🍰🍒 Basic Info : Suya or Velvet, it/doll (main pronouns) she/he (extra) || 🕷️🕸️misceverse alpha, 19yrs bodily, African American, artist & fanfic writer🕊️🪦. || Abrosexual-aroace spec, polyam, boygirl presenting but bodily nothing— (no assigned sex & no real gender because I’m non human) || click for strawpage ♡
𓊆ྀི❤︎𓊇ྀི dni & more below~ || ⚜️🎀 ᛝ Hugo’s beloved princess 𝜗ৎ • his n1, his destiny, his most suitable~ 🇫🇷
⚙️ ｡ﾟ•┈୨♡୧┈• ｡ﾟ
⠀ I am a darlingist ! <- check the underlined to learn what that means if ur new~
ㅤ♡ྀི My chéri, my precious Mr. Vivs, Hugo Vivien, is MY boyfriend ! My mate, my omega, my dearest~ He is my legitimate romantic partner given that I am a darlingist .
────۶ৎ──── I am also dating someone else but my main focus & priority, especially on this account, is Mr. Vivs ! Hugo is my everything if u haven’t been able to tell :3c
Extra- I am rad-inclus, pro-good faith, pro-fiction & pro-shipping, pro-kink, pro-para - anti non consensual harm / illegal/ immoral actions. ྀི◟‿ I am very strict with these beliefs & others, if you are mean & cruel i do not support you !
ᛝྀིྀི No DNI unless ⋮ You aren’t pro-fic or “neutral”, you interact with or are a Hugo simp & dni if you ship Hugo with anyone. I am voidsharing & have very strict boundaries when it comes to Hugo since of course, he’s my chéri~ ! || DNI antis & losers
𓏵‧₊˚ ┊ Tags & other socials ~ ⛌⛌⛌ ⛌⛌⛌ ೀ @/ hugosprincesse on twt , @/ hugosdolly on tt , ( dm before request): @/ suyapup on discord
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Blue Lock makes me very stressed especially thinking about future content 😞!!
As excited as I am & how big of a fan I am of the series, it’s very very hard for me to imagine that Hugo will successfully achieve his dreams in the end. Given he has now an “antagonist” role that makes 0 sense/ isn’t fair imo. I’m sure he won’t be a completely tragic character given the tone & message of the overall story, but the disappointment that he won’t win all 4 is very upsetting for me. Ofc maybe it’s too soon to judge, but I’m being realistic. I don’t think the story is in his favor, I think he’s meant to lose because he’s an “antagonist”/ one of Isagi’s rivals… for whatever reason.
I want Hugo to win all 4 so bad and to have a happy comfortable life. I’m sure he would regardless, but I still want him to win. All 4. So in my heart he has, and continue to, in as many universes as possible. Because it is possible. And he deserves it ❣️
Pretending to just be very devoted to the character publicly to avoid excessive backlash.. - person who has had thousands of people hate and fake claim them for having a more unique experience :’D
It feels weird pretending to only be in love with a character. But at least I’m safe! In a way I prefer the privacy.
soulbonding culture is…
hard relate. the “i just think they’re neat” approach has saved me from some long and complicated discussions with people that i don’t really feel the need to explain my bond to.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
BLLK + Whiplash AU fanart || tw : darkship , age gap + abusive || WIP art, actively working on it
I watched the film today, I’m currently rewatching it too LOL.. safe to say I love it
Ego x Isagi isn’t a ship I often see,, I’d love to see it more :’3 (hate, negativity, bad faith comments will result in a block + delete. I am not a discourse account, I don’t care to argue either.)
This isn’t a discourse account, never expect me to engage or entertain stuff you send me. I’m not going to argue with you, I’m not going to complain about whatever it is you say to me on here. I hold 0 respect for the anonymous and those who are overly negative. I do not interact with individuals who are overly negative and only/ mostly post negative things.
Even if I have a serious post every so often, that isn’t my account. It isn’t why I made it, it isn’t why I’m online, but when things need to be addressed they will be. That doesn’t mean it’s an invention to engage with me in certain ways. Small reminder. Want to argue or debate, or you want to see serious negative posts all the time, go to a different account.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The paraphilia community online is disgusting and highly disturbing, as someone with paraphilias this is a serious issue. My commentary on “No Act” as someone who actively studies psychology.
I will add resources to this post later on & post more about this. Ultimately, my stance is that the “no act” label is a watered down version of xenosatasim.
Part 1- what is consent ?
Consent is an agreement to an action to occur, giving permission for said action to happen. Consent is verbal, clear, and falls in line with legal and moral standards.
Consent can only occur without pressure, coercion, manipulation, force. It can only be consent if all parties are informed and aware of the situation. Consent is only possible if the action can be reversible, this applies to things like sex only. Because in other scenarios, actions that you can consent to aren’t reversible, such as surgeries, treatments, etc.
“Why does things like sexual consent needed to be able to be reversible and not things like ethical euthanasia?” This is because to be ethically euthanized, a person is capable of consenting to extremes from other factors even if the action can’t be undone for in this case euthanasia. However this factor can’t be applied to something like sex.
Mental wellbeing. If a person is mentally sound, then and only then they can consent. What does this mean? This means if the action is logically sound, reasonable, legal, and justifiable, it can be consensual. If someone is suffering to extremes, it makes logical sense in specific scenarios for ethical euthanasia to happen. However, it isn’t possible for an individual to consent to abuse.
Because no person who is mentally sane can consent to abuse. It isn’t logical, it isn’t justifiable, it isn’t ethical. This is why you can’t consent to things like necrophilia but can consent to die (only in specific scenarios) because consent ties into one’s mental state heavily.
Part 2- inability to consent , necrophilia
This is a screenshot of a section of the “NO-ACT” paraphilia post. Within it you can see various contradictions regarding abuse, consent, and what that is. Bending the law, bending the definition to consent, to justify the acts of unsafe and highly harmful actions. Such as incestious relations and necrophilia.
What is wrong with necrophilia? Outside of standard moral and the law and even outside of the consequences the body has from assaulting a corpse. It isn’t consensual. Disregarding all of the terrible things that comes from necrophilia such as disease and the disrespect towards the dead individuals family and if holding any sort of belief, the general offense of one’s family line and very spirit / soul. Outside of all the many bad that is necrophilia, the one thing that holds outside of just consequence.
It isn’t by definition consensual and in no way can be consensual.
This is because the person isn’t there during or after the process. Alive they can’t consent to such actions happening to their body, because alive you can’t consent to such acts to begin with. It isn’t logically sound, if someone was to say they’d want that it would question their mental state and would need to be checked to see why they want this and what the issue is. Because those who seek abuse need help, they don’t need abuse. And necrophilia is abusive. The power between someone who is living and someone who isn’t is terrible. The moral of disrespecting someone who passed who should be resting is terrible. There is nothing consensual about necrophilia by definition. Across human ethics and law, necrophilia is a terrible action. It is abuse. And it is absolutely disgusting to think that such action is being presenting as consensual or “pro bodily autonomy” when there is nothing pro bodily autonomy about assaulting a corpse. There is no argument, no case, no ethical justification to dispute this matter. It is just abuse.
Part 3- inability to consent, incest
As we now know and understand. Consent isn’t possible under certain circumstances. Can two adults who are related be in intimate relationships and have it be consensual? The answer is clearly no if you understand anything regarding the science and ethics, but we wouldn’t be here today if this fact was widely understood and known. So we have to have this conversation. No, there is no such thing as a consensual relationship between anyone who is related. It isn’t justifiable, it isn’t logical, it is inherently abusive due to what consent is by definition and the general consequences of incestious behavior. It isn’t about the harm it brings to having children, it’s about the harm it does to one’s mental and what had to have happened prior to cause this. Incest comes from grooming and neglect, and if something forms from grooming and neglect that alone points to the obvious. That what’s happening is abusive, wrong, and extremely harmful to all parties involved.
Incest is widely spoken about. In an ethical perspective, legal, and many victims of incest are very active in these conversations. I am in no way an expert, I simply know basic American law, general ethics, and moral understandings and consequences. As should the average person. But education and understanding is a privilege, and victims especially those who were groomed or neglected will not know or seek information that confirms that what is happening to them is wrong and harmful. Regardless of if they’re an adult or not.
Final- the issue
Due to the lack of education, it is very easy for victims, minors, and people alike to come on the internet and join communities that enables harmful and terrible behavior. My account isn’t an educational one, wasn’t made for those intentions, and I’m not studying specifically these things my interest is criminal rehabilitation.
If people have the time I highly recommend adding to my statement here. With your own research, your own story, and help spread awareness of what consent is. What abuse is. Because these conversations need to be had, there are way too many spaces online that hurts people like No-Act. And being a bystander at a time like this will only make it worst. If you’re able to, only if you wish to, please feel free to explain things yourself. Even if it feels like people should already know it. Such as incest and necrophilia being immoral, the law and why the laws are there, general ethics and morals and why they exist,
And most importantly, spread and post about the definition of consent. And what it means to consent. And how to be in relations safely, and signs to look out for when it comes to all forms of abuses
Please stay safe. Do not use the no-act tag / label and stay away from people who do.
It’s absolutely pathetic that you went to say this anonymously, doing such low level nothing “counter arguments” over basic definitions of what consent and abuse is.
In what world is “most relationships aren’t healthy” is a valid response to someone telling you that abuse is bad. Being a victim is no excuse to spread such terrible things and create more victims, this is disgusting behavior.
And I won’t even entertain the eugenics comment because no, saying incest is a product of grooming and neglect isn’t eugenics.
Do not send me gimmicks like this. This is the last post I’ll ever make like this.
Anyone who tries to tell you that consent isn’t “that important” is a predator and/or is being groomed by predators, btw. Yes, even if they’re [Insert Identity Here]. Consent can take many forms for different people and situations but it is always a requirement, not a suggestion, and if you feel like your consent was violated that’s extremely serious. There are not separate rules for queer people and cishets and there is not a group of people in the world who are “allowed” to assault others and you should never feel like you have to be silent out of fear of what will happen to your abuser should you speak out. Be weird, be kinky, do freaky CNC and practice RACK but remember that CONSENT IS PART OF THE EQUATION. Don’t let rape culture be normalized in the queer community.
Though we all know asking for consent is absolutely MANDATORY in all sexual encounters, you have to also be prepared to respond to the request of consent honestly.
That means being ready to say no if you don’t want to do what your partner is asking.
Yes, it is your partner’s responsibility to ask for clear, sane consent.
But it’s also your responsibility to provide an honest answer.
Which means saying no even if you feel bad about it.
Which means saying no even if you are a chronic people pleaser.
Which means saying no even when you’re are terrified to say say.
You don’t have to physically say no, you can say another word or make a certain signal or sound to convey that you are not giving consent, but you NEED to communicate that no.
As much as both you and I wish our partners could read our mind, that is not reality.
If you you say yes when you’re really thinking ‘I don’t know, if you say yes when you’re really thinking ‘no, stop,’ you need to say something.
Ofc it’s then on your partner to then respect this response, stopping and not guilting you for saying no.
But the point is that consent is something that needs all parties to participate. If you are on the receiving end of asking for consent, you need to be honest.
I get that it’s scary.
I get that you might feel awkward.
I get that you just don’t like saying no.
But speaking your mind during sex is integral. Being honest about your feelings has to happen.
Sex is supposed to be a positive experience. Saying no will keep it positive for everyone involved.
***EDIT: This is advice only when all parties are fully aware and actively participating. None of this is relevant when it comes to any non consensual sexual activity where you physically could not convey that ‘no.’ This only applies to consensual sexual activity. ***
The paraphilia community online is disgusting and highly disturbing, as someone with paraphilias this is a serious issue. My commentary on “No Act” as someone who actively studies psychology.
I will add resources to this post later on & post more about this. Ultimately, my stance is that the “no act” label is a watered down version of xenosatasim.
Part 1- what is consent ?
Consent is an agreement to an action to occur, giving permission for said action to happen. Consent is verbal, clear, and falls in line with legal and moral standards.
Consent can only occur without pressure, coercion, manipulation, force. It can only be consent if all parties are informed and aware of the situation. Consent is only possible if the action can be reversible, this applies to things like sex only. Because in other scenarios, actions that you can consent to aren’t reversible, such as surgeries, treatments, etc.
“Why does things like sexual consent needed to be able to be reversible and not things like ethical euthanasia?” This is because to be ethically euthanized, a person is capable of consenting to extremes from other factors even if the action can’t be undone for in this case euthanasia. However this factor can’t be applied to something like sex.
Mental wellbeing. If a person is mentally sound, then and only then they can consent. What does this mean? This means if the action is logically sound, reasonable, legal, and justifiable, it can be consensual. If someone is suffering to extremes, it makes logical sense in specific scenarios for ethical euthanasia to happen. However, it isn’t possible for an individual to consent to abuse.
Because no person who is mentally sane can consent to abuse. It isn’t logical, it isn’t justifiable, it isn’t ethical. This is why you can’t consent to things like necrophilia but can consent to die (only in specific scenarios) because consent ties into one’s mental state heavily.
Part 2- inability to consent , necrophilia
This is a screenshot of a section of the “NO-ACT” paraphilia post. Within it you can see various contradictions regarding abuse, consent, and what that is. Bending the law, bending the definition to consent, to justify the acts of unsafe and highly harmful actions. Such as incestious relations and necrophilia.
What is wrong with necrophilia? Outside of standard moral and the law and even outside of the consequences the body has from assaulting a corpse. It isn’t consensual. Disregarding all of the terrible things that comes from necrophilia such as disease and the disrespect towards the dead individuals family and if holding any sort of belief, the general offense of one’s family line and very spirit / soul. Outside of all the many bad that is necrophilia, the one thing that holds outside of just consequence.
It isn’t by definition consensual and in no way can be consensual.
This is because the person isn’t there during or after the process. Alive they can’t consent to such actions happening to their body, because alive you can’t consent to such acts to begin with. It isn’t logically sound, if someone was to say they’d want that it would question their mental state and would need to be checked to see why they want this and what the issue is. Because those who seek abuse need help, they don’t need abuse. And necrophilia is abusive. The power between someone who is living and someone who isn’t is terrible. The moral of disrespecting someone who passed who should be resting is terrible. There is nothing consensual about necrophilia by definition. Across human ethics and law, necrophilia is a terrible action. It is abuse. And it is absolutely disgusting to think that such action is being presenting as consensual or “pro bodily autonomy” when there is nothing pro bodily autonomy about assaulting a corpse. There is no argument, no case, no ethical justification to dispute this matter. It is just abuse.
Part 3- inability to consent, incest
As we now know and understand. Consent isn’t possible under certain circumstances. Can two adults who are related be in intimate relationships and have it be consensual? The answer is clearly no if you understand anything regarding the science and ethics, but we wouldn’t be here today if this fact was widely understood and known. So we have to have this conversation. No, there is no such thing as a consensual relationship between anyone who is related. It isn’t justifiable, it isn’t logical, it is inherently abusive due to what consent is by definition and the general consequences of incestious behavior. It isn’t about the harm it brings to having children, it’s about the harm it does to one’s mental and what had to have happened prior to cause this. Incest comes from grooming and neglect, and if something forms from grooming and neglect that alone points to the obvious. That what’s happening is abusive, wrong, and extremely harmful to all parties involved.
Incest is widely spoken about. In an ethical perspective, legal, and many victims of incest are very active in these conversations. I am in no way an expert, I simply know basic American law, general ethics, and moral understandings and consequences. As should the average person. But education and understanding is a privilege, and victims especially those who were groomed or neglected will not know or seek information that confirms that what is happening to them is wrong and harmful. Regardless of if they’re an adult or not.
Final- the issue
Due to the lack of education, it is very easy for victims, minors, and people alike to come on the internet and join communities that enables harmful and terrible behavior. My account isn’t an educational one, wasn’t made for those intentions, and I’m not studying specifically these things my interest is criminal rehabilitation.
If people have the time I highly recommend adding to my statement here. With your own research, your own story, and help spread awareness of what consent is. What abuse is. Because these conversations need to be had, there are way too many spaces online that hurts people like No-Act. And being a bystander at a time like this will only make it worst. If you’re able to, only if you wish to, please feel free to explain things yourself. Even if it feels like people should already know it. Such as incest and necrophilia being immoral, the law and why the laws are there, general ethics and morals and why they exist,
And most importantly, spread and post about the definition of consent. And what it means to consent. And how to be in relations safely, and signs to look out for when it comes to all forms of abuses
Please stay safe. Do not use the no-act tag / label and stay away from people who do.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
