great take in her March 26 post (you can tell just how long I've been chewing on this idea lol), where she said that, "We can’t simply forget that the Doylist perspective exists, and it is crucial that we consider that perspective before ripping a character to shreds for their mistakes. As such, the author has a responsibility to their story to ensure narrative clarity, consistency, and coherence in theme, tone, and character alongside plot progression."

The book can be fun and/or impactful for any reader who isn't bothered by the bigotry or implicit biases of the author. For me, this is like talking about Harry Potter and how JKR very obviously names her POC characters with the most racist option "on accident." If RR isn't racist, then she can at least admit that her subconscious is driving the wheel and crashing her writing into every fucking racist stereotype.

First, I should say that I’m aware that this is purely a headcanon.

I very much think that Rick Riordan always intended for Percy to be read as a white person.

He never explicitly calls him a person of color in the way that he does with his canonically non-white characters like Beckendorf, Ethan, Leo, Piper, Hazel, Carter, etc. In comparison to them, Percy’s ethnicity is left ambiguous, which considering he was created in the early 2000s by a white author, highly likely means that he is supposed to be white.

Additionally, almost every single one of his canon portrayals outside the books is white. That includes most of his actors, not only Logan Lermann and Walker Scobell, but also most of the actors who played Percy in the musical. (Actors like Chris McCarrell or Max Harwood for example), and also both of his official arts by Antonio Caparo and Viria respectively.

So, Rick probably always intended for Percy to be a white person.

However, when I create headcanons or analyse characters, I don’t really care for the author’s intention. I only care about what he included in his books, and I dismiss every piece of information outside of it.

In Percy’s case, that means I’m personally only considering the original five Percy Jackson books, short stories like The Bronze Dragon, Stolen Chariot, Sword of Hades, Staff of Hermes and Singer of Apollo, parts of Heroes of Olympus, and a very little bit of Trials of Apollo.

And the books themselves are far more ambiguous about the subject.

Now, before I continue, I should probably mention that I’m a white woman. Like, pale white. Pale in a way that I look like a Victorian child, who died of tuberculosis.  

I feel the need to point this out, because I know it can get very problematic when especially white fans headcanon specific ethnicities onto characters, or just generally headcanon characters as people of color. That can easily reinforce harmful stereotypes, like when making a “smart, nerdy” character Chinese, an “aggressive, male” character arab or the “loud, sassy best friend” Black. I’ve tried my best to be mindful of that here. But I also know that a lack of personal experience can breed ignorance and blind spots, and unfortunately no one is above unconscious bias.

So, if I’ve framed anything poorly or overlooked something important, I’m very open to correction and happy to revise my thinking.

Also, I tried my best to write this post with the necessary tact.  Mostly when I write about Percy, I exclusively write about fictional characters and worlds. That is not entirely the case here.

Part of my argumentation will be about how reading Percy as a person of color (specifically Syrian) can add further impact and layers to the treatment he receives in school and from the media. For that, I will be talking about issues and biases that exist in the real world and affect and harm real people. So, this post is a bit more serious than my others, and I hope I treated the subject with the necessary tact and respect.

With that context in mind, there are four main reasons why I personally continue to read Percy as a person of color, specifically, as someone of Syrian descent.

His actual physical description in the books

The way Percy gets treated within the mortal world

Percy’s story and the themes embedded in PJO

Personal preference  

1.      His actual physical description in the books.

(I think I should mention before I start my argumentation here, that I am aware that Syria is an ethnically very diverse place where a lot of different people live, including people who are pale and dark skinned. This specific part of my argumentation is about how Percy is generally described as being very "tan".. However, I do not mean to generalize and say that all Syrians look the same. In Percy’s specific case, I just personally read him as having a darker complexion, additionally to being Syrian.)

What really helps this headcanon is that Percy has never been explicitly described as white (at least to my knowledge). He has consistently been described as having a “mediterranean complexion” or as being “tan”:

‘Graecus means Greek.’ ‘Is that bad?’ Percy asked. Frank cleared his throat. ‘Maybe not. You’ve got that type of complexion, the dark hair and all. Maybe they think you’re actually Greek.’ (The Son of Neptune, Chapter 3, Percy)

His dark hair was swept to one side, like he’d just come from a walk on the beach. He looked even better than he had six months ago—tanner and taller, leaner and more muscular. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 2, Annabeth)

Granted, that does not necessarily mean Percy is a Person of color.  “Mediterranean complexion” and “tan” are vague terms and can include people from a lot of different countries. From European countries like southern Greek and Italy to west Asian countries like Syria, Lebanon and Palestine, to north African countries like Egypt and Morocco. I mean, the book even points out, that Frank thinks Percy’s family might be from Greece.

However, it does at least mean that his canon appearance is (probably) not pale in the way that Logan Lerman, Walker Scobell or his official artworks are.

(No hate to the actors obviously. Both of them are very talented and while I am not a fan of how either of their Percy’s are written, I 100% believe both could perfectly embody Percy with the right script)

Additionally, it is oftentimes stated that Percy looks very much like Poseidon. Apollo himself notices their likeliness in his narration in THO:

“As usual, I was struck by his resemblance to his father, Poseidon. He had the same sea-green eyes, the same dark tousled hair, the same handsome features that could shift from humor to anger so easily.”

In the past, Poseidon has been described as not only having a “Mediterranean complexion”, which, like already stated, could include just slightly darker skin than pale, but he has been described as “deeply tanned”.

His skin was deeply tanned (…) his hair was black, like mine. His face had the same brooding look that had always gotten me branded a rebel. (The Lightning Thief, chapter 21)

And even though the descriptions remain broad, I personally tend to read descriptions like ‘olive skin,’ ‘Mediterranean complexion,’ or ‘deeply tanned’ as very compatible with brown or non-white characters.

In early YA fiction of the 2000s and 2010s especially, authors often used vague descriptors like that to describe characters of color or characters whose ethnicity was left intentionally ambiguous.

Katniss Everdeen from the Hunger Games is maybe the biggest example of that. She is consistently described as having “olive skin” and “black hair”, which led to many fans thinking she is meant to be a poc. I think the most popular head canon for Katniss within the fandom is that she is native American.  

Similar to Percy, Magnus Bane from the shadow hunter series, who is half-indonesian, has been described as tanned in city of bones as well:

"Clary could tell from the curve of his sleepy eyes and the gold tone of his evenly tanned skin that he was part Asian. He wore jeans and a black shirt covered with dozens of metal buckles..."

And in a later book (Clockwork Angel), he has been explicitly described as having brown skin:

"His hair was like rough black silk, so dark it had a bluish sheen to it; his skin was brown, the cast of his features like Jem’s."

Meaning that while these types of descriptions don’t necessarily have to mean that the character they are describing is a person of color or has brown skin, they certainly can and have been used in the past to describe such characters.

One of the reasons why I personally headcanon Percy as Syrian, rather than as another ethnicity, is simply because his general physical description is very much compatible with many people from the Levant, including Syria. Syria has historically been a crossroad of cultures, migration, and exchange, and, because of that, Percy’s canonical features of dark hair and “mediterranean complexion, especially in combination with his green eyes, is more common in west asia, than in many other parts of the world.

But aside from his physical description, another reason, why I think this headcanon can be plausible and even add layers to Percy’s characterization, is because of the amount of bullshit he has to deal with in the mortal world.

He is constantly getting unfairly judged or blamed for things that are not his fault. Some of the ways Percy gets treated could be read, if one chooses to headcanon him as a person of color, as potentially intensified by racial bias.

2. The way Percy gets treated in the mortal world

There are three areas I want to focus on here:

How he gets treated within the school system

How the media treats him in “The Lightning Thief”

And two other singular instances, that are not part of a broader pattern, but, I think, still worth mentioning

School System:

It is unfortunately well documented that students of color in the United States are often treated unfairly and get disciplined more harshly than their white peers for similar behavior.

Research from the American Psychological Association, the Government Accountability Office, and other educational institutions has repeatedly found that Black students, in particular, are punished more frequently and more severely for minor infractions than white students in similar positions.

Ming-te Wang, professor for psychology at the university of Pittsburgh for example stated in her co-authored paper “The Roles of Suspensions for Minor Infractions and School Climate in Predicting Academic Performance Among Adolescents” :

“Unfortunately, we were not surprised by the findings, considering what we know about the role of racial bias in painting school adults’ views of African American youth as less innocent, older and more aggressive than their white peers. Regardless of the behavior that African American youth engage in, that behavior is viewed by educators as more worthy of harsh school discipline like a suspension.”

There is less large-scale data on Arab American students specifically (mostly because students of West Asian and North African descent have historically been categorized as “white” on demographic forms) but educational institutions like the Arab American Institute and the Harvard Graduate School of Education have also documented clear evidence of bias and discrimination toward Arab, Muslim, and Muslim-perceived students in schools, especially after political events like 9/11, or the genocide against the people of Palestine.

None of this means Percy’s treatment in canon has to be read through a racial lens. His poverty, school reputation, and neurodivergence can already explain it on their own. But if one chooses to read Percy as Syrian or otherwise Arab (or of course, as whatever you personally headcanon him as) some of his repeated experiences of being singled out, unfairly blamed, and punished in school in comparison to his peers can fit this larger pattern.

We see two examples of Percy’s school life throughout Percy Jackson and Heroes of Olympus and both follow a very similar pattern. One is in the lightning Thief, and the other is in Sea of monsters and in both instances, Percy has troubles with bullies, who instigate a confrontation with him, and as soon as that trouble escalates, the bullies get away scot free, while Percy is the one that gets in trouble.

At Yancy Academy, the bully is Nancy Bobofit.

Nancy is the obvious aggressor between the two of them and doesn’t try to hide it at all. She openly throws bits of her sandwich unprovoked at Grover, tries to steal a woman’s purse in a public location, and dumps her entire meal onto Grover’s lap on this one fieldtrip alone.

Yet, we don’t see her suffer any consequence for this pattern of repetitive behavior. Percy even states, that the only teacher in the entirety of Yancy Academy, who ever reprimands Nancy for her actions is Chiron:

At least Nancy got packed too. Mr. Brunner was the only one who ever caught her saying anything wrong. (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 1)

None of the other teachers or the principal seem to ever criticize her behavior.  

Percy meanwhile only engages with Nancy when he defends either himself or Grover from Nancy’s bullying. It is clearly stated in the text that that’s the main reason he gets into fights with her:

I got into more fights with Nancy Bobofit and her friends (…) All year long, I’d gotten in fights, keeping bullies away from him. (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 2)

Yet, he is the one, who gets punished for it. Not only does his headmaster warn him not to cause any trouble at the field trip (while not doing the same towards Nancy):

Anyway, Nacy Bobofit was throwing wads of sandwich (…) and she knew I couldn’t do anything back to her because I was already on probation. The headmaster threatened me with death by in school suspension if anything bad, embarrassing or even mildly entertaining happened on this trip. (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 1)

But he also expelled him from Yancy, partly because of these fights:

The headmaster sent my mom a letter the following week, making it official: I would not be invited back next year to Yancy Academy. (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 2)

It speaks of at least some sort of double standard between Percy and other students.

It is similar in Sea of monsters with Matt Sloan.

Matt Sloan is portrayed as a rich teenager, who takes everything he has for granted and is the biggest bully at school.

He, for example, starts a wedgie contest between the seventh and eight graders, two pebble fights and a full tackle basketball game:

What happened was a massive wedgie contest between the seventh and eight graders, two pebble fights and a full-tackle basketball game. The school bully, matt sloan, led most of those activities. (Sea of Monsters, Chapter 2)

He also openly bullies Tyson, going so far as to loudly calling him the r-word, and later steals one of Percy’s notebooks during class. Like Nancy Bobofit, he doesn’t seem to attempt to hide what he is doing, yet he never gets reprimanded for it.

Percy meanwhile doesn’t seem to partake in any of the aforementioned activities, only engaged Matt Sloan when he actively bullied Tyson, and as far as we know, didn’t disturb the school in any way.

However, he still gets immediately blamed for burning down the gym, based purely on Matt Sloan’s testimony, and the agreement of a p.e. teacher, who has been deeply focused on a magazine only seconds prior:

“Percy Jackson?” Mr. Bonsai said. “What … how …” Over by the broken wall, Tyson groaned and stood up from the pile of cinder blocks. “Head hurts.” Matt Sloan was coming around, too. He focused on me with a look of terror. “Percy did it, Mr. Bonsai! He set the whole building on fire. Coach Nunley will tell you! He saw it all!” Coach Nunley had been dutifully reading his magazine, but just my luck-he chose that moment to look up when Sloan said his name. “Eh? Yeah. Mm-hmm.” The other adults turned toward me. I knew they would never believe me, even if I could tell them the truth. (Sea of Monsters, Chapter 2)

And even after Chiron manages to make the mortals believe the gym exploded because of furnace explosion and that Percy is completely innocent in the matter, the school still expelled Percy, because he has, and I quote, “an un-groovy karma that disrupted the school’s educational aura”.  (Sea of monsters, chapter 20)

Mind you, again, we have not seen a single instance of Percy disrupting the classes in any way.

Again, this does not mean Percy’s treatment is canonically racialized. His ADHD, poverty, and reputation as a “problem student” already explain much of it. Both Nancy Bobofit and Matt Sloan are also explicitly portrayed as the children of very rich parents, which could obviously also explain why they are held to a different standard than Percy who comes from a poor background:

They were juvenile delinquents, like me, but they were rich juvenile delinquents. Their daddies were executives or ambassadors or celebrities. (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 2)

He always dressed in expensive but sloppy clothes, like he wanted everybody to know how little he cared about his family’s money. One of his front teeth was chipped from the time he’d taken his daddy’s Porsche for a joyride and ran into a PLEASE SLOW DOWN FOR CHILDREN sign. (Sea of Monsters chapter 2)

However, if one reads Percy as Syrian (or, generally as a person of color), these repeated moments of adults assuming the worst about him can begin to feel like part of a broader pattern and can seem reflective of real-life treatment of students of color.

A similar bias exists in media narratives.

Media

There is a high double standard in the us media between the way white perpetrators and victims are framed and talked about and how criminals and victims, who are people of color get talked about.  

Scott Duxbury, Laura Frizell and Sadé Lindsay, three sociology doctoral students at Ohio state, published for example in July 2018 a study in the Journal of Research in crime and delinquency, called “Mental Illness, the Media, and the Moral Politics of Mass Violence: The Role of Race in Mass Shootings Coverage.”

 Their study found that white shooters were 95 percent more likely to be described as “mentally ill” than black shooters, and even when black shooters were given that description, the coverage was still harsher on them. When shooters were framed as mentally ill, 78% of white attackers were described as victims of society, while the same narrative was used for only 17% of black attackers.

They explicitly say that white shooters are often framed as sympathetic characters who were suffering from extreme life circumstances, while black shooters are usually described as “dangerous” and a “menace to society”.  

Similarly, in collaboration with the Equal Justice Initiative, the Global Strategy Group, a leading research, communications, and public affairs firm in the us, published a report on the role of racial bias in the media, called , Innocent Until Proven Guilty? A look at media coverage of criminal defendants in the U.S.. This report used data from several criminal cases to analyze how differently black defendants and white defendants are portrayed.

The study found huge disparity in 20 different topics, including the use of imagery, language choices, etc.

It found, for example, that

Mugshots were used in coverage of 45% of cases involving Black people accused of crimes compared to only 8% of cases involving white defendants

White victims were nearly four times more likely to be presented in photos with friends and family than Black people victimized by crime, which reinforces existing tendencies to dehumanize black pain and suffering

Media coverage was 50% more likely to refer to white defendants by name as compared to Black defendants

The three words most used in characterizing white defendants were “father”, “son” and “man”, while the three words most used in characterizing black defendants were “murder”, “accused” and “arrested”

Quotes from family and friends were nearly twice as likely to appear in articles about white defendants than articles about Black defendants.

Although much of the strongest empirical research focuses on anti-Black bias, scholars have documented similar patterns of dehumanization, suspicion, and criminalization affecting Arab and Muslim communities, especially post-9/11.

For example, the report “Equal Treatment? Measuring the Legal and Media Responses to Ideologically Motivated Violence in the United States, released by the Washington-based Institute for Social Policy and Understanding stated that among perpetrators of ideologically motivated violent attacks, those who were perceived to be Muslim received sentences that were four times longer than non-Muslims involved in similar cases.

A double standard, that carried over into the court of public opinion, too: Cases of attempted violence by Muslims received 7 1/2 times more coverage from major media outlets, while successful plots were covered twice as much.

Nancy Heitzeg, a professor of sociology and critical studies of race and ethnicity at Saint Catherine University in Minnesota, also notes there is a “double standard” when it comes to white people versus people of colour when they commit the same crime:

“When a white individual is committing a crime, there is always a life story that gives characteristics to the accused. However, when a minority individual is committing the crime, there are no backgrounds, no excuses and no side stories.”

Similarly, Professor Leila Nadya Sadat, former Commissioner of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, once pointed out that there has been “a disturbing tendency in U.S. government’s public discourse to consider Arabs and Muslims as less deserving of normal courtesies than other ethnic or religious groups.”18 

Given, this background of dehumanization, lack of excuses, assumed guilt and unfair media treatment of People of color, please picture the following:  

A mother and her 12-year-old son are in a car accident. The police find the car they were in completely destroyed and the mother and son are nowhere to be found. There is no other evidence to what happened to them. No witness statements, no video footage, no nothing. Only the wrecked car, and a few drops of blood near the scene of the accident. The stepfather of the son then tells the police and media his stepson is a troubled child, who has expressed violent tendencies in the past.

And then, based on nothing but hearsay from the stepfather, the New York Times, one of the most influential newspapers in the united states, portrays this 12 year old as violent and as a potential suspect for his mother’s disappearance without bothering to censor his name and without the slightest shred of evidence that their disappearance was his fault:

Ms. Jackson’s husband, Gabe Ugliano, claims that his stepson, Percy Jackson, is a troubled child who has been kicked out of numerous boarding schools and has expressed violent tendencies in the past. Police would not say whether son Percy is a suspect in his mother’s disappearance, but they have not ruled out foul play. (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 9)

Mind you, this line of journalism goes directly against the New York Times Ethical Journalism Handbook.

This handbook says, for example:

“Accuracy is the foundation of our credibility, so carefully checking facts is a fundamental responsibility of every staff member. A staff member who knowingly or recklessly provides false information for publication betrays our readers’ trust. We will not tolerate such behavior.”

Hearsay, from someone’s stepfather does certainly not count as credible evidence.

It also states that:

Staff members should consult our lawyers on any potential legal issue that arises in the course of their work.

Some potential legal concerns before publication:

• Stories that include accusations of illegal behavior or other potentially damaging allegations, especially if there are no formal criminal charges.

Implying that a 12-year-old missing child might be a potential suspect for his mother’s disappearance (again, with no evidence) would, in my opinion at least, count as “stories that include potentially damaging accusations, especially if there are no formal charges”.

And the problematic media coverage does not end there.

Two weeks later, after Percy, Annabeth and Grover manage to defeat the furies, a picture is taken of Percy as he is leaving the destroyed bus, and this news article is published in the (fictional) Trenton Register News:

The Trenton Register-News showed a photo taken by a tourist as I got off the Greyhound bus. I had a wild look in my eyes. My sword was a metallic blur in my hands. It might’ve been a baseball bat or a lacrosse stick. The picture’s caption read: Twelve-year-old Percy Jackson, wanted for questioning in the Long Island disappearance of his mother two weeks ago, is shown here fleeing from the bus where he accosted several elderly female passengers. The bus exploded on an east New Jersey roadside shortly after Jackson fled the scene. Based on eyewitness accounts, police believe the boy may be traveling with two teenage accomplices. His stepfather, Gabe Ugliano, has offered a cash reward for information leading to his capture. (The lightning Thief chapter 13)

Granted, the bus explosion, the fact that he was seen alive while his mom is still missing and the fact that the mist apparently made it seem as if he accosted three elderly ladies, (even if it is weird that this is the picture that was painted here, since the furies first approached them, but okay) does raise points for suspicion, but it still doesn’t warrant the one-sided way the media continues to talk about him.

There is, again, no real evidence to prove that it was Percy’s fault that the bus exploded.

In fact, from the mortal perspective, there is more evidence to say the bus exploded because of mechanical or technical errors or because of the bus driver’s behavior. After all, while invisible, Percy jerked the bus’s wheel to the left, and then hit the emergency break, actions which would make it seem as if the bus didn’t function right or as if the driver lost control of it. There is no evidence at all to connect Percy to this sequence of events.

And, in the end, the bus exploded, because Zeus zapped it with lightning:

Thunder shook the bus. The hair rose on the back of my neck. “Get out!” Annabeth yelled at me. “Now(…) “Our bags!” Grover realized. “We left our-“ BOOOOOM! The windows of the bus exploded as the passengers ran for cover. Lightning shredded a huge crater in the roof, but an angry wail from inside told me Mrs. Dodds was not yet dead. (The Lightning Thief, chapter 10)

I doubt the mist needed to disguise that.

While highly unusual, it can happen that lightning strikes hit objects, even when the sky is clear and the actual storm miles away in the form of so called “Bolts from the Blue”.

(A "Bolt from the Blue" is a cloud to ground lightning flash which typically comes out of the back side of the thunderstorm cloud, travels a relatively large distance in clear air away from the storm cloud, and then angles down and strikes the ground. It’s one of the most dangerous types of cloud to ground lightning)

Yet, instead of considering a mechanical error in the bus, the weird driving of the bus driver or the possibility of a “bolt from the blue”, the news article immediately blames Percy for the bus explosion without exploring other options. So, it did not simply report facts. It selected the most incriminating interpretation available, the one interpretation of this incident which makes Percy look the worst. (Something which is far more common for how the media treats people of color, in comparison to white people)

The bus exploded on an east New Jersey roadside shortly after Jackson fled the scene. (The lightning Thief chapter 13)

Also, Percy is no longer treated in this article as a potential victim. The police no longer want to find him, because he might be in danger, but only because he is wanted for questioning for his mother’s disappearance, highly implying that he is a suspect:

“Twelve-year-old Percy Jackson, wanted for questioning in the long island disappearance of his mother” (The lightning Thief chapter 13)

And Grover and Annabeth are not described as potential friends, or companions, but immediately as “accomplices”, which certainly implies a crime, and paints the one-sided (mainly unfounded) picture of Percy as a criminal:

Based on eyewitness accounts, police believe the boy may be traveling with two teenage accomplices. (The lightning Thief chapter 13)

(The use of teenage is also weird, considering that they were both around 13 years old)

Plus, maybe the most disturbing part of this article is that it openly says hat Gabe “offered a cash reward for information leading to his capture.” (The lightning Thief chapter 13)

Since when is it okay, for a grown ass man to offer a cash reward for the capture of a 12-year-old child on national news? That’s just messed up on a different level and makes Percy seem more like a dangerous and violent threat, and less as a potential victim of a violent crime, and a 12-year-old child.

Then it gets even worse with what happened at the Gateway Arch.

Here, the media actually has footage for once:  

“Channel Five has learned that surveillance cameras show an adolescent boy going wild on the observation deck, somehow setting off this freak explosion.” (The Lightning thief, Chapter 14)

However, the news coverage still needs more nuance. “Going wild” and “somehow setting off” are very vague descriptions for what happened and the witnesses they do have, the family and the ranger, who were with Percy on top of the arch when Echidna attacked, don’t seem to blame Percy for what happened, at least from the little bit that we have seen:

The crowd parted, and a couple of paramedics hustled out, rolling a woman on a stretcher. I recognized her immediately as the mother of the little boy who’d been on the observation deck. She was saying, “And then this huge dog, this huge fire-breathing Chihuahua-“ “Okay, ma’am,” the paramedic said. “Just calm down. Your family is fine. The medication is starting to kick in.” “I’m not crazy! This boy jumped out of the hole and the monster disappeared.” (The Lightning thief, Chapter 14)

So, again, while the sequence of the events, the car crash, the bus explosion and the explosion at the gateway arch does imply a connection to Percy, it doesn’t warrant this extremely one-sided narrative of him:

“Percy Jackson. That’s right, Dan. Channel Twelve has learned that the boy who may have caused this explosion fits the description of a young man wanted by authorities for a serious New Jersey bus accident three days ago.” (The Lightning thief, Chapter 14)

Here, again, the authorities and the news completely blame Percy for the bus explosion, without even considering alternative reasons. In their minds, there is no doubt that he is responsible, despite the lack of real evidence against him. It is simply assumed guilt.

Also, the phrasing of “young man” is very interesting to me in this context.

Percy is a 12-year-old child during the lightning thief, far from someone who could reasonably be considered old enough to be a “young man.”

While “young man” can of course potentially be used for any child, it is a fact that children of color, especially boys, are disproportionately framed in older, less innocent terms when it comes to media portrayal.

This is a process called “Adultification.”

“Adultification” is a term which originated in the US in about 2008. Dr Jahnine Davis, the National Kinship Care Ambassador of the Uk and Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel member, says it can mean that children of colour are not seen as “innocent”, as their white peers would be.

The cofounder of the Center for policing Equity, Phillip Atiba Geoff released research called “The essence of innocence: consequences of dehumanizing Black children” in which he and his co-authors found that especially black boys are seen as older and less innocent.

One outcome of that is that especially black children are routinely held to adult standards with the country’s criminal legal systems. In March 2022, a Washington state intermediate-level appellate court even issued a published opinion acknowledging frankly that “adultification is real and can lead to harsher sentences for children of color if care is not taken to consciously avoid biased outcomes.” 

 So, yeah, referring to 12-year-old Percy as a “young man” instead of a child, can be seen as part of a larger pattern of adultifying children of color, if you choose to read him as such.  

Then, the last scene I want to talk about regarding this topic is this scene from chapter 17:

I froze in front of an appliance-store window because a television was playing an interview with somebody who looked very familiar-my stepdad, Smelly Gabe. He was talking to Barbara Walters-I mean, as if he were some kind of huge celebrity. She was interviewing him in our apartment, in the middle of a poker game, and there was a young blond lady sitting next to him, patting his hand. A fake tear glistened on his cheek. He was saying, “Honest, Ms. Walters, if it wasn’t for Sugar here, my grief counselor, I’d be a wreck. My stepson took everything I cared about. My wife … my Camaro … I-I’m sorry. I have trouble talking about it.” “There you have it, America.” Barbara Walters turned to the camera. “A man torn apart. An adolescent boy with serious issues. Let me show you, again, the last known photo of this troubled young fugitive, taken a week ago in Denver.” The screen cut to a grainy shot of me, Annabeth, and Grover standing outside the Colorado diner, talking to Ares. “Who are the other children in this photo?” Barbara Walters asked dramatically. “Who is the man with them? Is Percy Jackson a delinquent, a terrorist, or perhaps the brainwashed victim of a frightening new cult? When we come back, we chat with a leading child psychologist. Stay tuned, America.”

So, to sum this situation up, Gabe Ugliano, the adult man, who

is the husband of a missing woman, and the stepfather of a boy on the run,

didn’t hesitate to call his 12-year-old stepson dangerous and violent on national Tv and has offered a cash reward for information leading to his capture,

is seen on national tv playing a poker game only like three weeks after his wife disappeared, while a young blond woman, with the name sugar, is said to help him “grieve”

openly puts equal importance on his wife’s disappearance and potential death and on his destroyed car

still gets called “a man torn apart”, with no suspicion raised against him, while Percy, the twelve-year-old, gets called “an adolescent boy with serious issues”, who could potentially be “a delinquent” and a “terrorist”?

And, I mean, especially calling him a terrorist is a wild accusation to just throw around.

Additionally to Percy’s unfair treatment in media and school, there are two other moments that happen in the mortal world that I would like to shortly focus on.

Two additional moments

These two examples are admittedly much smaller and more interpretive than the earlier ones. They are not evidence of a broader pattern on their own, but they are small moments that, for me at least, make the reding of Percy as a person of color resonate more strongly.

For one, there is this small line in The Lightning Thief that has always stood out to me:

“A gang of kids had circled us. Six of them in all—white kids with expensive clothes and mean faces. Like the kids at Yancy Academy” (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 17)

On its own, this doesn’t have to mean anything. White narrators can and do describe other characters as white all the time, especially when combined with mentioning their social status. But I do find it interesting that Percy explicitly marks them as white here. It at least suggests that race is something he consciously notices and registers, rather than something that remains invisible or defaulted in his narration, which would be more common for white narrators (at least in my experience). That doesn’t mean Percy must be non-white, but it is one of those tiny moments that makes the reading of him as a person of color resonate with me more. 

Another small point is the way Rachel’s dad treats him.

He, the rich CEO of Dare enterprises, who has consistently been characterized as a very unpleasant personality, is recorded to refuse to even call Percy by name:

“So…I take it your friend isn’t coming to St. Thomas?” That’s what Mr. Dare called me. Never Percy. Just your friend. Or young man if he was talking to me, which he rarely did. (The last Olympian, chapter 4)

Now, again, this and every single point I mentioned could admittedly be a result from socio-economic differences, and Percy’s status as a poor, neurodivergent kid, who has been thrown out of all of his schools. And, again, I’m not saying it’s impossible for a white kid to receive this kind of treatment in the mortal world. But, personally, I do think that Percy’s story becomes more layered if he is read as a person of color. And I think there are enough points in the story to make this headcanon plausible.

However, I do not read Percy as a person of color simply because it is textually plausible, or because I like the headcanon (though I really do). I read him that way because I think it makes his story also thematically richer.

3. Percy's story and the themes embedded in PJO

Percy Jackson is fundamentally a story about marginalized children. Kids who have been failed by schools, rejected by adults, forced out of homes, labeled as “problem children” and then also failed by the systems in place in the mythological world.

And Percy, specifically, is a character whose story is deeply shaped by unfair treatment, both in the mortal, but also in the mythological world.

He is repeatedly misread by authority figures. He is scapegoated. He is constantly unfairly judged. He is treated as dangerous before he has done anything to deserve it and he constantly has to prove himself against established biases.

He is excluded and ostracized at Camp Half-Blood because of his parentage and because of his relationship to Tyson.

He is falsely accused of stealing the lightning bolt and the Helm of Darkness, and forced to clear his own name only two weeks after finding out about the mythological world’s existence.

During sea of monsters, he is singled out by the only two authority figures, Tantalus and Dionysus and treated badly because of it.

In Titan’s Curse, he is denied a quest he is objectively extremely qualified for simply because he is a boy, and he gets treated objectively really shitty by both Zoe and Thalia at the beginning of that book. He first has to prove himself before they start to treat him decently.

The gods themselves debate whether he should be killed or not with Athena actively saying he is too dangerous to be left alive.

Dionysus initially hates him and makes his life actively worse, not because of anything Percy did, but simply because he reminds him of Theseus.

And I could go on and on and on.

Let me be clear here.

I am not arguing that Percy’s experiences are canonically about race, or that his marginalization stems from racial prejudice in the text.

My argument here is that because his story is already so deeply intertwined with themes of ostracism, institutional bias, scapegoating, breaking stereotypes and structural inequality, reading him as a person of color adds an additional emotional and thematic layer to it. It certainly doesn’t replace any existing themes, but it does intensify them in a way.

But that is not the most important part of this headcanon for me.

The main reason why I think that reading Percy as a person of color makes the books more impactful is not because he personally is a victim of injustice.

The main reason is because Percy’s story, at its core, is a story about actively fighting against systematic injustice and inequality.

His story literally culminates in creating structural changes to an established thousands-year-old system, which allow for more equality within his society. 

His greatest success is not the defeat of Kronos.

His greatest success is the gods promising to agree to his demands, claim their kids, build cabins for the “minor” gods and Hades, and show amnesty towards the gods who, at one point or another, fought on Kronos’ side.

Percy consistently, throughout every single book, challenges either systems or biases that fail people, fights against bullies, who abuse their power, or actively chooses to side with people and beings who their society considers abnormal. His fight against injustice happens both on a larger and smaller scale and is inseparably bound to his narrative.

For example, when he chooses to help Clarisse in Stolen Chariot:

Now I’ve got to tell you, I’ve met a lot of godlings and monsters I didn’t like, but Phobos took the prize. I don’t like bullies. I’d never been in the “A” crowd at school, so I’d spent most of my life standing up to punks who tried to frighten me and my friends. The way Phobos laughed at me and made Clarisse collapse just by looking at her… I wanted to teach this guy a lesson.  (The Demigod Files: The Stolen Chariot)

Or when he defends Tyson, even when Annabeth talks badly about him:

As they walked away laughing, Annabeth grumbled, “Just ignore them, Percy. It isn’t your fault you have a monster for a brother.” “He’s not my brother!” I snapped. “And he’s not a monster, either!” Annabeth raised her eyebrows. “Hey, don’t get mad at me! And technically, he is a monster.” (…) Cyclopes are the most deceitful, treacherous-“ “He is not! What have you got against Cyclopes, any-way? Annabeth’s ears turned pink. I got the feeling there was something she wasn’t telling me-something bad. “Just forget it,” she said. “Now, the axle for this chariot-“ “You’re treating him like he’s this horrible thing,” I said. “He saved my life.” (The Sea of Monsters, Chapter 6)

Or when he actively defends Nico, when Hera tries to imply that he does not belong:

I balled my fists. I couldn’t believe she was saying this. “You’re the one who paid Geryon to let us through the ranch, weren’t you?” Hera shrugged. Her dress shimmered in rainbow colors. “I wanted to speed you on your way.” “But you didn’t care about Nico. You were happy to see him turned over to the Titans.” “Oh, please.” Hera waved her hand dismissively. “The son of Hades said it himself. No one wants him around. He does not belong.” “Hephaestus was right,” I growled. “You only care about your perfect family, not real people.” (Battle of the Labyrinth, Chapter 20)

Or when he argues against killing Bessie in front of the entire Olympian council:

"Well," Zeus grumbled. "Perhaps. But the monster at least must be destroyed. We have agreement on that?" A lot of nodding heads. It took me a second to realize what they were saying. Then my heart turned to lead. "Bessie? You want to destroy Bessie?" "Mooooooo!" Bessie protested. My father frowned. "You have named the Ophiotaurus Bessie?" "Dad," I said, "he's just a sea creature. A really nice sea creature. You can't destroy him." Poseidon shifted uncomfortably. "Percy, the monster's power is considerable. If the Titans were to steal it, or—" "You can't," I insisted. I looked at Zeus. I probably should have been afraid of him, but I stared him right in the eye. "Controlling the prophecies never works. Isn't that true? Besides, Bess— the Ophiotaurus is innocent. Killing something like that is wrong. It's just as wrong as… as Kronos eating his children, just because of something they might do. It's wrong!" Zeus seemed to consider this. (Titan’s curse, chapter 19)

Or dozens of other examples I could name.

The fight against injustice is one of Percy’s defining narrative traits and, I think, him being a person of color just adds to that story, especially with the historical context of the fight against inequality within the United States.

Personal preference

There are other reasons why I specifically headcanon Percy as Syrian, but these really boil down to only personal preference.

Admittedly, this entire post is about personal preference. It’s a headcanon, after all, and like I stated at the beginning, probably not Rick Riordan’s intention when he wrote these books.

But, specifically this part of my explanation is not supported by quotations from either the books or published papers at all, and really only about what I think.

I think my post was more about why I generally like the headcanon of Percy being a POC, and not why I headcanon him specifically as Syrian.

Now, I would love to be able to write a longer text where I connect Percy to values often associated with many Syrian and broader Levantine communities, such as hospitality, community, resistance and the importance of family, or where I perhaps delve into historical and mythological narratives that echo his story.

However, I think to accurately and respectfully write about a country’s culture, and to explain why a fictional character could potentially be part of it, you need to have more than surface level knowledge about that culture.

Knowledge, which I sadly do not have,

To be completely honest, I am not qualified enough to write a text like.   

So, instead of writing a surface level explanation, which has the potential to be full of stereotypes, half-truths and inaccurate information, and which generalizes the culture of a country as beautifully diverse as Syria, I’m going to be honest and say that this headcanon exists mainly because of a personal preference.

It probably boils down to three main aspects:

Like I said, the main reason why I always pictured Percy as specifically Syrian in the first place is because of an elementary school classmate, who happened to vaguely look like Percy and whose family originated in Syria. That headcanon just stuck with me since then.

As someone living in Germany, I naturally have more contact with people of Syrian descent than other communities, since Syrians are now one of the largest immigrant groups in the country. So, approximately 1.2 million Germans are also Syrian

I also think Arabic is a beautiful language, and I like imagining my favorite characters speaking languages I love.

Admittedly, weaker arguments, but they’re the truth.

Additionally, I just think it’d be cool, simply representation wise.

Especially since the first Percy Jackson book came out in 2005, where anti-muslim and anti-arab narratives were still very high mainly because of 9/11 and where a lot of racist stereotypes dominated arab characters and stories in the us media (mainly portraying arab people as violent and aggressive), I like the idea of the protagonist of one of the most popular fantasy books aimed at children to be Syrian.

Especially since Percy as a character is so much defined by his compassion, kindness, bravery and empathy.

So, yeah, that’s why I personally headcanon Percy as a person of color, and specifically as Syrian.

I hope this post was enjoyable to read and that I made my reasoning clear.