when a moot changes their pfp i feel like a baby whose dad shaved his beard
Mike Driver

shark vs the universe
will byers stan first human second

oozey mess
Jules of Nature

pixel skylines
todays bird

gracie abrams

β
I'd rather be in outer space πΈ

Love Begins
taylor price
YOU ARE THE REASON
noise dept.

Kiana Khansmith

JVL
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

π
seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from India

seen from Oman
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from United States

seen from United States
@harrowharrks
when a moot changes their pfp i feel like a baby whose dad shaved his beard

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
ep 1: rhaenyra being geeked af that alicent came to dragonstone and ignoring everyone who is trying to tell her to not trust alicent
ep 2: alicent committing treason left and right to prepare the city for rhaenyra. daemon and mysaria gossiping about whether rhaenyra and alicent still hold affection for each other
ep 3: rhaenyra blatantly favoring alicent seeking advice from her
ep 4: reunion in the godswood. rhaenicent proposal
ep 5: alicent admitting to being jealous of rhaenyra choosing daemon over her and trying to steal rhaenyras gf
remember. however gay you think the episode may be. it'll always be gayer
im sorry it's so funny to me how aemond and aegon are having a telepathic argument about which of them was their mother's favorite child and all the while she literally traded them both in a heartbeat for helaena's life weeks ago
re: ilya's terrible therapist
okay i think i'm obligated to say that although i am a mental health professional very obviously nothing i post on my heated rivalry tumblr is professional advice nobody sue me or anything. i should also probably caveat that i am coming from a very specific perspective: i'm a relational psychoanalyst; i have adjunctive training in several behavioral modalities but i believe very, very strongly in relational psychodynamic work as being THE thing. for patients with complex relational trauma (aka mr. ilya rozanov), i don't believe anything else can create lasting change. i also don't believe in the medical model of mental health. these are things about which reasonable people can, of course, disagree, so i'll try to separate out things i think she does WRONG vs things i think are missed opportunities to do well/what i would do differently
THINGS THAT ARE WRONG the biggest and worst: patient presents for therapy for first time despite significant treatment barriers. patient discloses that he believes he is depressed. patient has a first-degree relative who died by suicide. your next question, your very next question, is "are you thinking of killing yourself". you don't beat around the bush, you don't imply it, you don't wait until the patient volunteers. you must ask directly and you must do so before the patient leaves your office, because there is a huge and immediate risk that this appointment is someone's last cry for help before an attempt, and the odds of a depressed patient with a trauma history related to the suicide of a parent attempting suicide is fucking staggering. it is in my opinion malpractice not to even screen for suicidal intent at this first appointment ANYWAY, i do this for all patients and to not do it for someone with ilya's history is outrageously dangerous. life-threateningly incompetent care. lack of treatment planning: doesn't take a history or anything at the first appointment. jumps directly into talking about a horrific trauma (finding his mother's dead body). sometimes people do come in to a first session in an escalated state and have to begin directly with discussing whatever is happening at that moment, and then you meet them where they're at, but ilya arrives in a calm if slightly nervous state. she should have started by laying out what therapy would look like and beginning to build rapport, not immediately being like "so how about your mom's corpse". the way she makes the diagnosis of depression is bizarre. βI think you are depressedβ. she doesn't clarify whether or not she's actually diagnosing him with depression under the medical model, explain what that means, or ask what it means to him to hear that. it's also MONTHS in, after he came in suspecting depression, that she makes this diagnosis (in the US it has to be in the first session generally for insurance purposes, different, also bad). no actual screening for symptoms, no psychoeducation about what it means to have depression, no sense of prognosis which clearly upsets the patient. it is so important to contextualize a diagnosis, both what the particular diagnosis is and what the act of diagnosing means. no differential diagnosis. she knows that ilya has experienced at least one criterion A trauma for PTSD (his mother's death) but does nothing to screen for symptoms. she doesn't ask how old his sexual partners he had when he was fourteen were to screen for sexual abuse. she doesn't rule out bipolar which is a must when diagnosing depression. she doesn't ask any questions about substance use or screen for potential neurodivergence or any of a million other things. she doesn't refer to medical for potential physiological contributors for a guy whose career is "getting hit really hard in the head".
no clear treatment plan or goals, and no sense of how therapy is going to work besides⦠talking? the only goal ilya really sets is "be good enough for my boyfriend," and although she (rightly) pushes back on that she doesn't help him identify an alternate goal. she also doesn't explain what therapy is going to be like or how it works or help him get on board with what the project of therapy is going to be. she seems unshaken when he misses five appointments in a row (if i had a passively suicidal patient miss five appointments in a row i would not be brushing that off, we would be having a good chat about what the barriers to treatment were). culturally incompetent care: they're part of the same minority group (Russian immigrants) across one axis of identity, but Galina is not a queer hockey player (or as far as we know queer at all). she minimizes and dismisses the discrimination ilya is likely to face in his career from coming out, including the fact that he could get deported to Russia, jumping to a CBT technique that asks him to imagine the worst case scenario without engaging at all with how it feels to be in this position or validating his fears. mental health professionals have an ethical obligation to educate themselves about their patients' identities and to listen first. "I could lose my job and be deported and jailed because of my sexual identity" is not a cognitive distortion, it is a terrifying reality. perhaps an unlikely reality, but it exists. trying to use cognitive therapies to "reframe" real experiences of discrimination is, flat-out, therapeutic abuse. she also should have explicitly responded to his fear that she would out shane when he's afraid to say shane's name, not obliquely implied that she knows they're both hockey players: "i want to let you know that confidentiality extends to anything and everything you tell me, except (reiterate legal carveouts). there are no circumstances under which i would disclose your partner's identity to anyone. if you want to use his name, i won't repeat it to anyone except when we're in this room" THINGS THAT ARE POOR THERAPEUTIC STYLE IN MY OPINION AND WHAT I WOULD DO BETTER #MYNARCISSISM lack of curiosity: she does not prompt him to reflect emotionally, even when there are very obvious entry points to do so to do so. i.e. ilya says he's glad his father is dead, which is a huge emotional disclosure that is very risky for a patient to make, especially in a first appointment because he might expect judgment. and she just⦠asks a factual question about the timeline, rather than engaging with the emotional content in any way (as a relational analyst what i would do here is ask "what does it feel like to share that with me?", but i do not think any good therapist would like, change the subject away from the feeling)
she regularly offers direct opinions about/interpretations of things ilya says, very early in their therapeutic relationship. "that must have been very hard" in response to his father's expectations of him (which he interprets as being about sochi--he seems to hear 'it must have been hard for you to fail like that', which is, uh, bad!), "it's good that you had that," etc. in spite of the fact that he's already indicated a complex relationship with his family and himself that mean he might feel quite differently than someone else expects! was it good that he had hockey, or did it just create another burden on him and his relationship with his father, or is it somewhere in the middle? did his father's expectations feel hard? traumatizing? was he proud that so much was expected of him? when did he notice those feelings? just some questions i might ask. describing how ilya must feel about things closes off conversation. her affect and presentation in the session: ilya repeatedly notices her masking her reactions to things, like the fact that he became sexually active so young. i guess technically you're still allowed to be a blank slate style therapist, even though i don't know anyone who still does this. but if you're a blank slate, be a blank slate. don't let patients notice that you're hiding your reactions to things. so for instance i would approach that conversation by having whatever reaction i had and then saying, "you might notice i had a reaction to you saying that," and either asking the patient how they interpreted my reaction or asking them if they'd like to know what i'm thinking (and then how does it feel to know that i'm feeling concerned, etc, the relational field goes on forever). my way isn't the only way but if you're visibly swallowing reactions it's bad. she doesn't check in with ilya about how he's feeling about therapy and dismisses his fear that it's not working. tbh the only thing she says that i like is "i'm good, but i'm not that good," which IS something i might say. but she doesn't go from there, it becomes a way of dismissing his fears. i would have asked what it's like to have to tolerate such a slow and uncertain recovery process. does he think therapy can help? are there ways in which it has helped? how does it feel to talk about it? how does it feel to talk to me about it? bizarre attitude towards self-disclosure. she gives ilya next to no information about herself, which, again, is an old-fashioned but not per se wrong way to do it. just because i'm the relational yapper machine 3000 doesn't mean that every therapist needs to tell their patient anything about themselves. but she does self-disclose twice. she tells ilya that she's watching their season/is a hockey fan, and makes a weird comment that she also enjoys shopping as a coping mechanism but that bedsheets are more in her price range than sports cars. even though i'm the yappatron 3000 i would not choose to make these particular disclosures! admittedly if i had a famous patient and i knew about their career i would probably tell them that directly in the first session, i would not however make asides about it because now you're kind of creating a dual relationship. the bedsheets thing is weird bc you gotta keep a wiiiide birth around anything even quasi sexual, like don't invite a patient to imagine what your bed is like you weirdo. also finances are usually an inappropriate thing to self-disclose, because therapy is also a financial relationship! i would never joke about how a patient has more money than me (even though most of my patients have a lot more money than me), it seems likely to induce guilt and also to disturb the therapeutic frame around money which is hard to manage anyway
therapeutic interventions: i mean the biggest problem is that she doesn't really seem to have a consistent style or approach or anything. they just kind of chat. the things she does say areβ¦ weird. she directly gives advice about what he should do in his relationship with Shane repeatedly. She doesnβt otherwise tell ilya what to do, which would actually be more appropriate--there's a place for giving depressed patients clear instructions imo. but she doesn't do that, she tells him what to do with his boyfriend which is far riskier because she's never met shane! the worst bit is that she also directly predicts what the outcome of one of the conversations she tells him to have will be, which isβ¦ bad, because she does not know Shane, and this is like their fourth session, and she could be wrong. Thatβs how you destroy a therapeutic rapport forever btw, is make a promise you canβt keep. i have never in my career assured a patient that a conversation they were gonna have with someone else would turn out well, because i don't know that person. maybe shane is an abusive asshole who is going to say "well if you're depressed just kill yourself already". she doesn't know this man!
her ideas about how to treat depression seem limited to pills and exercise. which is crazy because the man is a professional athlete. and she's like "well maybe go on a bike ride." because rachel reid clearly doesn't know how therapy works or what the mechanism of action is! she doesn't lay out the many, many possibilities ("i recommend speaking to a psychiatrist, options might include ssris or snris, other antidepressants, mood stabilizers, etc. there are also interventional methods like intravenous ketamine, transcranial magnetic stimulation, or ECT. i mention those only so you understand that there are a lot of options, and a lot of hope). she doesn't actually offer psychoed about lifestyle interventions--why exercise? what does nutrition look like? sleep? she tells him he needs to come out to his friends but doesn't offer anything to help him actually understand how social isolation and depression interact. she doesn't look at any of his strengths, notably the fact that he has a partner who adores him, that he has survived a lifetime of immense trauma, that he has a brilliantly successful career, etc. there's a stab at one CBT exercise but otherwise no concrete skills (again not my thing but it would be something). and no information about different therapy modalities and how they could potentially help him. okay that's the end of my essay sorry to anyone who doesn't care and had to watch this get reblogged like 8 separate times becasue tumblr was mad abt how long it was if anyone wants to know My Case Formulation of fictional character Ilya Rozanov and how i would Fix Him let me know @stunkbug here is the essay!
long distance selfies
early access + nsfw on patreon

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
which is totally fine! by the way! i can absolutely be normal about this no problem
so, old news obvious news blah blah, but i keep seeing people not getting this about my girl gideon nav so have to say: i think at first blush, people get the impression that Harrowβs got all the convolutions and layers and hidden vulnerability whereas gideon wears her heart on her sleeve and is just brazenly herself (a loveable rowdy himbo) & thatβs the contrast. and yes, thatβs there, but thatβs not all. that dynamic itself is a part of their mutual (codependent) front, and like everything else in this book, it gets peeled back.Β
i think the real contrast is that theyβve both got masks, and those masks are complimentary. theyβre both kids who never got a childhood. they grew up tortured in the same place from very different angles with no one but each other to butt heads against. they both had to play-act grown up versions of themselves with few models for what a well-adjusted adult even looked like. so itβs cartoonish. gideon is the plucky hero of her own adventure story that will totally have a happy ending some day, far far away from her nemesis whom sheβs totally not in love with. harrow meanwhile (to grossly oversimplify) has to imagine herself as someone cruel and cold enough to cope with being alive at the price of 200 other people. these two things fit very well together. gideon can play the hero to harrowβs villain, and harrow can enact cruelty toward gideon to make herself feel strong and mean (and generally just to vent anguish). the way they hate one another is a kind of mutual protection - it re-enforces the self-image that each of them needs to get through the day. but thatβs the coping mechanism. harrow the ruthless bones overlord. gideon the hapless swords idiot, who thinks of nothing but tiddies & sweet sweet vengence (harrowβs corpse in various states of disgrace ) all day. and behind that theyβre both tearing apart at the seems beneath caricatures of themselves that areΒ deeply unsustainable and neither of them feels safe letting on the extent to which thatβs the case. their hearts are a goddamned mess. neither of them is wearing that shit on their sleeve.Β Β so yeah, thereβs a lot more to gideon than being a swords himbo but thatβs not the wild thing. the wild thing is sheβs so convincing that she somehow manages to sell people on her no braincells actΒ while being the pov character of entire first novel.
-Β
thinking more about John and.... at the end of HtN when he was interogating Wake, she wanted him to say her name. "i'll be dammed if i pass up the chance to hear you speak the words" and "they're dead words, a human chain reaching back ten thousand years": Awake Remembrance of These Valiant Dead Kia Hua Ko Te Pai Snap Back to Reality Oops There Goes Gravity.
and then she asks him "how did they make you feel?" and of course, John deflects.
but that's Aotearoa's national anthem in teΒ reo MΔori. and as we learn in NtN, John is Maori. that's his anthem. how must have that felt, to John? to hear his own anthem claimed by someone descended from the people who left his earth to die?
#god if i were john id be so fucking mad that this CHILD this infant this stupid baby has the guts to claim something she has#no context to understand#and of course after 10k years john YOU are the one doing colonialism please look in a mirror etc#john really is just so fucking fascinating#he says he doesnt care. he says it makes him feel sad (pathetic) bordering on funny but. john i dont believe you#john's anger is something we have only really seen once. but. yeah.
βwhat the fuck did Anastasia do?β some wild speculations for funsies
What we know: Anastasia was trying to achieve Lyctorhood, and believed there was βanother wayβ other than the standard βkill your cav, eat their soulβ way. Anastasiaβs process still included the Eightfold Word, was performed in βlaboratory conditionsβ and Samael, her cavalier, died. She later went on to fund the Ninth House. Everything else is speculation, or comes from biased accounts.
What we donβt know: A bunch of things!
One is when it happened: We donβt know when Anastasia attempted to ascend, compared to the other Lyctors; we only know that she did it in relatively safe conditions. We DO know that she worked βclosely with Cassiopeiaβ (HtN, 51) and researched it βtoo muchβ, trying to do the process a different way βslower and more methodicallyβ. Cassiopeia was the fourth Lyctor to ascend - my guess is that Anastasia made her attempt at any time between shortly before Cassiopeiaβs and shortly after Cytherea.
The other is what exactly happened: all we know for sure is that John claims Anastasia failed, and he killed Samael to stop the botched process. Of course Johnβs account is wildly unreliable but IMO, heβs not the kind of person to say a straightforward lie when a half-truth will do β not because of moral qualms against lying (LOL), but because he likes to have plausible deniability with himself that he did a hard thing for the right reasons. Iβm assuming Johnβs account is like, 60% true here. And itβs very juicy
Wild guess time!
Wild ass guess but my idea is that Anastasia tapped into Alectoβs enormous well of power, but dragged Samael into it via the Eightfold word. Then either the feeling of Alectoβs soul was too much for them and it made Anastasia panic, screwing the process. John killed Samael to stop it.
Why would you even think that? Good question!
I think John claiming that killing Samael was to Anastasiaβs benefit is partly the truth; again Johnβs very good at twisting facts so that he comes out squeaky clean, but heβs less likely to lie outright. We also know that Anastasia remained on decent enough terms with John & Lyctors afterwards β I bet their relationship was very fraught, but doesnβt seem to have been on the level of βI never want to see you again.β
Alecto feels guilt over Samaelβs death. The first thing she tells Harrow, Anastasiaβs however-many-times-removed grandchild, is βIβm sorry about Samaelβ (NtN, epilogue). Alecto had the chance to apologise in person to Anastasia for Samaelβs death, but she still feels the urge to apologise again to a direct descendant, immediately. This, plus the fact that she swore herself to Anastasiaβs line (a big fucking deal!) makes me think that SHE was personally involved in Samaelβs death, not just a witness, and she feels the urge to make up for it.
Anastasia βpanickingβ is a very likely reaction when confronted with Alectoβs sheer power β John completely lost it when he ascended, and while Anastasia made her attempt in less fraught circumstances it was probably still A Lot to handle. My guess that she βdragged Samael into itβ is based on the speculation that the Eightfold word is what ties the cavalier to the necromancer and includes the cavalierβs name (because Harrow removed all memories of Gideonβs name, not just her existence, to stop herself from consuming Gideonβs soul) and when her panic caused her to lose control over the process to some extent (probably painful and/or gruesome) Johnβs resort was to kill Samael and stop the process that way.
Another (IMO less likely) possibility is that Alecto threw a Nona-style tantrum that Samael couldnβt withstand, or even killed Samael herself. These would both work with her guilt + the fact that whatever happened needed a pretty thorough βcleanupβ after, but I donβt think Alecto was physically present. (However, I do think that Alectoβs involvement would be pretty much the only thing to get John to admit to something he didnβt do, and would explain why he agreed to lock up Alecto after + why Anastasia would agree to assist with it)
Ok but why would Anastasia even be able to tap into Alectoβs power?
I just think Anastasia is extremely scary. She was the one to work on Teacher (cramming 500 souls into 50) and she later went on to fund the Ninth, the House that supposedly does strictly bone necromancy, wouldnβt even touch flesh magic, but also, somehow, managed Harrowβs conception β something John, God himself, calls βa walking miracleβ.Β
Yes, Harrowβs parents were skilled, but not that skilled. My guess is that they based their work on Anastasiaβs research β a βworkβ that John compares to a smaller-scale Resurrection.
If thatβs the level Anastasia was working withβ¦ I just think she was very good at soul fuckery. I also think that the fact that planets have souls in TLT (even planets that donβt contain any life formsβ¦ except potentially they all do) points to the existence of an βoversoulβ β universal life existence within all beings; sort of the greater matter of which human souls are the molecules. I think Anastasia was sufficiently skilledto have reached to whatever spillover of Alectoβs soul was left, maybe through Johnβs presence, or maybe because she was still partly tied to the planet that became the First House, and Anastasia pulled on that string not knowing what it was.
This last section is 90% a wild guess, but I THINK it fits with Harrow telling John in NtN (John 5:4) that he βwatched them misunderstand the processβ so hereβs my shred of canon evidence.
Anyway, hereβs my current Anastasia Theory β to be debunked in 2023
Another way to support and show love to Hudson Williams is to watch and comment on his short films. I'm providing a list below. He didn't act in every film, but he worked on these films in some capacity whether it's in front of the camera or behind the scenes. Please make sure to show love to his co-stars and co-creators too. Also, please pay attention to content warnings.
And⦠Action!
And... Release!
Brim Reaper
Buttons
CHAD GPT
Detective Ultra
Devil Makes Three
Dogging
A Girl Dies
A Heist of the Heart
Hold your Back (TW: Domestic Violence)
Inside Augustine Mendoza's Quotidian Apartment
The Interview
Jump (TW: Depression/Suicidal Ideation)
KTFO
Lights On (Music Video)
Metal Fist Death Punch
Off Objective
Over the Edge (TW: Depression/Suicidal Ideation)
Peace of Mind
Peaceful Protest Turned Heated Rivalry
Sanctuary
Snow Angel (TW: Drugs/Violence)
Soakers (TW: Sexual Content)
Super Support
Supper Support 2
The Ticket

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
awesome awesome interview with Emily Wilson
Party Knight. βοΈ
i need 50 thousands hours of kissing
another week of whatever the fuck this shit is
What, you got tired of looking like shit?
shut up.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
the most important virtues for the young woman are as follows: time theft, selfishness, orgasms, irreverence to authority, sacrilegious behavior, a questioning mind, and eating regular meals.
Born to be the lesbian childfree divorced wine aunt who travels across the world, forced to be a religious Westerosi queen