this in the singularity
Someone is legit going to get deradicalized as a kink
whatever it takes, man
EXPECTATIONS
KIROKAZE
todays bird
Mike Driver
Not today Justin
tumblr dot com
đŞź

Love Begins
Game of Thrones Daily
h
occasionally subtle
RMH
The Stonewall Inn

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ

izzy's playlists!
Keni

titsay
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from France

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil

seen from Netherlands

seen from T1

seen from Puerto Rico

seen from Canada

seen from France

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Morocco
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Pakistan

seen from Iraq
seen from Lebanon
@elegantruinsfun
this in the singularity
Someone is legit going to get deradicalized as a kink
whatever it takes, man

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Age-old advice which is more relevant nowadays rather than less. This is the second iteration of it though. The original version is: âNever write anything in a letter you wouldnât want to see in print.â Advice handed down by my mother from her forbears.
âI have no clue why women are so scared these days.â
seriously though
Can we just say âmentally ill people are dangerousâ instead of âmenâ are dangerous? Because if youâll notice, not every single man on the planet is out slitting throats and threatening shootings. Shut up with this âall men are murderersâ bullshit. Generalizing never helped anyone.
âHOW DARE YOU NOT IMPLY EVERY SINGLE MAN ON THE PLANET OUT OF 7 BILLION PEOPLE IS A MONSTER!!!1!!!â
-Tumblr
*sigh* Here we go again
Woman kills man for refusing to give her beerÂ
Woman stabs man for refusing to have sex with her, threatens to cry rapeÂ
Woman rips off manâs testicle because he rejected her, tried to swallow it
Woman kills man for refusing to marry herÂ
Woman cuts off manâs penis because of argumentÂ
Woman shoots her husband after argumentÂ
Woman cuts off cheating boyfriendâs penis, flushes it
Woman suspects husband of cheating, stabs him to deathÂ
Woman shoots, kills boyfriend for cheatingÂ
Woman stabs boyfriend for cheating in Monopoly board gameÂ
Woman shoots, kills man for ending relationshipÂ
Woman sets husbandâs genitals on fire for hugging another woman, diesÂ
Woman kills, dismembers husbandâs body over argumentÂ
Mother kills 18-month old twins to get back at husband she thought was cheatingÂ
Woman kills husband after he confronts her about affairÂ
Woman kills cheating husband with lethal dose of heroinÂ
Woman runs over, kills cheating husbandÂ
Obese woman sits on boyfriend, kills him and avoids jail timeÂ
Woman kills boyfriend with stiletto shoe
Woman murders cheating husband with coffee mugÂ
Woman kills boyfriend for not buying her a giftÂ
Woman kills boyfriend who accused her of cheatingÂ
Woman stabs and kills boyfriend , Judge: âI hope you die in prisonâ
Woman shoots, kills ex-boyfriend, buries him in pile of debrisÂ
Woman shoots boyfriend in the back of the neck, killing himÂ
Woman shoots boyfriend six times, kills him after argumentÂ
Woman stabs, kills boyfriend over motherâs day giftÂ
Woman stabs boyfriend to death, also stabbed her husband to death 7 years prior
Woman pushes way into home, stabs boyfriend to death over argumentÂ
Woman angry at boyfriend takes her anger out on his 4 year-oldÂ
Woman stabs boyfriend to death, thought he was cheating on herÂ
Woman bludgeons husband to death with hammer to pay back loanÂ
Woman stabs, kills boyfriend during argumentÂ
Woman murders boyfriend for tweeting out his female crushÂ
Woman shoots and kills boyfriend, kills self while out on bailÂ
Woman stabs to death boyfriend over argument about an exÂ
Woman stabs and kills boyfriend for social media postsÂ
Woman shoots boyfriend in the face, fails to make it look like suicideÂ
Woman kills boyfriendâs puppies during phone argument
Woman shoots boyfriend in the face with rifle during argumentÂ
Woman pushes boyfriend off fence after argument, killing himÂ
Woman attacks boyfriend with large knife, intent to killÂ
Woman abused, threatens to kill boyfriend in sleep
Woman beats, murders boyfriend and puts him in freezer because he wanted to break up with her
Woman held gun to boyfriendâs head, murders on ChristmasÂ
Woman with previous assault charge on another boyfriend stabs and kills different boyfriendÂ
Woman attempts to murder boyfriend with giant breastsÂ
Woman stabs boyfriend in neck, killing him after argumentÂ
Woman chokes and stabs ex-boyfriends cat to deathÂ
Woman starts argument with boyfriend, stabs and kills with umbrellaÂ
Woman kills boyfriend with her car after argumentÂ
Woman shoots, kills boyfriend in his bathroomÂ
Woman shoots, kills boyfriend with illegal handgunÂ
Woman sets her boyfriend on fire, killing himÂ
Woman shoots and kills ex-boyfriend multiple times, kills herself
Woman shoots boyfriend in the head, found out he was dating other womenÂ
Woman stabs and kills boyfriend over financesÂ
Woman stabs and kills boyfriendâs lizard because she thought he was flirting with other womenÂ
Woman shoots, kills boyfriend who wanted to end their relationship and urged her to get an abortionÂ
Woman attempts to murder husband with poison in her vagina
Woman stabs boyfriend to death after he slaps daughter
Woman conspires to have secret lover murder her husband
Woman stabs, kills boyfriend over argument on Labor Day
Woman stabs boyfriend in the chest over argumentÂ
Woman stabs boyfriend to death after finding photos of other women on cell phoneÂ
Woman tortured ex-boyfriendâs dog until it died after argumentÂ
Woman stabs boyfriend in his chest and through his lung, nearly killing himÂ
Woman fatally stabs boyfriend during heated argumentÂ
Woman kills her boyfriend with blunt force trauma to the head using frying pan
Woman stabs boyfriend to death for drinking her beerÂ
Woman strangles boyfriend to death during argumentÂ
Woman stabs boyfriend with serrated knife over argumentÂ
Woman shoots, murders boyfriend while she was on house arrest for another murder 11 years priorÂ
Woman stabs, kills boyfriend then texts friend about eating the bodyÂ
Woman stabs, kills boyfriend over disputeÂ
Woman shoots boyfriend in the head, suspecting he was cheatingÂ
Woman shoots man in the groin after argumentÂ
Woman fires handgun into the home of man who denied her a kissÂ
Woman stabs husband to death over cheating fearsÂ
Woman shoots, kills ex-boyfriend and his new girlfriendÂ
Women kills husband, commits suicideÂ
Woman shoots and kills man over argumentÂ
Woman kills husband with baseball bat for talking back to herÂ
Woman kills husband, confesses to family then shoots herselfÂ
Woman stabs boyfriend 31 times after he said exâs name in his sleepÂ
Woman shoots husband in the head, shoots herselfÂ
Woman kills boyfriend over argument at house partyÂ
Woman shoots boyfriend with shotgun for texting another womanÂ
Woman kills boyfriend because she âsmelled sex on himâÂ
Woman runs over boyfriend, kills him
Woman stabs boyfriend in the eye for turning down threesomeÂ
Woman stabs ex-boyfriend for refusing to stop playing the EaglesÂ
Woman stabs boyfriend, throws out his prosthetic legs so he canât chase herÂ
Woman ties up, stabs husband 193 times, jury finds her guilty for suspicion of trying to claim life insuranceÂ
Woman stabs fiance for refusing to take her to the liquor storeÂ
Woman assaults and threatens boyfriend with knife for not cuddlingÂ
Woman stabs man with ceramic squirrel for not bring home beerÂ
Woman stabs taxi driver after he refuses to have sex with herÂ
Woman stabs ex-boyfriend in his penis after discovering he had a new girlfriend
Woman stabs boyfriend twice over time he spent in bathroomÂ
Woman stabs boyfriend over Facebook postÂ
Woman stabs her boyfriend several times because his dog ate her marijuana stashÂ
Woman stabs boyfriend for not calling her every two hoursÂ
Woman shoots man five times for rejecting her, kills herselfÂ
Woman murders ex-boyfriend with liquor laced with poison, was jealous he was engaged to new womanÂ
Comedian Phil Hartman was murdered by his wife on May 27th 1998
NFL player Steve McNair was murdered by his girlfriend on July 4th, 2009
John Wayne Bobbitt had his penis cut completely off on June 23rd, 1993
Travis Alexander was murdered by Jodi Arias on June 4th, 2008
Andrew Bagby was murdered by Shirley Jane Turner on November 6th, 2001 (She later murdered their 1 year-old son on August 18th, 2003)
Brenda Spencer killed two and injured nine at Cleveland Elementary School on January 29th, 1979
Laurie Dann killed one boy and injured five others at Hubbard Woods Elementary School on May 20th, 1988
Jennifer San Marco killed eight people at Goleta postal facility on January 30th, 2006
Sylvia Seegrist killed three and injured seven during a shooting spree at a Springfield mall on October 30th, 1985
Mary Ann Holder killed five children including her own son in Pleasent Gardens, NC on November 20th, 2011
Jullian Robbins killed one and injured two at Penn State on September 17th, 1997
Heather Smith killed two then committed suicide at Spanaway Junior High School on November 26th, 1985
Latina Williams killed two others then self at Louisiana Technical College on February 8th, 2008
Amy Bishop Anderson killed three and wounded three others at the University of Alabama on February 12th, 2010
Whatâs most interesting though is that mainstream media doesnât even mention female shooters when they claim to show the history of the crime â but I guess theyâre going by high scores. While its true that most shooting sprees are committed by males, it is also true that most child abuse, neglect, and murders are committed by females.
Women who killed or attempted to kill children in the news, past 30 days (US):
Florida woman shoots, kills her 2 teenage sonsÂ
Mother throws 1 year-old daughter under truck, kills herÂ
California mom stabs her 3 daughters to death. all under 2 years old
Mother attempts to kill her 3 teenage childrenÂ
Mother kills her infant son by stabbing him to deathÂ
Woman kills 2 year-old girl, attempts to kill 10 year-old boyÂ
Utah mom murders 6 newborns, keeps them in garageÂ
Mother charged with trying to suffocate daughterÂ
Woman charged for killing 8-month old babyÂ
Women who killed or attempted to kill children in the news between January and April 2014 (US):
Mother drowns both of her sons aged 3 and 6Â
Mother attempts to drown her 3 children in oceanÂ
Utah mother shoots and kills two teen daughters, then herselfÂ
Mother suffocates 14 month old son, fails at attempted suicideÂ
Woman babysitter murders 19 month old boyÂ
Mom kills 7 month old daughter, blames JesusÂ
Woman operating illegal daycare responsible for 3 month old girlâs death, police find 14 children in her basementÂ
Mom strangles 3 day old baby boy, discarded body in trashcanÂ
Woman suffocates 2 year old girl of fiance, fakes sexual assault by unknown assailant to cover tracksÂ
Mother charged with killing 2 year-old daughterÂ
Mother of several children with history of violence murdered and buried 2 year-old daughter in shallow graveÂ
Mother stabs and kills her 2 children in exorcismÂ
Mother kills her teen son and daughter, selfÂ
Mother confesses to killing 10 year-old sonÂ
Mother tortures and kills 3 year-old son, burned genitals with lighter
Feminists need to stop turning things that both genders perpetrate and happen to both genders into gendered issues.
And no, not all women irrationally fear half the human peoulation based on the actions of a few. Way to make a sexist generalization, OP.
Also, the vast majority of assault and murder victims are still men, no matter how much folks like OP cherry pick headlines and remove them from context.
Not to mention how the amount of actual men who assault a woman over rejection is miniscule.
Have you ever noticed that dubson has no idea how to establish a exciting world for the stories to take place in. Like take alex ze pirate as a example, If you put them into usual kinda setting for pirate stories, she makes no sense and also wouldn't be respected as a pirate because shes a woman, but i imagin if you bring this up for the whole argument that she is a woman in a pirate setting usualy dominated by men, dubs would go beyond the defence
You should see when he talked about rebooting the comic and posted a map of the world.
He specifically named countries and cities after Anita Sarkesian, Zoe Quinn, Brianna Wu, ect; bragged about it; and even tagged said people to brag about it. Not even joking.
HOLY SHIT HE REALLY ISNâT JOKING
Some highlights
Sarkeesland and its capital, Anita Hall
The country the main characters come from is Sapphos (because Dobson wasnât fetishizing lesbians enough already)
Fuckinâ DOBSHIRE
The fact that his series about pirates is set in a huge landmass with no other continents and only one island
Fortress of Domination. Iâm surprised there isnât an Inflation Tower or Castle Furry.
Ragnar Rock (wow, such creativity)
Tortreega (I bet thatâs where Captain Jock Spirrow lives)
Hnif Kjalka? How the fuck do you pronounce that?
LOL Aceca Burgers
âDunhanâ? I know Dobs has a questionable taste on female idols, but I thought not even he would be enough of a dipshit to stan Lena Dunham
Skibitty
Riverwood and White Watch Tower (âHello, Bethesda Softwareâs legal department? I think you might wanna take a look at thisâ)
Malala Mt.
Shinning Meadow (sic)
The rest of the names seem to be taken from a random fantasy name generator or something
And, of course, the random LOTR Elven text at the corner. Because this map isnât clichĂŠ enough.
Huh, must have missed this when it was first reblogged. Sorry about that.
But yeah, hereâs the proof I wasnât just bullshiting you guys. Thanks @starkillerrx
I pity the Dob.
Someone shared this lovely post on Reddit and for whatever reason someone commented this:
It absolutely is your responsibility to give your partner physical affection. Partners are supposed to be loving and affectionate with each other. If you expect your man to be affectionate with you and comfort you when youâre down, then why shouldnât he expect you to do the same? Loving your partner isnât âsolving all of their problems,â itâs being a good partner.
âThe trauma that stems from not being lovedâ, so your solution to a man that wasnât loved is toâŚnot love them and force them to figure out how to love themselves without any support or assistance or guidance from the people in their lives that are SUPPOSED to love them? Honey. If this person is in your life, you are supposed to love them and they are supposed to love you. Love is a two way street. Also. If you are worried about a man having you the significant other as their only source of emotional support, you talk to them about it and help them find other sources of emotional support, YOU DONâT CUT OFF THAT SOURCE OF SUPPORT AND MAKE THEM HAVE NO SOURCES JUST BECAUSE YOU DONâT WANT TO BE THE ONLY SOURCE! This kind of stuff makes no sense to me. âThis person is dying of starvation and the only one nearby with food that could help them is me and they are someone I care about, but I donât like that so instead I am going to hide my food from them as wellâ
"You'd be shocked how many guys think it's a good idea to rely on their partner as their sole source of emotional support"
Do you hear yourself? Where is he supposed to get other sources of emotional support from if he's already been deprived of all the normal ones??
And of course Thex chimes in with his 0-Kelvin takes;
This you?
Nope.
Your take was still dumb guilt by association, no matter how many strangers you think I am. And given your misandric track record, probably motivated by sexism.
Defend it or be quiet. Because you sure seemed to be implying the sentiment is wrong just because you can link it to Bad People.â˘
Not that I plan to listen either way.
Okay so...
what exactly was supposed to be wrong with that deviantart?
Yes yes, I know, kinky transformation fetish art, I get that! But. It's entirely unrelated to the conversation at hand and does nothing to refute anything stated.
It's just Exo being the creepy fucking weirdo who should never touch another human being that he usually is.
Oh, and: Yes. You are required to give your partner physical affection. Not sex, but actual physical contact is so important to relationships and marriages that trying to force people to withhold it is called 'Alienation of Affection' and you can be SUED for it.
And the very act is called 'Emotional Abandonment' and yeah jesus fuck Exo really does advocate for utterly one-sided loveless marriages. Which to be fair, is probably the only kind of marriage his fucked up ass could ever have.
Itâs to show that Sir, if he and Nequ are actually the same person, has addictive tendencies and my response likely struck a nerve with him. Only addicts have folders full of smut.
Alienation of affection requires someone outside the marriage to be interfering, and is only actionable in six states anymore.
The one previous partner of mine who willingly gave me affection without prompting also propositioned me. If I want to have a full relationship that isnât centered around intercourse, itâll almost certainly be with someone whoâll make me work towards affection of any kind. And Iâm ok with that. It means Iâll be with someone who is patient and knows her value. So thatâs not as much of a gotcha as you think.
Didn't I block you, you incredibly creepy fuckwhistle?
Because going from the top, you're listing 'is willing to show you affection and care, without hesitation' as a BAD thing. (And yes, I too think any woman who knows their value truly shouldn't ever want to touch you in any way, whatsoever.)
Telling women that 'they should not show affection towards their partners, and that their partners are harmful for wanting it' it IS being someone outside the marriage interfering with it. What the fuck do you think these terms mean?
And finally: You picked a random person off of deviantart, accused someone of being that, and then treated 'No, I'm not, and what's your point?' as some kind of 'striking a nerve'.
But then again, you treated my being a bisexual woman as some kind of gotcha, as if that's proof of my moral degeneracy, so honestly I'm lumping this in with 'you're an excessively creepy fuckwagon'.
I'm blocking you now, yet again, because you're a living stain on the face of humanity and the moment you learn that you're actively harming those around you and either change or lock yourself away in a padded cell cannot come TOO SOON.
> You picked a random person off of deviantart, accused someone of being thatÂ
Well, not entirely random.
Iâve deliberately been lying and implying, so attempted doxxers end up looking at Nequ. But only if they were really crazy and dedicated.
(I donât even know who she really is.)
Also, I've made a shocking discovery!
Well? What do you have to say for yourself? And myself?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Given the recent speculation that HBO is going to produce a Harry Potter TV show, I'm just going to remind everyone that everything after the Harry Potter books (even some of the original movies tbph) has been disappointing, even for â maybe even especially for â devoted fans.
Everyone was hyped for Pottermore, and then it turned out to be pretty boring. The Sorting Hat/wand/etc. parts were interesting but, in retrospect, were just Buzzfeed quizzes but with cooler graphics. The rest was a slow walkthrough of the books that everyone who was there had already read. There is a reason why it no longer exists.
Everyone was hyped for The Cursed Child, and then it turned out to just be completely nonsensical, OOC-ridden fanfiction. I don't think I even need to elaborate on this point.
Everyone was hyped for Fantastic Beasts, and then it turned out to be utterly terrible. Well, the first one was mediocre with some serious flaws. Allegedly the third one was better than the second one, but given how bad the second one was, that's like saying that cold toast tastes better than a small pile of shredded toilet paper.
And this is not even getting into the bigotry. This is purely technical criticism of the works themselves. And they still sucked!
Regardless of whether you simply don't care about her transphobia or if you hate it and are wracked with guilt about your residual nostalgia, it's the same fucking song and dance we've done for over twenty fucking years.
Stop trying to kick the fucking football.
I completely forgot the third Fantastic Beasts movie happened.
Did it happen?
Just an experiment. Reblog if you actually give a fuck about male victims of domestic violence and rape.
Of fucking course
What sick bastard doesnât
âYouâd be surprisedâ, said Xaldien, who just lost four followers and received a lovely âmen canât be rapedâ anon shortly after reblogging this the first time.
Yowch, disgusting.
If I donât reblog this, assume Iâm dead.
Always reblog this
If you Dont reblog this if u see it then i cant call u my friend
IF ANYONE TELLS ME THAT MEN CANâT BE VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND RAPE, I AM SICKENED BY THEIR MERE PRESENCE ON MY BLOG.
If you disagree with me, unfollow my blog, block me and never look at my blog again.
If you want to debate about this or send anonâs about this, I will reply but your actions have consequences.
Out of 19000+ followers I have, only one of you actually reblogged about this issue, yet a lot of you have reblogged and liked a picture by playboy about catcalling and that how men should never do it.
Additionally, I have received abuse in my ask box (which I will be answering when I can) and threats. In particular death threats and rape threats.
I can see the real problem here already. Male domestic violence and rape is just invisible in our society because we donât want to talk about this because it just damages the status quo of this fucking website.
Iâm a male victim of child sexual abuse. We matter. Please, reblog this.
Please never forget male victims are real and it can happen to everyone/anyone
Make sure the romance is there on both sides people
Screw people who donât believe in male rape.
Everyone can be raped and denying that because of your childish, pathetic hatred for men is quite frankly disgusting.
We should care about our mens just as much as our womens.
I canât believe there are people who wonât reblog thisâŚ
of fucking course
Who wouldnât reblog?
Holy shit⌠Look at all these deactivated users. It really says something, huh?
Look, if you were sexually abused, or harassed, or raped, you can take comfort in knowing, regardless of gender, that I will be here to help you however I can, even if itâs just to help you smile again with my dumb shitposts.
Women and men can be raped. They shouldnât, but it happens, and when it does, we need to help each other out.
Gas prices have come down quite a bit recently. Did anyone give Biden credit for this?
No, because his administration told me he wasn't responsible for gas prices.
Are you telling me they lied to the American people?
I like how Biden gets credit for something he was forced to do, after he opposed domestic oil production.Â
Which, IMO, has a very strong chance of leading to the Russia/Ukraine War which choked supply in the first place.Â
 I also like how the last point is literally "he told CEOs they should do stuff".Â
Something tells me that the right column is leaving facts out.Â
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/house-approves-bill-to-combat-gasoline-price-gougingÂ
>A bill backed by House Democrats would give President Joe Biden authority to declare an energy emergency that would make it unlawful to increase gasoline and home energy fuel prices in an âexcessiveâ or exploitative manner. Â
Ah, there it is. I think I see why the GOP might not want to give Biden more power over the economy.
Oh, sure, they pretend to hate it. But inflation is a useful weapon against Democrats, and rich people and the business lobby benefit from i
> Senator Rick Scott, who chairs the National Republican Senatorial Committee, is ecstatic. âWeâre going to continue to have inflation,â >he told The Wall Street Journal on November 14<, âand then interest rates will go up. This is a gold mine for us.âÂ
So Senator Scott was saying that Biden's apparent screw-ups make the GOP's economic policies look better.Â
Which is, um, true.Â
He was not speaking financially, but politically.Â
Imagine taking a correct criticism of your team and quote-mining it to a sentence fragment so you can make the other team look bad.
And then turning off the reblogs because people called out your lies.
Can someone with more time on their hands go through and report these replies or maybe tell them to die
Free block list in the notes, yall
Also, as someone actually living in Florida, theyâre not banning porn from classrooms. That was already not allowed. Theyâre banning anything that mentions racism and queer folks. Unless you wanna convince me all the math textbooks that are banned from Floridaâs school curriculum had kids counting dicks. But something tells me yâall just see two men holding hands and think of anal sex. And also that youâd immediately abuse your own child if they came out as gay or trans.
But hey. If you genuinely and truly believe that anyone is showing literal porn to elementary school aged children, I dare you to pick up a list of the books banned in Florida schools, read it, and then show me the page where this is happening. And then keep doing that because one slipping past the censors doesnât mean thereâs this epidemic. But itâs less time and energy to just baselessly call me a groomer for being queer. Difference is one shows you actually give a damn about truth and children and the other doesnât require you to give a shit about either. đ
My man bos1boss10 obliterating republicans with one comment
Yes, he certainly owned those people he made up. Meanwhile, in reality, loads of people are explicitly complaining about kids being exposed to explicit sexual content in the name of LGBT activism, not just âgay people existâ.
You can disagree with that, but donât just imagine what you think theyâre like, or blindly believe what other people say theyâre like, and act like you scored.
If a parent really wishes to show sexually explicit content (lgbt or not) to their child (please remember thatâs legally considered as csa), theyâll do so at home. schools should not have such material in the classrooms
(for all seemingly innocent books that may be âbannedâ from school, libraries exists)
Not wanting pornographic material to be shown to grade school kids is fascist, I guess.Â
So, a few things about this. First, itâs 2023. Kids are being shown, and finding themselves by looking, material you would consider pornographic all the time. Not that there is a single standard definition of that, and not that the bar for LGBTQ material to be deemed pornography isnât *much* lower than for straight media anyway.
Second, if by âgrade schoolâ you mean elementary school-where and when? People have been asking for an example since mid-February, and the closest Iâve seen anyone come was a graphic novel depicting same sex relationships and sex acts that was optional reading for high school students.
Third, none of this makes you a fascist by itself, necessarily. Being outraged and targeting queer media for banning while ignoring straight media, even that doesnât make you a fascist. It gives you a notable quality in common with them, though.
So, first thingâs first. The average age of exposure to hardcore porn is something like 12 years old. That ainât right according to any sane standard.  People have been getting prime examples of pornographic material being shown in grade school since before mid-February and theyâre either conspicuously ignoring them altogether or outright denying their existence.  https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/young-kids-being-exposed-to-porn-in-school-parents-shut-down/  None of this either makes you a fascist or even ever-so-slightly aligns you with fascists, period. No oneâs ignoring anything except âqueerâ SLACKtivists who are keen ignoring objective reality and common sense.  None of you throwing around categorically unfounded and provable accusations of being a fascist or âfascist-alignedâ (which are all of them) know what fascism even is or what fascists believe, and donât try to lie to me by saying you do, either. You donât and you know that you donât.Â
As for age of exposure, Iâm not talking about whether itâs right, Iâm insisting you make your claims honestly. This isnât about stopping kids from being exposed to hardcore pornography, because as you note, that ship has sailed. Iâm not even talking about whether or not thatâs a good thing (personally I think sex ed in America is laughable, and this is part of it.) Not that 12 year olds are seeing hardcore pornography in school libraries anyway.
Wow, what an absolutely hot garbage source that doesnât even support the claims youâre making. Aside from it having a bigger tilt than a headline on Breitbart, aside from a reliance on an anonymous source, even this article that you linked talks about high schools and a public library. (Fascinating, a public library, not just âfor the childrenâ).
So yeah, youâre full of shit. Youâve lied about what your own âevidenceâ says. I guess you expected people to read âfar left school boardâ (the first lines), and turn their brains off like you did. Wanting to ban queer media from public libraries-like your own source actually mentioned-DOES have something in common with German fascists. Iâm not sorry youâre uncomfortable with that. Tough shit. Maybe consider being less of a hysterical, homophobic bigot.
As for knowing what a fascist is, well. Thatâs a complicated question, actually. Maybe itâs a little like pornography. Maybe I know it when I see it.
:)
Whether you think so or not, my claims are made honestly. And, yes, kids are seeing hardcore porn either in school or on school devices.  Wow, yet another accurate source that yâall want to ignore because itâs inconvenient for you. So, yeah, youâre confessing that youâre full of shit yourself by falsely accusing me of same and also confessing over lying about what evidence there is, too. No oneâs talking about banning âqueerâ media, either â and no, my source DOESNâT say that â so thereâs nothing to have in common with fascists of any stripe. Iâm not sorry that youâre too uncomfortable with being wholly unable to critique anything you disagree with and have to stoop to demonstrably false accusations of âMuH fAsCiSmâ. Maybe consider less projection.  You clearly wouldnât know pornography when you see it, either.  :DÂ
Holy, you are not posting honestly. Youâre a fucking lying cunt. You lied about what books were in school just like Desantis. The books in question were not porn nor inappropriate.
Youâre not protecting kids. Youâre slandering people.
But please pretend youâre poor victim and everyone who rebuts you is evil
mars1naut says that you should be showing this to your 6-year-old.
She ain't even subtle anymore lmao
had these images attached
she's outright saying she believes queer people are murderers when all we want is to be treated equal. from the murders of queer people, we know murder does not create equality
tweet is from march 16, 2023, for reference
Oh, this immediately set off antisemitic and fascist alarms in my head.
That isn't a dog whistle, that's an air siren.
Iâve been pretty critical of discourse about how Harry Potter was Always Already bad, and will likely continue to be, but in this particular case I think itâs fair to say that Rowlingâs kind of always been like this. There was a good post a long while back about how for all that the novels are about the wizarding world falling to fascism and all that, Gryffindor looks a lot more like how fascists present themselves and Slytherin looks a lot more like how fascists present their enemies. Not just in a facile, âpropaganda portrays its makers as good and its enemies as badâ way, but in the specific virtues and vices on display. The good guys are honest, brave, clean-living types, not homogeneous but definitely normal, while the bad guys are an insidious cabal of underground schemers subject to all sorts of moral perversions.
Thatâs not really unique to fascism, but it is consistently a way the powerful write propaganda against their less powerful enemies, whether itâs Roman aristocrats writing screeds against early Christians, Christians writing them against Jews, or fascist states against communists and democrats. And thatâs really the crux of it: she has a sense of herself as a defender of the underdog, but this is true only so long as the underdogs are normies and the people treading them down are freaks. (I haven't read the whole book, but a plot summary at least would suggest that The Ink Black Heart very much follows this trend: the big bad incarnation of the patriarchy isn't an MP looking to take away the rights of whole swathes of women or anything like that, it's some nasty weirdo incel forum troll.)
She really doesnât seem to have a concept of what itâs like to be a person that normal, polite society hates and wants to suppress, or even that there are people like that who are hated for unjust reasons.
An interesting comparison. Weird that she's doing it while allying with the fascists who are also like that, but who actually do say that their opponents must die.
I. I just...
I want to make this absolutely clear, that I do not support JKR, in any way.
And having said that, I really think it's noteworthy that JKR is bringing up groups and organizations that say 'you have to do what I tell you or I'll hurt you for not having done so'
and you liken it to all queer people are seen of as a threat.
Like, I had to spend the past month watching 1) people get death threats/harassment around a video game. 2) People praising those sending death threats/harassment about a video game, 3) People getting very angry about people pushing back against said death threats/harassment and then 4) People pretending the death threats/harassment never happened.
So the claim 'oh the LGBTQ community just wants equal rights' is both a) valid, and b) a dodge around the fact that people like what she's talking about really exist and they tend to be the people claiming anyone who disagrees with them is a fascist.
Like, I get that nobody wants to admit that the bad people who agree with you exist and are a problem but jesus people.
I think there is an enormous difference between "in literally every group with multiple people, at least one of them is an asshole" and "this group's entire defining reason for existing is wanting you dead".
Are there queers who send death threats? There totally are! Are there many of them, as a proportion of the community? No. You can know hundreds of queer people and get zero death threats about things.
Are there neo-Nazis who want those who oppose them dead or in camps? Yes! Are there neo-Nazis who don't want that? No. Because that's foundational to their ideology.
I do grant that there exist people who are queer and also violent nutjobs, but I really do think that the distinction between "a group maybe 1% of whom are being assholes on the internet, and at most 1% of those are actually willing to take it further" and "a group whose foundational ideology is the destruction of various other groups".
Consider (1) how many queers there are (2) how many neo-Nazis there are. Next, consider (1) how many people have been subject to actual physical violence over playing that game, and (2) how many people were subject to actual physical violence by neo-Nazis for being queer or not-white or something during that same time period.
You'll note that there are many more queers, but the actual amount of violence produced by them, even in absolute terms, is way lower.
The level of violence by queers against people who are not at all threatening them is... Basically the same as or possibly lower than the background level of "humans are just violent sometimes". The level of violence by queers against people who are indirectly supporting people who literally want them dead might be higher, but it's not much higher. It's not until you get to people actively promoting eliminationist philosophies or social policy that you start seeing a noticeable level of actual violence.
Note: I'm not saying that the asshole queers aren't a problem. I'm just saying it's absolutely ridiculous to even suggest that it is a problem that comes within one or two orders of magnitude of the severity of the problem the transphobes and neo-nazis have. And yes, I think it's actually pretty fair to treat those groups as overlapping, because some Nazis showed up at a transphobe rally a couple of days ago, and five consecutive transphobe speakers said exactly zero things to communicate that they didn't think Nazis were great, and I think at that point... It's pretty fair to say "so there was a transphobe and Nazi rally", because you know what, yeah, it is reasonable to expect people to just stop and condemn Nazis if they don't actually want Nazis at their rally.
Now, I'm asking this out of clarity, is your response here?: 'Yes, it happens, but bigger evils exist, so it doesn't matter that it happens.'
Because you didn't disprove her position, you didn't argue she was being hypocritical. You argued that somewhere, somehow, at some rally, some group of transphobes also had nazi's and that because of this, she's wrong and a fascist.
Like you literally see a post where she's decrying nazi's as the worst kind of people, and your rebuttal is 'well, someone else didn't speak about nazi's so!'
And not actually make a point.
The statement 'I'm not saying that the asshole queers aren't a problem.' is fucking laughable when the OP and the people following them are using the statement 'there are asshole queers out there acting like nazi's do' as somehow proof of hatred of all queers everywhere.
Ya know, you made a post about how emotional thinking leads to one making bad decisions, that pressing on to anger makes you overlook things and make unsupported claims.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
âIf someone is against rape, but they think threatening rape towards someone they hate is okay. Then they were never against rape.â
So itâs okay for fascists to want me enslaved or dead, but not for me to hope that those fascists get raped?
Not if you claim to be against rape.
If youâre actually against rape then you think rape is always wrong regardless of context.
If rape is okay against people you donât like youâre not against rape. You just think thereâs an acceptable level of unpleasantness that needs to be reached before you can rape someone.
Nonny, no one wants you enslaved or dead. And nobody in the history of ever who wanted other people raped has been the good guy.
This is why, aside from unproductive venting, I try never to say that pedophiles or rapists should be raped. There's no way to justify rape. It just can't be done. Raping a rapist just creates more rapists.
Execution, on the other hand, can be done ethically. You can execute a pedophile or a rapist and not create a murderer, because ethical execution isn't murder.
âIf youâre actually against rape then you think rape is always wrong regardless of context.â
Something you have to keep in mind when debating leftists is that they literally donât think like this. Despite using the same words, their conception of âgood and evilâ is the exact opposite. To them it is not actions themselves that are moral qualifiers, but identity.
To them the sole moral qualifier is the beneficiary of an action. The ends always justifies the means.ďżź There is always some circumstance to justify any and every action.
Seems like an ideologue/collectivist thing in general.
So we're not going to tag the person that wrote this:
â93% of the BLM protests in 2020 were peacefulâ yeah thatâs why they didnât fucking do anything. Peaceful protests are only for optics; to try and convince the white people in power that weâre âorderlyâ and donât want any trouble, yet they still coined us as âviolent radicalsâ so at this point, what benefit is there really for future protests to be peaceful?
Because this person is the purifying violence + racism type, and you can never trust what they're going to do. But we're going to respond anyway, because it should be answered.
The riots killed about 2 dozen people and caused over a billion dollars in property damages based on insurance claims alone.
Multiple major corporations donated money to "BLM" groups, which then got siphoned off to buy land and mansions.
Why did it get siphoned off? Because there was no actual, non-bullshit, program that leftists were broadly aware of to reduce police violence, or to reduce criminal behavior. To the degree that there were programs that showed long-term effects in crime reduction (like Perry Preschool), they were pushed out of leftist popular consciousness by race scientistic bullshit like racial "privilege" theory, which proposes an unfalsifiable inherited racial taint and produces zero beneficial results.
From where they currently stand, there is no path where burning more TargetÂŽ department stores down somehow gets them reduced police violence.
For violence to be effective, one must have a solution that can be implemented in the first place. Violence cannot implement a solution that does not exist.
One can attribute the nation-wide increase in homicide to a nation-wide wildcat police strike, but if police refusing to do their jobs increases the homicide rate, this implies that police actually do reduce homicide - and since so many of the victims are not "white" or "white-adjacent," not just for "white" people.
So just flat "defund the police" is out. If social programs are supposed to pick up the slack, then which social programs are to be used needs to be known beforehand, because if the social programs don't work, then that's just letting criminals prey on the weak and unwary.
The CHAZ managed to kill more black men per capita than the regular police.
So just replacing the police with left-wing vigilantes and anarchist communes is out, too.
At the very least, BLM was openly condoning vandalism and riots, to the point of paying riotersâ bails.
And lots of that was happening in black neighborhoods. The places BLM is supposedly trying to help.
If BLM couldnât change things at the height of their power, when cities across the nation were giving free passes to violent rioters, maybe the problem is more fundamental.
I also like how 1 in 15 BLM protests turning violent is apparently just an insignificant amount, and the violence could not have hampered the greater movement.Â
Nobody who wasnât a retard or an actual racist was complaining about peaceful protests that didnât do crazy shit like block entrances to hospitals or something. Peaceful protests are an inalienable right-violence and destruction are not.
I've been complaining that BLM was protesting over racism without actually proving racism. It doesn't even try. It just assumes.
I think "you have not actually justified your cause" can be a valid criticism of protests.
Casual sex is stupid and risky. You donât need to have sex. You wonât die without it. So stop sharing your most sacred, intimate moments with people you barely know.
Anyone who calls any normal bodily function "sacred" is a silly christian and should be avoided at all costs
The rapist is lecturing us on who should be avoided lmfao
This is bait.
By Jonathon Van Maren In 2019, the Houston Public Library admitted that a registered child sex offender had been reading to children as part
A UK-based drag queen well known for his performances to children is fundraising for the funeral costs of convicted child sex offender he ca
A scantily clad drag queen was performing her show at a so-called Family Pride event in California, when at some point, a little girl unexpe
OK, Groomer.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
further evidence toward my thesis that a big part of fromsoft's games is that the devs are all massive trolls and masters of physical comedy
(i wanted to add this elden ring video from twitter to a reblog of another post but i forgot you cant do that so im making a post about it)
original tweet