Revenge Gay

all of the numbers that are divisible by 17 sound so absurd. 51? 68? 85? ridiculous. 102? absolutely not. and don't even get me started on 119

34 and 136 i can believe, but i feel like i shouldn’t. it’s 102 in a trench coat

did we just run out of posts to make

no, i haven't made a post about every number yet

I'm sorry to let you know that 100,000,001 (one hundred million and one) is divisible by 17 and because of that, so is every 16-digit number that is four digits repeated four times e.g. 1234123412341234

Dividing by 17 in-general is insane behavior. This is eldritch math, so of course it’s gunna have wild outcomes. This is truly an info-hazard. I’m gunna see a number in the wild, wonder if 17 is lurking in there, and if I whip out my phone calculator and it’s true I’m going to LOSE IT.

A PORN BOT UNFOLLOWED ME?

you people aren't CASTING

we really should be calling it fanworks, not content

I'm here for fun and community not to rp a mega corporation's underpaid social media intern

genuinely really funny when twerfs believe that porn is what proliferates misogyny. how do they think this interacts with gay men and their misogyny. like do we think it's perhaps from societal structures, centuries of discrimination leading to straightforward advantages for men (and sometimes women) for performing misogyny (which also affects marginalized men who, you know, sometimes, wouldn't ever really interact with porn about women) or is it the consumption of erotic art which often has women in it or is just straight up made by women. which not every man consumes.

noticing that porn often has misogyny in it and concluding that it is a corrupting force that causes or exacerbates misogyny, and not like, concluding that societal forces of misogyny cause people to put misogyny in their porn

do we kill fashion as an artform because fashion has a lot of misogyny in it

whoever wrote this paper has the funniest phrasing possible

happy turtle bit off a cop’s toe in the hudson river day for those who celebrate

A CENTURY AGO

discussion about right wing radicalisation focuses near-exclusively on men becoming white nationalists but i wonder how it might manifest elsewhere. like, imagine a heavily online subculture of mostly women and they're dedicated to rooting out degeneracy, maintaining a rigid social order, refusing to acknowledge scientific consensus, being violently paranoid of a dehumanised other, adhering to exclusively eurocentric standards of beauty and politically dedicated to exterminating a minority group (possibly one that was already historically targeted for genocide). that'd be fuckin crazy lol

It's amazing how you made a post saying radfems are just like nazis, and then someone went into the comments to call you a slur to prove it.