it's been observed many times before but man it is kind of funny that Americans were so galled about the idea of foreign interference in the presidential election. Fuckkkkkk who would do something like that... Truly shameful behavior what kind of monstrous government would do something like that
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
can we bring back the term "fair-weather friend" bc I feel like if fair-weather friends got called that more this whole argument about whether or not you should be there for your friends when it's inconvenient/at what point of personal inconvenience it's ok to bail on your friends would kinda fall apart bc like. we literally have a word for "friend who's only there when you don't need something from them" because the baseline expectation is that a friend should be there even when it sucks. like we used to make fun of people for bailing on their friends.
Every diaspora reactionary cheering on regime change wouldn’t find it as funny if a foreign power like China bombed American schools because our police and federal agents kill protesters, a crime they’ve absolutely been guilty of.
Wonder why there’s a double standard here, is bombing children not bad? Is it only acceptable to bomb children when it overlaps with America’s imperialist desires to control the governments, people and resources of a region? Is that why it’s acceptable to bomb children in Gaza and Iran but the idea that any government would bomb our nation for its crimes against its people is so absurd as to be unthinkable, impossible, politically laughable? Why?
There's a tendency in IR discourse that I've noticed where the fact that many so-called “authoritarian regimes” curtail what is often labelled as the “freedom of speech” of individuals is framed as evidence of some innate illegitimacy, often presented as a desperate gambit to maintain the power of those in control. I think this is a fundamental mistake. So-called “democratic” countries can afford free speech because they exist within a normative hierarchy stabilised by international institutions, the primacy of their economic systems, and, of course, an as yet unchallenged position within the world order. This makes them more resilient to ideological destabilisation, not because of any innate moral superiority of their systems or ideologies, but because they occupy a materially and normatively privileged position within a particular historical context. As the material power of this world order declines, its normative power follows suit, and this is already evident as states long self-styled as bastions of free speech become less willing to tolerate dissent, from the US to Germany, while at the same time states considered repressive begin experimenting with gradually opening space for discourse.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Do you believe that Jewish people are the one and only group of natives who do not deserve to live in their origin country? Do you think land back does not apply to them? Do you think only Palestinians have the right to self determination and their homeland? Do you know that the history is that both groups are indigenous and all historical evidence demonstrates that?
Do you not understand what the word native mean? Do you think it's okay to murder Palestinians and starve children to death because you some guy from Poland made Aliyah and now he thinks he's "native"
There are literal converts who will go to Israel and steal land from Palestinians. There is constantly settler violence happening against Palestinians
Stop trying to excuse the genocide especially with words you don't understand
Land back is when Shlomo from Williamsburg joins the IDF so he can kill Palestinians and take their land and then protest for the right to rape prisoners
And no none of this applies to Israelis. You can't be a settler colonial project and claim to be indigenous. That's not how it works
Land back is when the Israeli government offers you tax benefits, monetary incentives, and the protection of the IDF to move from Europe to Israel so you can displace an indigenous family in Palestine.
Land back is also when you destroy millions of olive trees since 1967 and kill Palestinian farmers who have been taking care of this land for generations
If criminals don't get to have human rights, then the people in charge of deciding what a criminal is get to decide who is and is not human. Do you understand? Is this not blindingly obvious? Do you care?
Or do you assume you will always be "one of the good ones"?
I read this column by Chris Hedges that I wanted to share.
He makes a great argument about how Zionists have weaponized the holocaust and transformed it into an industry that uses it to justify the actions of Israel instead of using it to learn from history.
I agree with how he points out the fact that Holocaust institutions and scholars have largely failed to condemn the genocide in Gaza and turned "Never Again" into "Never again for Jews"
It's a great read and there is also this video that is worth watching
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I still can't stop thinking about this even though it's months gone but I just have to say it and it will always be indicative of how Americans, leftists or not, will always fall short of seeing non Americans as humans.
One of the most grotesque things about the reaction to Khamenei’s assassination was watching Americans immediately pivot into fantasising about a “secular Iran” or a “free Iran” before the blood had even dried.
Not mourning the dead. Not acknowledging the 160 schoolgirls killed. Not reckoning with the fact that this violence was inflicted on actual human beings. Just instantly launching into imperial wish-fulfilment: maybe NOW Iran can become the version of the country WE want it to be.
And it revealed something deeply ugly about how Americans engage with the rest of the world politically. Entire countries only exist to them as symbols in their own ideological narratives. Iran is not a real place full of people with complicated political histories, internal movements, contradictions, factions, and trauma. It becomes a blank screen for western projection: oppressed women waiting for western liberation, secular democracy waiting to be “unlocked,” grateful citizens waiting to be saved through bombs and assassinations.
It is such a profoundly unserious and anti-intellectual way to understand politics. People genuinely talk about regime collapse like they are discussing a season finale instead of the destabilisation of an 90+ million person country with enormous ethnic, religious, regional, and geopolitical complexity. They do not study history. They do not learn from Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, or literally any other intervention where western fantasies about liberation produced mass death and instability. They reduce politics to aesthetics: “religious government bad, secular government good,” as though societies can simply be traumatically shocked into becoming western liberal democracies overnight.
But more than stupidity, it was the speed of the dehumanisation that was horrifying. Americans could not even pause their fantasies long enough to process the bloodshed THEY were celebrating. The deaths themselves became secondary to the imagined outcome. The massacre was reframed as potentially “worth it” if it created the Iran they wanted to see.
That is the logic of empire in its purest form: other people’s suffering becomes acceptable, even exciting, if it can be turned into political transformation desirable to the west.
And the sickest part is how casually this mindset appears. People say these things like they are discussing sports trades or fictional worldbuilding, completely detached from the reality that the “birth” of their ideal secular state would come through terror, mourning, orphaned children, destroyed families, and mass instability.
The ideal image they had of a “free Iran” was built, in their minds, directly on top of the bodies they helped justify.
every day it just concerns me how little compassion people have. no compassion for those living in the global south. no compassion for immigrants. no compassion for disabled ppl. no compassion for addicts. no compassion for prisoners. no compassion for children. like holy shit ...
i made a separate post about this but actually there are plenty of people cough white people who care about animals more than they ever do human people . not what i'm talking about make your own post
I know it’s petty at this point, but I genuinely despise tumblr/bluesky liberal Zionists like afurioushawk and short-wooloo. Like, I’m sorry, LBJ a good president and good man?! Deregulation and Shah of Iran stooge Carter? Crime bill Clinton?! Knowing that this person is a Star Wars blogger, they probably think Nixon started the Vietnam War, like most liberals, as Lucas based Palpatine off Nixon. Nixon and Kissinger are burning in hell for their crimes against Vietnam, Chile, Cambodia and Laos, but Nixon didn’t start the war, his two democratic predecessors, JFK and LBJ, along with his old boss that is treated as the good republican by liberals, Eisenhower, started it. My Lai occurred under LBJ and he and JFK propped up genocidal dictatorships in Brazil, Greece and Indonesia in the name of anti communism.
How the Washington-backed Indonesian mass killings of 1965 reshaped global politics, securing a decisive victory for U.S. interests against
That person screenshotted above is known for crying racism at any criticism of their favorite fictional characters, the Jedi order, because Lucas used eastern philosophy when crafting them but they are fine with real Asians being slaughtered as long as a democrat does it. I swear these people don’t study history because if they did, they wouldn’t be liberals. Liberal revisionism treats the Vietnam War as a well intentioned mistake and not one of the many acts of imperialist violence America committed. I used to own this book, The Spitting Image, that examined the way the US rewrote the Vietnam narrative as a noble cause and the spat on veteran story that’s used to vilify anti war sentiment, which is still relevant with the Free Palestine Movement being deemed antisemitic by liberals.
One parallel between the 60s and now is Biden and LBJ being terrible people and racist imperialist scumbags who have millions of liberals defending them while they left in disgrace. Trump and Nixon are/were POS but Biden and LBJ were so bad that they created the material conditions that elected them. Not unlike how liberals and Never Trumpers co-opted the anti Trump sentiment, democrats only got on board with the anti war movement when Nixon was elected. RFK sr, who himself wasn’t great for wiretapping MLK and attempting to assassinate Castro, took a lot of heat for running against LBJ and the war in the 1968 primaries. We weren’t even allowed to have primaries last year which is why we got stuck with Harris as the candidate.
Democrats only supported civil rights legislation because the USSR called America on its hypocrisy of promoting itself as the “free world” while oppressing its nonwhite citizens. Carter was terrible, and his humanitarian image is a false cover for his blood soaked legacy. Same with Gerald Ford’s legacy as a nice guy. He was proto Reagan on economics, being the first neoliberal president who supported deregulation, and Clinton would continue that by cutting welfare programs and passing the crime bill. Not to mention JFK, his brother Ted, Biden and Clinton all having sexual harassment allegations against them but only Trump’s are called out by the liberals who attack Palestinians and leftists for the false r*pe accusations on October 7th.
After living for a full century, Jimmy Carter now lies in dignified repose, awaiting the pomp and pageantry of a state funeral. Worms will s
This is just proof that these liberals only care about what happens in the United States and don’t care if the president is a bloodthirsty monster, as long as they’re a democrat who makes mild concessions to western queer rights. They don’t care about brown people being bombed and slaughtered as they will shout down victims of America with their Russian bots talking point. They defend Obama not shutting down Guantánamo and drone striking the ME while weaponizing anti black racism accusations at critics of him and Harris. They act as if the democratic presidents have no control over getting legislation passed and act as if leftists are dumb and don’t understand how congress works yet treat Trump as the Antichrist who can do whatever he wants.
Afurioushawk is straight up dishonest about the left, lumping in actual Marxists with socdems like Bernie and Mamdani and lying about what we stand for. Like all liberals, he’s obsessed with claiming the left treats revolution akin to the Christian rapture and complains we haven’t started it yet. Him defending Harris imprisoning people reeks of transmisogyny as he claims the left is mad about her locking up “r*pists”. Harris, despite what liberals insist, very much put trans women in men’s prisons which got them killed in some cases and denied them treatment. Liberals will cry “purity testing” at people against genocide and bigotry and are violently Islamophobic to the uncommitted movement, who they blame for Harris’ loss. For more proof of these people’s transmisogyny and willful ignorance I’ll just leave these here for you to see:
It’s as delusional as those who treat FDR, LBJ and Bernie as the true socialists and not Lenin, Stalin and Mao. “Most progressive left wing president” my *ss. If the most progressive president we could have is a racist, Zionist union buster, then the US deserves Trump who rips the mask off and shows how evil and corrupt this country has always been.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
May 21, 2026 - Gusano and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio posted a video addressed to Cubans claiming there’s no oil blockade by the USA, and that their problems are caused by the Cuban government in stead. Needless to say, it didn’t land well with Cubans who are living through blackouts that became far worse after the USA began stopping oil from getting to the island. [video]