I can't believe Rick is gonna have me defending Hera too after already doing so with Zeus...
But while yeah she was absolutely terrible in the heroes of olympus series with the whole kidnapping and erasing peoples memories thing, in tbotl, Rick's writing of Hera is just misogynistic, let's be real
Yes, she has a terrible past with Hercules and even her own son. Funnily enough, the other gods who show up to offer help in their missions aren't criticized that harshly for their past actions, but more so for the role they're playing currently in the story. And in this book? Hera is helping them a lot, actually. And she doesn't even need the mission to involve clearing her name or getting her sister back or trying to convince her son to change his mind; she's doing it bc it benefits the camp, which benefits the gods, and it's strategically wise to do so.
And I do think that at least one of the things she's criticized for doesn't really make that much sense.
Percy gets mad at her for not paying to get Nico free passage through Geryon's ranch. Well, why would Hera know about Nico's whereabouts? Percy keeps Nico's father a secret from everyone until Nico uses his powers at the end of this book. At the time that Hera was paying for their safe travel, Nico wasn't part of their mission, and she had no reason to know he was a son of Hades, or to keep tabs on him and know he was there.
From what we know about Hera, it actually would've made more sense for her to ensure he wouldn't be taken to the titan army if she knew about him and his parentage, bc she's concerned about the war, and isn't really the type to waste the opportunity of getting a powerful ally to their side, least of all to give him freely to the enemy.
But at this point in the story, it makes more sense for her to not know about him at all, so there's no reason for us or Percy to get mad at her for not going out of her way to ensure no one was left behind! She was helping them in their mission, and Nico wasn't part of it. As much as I love to see Percy getting mad at her on Nico's behalf, this scene, to me, shouldn't exist. After all, did we get mad at Poseidon in the first book for only giving Percy three pearls to get out of the underworld, despite Percy planning to save Sally too?
(The circumstances were a bit different; they likely wouldn't have been able to get her out without Hades' explicit permission, but whatever, if they did, there wouldn't be a fourth pearl to give her, and yet the story knows there's no point in getting mad at Poseidon for this)
And did the narrative or the characters criticize Apollo that harshly in ttc when he didn't care about Annabeth's fate?? Did Percy end this book on bad terms with him?
Did Thalia ever mention Halcyon Green's story to Percy in that book? Or were we allowed to form a more positive opinion of Apollo based on his current actions?
I'm not saying Hera wasn't a jerk in her conversation with Percy and Annabeth. But Rick was making the narrative particularly critical of her for no good reason.
She congratulates them on completing the mission to save the camp. Which they did
But then Rick makes Annabeth go out of her way to refute this. Which??? I'm gonna be honest, this is not the type of stuff you usually discuss with a god, unless it's one you're more familiar with, like Percy with his father or Hermes, for example. Otherwise, Hera's dismissive answer is exactly the type of response you would expect. And why wouldn't she say this? Luke committed many crimes, and so did Daedalus, so much so that he was cursed by Athena, and he was already cheating death anyway. Hera wasn't close to them; why would she care about their deaths? Saying that they are better off gone is one of the nicest things she could've said.
And Pan??? He was already dead; he just hadn't faded completely bc of the satyrs. They couldn't have saved him anyway; they didn't fail him at all.
This is definitely the kind of moment where Percy might not appreciate her comment, but much like he did with Apollo, he would take a deep breath and understand that, yeah, gods are like that.
Of course you could say, well, Annabeth cared about both, and she was having an emotional moment about this just before Hera showed up, it makes sense for her to get mad at her.
But then, if Annabeth is going to be the only one Hera is going to get back at for this (with the whole thing about cows following her around), at least let her be the one who really argues with her, instead of mostly just agreeing with Percy. And let the narrative not agree entirely with her as well! Daedalus killed a child, and Luke tried to do so many times too; I mean, in this book alone he sent demigods to be killed for entertainment and caused his younger brother to go mad in the labyrinth. It's not unreasonable to not feel really that bad for either of them.
But then again!!!! Did they really need to fight her over this??? All this started bc she was congratulating them and later asking for offerings. But did anyone get mad at the gods in the last book when they were all partying hours after Zoe's death, Luke's supposed death and after losing Bianca in the mission too? Were any of them arguing with anyone who congratulated them on their mission?
Hera's kind of an asshole, sure, BUT SHE SAVED THEIR LIVES MULTIPLE TIMES AND THEY LIKELY WOULD NOT HAVE SURVIVED WITHOUT HER HELP. Being that dismissive of her is not only unwise, but genuinely unfair.
She got rid of Janus for them, paid so they wouldn't have to fight Geryon (even if they did end up doing so, once again, WITH HER HELP tho I have Opinions about the idea that Artemis and Apollo wouldn't have helped Percy in that moment — you can't make me fall for this propaganda), and she saved Percy's life by getting him to Ogigia to be cared for by Calypso, not to mention the fact that she was the one who gave them a tip about Percy knowing the answer to how to navigate the labyrinth and then sent them to Hephaestus to help them realize what it was. And once again, her comment about Nico? It's her only crime, and it doesn't even make sense for her to commit it, Rick just wanted her to look bad. God forbid a GODDESS with a controversial past gets some good pr in these books, as opposed to the many GODS with controversial pasts that get great pr in these books, right?
Also, important to notice that Hera was already being very tolerant with them, considering Rick makes Annabeth be honestly kinda disrespectful to her in their first encounter.
(Hera had already left when Annabeth said that, obviously)
Hera was offering them a wish, which she wasn't obliged to do; it's not her fault Annabeth chose something they already had. But her tip about Percy knowing the answer was useful anyway. It's more than what they had going into this mission. Sure, Hera's answer was frustrating but that's how the gods operate. And she was right; getting something and having the wits to use it are two different things. Not to mention, it's a really nice quote. Annabeth is letting her frustration get in her way, and being very entitled. Hera could've gotten mad at her over this, but she lets it slide and just gives her some food for thought. She's being low-key nice most of the time in this book, and being repeatedly disrespected in return.
Anyway, in conclusion, THEY DID NEED HERA'S HELP and she was the immortal who interfered the most on a mission for their benefit, so I think she can be a bit of a jerk about it and still get some offerings. #myopinion #shecould'vesaidworseanditwouldvebeenjustified #i'mnottalkingabouthoosodon'ttalkabouthooeither #thisisadoylistanalysistreatitaccordingly