pump up the jam

attaching negative connotations to that word will restrict your self efficacy and make you live a miserable impoverished life.

it’s a female anti pattern for power to resent selfishness in others and annihilate it in yourself. Listen, everyone has to look out for themselves. Sure, I might dislike another person who’s stepped on me, but I respect the hustle, and I’ll do the same as them when I get the chance to.

there’s absolutely zero merit in purposely restricting what you can and can’t do in order to avoid being called ‘selfish’

Also, chow mein noodles are ideal as a starch, they were literally made for stir fry. Chow is Chinese for stir fry, and mein is Chinese for wheat noodle.

But rice noodles, rice, potatoes, macaroni (or any small pasta. Don't knock it till you try it!) all good as a starch for stir fry.

For veg, carrots, celery, brocolli, cauliflower, baby corn, green beans, snow peas are all great stir fry veg.

For meat, ideally you wanna marinate for at least an hour before you cook it. Just with some salt, soy sauce, chicken/veg stock powder, and corn starch (for keeping meat tender). You can marinate tofu as well.

I'm looking at my lists and I was trying to be helpful, but I realize, you straight up can stir fry anything. So go forth, and stir some edible crap in a hot pan with oil. 💚

Majority of ai bros are men.

If they use something it means everyone uses it.

For techbros, protesting ai and using it isn't illogical, because hypocrisy is NORMAL.

When men meme about protecting Latino men, they meme about protecting their buddies, the guys. They meme about them being equal, being human

If a man says a "joke" he actually thinks like that or he would do it.

If moid "jokes" in front of women, he's gauging their reaction and tolerance to his depravity.

Woodhouse’s Toad (Anaxyrus woodhousii), family Bufonidae, Otero County, South Central U.S.

He does not see the point in reading fiction. He says there is nothing to gain and non fiction is superior. I asked him what books has he read/is currently reading. His response “I don’t read I listen to podcasts”

He thinks art, cinema and television are frivolous

He considers himself cultured

He thinks women should be dependent on men. “Yes they can have their autonomy to cook and clean and stuff but they should lean on us”

He says his ideal relationship involves his gf not working and women should have an existence that is stress free. Men handle stress better. I pointed out that the current male suicide rates paint a different picture. He just kinda stared at me

When I pointed out that women ought to work bc the hand that feeds you can also starve you and slap you, he said “do you really still believe in domestic violence? That’s rooted in fear.” And I showed him a few domestic violence stats and he said “maybe we don’t have the full picture”

He says that women are more emotional and men are more logical. I pointed out “have you ever seen what happens when you tell a man no I’m not interested?” And he paused and said “okay but that’s not emotional tho, that’s anger”. I showed him a few family annihilator news clips and he’s like “again, those men aren’t emotional, they’re angry”

He says that women choose to not pursue an education. I pointed out that I just graduated with an engineering degree, our other coworker just got her masters, another one is going back for her PhD and another will be taking the BAR in two years. I also mentioned that black women in America are amongst the fastest growing highly educated demographic. He then pivoted to “degrees are worthless, you don’t need one to earn 6 figures”

I am angry, therefore I'm logical. I'm logical therefore I am correct.

The follow up questions are:

• Do you think this is an isolated incident?

• If it is, how would you know for sure?

(Use the word for what they really are - children - no one wants to admit to being a pedophile and when they realise they are you either stop them or show them for the pedophiles they really are.

The pedophiles will always try to explain away how teenagers and ‘almost-legal’ girls are basically the same as legally aged women. Follow this up with: So if 17 is okay because it’s almost 18 does it follow that 16 is okay because it’s nearly 17 which is basically the same as 18? Then 15 is basically 16… 14 is basically 15… 13… 12… 11… where does the line get drawn if crossing the line is okay? And if crossing the line is okay when it is close enough - then wherever a new line is drawn will it also be okay to cross? Where does it stop? Where is your actual bottom line of what’s okay?

Do you think sex trafficking in porn is an isolated incident? If it is, how would you know for sure? If it’s not, what is the acceptable number of forced and raped women and children you would accept in your porn?