Dalek Ix Says Stuff

To a 17 paragraph explanation that the lil guy is not being harmed and that the poster knows this because he did a private independent journalistic investigation over the course of multiple months in order to find the original creator of the gif and ask them if the lil guy was harmed, also to double check they consulted 100 different lil guy experts to ensure the lil guy was not hurt. They did all of this so that people looking at the gif of the lil guy spinning would not have a panic attack over their worry that the lil guy was hurt.

Kill La Kill Hellsing AU

Fetishization of Jews (Sounds contradictory, isn't)

Obsessed with supercessionism

Blame Jews for their life not working out the way they wanted it to and also every social ill that occurs to them really

Enjoy and justify cutting Jews out of public life (Bar tokens you'll turn on later)

Enjoy and justify lighting Jews on fire

Enjoy shooting Jews outside Jewish buildings (And inside too but hey)

Failure to realize that with the Jews dead the regime needs new enemies to justify its existence... and has also been going after said other enemies the whole time.

If Israel was intending to commit genocide...

Then why isn't everyone in Gaza already dead?

They have the means, the ability, and the tools to do so.

The only answers that Jew-haters can come up to explain how 98% of the population of Gaza was still alive after two years of intense urban warfare--when the fighting in Mariopol, Ukraine, had a higher death toll despite taking less time--tend to fall into one of three categories:

Incompetence--the IDF intends to kill them all, but just somehow is too stupid to manage it.

Conspiratorial--the IDF intends to kill them all, but is being sneaky about it, in order to distract... somehow. Which is just "Untrustworthy Jews" in a different package.

Abject denial--"La la, la, The Jews are trying to kill them all! Hitler was right! I can't hear you and your evidence and details! I know in my heart that the Genocide is Real, just like how my parents know that Jesus is their Lord and Savior!"

And given that the "genocide scholars" in this case include a woman who has claimed a higher death toll and that the Israelis eat Palestinians and feed the leftovers to dogs, and a "genocide scholar group" that has no requirements for joining, and thus has "Emperor Palpatine" as a listed member... and several NGOs and states admitted that they would have to alter the definition of "genocide" to make what happened in Gaza count...

Yeah, there was a "broad consensus" in Nazi Germany that Jews were subhuman creatures that needed to be exterminated for the safety of the human race. Doesn't make it right.

Furthermore, in answer to the question...

No, it's how the Right and the Left have shaken hands and agreed that Jews Are The Problem And There Is One (Final) Solution that is acceptable. Going back to the original post, when a Leftist African-American politician was promoting a Jew-hating propaganda piece created by the KKK that claimed that Jews were responsible for 9/11.

i'm not gonna argue genocidal intent, since that would require convincing you that there was intent which is clearly impossible, but we can talk about ethnic cleansing:

"The UN Commission of Experts described (United Nations) ethnic cleansing as "a purposeful policy designed by one ethnic or religious group to remove by violent and terror-inspiring means the civilian population of another ethnic or religious group from certain geographic areas," and stated that the coercive practices used can include "murder, torture, arbitrary arrest and detention... forcible removal, displacement and deportation of civilian population... wanton destruction of property."

so forcible displacement is part of the UN definition of ethnic cleansing

"Nearly all of Gaza's current population of 2.1 million people has been displaced, lacking access to sufficient shelter, food, life-saving medical services, clean water, education and livelihoods."

"More than 60% of the population had lost their homes... Gaza's economy has contracted by 84%... 'The scale and extent of deprivation across living conditions, livelihoods/income, food security, gender equality, and social inclusion, have pushed back human development in the Gaza Strip by 77 years,'" the assessment said.

"Over 371,888 housing units have been destroyed or damaged, more than 50% of hospitals are non-functional, nearly all schools destroyed or damaged, and the economy has contracted by 84% in Gaza."

"Approximately 81% of all structures in the Gaza Strip are damaged... An estimated 320,622 housing units have been damaged." -- based on publicly available satellite imagery

it's not "sneaky" to not just literally nuke the strip and kill every single person inside. you can ethnically cleanse a group of people by destroying all their housing, their education, their economy, access to food, their healthcare, etc., and generally make the place unlivable. this has historically been an ethnic cleansing tactic, such as in the case of the holodomor in ukraine, and i would not say this is unique to israel or jews

So, to summarize:

You came onto a post talking about the Jewish experience with how chummy Leftists and Neo-Nazis have become over the last several years when it comes to hating Jews--to the point that Leftists are now endorsing Marjorie Taylor "Jewish Space Lasers" Greene--and basically went, "Well, have you considered that the consensus is that Jews are actually the bad guys and are doing what the Nazis did to them?"

And when I pushed back on that, pointing out the bias of the sources and how the situation does not show a genocide, you basically went, "Nuh uh" and shifted the topic, refused to engage with the discussion of antisemitism, and accused me of projecting antisemitism onto you, when you are engaging in antisemitism.

I owe you and your entire Jew-hating movement nothing until you police your own. At a fucking minimum, kick out the people who call Jews "inbred" (Piker), cannibals (Albanese), and the like... instead of, yanno, elevating them to be speakers of the movement. Until then, all I see is an old quote from Sartre:

"We know how difficult things would be, if today in every city during the bomb attacks, the burdens of war and the privations, we still had Jews as secret saboteurs, agitators and instigators... We have the moral right, we had the duty to our people to do it, to kill this people who would kill us."

Alright, look. I understand. I was there at PAX when the question was asked if Pragmata has any Mega Man connections and that sentiment was denied outright.

Alright, look. I understand. I was there at PAX when the question was asked if Pragmata has any Mega Man connections and that sentiment was denied outright.

Happy Cinco De Mayo!

Let's be clear, Iran bombed:

Bahrain

Iraq

Jordan

Kuwait

Oman

Qatar

Saudi Arabia

United Arab Emirates

That's huge. And so, so fucking dumb.

Iraq, if you didn't know, has been an Iranian ally, verging on an Iranian client state, since the end of the Iraq War. And they BOMBED them.

Oman has pursued a policy of 'friend to all, enemy to none' for like, decades by this point and as such, has very limited US military ties and relatively positive relations with Iran. And Iran BOMBED them.

Iran bombed more Arab states in the last 48 hours than Israel has in nearly 80 years.

Like, the Gulf states are stunned right now. Iran just undid 20 years of careful indirect maneuvering and gentleman's agreements and plausible deniability and semi-alliances in a day. Iran has collapsed decades of calibrated proxy strategy, unified the Gulf Cooperation Council, and triggered the largest interstate Middle Eastern war since 1991. Iran targeted hotels, airports, residential areas, and all kinds of civilian infrastructure in the Gulf.

I really don't know what the hell they were thinking. It's baffling to me. So baffling I've heard people theorizing Iran lost control of its military in the aftermath of the decapitation strike conducted by the US and Israel and Iranian military units just unloaded on the Gulf out of revenge.

The only stupider things Iran could do would be detonate a dirty bomb or attack Turkey and draw NATO into the conflict.

Basically, all this is to say, Iran's regime seems intent on burning down as many bridges as it can on its way out.

What's especially nuts to me is how preventable and self inflicted this is. You know what the Gulf states would probably be doing right now if Iran hadn't attacked them out of the blue? They'd probably decline to let the US use its bases and would be petitioning Washington and Jerusalem to negotiate and get a ceasefire going. Instead, now they're letting the US use their bases and shooting down Iranian drones and missiles.

But let me educate your dumb ass. Iran attacking the Gulf States is the best possible strategic window they have. Not only does it allow them to undermine the United States' reputation as a security guarantor, incentivizing the Gulf countries to expel US military bases and therefore weakening the US' grip on the oil market without even mentioning their military presence in the Gulf, but it also gives them negotiating leverage by plunging Western markets into disarray. Iran is a country that has built its entire infrastructure to be resilient to sanctions; they can withstand disturbances to the global supply chains better than transnational economies that stand far more to lose by prolonging this conflict. You immediately jumping to clichés about some kind of irrational and incompetent "authoritarianism" showed me that whatever institution you studied at was more concerned about bumping out useful idiots than actual analysts.

Iran attacking the Gulf States was Iran burning down their decades long diplomacy efforts to woo and corral the Gulf States by attacking their oil infrastructure to cause economic pain in the west. It actually pushes the Gulf States closer to the US and Israel, the opposite of your claim, because now they've decisively seen that diplomacy with Iran is a fool's errand. Now they have every reason to see Iran's regime deposed, more than they already did, because they know Iran can be trusted in absolutely no agreement they make. I'll highlight again (you must have missed it because Marx's dick was shoved too far down your throat) that the Gulf States allowed the US to use their airbases, which they did not do during the 12 Day War and would not have done if Iran hadn't been fucking stupid enough to attack them.

Basically, Iran just made permanent, long term enemies out of the most powerful Middle Eastern states in exchange for pressure to get a two week ceasefire, a ceasefire that is presently falling apart and wouldn't even preclude the possibility of a future war down the line. Very wise and long term strategic.

Iran is resilient to sanctions like a man bleeding out is resilient to dying of cancer. They're running out of water, their supreme leader is dead, their selected successor died in a helicopter crash and they have no backup, they have a population that nearly universally hates them and revolts every few years, and absolutely no way to restore their legitimacy. They've got bigger, more immediate problems that make the sanctions look like a mild inconvenience.

Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States expelling the US's military bases will happen when hell freezes over. Especially now, they're more dependent than ever on the US and Israel to defend them. They've been hoping to contain Iran through negotiations, and in that complacency, their military has been lax. The fucking Houthis have a better military than Saudi Arabia, and you think they're raring to expel their premier military ally? The guys who are gonna sell them the air defense systems to keep their skies clear for the tourists influencers? Give me a fucking break. They don't want to decouple, they want the US to do the job and kill the Iranian regime faster lmao

I'm not an 'actual analyst' lmao means a lot coming from the guy who reposts actual DPRK propaganda:

Oh no, I don't have the approval of the tankie who supports the most totalitarian regime on the planet, whatever will I do?

Also, your pinned post literally highlights your Bachelors degree in International Relations, you fucking hypocrite. 'Educated in an imperial core university' man, I knew tankies were bereft of a brain and a soul but goddamn, you impress me, truly.

Can you explain why it is somehow the US’s right and/or responsibility to topple any regimes of any kind around the world? What about the current US regime? Should China assassinate trump to liberate Americans from the myriad human rights violations currently happening in the US? Can you explain how this time US intervention in the Middle East is going to have better results than the multiple other times in the past?

'When during WW2 did?'

Alll the fucking time.

But the really offensive thing @jollygreengiantdick said was 'justify by calling them terrorists?'

Because this isn't some US thing that came out of nowhere, GLOBALLY Iran's backing and supporting of terrorist forces to push their own political agendas is EXESSIVELY well known.

And that's BEFORE we get into what Iran does to IT'S OWN PEOPLE.

You deep throat the boots of the US military industrial complex when you try to make excuses for why it’s okay for them to bomb another nation unprovoked. Your indignant self-righteousness over “freeing” a people who never asked the US to start bombing their cities and then justify it by calling them all terrorists with WMDs (just like Bush did) is astounding.

You are doing Olympic level mental gymnastics to justify why the US has any right or responsibility whatsoever to interfere with another nation’s government or people because you’ve been propagandized and brainwashed by western media to believe the US is ever righteous or sympathetic to the civilians they’re bombing.

Since it’s okay to overthrow a state we don’t like and kill their fascist leader, I’m assuming you’d welcome a foreign invasion in which trump was killed and a “regime change” was installed by that foreign country, right?

What IS notable is that I cited easily accessible information, none of which is ever really denied by Iran... And you claimed it to be 'Propaganda'.

Your insistence that Iran is evil because of their backing of terrorist orgs seems to ignore the history of the US funding a terrorist org (mujahideen) that then branched out to became al-qaeda and the taliban.

If your metric for how evil a regime is relies on its funding terrorists, maybe look into the US’s history of that before you use it to defend the US. They also funded the Contras in Nicaragua, who used terror and rape to attempt to overthrow a democratically elected socialist government. The US has been using state sanctioned violence against its own people for centuries (most obvious example is the civil rights movement during which law enforcement lynched countless black protesters/activists to silence them) so miss me with that excuse too. What, do you think it’s not as bad because the US isn’t doing it to white people?

You denied that there was mass murder, and now respond to the existance of mass murder as somehow deflecting away from crimes in the USA.

I said nothing about if the united states did one thing or another, because my entire point is, and always has been, that you're unwilling to accept the idea that there may be evil nations outside if the united states, and that you will, in fact, deny the existence of evil in order to maintain the position that the USA is the sole creator OF evil.

You don't even need to be fed propaganda, because you are the own source of your propaganda. Speaking to you is like trying to deal with any conspiracy theorist. You will turn any refutation of your denial of physical reality into proof that you are conspired against.

You can be a flat-earther all you wish. but I'm not obligated to buy into your conspiracy world view just because you don't want to admit to the evils existing in the world.

You response makes no sense. Please quote where I denied there was backing of terrorism. Please quote where I denied there was mass murder. Your “point” was from the beginning to point out how evil Iran is in response to someone asking about OP’s justification for the US’s actions and motives in its unprovoked attack of Iran.

My entire point has been that the US started this war with the goal of obtaining oil sources and replacing the Iranian leader with a more US-friendly one, not with the goal of helping the people of Iran, and things will likely be worse for those people after the US is done there, as they have been every time the US has interfered in the Middle East before.

All of your replies have been an attempt to prove Iran is evil after being asked why the US has any right or responsibility to “liberate” anyone in other countries, while you completely ignored the actual question.

But fuck it, I can answer your dumbass questions really fast.

Denied the existence of terrorism? 'Remind me how many innocent European civilians did they slaughter and then justify by calling them terrorists?' Framing the bombing of Iran in the context of ww2 and questioning the actions as 'Justif(ed) by calling them terrorists' is a framing that infers that the accusation of terrorism is at best overblown to at worse overtly false.

Denied the existence of mass murder? 'Did the US start WWII and use it as an excuse to kill and replace Germany’s leader with a US friendly one for oil interests?'

The very framing that the only motivation is oil is itself denial that there could even BE any other reasons. Like mass murder.

And if ANY of that wasn't enough, the simple fact that you responded to the direct evidence of both terrorism and mass murder with accusations of those things being 'Propaganda' just further proves the point that you only admit them to being real now because it's blatantly obvious YOU DO NOT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT THE MURDER OF THE IRANIAN PEOPLE.

YOU DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE OPPRESSION THAT THEY FACE FROM THEIR OWN LEADERSHIP.

They exist to you only as proxies for your permanent conspiracy theory, and I don't have time to waste on a fucking flat earther who handwaves away mass murder because it doesn't fit into your grand world view.

do not separate them

bonus: it’s kuki’s squishmallow

(hope its ok im reblogging with this) THANK YOU. this original post could have been worded better i admit but in case anyone has no idea what i was talking about, ive seen a bunch of antisemites say things like "talking to an israeli person normalizes israelis and israel as a country" and people basically saying that if you even acknowledge an israeli person who exists you are "normalizing israelis and support genocide" its crazy shit. its literally the kind of thing hasan piker has been saying (link to post with screenshot) - actual quote: “All jokes aside, Gal Gadot serves an important role in normalizing Israel as not a fascist ethno-state, but instead a place where a lot of beautiful women come from. And those beautiful women happen to serve in the IDF, because there’s also this weird sexualization of the forces as well that takes place, and it plays another role in normalizing Israel and its activities and actions, and whitewashing it.” (source)

like literally weve gotten to the point where an actress' nationality means she is sexualizing her country's military and everything they have ever done wrong???????? theres like ten layers of misogyny and xenophobia wrapped up in this one.

its so ass backwards that we now see people who proclaim themselves to be progressive people who care about humanity to suddenly decide that extreme xenophobia, sexual harassment, and straight up text book nazism is now justified as long as its against someone from a country they dislike. imagine for a moment that someone said having a conversation with a mexican person is "normalizing mexicans". imagine saying that being friends with a gay person is "normalizing the gays". arent we supposed to be against extreme social isolation based on a persons identity??????

now to bring up the BDS thing. this is so fucking frustrating to me. again, they want to fully isolate israelis and by extension literally any jew anywhere as we have seen time and time again. the thing about BDS is that its literally ALL PERFORMATIVE!!!!!!! they boycott any business that they even THINK might POSSIBLY be (((zionist))) and yet that energy is completely gone the moment the israeli product in question is life saving medical technology and medications. these people will say that israeli doctors finding an affective treatment for lymphoma is pinkwashing whitewashing sciencewashing whatever the hell washing israel. they hate israeli people so fucking much that they think theres an evil plan by (((them))) behind curing fucking cancer. and yet i fully believe that if they were in the emergency room with a life threatening medical issue, they wouldnt be asking the doctor if the technology used to keep them alive "supports genocide" or not.

and i also want to bring up the mapping project. this is something i cant believe we dont talk about very much. i am not going to link their official site here but i have read through it. instead, heres the overview from the ADL:

FAQs on the Boston Mapping Project | ADL

it is literally a map of every single "zionist" institution in Massachusetts. this includes jewish nonprofit orgs, jewish schools (yes, including ones for actual kids), medical schools & medical institutions. the language used on the site is straight out of the protocols and mein kampf. they literally say an education program for teenagers contributes to "ecological apartheid". the funniest part is that they have a ton of land acknowledgements on the site and keep comparing palestine to native tribes in their area. and idk any native ppl reading this are free to correct me, but somethings telling me that the people in those groups probably dont want their names attached to an organization that literally wants to purge the country of anything remotely jewish. i am not going to get into jewish indigeneity here because im sick of explaining it. jews are indigenous. we did not colonize our own ancestral homeland.

anyway, suggested reading:

List of Israeli inventions and discoveries - Wikipedia

The top 64 innovations developed in Israel - Unpacked

(i better see the bds people boycott cherry tomatoes.)

Comment by dykecymraeg266 reading:

The comparison to mexicans is not the same. Whilst mexico was created as a spanish apartheid state against native mexicans, and that system is still present in places like oaxaca, mexico is not exactly a settler colonial state, in the same way isreal, USA, and s.africa are. A good comparison would be casting a beautiful afrikaaner girl as superwoman whilst native black south africans are slaughtered.

The picture in question: *literally the most popular thing I've ever drawn in my fucking life and I've gotten literally dozens of people asking for commissions for me to draw more*