Went to twitter to check on people and it's full of terfs...
cherry valley forever
Keni
Show & Tell
Monterey Bay Aquarium
occasionally subtle
Acquired Stardust
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Andulka
Peter Solarz

Stranger Things
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Claire Keane
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
AnasAbdin
taylor price
trying on a metaphor

Janaina Medeiros

shark vs the universe
hello vonnie

seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@lockerandom
Went to twitter to check on people and it's full of terfs...

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i miss 2014 feminism so much. we were all so newly progressive. we just learned what the word intersectionality means. girls were starting movements at their schools to change the misogynist dress codes. now we’re stuck in the hellscape of “i’m just a girl” “girl math” “being good at the blue store so he’ll take me to the pink store” WHERE DID WE GO WRONGGG
oh and don’t forget that trans women are getting banned from women’s sports because apparently cis women are all born with glass bones and paper skin and will literally disintegrate and die if they try to play a sport against anyone that isn’t another cis woman because they inherently suck so bad at it💔 like ARE WE HEARING OURSELVES
remember when beyonce displayed the word feminist broadcast on live tv during the VMAs. remember that. now no one i know irl calls themselves a feminist. was it just a trendy buzzword to you all
Nostalgia goggles. Things were worse then. Gamergate was taken seriously, no one legitimized internet harassment, the manosphere wasn't problematized, and progressives were less accepting of trans women and people with autism. TERFism wasn't segregated the way it is now; it was actively informing dominant strains of feminist thought. Feminists were writing op-ed pieces about how men shouldn't call themselves feminists because it was like a predator's camouflage, and a go-to example was trans women sneaking penises into women's spaces. bell hooks accused Laverne Cox of inaccurately representing women with a hyperfemme aesthetic, like Cox was just putting on a costume and was not authentically a woman who happened to be hyperfemme. Radfems also influenced mainstream feminism to be more anti-BDSM than it is now, framing everything as an ideology supporting misogynistic men; in the wake of the Fifty Shades of Grey movies, feminists generally support informed consent models.
A key part of just having learned about intersectionality is not fully integrating it into your worldview. Generally, we're all better off now.
In fandom spaces I'm seeing a lot of feminism, but unfortunately its going very much into radfem/terf direction and some outright racism when it comes to Black men characters.
Its odd because I'm seeing this more in m/m spaces. Maybe its just the fandoms I'm in or have been in but I used to not see so many terfs ship m/m?
There's a lot of shaming of bisexuals too. In the LOK fandom, there were people that were getting very mad when they found out that Korra and Asami are both confirmed bisexuals by the creators and not lesbians. Its one of the few bi4bi canon ships out there and there was outright hostility to it.
This was a thing back when korrasami went canon. Bisexuals talked about bi erasure when people were angry at the thought the girls could be bi.
But yeah there was absolutely push back ten years ago with feminism becoming more mainstream. I remember a lot of it starting with Anita Sarkesian (Can I now say her name without my inbox being flooded with hate?) Gamergate came shortly after and it was bad and kind of won the culture war.
Why aren't we talking about the real reason male college enrollment is dropping? (Celeste Davis, Oct 6 2024)
"White flight is a term that describes how white people move out of neighborhoods when more people of color move in.
White flight is especially common when minority populations become the majority. That neighborhood then declines in value.
Male flight describes a similar phenomenon when large numbers of females enter a profession, group, hobby or industry—the men leave. That industry is then devalued.
Take veterinary school for example:
In 1969 almost all veterinary students were male at 89%.
By 1987, male enrollment was equal to female at 50%.
By 2009, male enrollment in veterinary schools had plummeted to 22.4%
A sociologist studying gender in veterinary schools, Dr. Anne Lincoln says that in an attempt to describe this drastic drop in male enrollment, many keep pointing to financial reasons like the debt-to-income ratio or the high cost of schooling.
But Lincoln’s research found that “men and women are equally affected by tuition and salaries.”
Her research shows that the reason fewer men are enrolling in veterinary school boils down to one factor: the number of women in the classroom.
For every 1% increase in the proportion of women in the student body, 1.7 fewer men applied.
One more woman applying was a greater deterrent than $1000 in extra tuition! (…)
Since males had dominated these professions for centuries, you would think they would leave slowly, hesitantly or maybe linger at 40%, 35%, 30%, but that’s not what happens.
Once the tipping point reaches majority female- the men flee. And boy do they flee!
It’s a slippery slope. When the number of women hits 60% the men who are there make a swift exit and other men stop joining.
Morty Schapiro, economist and former president of Northwestern University has noticed this trend when studying college enrollment numbers across universities:
“There’s a cliff you fall off once you become 60/40 female/male. It then becomes exponentially more difficult to recruit men.”
Now we’ve reached that 60% point of no return for colleges.
As we’ve seen with teachers, nurses and interior design, once an institution is majority female, the public perception of its value plummets.
Scanning through Reddit and Quora threads, many men seem to be in agreement - college is stupid and unnecessary.
A waste of time and money. You’re much better off going into the trades, a tech boot camp or becoming an entrepreneur. No need for college. (…)
When mostly men went to college? Prestigious. Aspirational. Important.
Now that mostly women go to college? Unnecessary. De-valued. A bad choice. (…)
School is now feminine. College is feminine. And rule #1 if you want to safely navigate this world as a man? Avoid the feminine.
But we don’t seem to want to talk about that."
very good tags from @downwarddnaspiral
literally saw this tweet this morning
I saw a dude say with his whole chest that biology isn't really STEM
Take a wild fucking guess as to which major has the most female students
The trouble with mending, and all the cute visible mending trends especially, is that mending is predicated on the idea that what you have is an essentially sturdy garment that has worn out in a high-wear area or gotten damaged/torn. Whereas what most of us are actually dealing with is cheaply made shit that has simply given out at the first sign of adversity. If you mend something that's weak to begin with, it's entirely likely that it will just tear at the edge of the mend, which will suddenly be the strongest part of the garment. Or if your shirt has worn through or ripped out at the seam, it's just a crap shirt, and you can fix that seam, but another will give soon, and you have to make an honest assessment of whether the work you put in is worth it. My cheap Hanes white cotton socks blow out at the heels far faster than they ever used to, and fuck a bunch of that, but I'd never bother darning them. They'll just blow out at the toes in a month.
I don't have a solution to offer for this that doesn't involve spending either more money or more time. It is still barely possible to buy quality clothing, but it costs more than most of us can afford. And you can still make your own clothing, but as the skills and tools become less common, it's all the harder to learn. All I can say is look around, make a real assessment of your resources (like, say, Grandma still has a working machine and a stash of probably unfashionable but maybe cute fabric, or you think you can afford two pairs of good work pants a year and then keep them mended), and do your best.
Strategies to help alleviate this (not solve because that's an industry+cultural wide problem, and like OP said it all takes at least more time if not also more money):
Have different nice clothes and clothes that you're ok with getting worn down, it will extend the life of your nice clothes
Change out of your nice clothes when you get home
Get an iron and use it on your nice clothes between most wears and only wash every few wears or when there's a stain or you got too sweaty (take care of your iron too, use filtered water in it)
When you wash your nice clothes, use cold water and then hang to dry. Hot water and dryers put a lot of wear on clothes
Get some wool dryer balls for when you use a dryer, it will speed up drying so you can also reduce the length of time clothes are in the dryer
This one's hard: don't overstuff the washer and dryer
Wear tank tops/undershirts. Thicker/higher quality clothing can be stiffer/more uncomfortable than cheap fabric so a tank can give you a buffer. It also helps keep your sweat off the clothes
Try going up a size when you buy new clothes, a lot of wear comes from clothes stretching/getting pulled around your body as you move rather than just the friction between you and the things around you
For socks: try loosening your shoes and cutting your toenails more often
Be mindful of how you take off your clothes, if you pull on the collar to take your shirt off, that's where it's going to start to rip
Be ok with small holes in your clothes. I agree it's often a waste to repair but it doesn't have to be trashed immediately
All sound advice, thanks!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
When you ship, do you go looking for a ship or does the ship come to you? When you like a character do you find someone to ship them with? Or do you see two characters and think, now that would be interesting.
I'm always curious why people ship two characters. For me, I rarely intend to ship. Usually a characters interaction just clicks for me. (And sometimes it's random as hell). I guess you can say I don't choose my ships they choose me.
I also know people that like to pair everyone up including the spares. I know others that just ship the two characters they find the hottest.
So what makes you ship something?
I'ma just leave these here for like... *Cough* Research purposes and such.
hee hee hee...
DERRY GIRLS | 1.02
Denying the role that individuals need to play in combating the climate crisis is the leftist version of climate change denial. Anyone responding to suggestions of realistic, accessible changes to reduce your own impact with anything resembling ‘100 companies are responsible for most of our emissions so this is pointless’ are engaging in science denialism.
There is no way that collective action takes place without individuals making changes in their own lives. Yes, the rich are more responsible than the poor and yes, what we need is systematic change. However, there absolutely are things we can and should be doing to reduce our own impact and put pressure on polluting industries through direct action and boycott.
These include stopping or reducing flying, eliminating or drastically reducing our consumption of meat and dairy, buying second hand where possible, repairing, recycling and supporting environmental action and rewilding efforts. None of this in isolation will mend the world but its a hell of a lot better than passing the buck while refusing to make any changes in our own lives.
I know that the idea that climate change is caused by someone else; somewhere else, and that it’s up to them to change instead of us is seductive rhetoric, but it’s also extremely dangerous. It encourages the kind of apathy that plays directly into the hands of corporations who want us to feel powerless and to continue to consume as we do now.
We can’t just sit around and wait for The Revolution; we have to live revolutionary lives.
Just to add for some of you in the notes, the ‘100 corporations are responsible for 71% of emissions’ headline was a gross, clickbait misrepresentation of the truth. Influencers and media outlets twisted the results of this study because they knew consumers wanted something, anything, to tell them that the responsibility isn’t on them to make any change, since it’s all the fault of those big nasty corporations. The following is from the Fullfact analysis of this study:
“In the original press release accompanying the report, CDP said: “100 active fossil fuel producers including ExxonMobil, Shell, BHP Billiton and Gazprom are linked to 71% of industrial greenhouse gas emissions since 1988.”
“This means that the total estimated cumulative greenhouse gas emissions released by human activity (excluding carbon dioxide from land use, land use change and forestry, and agricultural methane) between 1988 and 2015, 71% of those emissions originated from 100 fossil fuel producers. This includes the emissions from producing fossil fuels (like oil, coal and gas), and the subsequent use of the fossil fuels they sell to other companies. Therefore, it might not come as such a surprise that these 100 entities are linked to 71% of human activity-related greenhouse gas emissions, since all 100 are fossil fuel producers.”
In other words, this study (which was extremely limited in scope) concluded that 100 companies produce 71% of the fossil fuels which are then used by other industries and by consumers themselves. 100 companies aren’t causing 71% of emissions, they’re producing the fossil fuels that are then linked to 71% of emissions. Those are completely different things.
My biggest pet peeve about sustainability discourse is that, yeah, a handful of companies are fucking us all over, and yeah, we need fundamental change coming from the government. But also you need to understand that you can't have both things:
You can't have zero single use plastic and only sustainable materials and expect to be able to afford brand new clothes every month.
You can't have an increase in workers rights protections and expect to still get things you order online delivered to your house in a couple of days.
You can't have meat production reduced to the point where it's not environmental destructive and expect to be eating meat more than a couple times a week at most.
We NEED big scale change but that WILL significantly affect your lifestyle. You need to stop living in a fantasy world where fast fashion prices or eating animal products daily can ever coexist with sustainability.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i love fur, i love leather, i love wool, i love long lasting materials without plastic in them that will decompose and go back into the ecosystem after serving me well for several decades.
commercial leather is not biodegradable because it is tanned with chromium, a carcinogen, which releases into groundwater supplies when buried or into the air when burned
farmed fur, which accounts for 80-85% of all fur on the market, is “no more sustainable than textiles made from petroleum” and has a higher impact on 17 of 18 studied environmental themes, including climate change and toxic emissions when compared to cotton, acrylic, polyester (imitation fur) and wool
undyed wool is fully biodegradable, but synthetic wool dyes affect biodegradability and create toxic wastewater that is dumped into the environment after production, while natural dyes lack colorfastness so the industry “extensively” uses environmentally harmful heavy metals to bind them to the wool
consumer goods made with animal products are not magically good for the environment just because they come from animals. commercial textiles are not going to go back into the ecosystem at the end of their usefulness, not least because factory farms—the source of almost all leather, fur, and wool you can buy—were never part of an ecosystem to begin with
all of these industries have massive lobbying groups that have spent millions of dollars on campaigns lying to you about how “eco-friendly” their products are because they desperately don’t want you to call your representatives and tell them to increase local environmental regulations on textile manufacturing instead
These industries spend enough on corporate propaganda and greenwashing their products without you guys shilling for free.
some of the top comments on a hank green reel about climate change.
this attitude is honestly terrifying and also infuriating to me. Yes, billionaires are the main polluters of this planet, far disproportionate to their number.
but the fact that to so many (us-american) leftists, "tax the rich" and "expropriate billionaires" has turned into people living in some of the richest countries on the planet convincing themselves that their consumption and living habits bear no responsibility in climate change makes me feel sick
believing in that to the point of saying CARS are not harmful for the planet? have these people lost their fucking minds? and of course, its only ever other countries which are to blame....
its exactly these takes that you encounter in anti-vegan rethoric as well. as soon as anyone demands a change of these people, they bend over backwards and use leftist internet lingo to say that asking them to change is akin to being a facist or whatever
like exactly…..the responsibility rests on the West and I need people to understand that, ESPECIALLY Americans. Especially when the global south and small island nations are disproportionately bearing the brunt of the effects of climate change. This comment isn’t accomplishing what you think it is and belies responsibility but actually is so, so ignorant and counterproductive to change. change starts small and starts with you.
Sorry, imperial core leftists, but you will actually have to give up over-consuming commodities that were created using other countries extractive labor in order to save the global environment. You can't be an ally to the global poor while also taking from them nonstop. link 1: The US and Europe are responsible for the majority of global ecological damage caused by the overuse of natural resources
link 2: Over-consumption in the world’s richest countries is destroying children’s environments globally
link 3: High-income countries are responsible for 74 percent of excess resource use causing ecological breakdown
It’s true that individual action alone can’t save the planet. But it’s also true that when the necessary large scale changes are implemented, your lifestyle will have to change.
the funniest thing about the tiktok tradwife craze is people learning financial abuse exists but like, as a hypothetical. "wait what if the relationship doesn't work out and you have nothing of your own and nowhere to go?" congratulations you figured out a common reason people remain in abusive relationships and why it's important to maintain some level of financial independence
Something I've been thinking about in regards to this. What are we going to do as AI starts taking jobs? Are we going to see more and more people dependent on a partner? What does someone do when they are layed off because a computer can do their job better? And I mean both men and women. We thought the creative jobs would be the last to go but they ended up being the first.
We need to fight for UBI now.
I think the most frustrating thing, period, is that gaps in resumes need to be explained.
Have people tried to explain the rationale to me? Yes.
Do I still get incredibly annoyed in interviews when I have to explain that a relative needed full-time care, and I was the person in the best position to do it (and thankfully we could afford for me to spend my time that way)? Yes.
Financially depending on another person means that if *anything* happens to them, you, and the rest of the people depending on them, are at risk. The most frustrating thing about that though is if you need to work because of misfortune, you can be penalized again in the form of a difficult time finding work.
(The job hunt is not going well and I needed a mini rant)
Oh I agree with that point independent of like, the bigger argument. I think it's stupid that our work culture doesn't take into account that not everyone can or will spend their entire adult life employed with no breaks, it's just ignoring reality. Especially in the case of caring for a sick loved one, like very few people who become caregivers in that way anticipate that or work that into their "5 year plan".
And that goes for anyone who has a work history gap, stay at home moms included. It's only included in the trad wife argument because it realistically is something that could be an obstacle if you have to get a job after a decade or more of not being employed, and it's just one more thing that could make financial independence for those moms/wives difficult. And like a certain wife was bragging about in the notes of that reblog, a lot of women in that situation don't have any previous work history or higher education, which adds another layer of difficulty.
But even if our work culture sucked less and gaps weren't an issue, there would still be a ton of things stacked against a mom who is trying to leave a situation where she is completely financially dependent, with no agreements or safety nets put in place. In some places, not having a job or work history can be used against them in custody battles. Also trads love to argue the child support thing, but that system is so imperfect.... I know of a person who was ordered to pay $4 (yes you read right) a week for each of their 2 kids, so $32 dollars a month for *both* kids (and they don't even pay that). So to say that a dad would absolutely have to pay a fair amount in a divorce situation is completely untrue.
Sorry I went on a bit of a tangent lol but I agree with you, the work gap thing is just used in that kind of argument bc it's a real possible obstacle for women in that situation.
This is where people that have a loving and supportive family have a huge advantage. Especially when they have a parent that says "if things don't work out, come home." I'm thinking of a friend who was in an accident, ended up disabled and was out of the workforce for five years. His parents had him move in with them and later they helped him get another job. I don't know what someone who didn't have a supportive family would do in that situation.
Really gaps in resume should not hinder someone from finding a job. Someone who went to jail for twenty years for possessing weed should not have a next to impossible time finding a job. Not only do you have the work gap, but also prison time.
I do know a lot of women who were SAHMs who either became Pharmacy technicians or work in care giving fields after all their kids are in school. Or some do doordash or instacart. A lot of people that served prison time were also doing delivery service jobs before they started to require background checks.
Of course you also have those Tradwives that are making money with their instagram accounts and its targeted at a certain group of men. Or they are trust fund kids. (Nearly every SAHM where I live is a trust fund kid I wouldn't call them trad wives and I've never seen a legit tradwife in person.) But many of their followers do not realize that they have those safety nets. I at least hope those girls have supportive families that will be willing to help out if things go south in their marriage.
Anna Duggar's case is unique because she still gets to live in a warehouse. Yeah it sounds like that would suck but she and her kids have a roof over their heads and now Josh is gone (She's incredibly stupid in that she still wants to be with him)
So I think there are definitely many different types of women who don't work for "religious" reasons, the rich trust find trads are certainly one of them. If we're talking Anna Duggar, she comes from more of my old sphere of Christianity which religiously leans more baptist/evangelical than most women who call themselves "trad", who are usually either catholic or conservative influencers. I would call people like Anna Duggar fundamentalists over trad and I think there are lots of distinctions, but primarily fundamentalists tend to be more likely to be poor or near poor, whereas the trad types maybe are more likely to have a security net (I would argue that that's not a firm rule though).
I agree with what you're saying, but I did want to add that distinction. Theologically, Anna Duggar is a good example of a fundamentalist evangelical, but her life otherwise is really not. Rich families of the Duggar status in that corner of Christianity are few and far between, and your average teenage girl who believes she should get married as soon as possible, never work, and be eternally pregnant for similar Duggar-y religious reasons is very unlikely to be born into/marry into that kind of situation.
The Duggar family's life before their TV show is a more accurate picture of how those kind of big, 'traditional' evangelical families live (cramped in too small of quarters, spending as little money as possible, parentifying the older girl or even sometimes boy kids because they can't afford childcare or give each child the attention the need, etc etc etc) and honestly the Duggars were doing OK compared to some families I grew up with. Take all that I put in parentheses, add hunger, add lack of basic education, it can be a really bleak situation.
So I say all that just as context because a lot of times in those communities, the parents would not welcome back a married child if they were having martial issues. That's not always the case obviously, but because of the strict religious rules and because a lot of those families couldn't afford another adult under their roof, it isn't an option for a lot of fundamentalist women to just go back home.
It's the part of the same culture that is the reason Anna Duggar doesn't leave Josh, it would completely disintegrate the only support system she has if she did so, and the Duggars are only keeping her up because Josh is so obviously guilty.
So I come from that perspective a lot when talking about stay at home conservative moms, because even if a lot of those trad influencers have a safety net should their marriage go under, the non-wealthy women they are influencing and pandering to don't always have that option.
It took me awhile to figure out what a tradwife was because I thought, isn't that just a SAHM? But tradwife seems to be more extreme and they don't wear pants? I've also suspected that some of those tradwife influencers are just fetish influencers. I can tell what audience they a re trying to attract. But you also get genuine ones.
For girls watching those influencers and want to take on the tradwife lifestyle, they need to realize that those influencers do have an income and are not completely reliant on their husbands. Its like a lot of those fundie women who tell women that their husband should be the breadwinner but then they are clearly making money through youtube or instagram. It likes behind all those housewife characters from 1950s TV was a woman making a lot of money as an actress.
Otherwise, to really make being a SAHM work, you need to come from money. They women where I lived, it was like they never left college, but now they don't have class. They were going to yoga, out for lunch, mommy and me classes, swimming, it was fascinating to watch. It was almost always the well off girls from high school who were leading these lives.
Anna, I used to want her to divorce Josh and get her kids away from him. But now that he's in jail I think she's better off just living in the warehouse. She's got seven kids. In that situation that's the best place for her, assuming there is not another predator living near by and has access to the kids.
The US system is so fucked up. There's no safety net and most people are one accident away from being broke and homeless. Healthcare is tied to employment and you need to work full time to get those benefits. I wish I could work only twenty hours. I'm neurodivergent and COVID fucked me up. But I need the healthcare full time gives me. I think parents in general would be much happier with a twenty hour work week. Then they can easy alternate who is watching the kids with out both being exhausted after an eight hour work day. And all of us could use more free time.
I wish I could write more but... work.
I think the most frustrating thing, period, is that gaps in resumes need to be explained.
Have people tried to explain the rationale to me? Yes.
Do I still get incredibly annoyed in interviews when I have to explain that a relative needed full-time care, and I was the person in the best position to do it (and thankfully we could afford for me to spend my time that way)? Yes.
Financially depending on another person means that if *anything* happens to them, you, and the rest of the people depending on them, are at risk. The most frustrating thing about that though is if you need to work because of misfortune, you can be penalized again in the form of a difficult time finding work.
(The job hunt is not going well and I needed a mini rant)
Oh I agree with that point independent of like, the bigger argument. I think it's stupid that our work culture doesn't take into account that not everyone can or will spend their entire adult life employed with no breaks, it's just ignoring reality. Especially in the case of caring for a sick loved one, like very few people who become caregivers in that way anticipate that or work that into their "5 year plan".
And that goes for anyone who has a work history gap, stay at home moms included. It's only included in the trad wife argument because it realistically is something that could be an obstacle if you have to get a job after a decade or more of not being employed, and it's just one more thing that could make financial independence for those moms/wives difficult. And like a certain wife was bragging about in the notes of that reblog, a lot of women in that situation don't have any previous work history or higher education, which adds another layer of difficulty.
But even if our work culture sucked less and gaps weren't an issue, there would still be a ton of things stacked against a mom who is trying to leave a situation where she is completely financially dependent, with no agreements or safety nets put in place. In some places, not having a job or work history can be used against them in custody battles. Also trads love to argue the child support thing, but that system is so imperfect.... I know of a person who was ordered to pay $4 (yes you read right) a week for each of their 2 kids, so $32 dollars a month for *both* kids (and they don't even pay that). So to say that a dad would absolutely have to pay a fair amount in a divorce situation is completely untrue.
Sorry I went on a bit of a tangent lol but I agree with you, the work gap thing is just used in that kind of argument bc it's a real possible obstacle for women in that situation.
This is where people that have a loving and supportive family have a huge advantage. Especially when they have a parent that says "if things don't work out, come home." I'm thinking of a friend who was in an accident, ended up disabled and was out of the workforce for five years. His parents had him move in with them and later they helped him get another job. I don't know what someone who didn't have a supportive family would do in that situation.
Really gaps in resume should not hinder someone from finding a job. Someone who went to jail for twenty years for possessing weed should not have a next to impossible time finding a job. Not only do you have the work gap, but also prison time.
I do know a lot of women who were SAHMs who either became Pharmacy technicians or work in care giving fields after all their kids are in school. Or some do doordash or instacart. A lot of people that served prison time were also doing delivery service jobs before they started to require background checks.
Of course you also have those Tradwives that are making money with their instagram accounts and its targeted at a certain group of men. Or they are trust fund kids. (Nearly every SAHM where I live is a trust fund kid I wouldn't call them trad wives and I've never seen a legit tradwife in person.) But many of their followers do not realize that they have those safety nets. I at least hope those girls have supportive families that will be willing to help out if things go south in their marriage.
Anna Duggar's case is unique because she still gets to live in a warehouse. Yeah it sounds like that would suck but she and her kids have a roof over their heads and now Josh is gone (She's incredibly stupid in that she still wants to be with him)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
god i hope the cpsc takes the shot. i think this would dramatically change their entire business model. amazon makes so much money by selling defective or mislabeled or just plain dangerous products and then faces little liability because this stuff is actually being sold by random third-party sellers that don't get vetted at all and can be hard to prosecute because they're in china or wherever. this is a big part of what makes amazon so powerful and it would be good for everyone if they were forced to bear more responsibility for the damages caused by the crap available on their website
So fucking tired of the gods damned temu ads being fucking everywhere. I’m so fucking sick of this bullshit system temu and shein have built themselves on of fucking, palatable exploitation where westerns are fine with it because “but it’s so cheap and it gets here so fast” at the fucking cost of people working for the equivalent of pennies an hour