Hi M! I've been wondering how much your research and history impacts your writing. Basically, if you know your story is set in 1978 in Michigan and you want to reference AC/DC's Back in Black (released in 80) for whatever reason, do you fudge it and just go for it or would you find something else? What if history actively contradicts large parts of your story? Also, thank you so very much for answering questions. I appreciate it more than I can communicate thru a tumblr ask!!
I do pretty meticulous research and Iām a slave to historical accuracy. I will spend six months or more doing research before I even start writing, continue to do research throughout the process (especially as I stumble on things I hadnāt thought to investigate before), and keep doing research even after Iāve done ten drafts of the book. Iāve been doing research for a book thatās in its fifteenth draft now since September of 2016. Do I make mistakes? Inevitably. But consciously āfudgingā is not something Iām ever going to do. I respect history too much for that. Itās a major part of my academic background and willfully ignoring it just isnāt something Iām capable of. Hereās why that isnāt usually a problem: I donāt write stories that contradict history, because the stories I write which have a historical element are inspired by history, not written in spite of it. Writing any form of historical fictionāeven/especially if youāre writing within living historyāis an absolutely enormous amount of work, and doing it for any other reason than because youāre inspired, fascinated, and obsessed by that history doesnāt make any sense. (More hereĀ and under the research tag; but Iād start with older posts and work forwards.)
Disclaimer: this is just my own personal approach, and like I said, itās informed by my academic background. This isnāt theĀ ārightā way to do it, just my way of doing it. Some authors have made whole careers writing anachronism.Ā