"but lestat was louis's ABUSER and blaming it on akasha is absolving him!"
first: no, they're not blaming lestat's violence toward louis on akasha. lestat openly took personal responsibility in the s2 ep that is constantly being referenced. his relationships with ALL of his fledglings have gone sout one way or another. he's caused all of them pain and destruction (save for gabriella, who was biting at the bit to ditch him almost as soon as he turned her). his violence against louis specifically is obviously his greatest shame: a violence he caused not by association, but with his own hands, because of his own anger and selfishness. there was no one he could reroute the blame to in any way like he could with nicki and even claudia. by all accounts if he hadn't been lured to paris and forced into the trial, he would never have bothered claudia again and didn't want her to die. he was PROUD that she killed him and became who she was.
he actually likes and cares about his bandmates. this claudia storyline and nicki's presence this season (not to mention gabriella's... whatever-is-wrong-with-her and louis's semi-estrangement) are really hammering home that all of his fledglings are either hurt by him or always leave him or both. he's doesn't want three more fledglings whom he will inevitably hurt or will leave him---and also! he considers turning someone who isn't on the brink of death* to be murder.
he refuses to turn them while thinking of the greatest violence he ever committed against a fledgling. in an episode where he has a whole-ass song about failing claudia after comparing his parenting to gabriella's (the witches vs the body in the incinerator).
the blood he's warning them about is HIS. not akasha's.
*(it's implied that lestat turns louis because louis is suicidal)






















