Whenever you want to argue with me remember that Iâm a bad bitch who fucks married women and youâre the type of person who merely argues with bad bitches who fuck married women

blake kathryn
Not today Justin

titsay

#extradirty
Keni

Discoholic đȘ©
Cosimo Galluzzi
Game of Thrones Daily

romaâ
$LAYYYTER
cherry valley forever

â
DEAR READER
we're not kids anymore.

ç„æ„ / Permanent Vacation
Xuebing Du
h


seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from Austria

seen from Portugal
seen from Austria

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United Kingdom

seen from India

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
@cyberpunkpavlichenko
Whenever you want to argue with me remember that Iâm a bad bitch who fucks married women and youâre the type of person who merely argues with bad bitches who fuck married women

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
The lawsuit touches on a growing conversation over how companies are using technology, including AI, to push prices higher.
A federal lawsuit alleging that gas companies in California are colluding to keep prices high through their use of AI-powered software will test the stateâs antitrust law at a time of growing concerns about the effects of technology on the high cost of living.
Filed on behalf of three drivers last month, the proposed class-action lawsuit accuses roughly a dozen companies and their subsidiaries â including Walmart and 7-Eleven â of using algorithmic software to fix prices. The company that provided the software, Kalibrate, is named as a defendant.
Kalibrateâs program, according to the lawsuit, encourages gas stations to upload private price data. The companyâs AI-powered software, called Kalibrate Fuel Prices, then uses the data to recommend prices in real time, promising in its marketing materials to help gas companies âsqueeze out profit.â
The lawsuit touches on a growing conversation over how companies are using technology, including AI, to push prices higher.
In a highly publicized case in 2024, the federal government sued a company whose algorithmic pricing software was used by large landlords to share private rental data, recommend prices and drive apartment rents up. Last year, reporters found that the grocery delivery company Instacart was running AI-enabled pricing experiments on customers, sometimes resulting in a nearly $3 difference in the price of individual products.
âI wouldnât be surprised if (this kind of individualized pricing) exists in all different kindsâ of industries, said Robert Zeithammer, a professor at UCLAâs Anderson School of Management. âIf youâre a car dealer, you could be doing it.â
Lawyers in the gas station lawsuit assert that technology is enabling antitrust violations. Even if companies didnât communicate their pricing strategies to one another directly, the argument goes, the software is allowing them to share data and keep prices above a certain threshold.
âThe quintessential image of price fixing is a secret deal made between competitors over cigars in a smoky back room,â attorneys wrote in the complaint. âBut as technology has advanced, so too have the mechanisms available to competitors to fix prices without the cigars, the smoke, or even the room.â
The lawyers represent two firms that include staff members who worked at the Federal Trade Commission during an era of bolstered antitrust enforcement under President Joe Biden.
The Los Angeles Times reached out to the companies named in the lawsuit, but only Walmart responded, saying it would address the accusations in court.
In a statement, Kalibrate denied the claims.
âWe disagree with the allegations in the lawsuit and intend to defend the company vigorously,â Matias Toye, legal director at Kalibrate Technologies, wrote in an email. âKalibrate is committed to serving its customers with lawful, innovative fuel-pricing technology, and we remain focused on supporting our customers while respecting the litigation process.â
The lawsuit comes as consumers report struggling to afford basic necessities. Recent polling from Gallup found that Americans are concerned most about housing and energy prices, including gas.
In California, drivers pay some of the highest prices in the country. Taxes, environmental fees and the Iran war have pushed fuel prices up; according to AAA, regular gas sold at an average of $5.43 a gallon on Tuesday, which is more than $2 above states such as Texas and Oklahoma.
The lawsuit alleges that Kalibrateâs software drove prices at the pump even higher. It cited research on algorithmic pricing that found when a station adopted this kind of software, prices rose by an average of 6 cents a gallon.
Established in 1907, Californiaâs antitrust law makes clear that itâs illegal for companies to come together and agree on prices to charge customers. The practice is anticompetitive and hurts consumers, antitrust experts say.
like idk i think at this point im just gonna have to start blocking anyone who's into taylor swift. sorry but if you can't drop her even after she invites ICE agents to her fucking wedding i just don't really think i want you near me. why are you throwing all of your supposed values away for a mid at best pop singer?
*guy who runs a ICE concentration camp, not an ICE agent. my bad. point still stands.
Sources:
Steven J. Demetriou, guest 92 of 93 as photographed by Backgrid
He is the executive chair of Amentum, a company that provides engineering and technology to the USAâs army and nuclear programs. They operate the most test and training ranges of any contractor if their site is to be believed.
It appears they run the East Montana concentration camp, the largest in the USA. While much of the abuse, including sexual and physical abuse, occurred under the campâs previous contractor, Acquisition Logistics, the ACLU has confirmed Amentum was WORKING AS SUBCONTRACTORS at the East Montana camp during this time. Amentum's current role as sole contractor from March onwards proves no less deadly, with 2 overdoses with the intent to commit suicide from inhumane conditions. Representative Escobar confirmed nothing has changed since Amentumâs takeover. Lawyers representing prisoners report being unable to reach their clients.
The following conditions are BY DESIGN, as "Guards tell people detained at Camp East Montana who complain about conditions that if they do not like the conditions, they should self-deport." Civil Detention Centers are not supposed to be punitive. This is only a civil detention center on paper. It is a concentration camp.
The ACLU lists: I already linked this but I'm doing it again bc if you read one source, it should be this one.
Medical neglect, including for people with pregnancies, diabetes, cancer, and HIV.
Severe beatings. One man was beaten to death for requesting his asthma medication.
solitary confinement
unclean water
Tuberculosis and Measles outbreaks
Limited to no sunlight
no or limited hygiene products
rotten food, not enough food, no special diets for medical conditions
SEXUAL ASSAULT
No ventilation in a DESERT leading to lung damage
Not enough toilets, overflow often, whole tent smells of urine and feces
No privacy to use said toilet
Threats and beatings for those that refuse to sign deportation papers, sometimes to places they are NOT FROM
No activities, punished for attempting to make art from recycled items like cracker boxes, can only practice own religion at guards' discretion
no dental care. This is likely universal across US concentration camps. Note Emmanuel Damas, the Haitian immigrant that died from a dental infection due to lack of care
Unable to receive legal representation if not already represented
LOCATED ON FORMER JAPANESE DETENTION CAMP BECAUSE TIME IS A FUCKING CIRCLE
Taylor Swift's guest is directly responsible for these. This is the LARGEST CONCENTRATION CAMP IN THE US, made to hold 5000 people. He's not just any ICE contractor he is the biggest and baddest. At least this will get people talking about just HOW bad this camp is.
Note this camp is in the Chihuahua Desert: This heat wave? Try it in a windowless fucking 108 by 36 ft tent with 72 other people with no soap.
The reason is bc (in case anyone wanted to know) (and this isnât an excuse I hate ts and her husband) apparently he is the adoptive father of Travisâ childhood friend.
Swifties are going âher team didnât do a better bg check!!! Itâs her teamâs fault!!! Her team is setting her up!!!â At what point will swifties stop making this everyone elseâs fault. She married to a man whoâs childhood friend is the child of the guy who runs the largest ICE facility and they both thought it was normal to invite his dad too, which shows they think highly of him. Her team isnât âsetting her upâ she is more than okay with this

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
i have a few comments of my own regarding this, though i will largely leave this and let you all be a judge.
what i will say is: look at isff continuing to put the abuser's feelings first while not having the slightest consideration for the mental state or feelings of the victims in question.
what i will say is: look at the phrasing at the beginning. minimizing the actions by refering to abuse as simply "something bad". painting it as just some inconsequential thing.
and yes, sexually assaulting someone is a crime. putting out cigarettes on someone's arm is an act of abuse.
"as long as you lie and call sophie a liar" here she is, outright implying that sophie's victims are lying.
part of me wonders if the "you want her to be removed from her job?" is a memorized formula for her. though i would like to remind you all, this situation began with isff reblogging sophie's fundraiser for a birthday vacation trip and someone informing isff that sophie has sexually assaulted other trans women.
on the matter of personal opinion regarding all of this, i need to say: it boils my blood to see the blatant rapist and abuser apologia disguised as "protecting trans women". especially in the example when isff is throwing five other trans women under the bus to defend their abuser. it boils my blood to see isff spit in the faces of multiple fellow trans women. to see her handwave away the abuse of her sisters. to see her refering to victims and people advocating for them as "danger to the community". the comparison of her just easily calling them that, when she's fighting tooth and nail against their abuser being refered as such due to actions they committed against them.
Workers proud of their efforts to grow renewable energy say US president pursuing âpersonal vendettaâ at their expense
Donald Trump has blamed everything â from ânational securityâ issues, the deaths of birds and whales, and cancer â in his decades-long campaign against windfarms. But as the Trump administration continues to undermine the industry, what worries workers most are their jobs
Since taking office for a second term, Trump has issued an executive order aiming to halt all wind-energy leases and permits, attempted to issue stop-work orders on wind projects under construction, and paid more than $2.6bn in settlements to buy out wind energy leases. And hundreds of workers have been affected.
Thomas Kilday, a furnace electrician with IBEW local 99 in Providence, Rhode Island, was in the midst of a four-week shift onboard a vessel off the Atlantic coast working on the Revolution Wind Project in August last year when the Trump administration issued a stop-work order on the project.
âNo one really knew what was going on. We didnât know what it meant for us. We just knew that everything was up in the air,â said Kilday. âYou plan your whole life around being gone for 28 days, and to come out here and have it thrown up in the air, worrying what does this mean for me, for my pay for the next four weeks, whatâs going to happen? Thereâs a lot of uncertainty.â
Construction on the project is done on shifts of 28 days on and 28 days off, with workers residing on a vessel on the ocean and taking helicopters to work on the turbines.
A federal court granted an injunction to block the stop-work order in September last year. In December, the Trump administration issued another 90-day stop-work order, citing national security, before a second judge issued an injunction in January.
When the second stop-work order was issued, Kilday was celebrating Christmas with his family and preparing for another four-week shift.
âThat was really difficult,â he said. âI just spent a bunch of money on Christmas gifts for my family, and it was not what I wanted to be thinking about. Six months out of the year weâre away from home, and for what little time we do have at home, not to be able to just focus all of that time and energy on our families, itâs tough. Itâs not a great feeling to be worried about your job when youâre supposed to be home.â
âWeâre proud of the work that we do out here, and we want to be able to continue to do it. We think itâs important work,â added Kilday. âWhen Iâm at home, and I drive down my street, I look up at those power lines. I helped create the power thatâs running through those power lines, and Iâm proud of that.â
Revolution Wind announced in March that it began delivering power to New England, citing the work of more than 1,000 local union workers, and is expected to power more than 350,000 homes and businesses. The projectâs construction is over 90% complete.
In June, the Trump administration abandoned an effort to try to halt all wind projects and leases across the US, giving up a challenge in court to a judge tossing Trumpâs executive order to freeze all permitting and leasing for wind projects.
Instead, the Trump administration has opted to buy out wind project leases.
Trumpâs Department of Interior has completed four deals so far to cancel wind project leases, paying energy corporations a sum of more than $2.6bn, including paying $765m to Invenergy to abandon four wind projects in California, New York and Maine and nearly $900m to Bluepoint Wind and Garden State Wind to cancel offshore wind leases in New York and California.
âI think itâs a foolish policy that the Trump administration is engaging in trying to buy out these leases,â Pat Crowley, president of the Rhode Island AFL-CIO, told the Guardian. âThese projects are not only helping to reduce our carbon emissions, theyâre providing good-paying union jobs for thousands.â
Crowley said that workers would have had long-term job stability from working on these projects. He noted the Trump administration had lost in court in its attempts to issue stop-work orders on five wind projects in the Rhode Island area.
âWeâre five for five taking on the Trump administration,â he said. âWhat the Trump administration is doing is just throwing money away for the sake of their ideology.â
Will Gonzalez, a construction laborer with the Laborersâ local 385 in Fairhaven, Massachusetts, worked on the Vinyard Wind 1 project off the coast of Marthaâs Vineyard, a project the Trump administration attempted to halt in January. The project is now completed and fully operational.
He criticized the Trump administrationâs efforts to halt wind turbine projects, claiming the opposition from Trump stems from his experiences trying to stop a wind turbine project near his golf course in Scotland, losing an appeal in December 2015.
âItâs a personal vendetta,â said Gonzalez. âGood union jobs â we shouldnât be trying to take those off the table. That just doesnât make any kind of sense. Families obviously need good jobs ⊠why take those jobs away?â
Gonzalez said he and his co-workers were leaving training and certifications unused because of the halting of wind power projects.
âAll of us that worked on that Vinyard Wind 1, obviously, we would have loved to segue right into another project,â he said. âWeâre fully trained, ready to go, willing and able, so it directly affected us. But you move on. You [have] got to move on. You canât sit and dwell on that, because thatâs not going to pay the bills.â
The White House directed comment to the Department of Interior.
A spokesperson for the department denied the cancellation and stop-work orders of projects had had any impact on jobs, even on projects under construction when halted. The spokesperson did not respond to a question asking for clarification and did not comment on Trumpâs prior animus toward wind turbine projects involving his golf courses.
âNo jobs were eliminated because none of these leases were operational or supporting employment,â the spokesperson said.
âRather than waiting years for the projects to materialize, the Trump administration is prioritizing investments in existing infrastructure and functioning supply chains that can create jobs now and deliver economic benefits faster.
âThis approach puts more people to work more quickly, using proven, affordable, and reliable energy rather than relying on projects tied to leases that were not producing jobs in the first place.â
white people need to be banned from southeast asia unless a local can vouch that they're normal like im sick of the holistic wellness island retreat authenticity new age mystic third eye opening faux kundalini tantric interpretive dance island gentrification sex tourism self discovery shit they're always doing posting videos in elephant print sarongs writhing to shitty edm in the jungle somewhere in thailand ive had enough
Please stop scrolling my mother is dying.
Every day I wake up hoping my mother will feel better. Every day I see the same pain, the same exhaustion, and the same struggle to breathe.
Her illness does not wait. Time does not wait. But we are still waiting for the help she desperately needs.
7 days have passed without a single donation, and we are still only âŹ1,260 away from our goal.
Please, do not let our story disappear. If you can donate, even a small amount helps. If you cannot, please reblog and share. One person seeing this post could change my motherâs .
vetted by #731 | Donate
My mother suffers from a severely enlarged thyroid gland. The swelling has become so large that it affects her breathing and makes everyday activities difficult.
The enlarged thyroid causes my mother constant discomfort, exhaustion, and difficulty breathing. Her condition has continued to worsen over time. please donate
hi! fyi both people from that "what's wrong with girlboss feminism" post are terfs
Iâm aware I was outfeministing them as a transsexual woman on purpose.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
Generative AI and the artist discussion is such a distraction from AIâs military and police applications or its role in automating hiring discrimination.
The Nazis didnât attack artists for being artists. They primarily targeted gay and Jewish artists for âdegeneratingâ the culture through their avant garde ideas.
They did not attack artists for the sake of them producing art. The Nazis literally produced their own art and films. They were not against art itself but Jewish art. They were very clear about that.
they literally did attack artists for being artists. they fired them for not producing art to their tastes. they went after art for being communist. nazis had a very specific idea of what sort of art was acceptable (modern art bad, historic art good) and the idea that art was ONLY bad because it was associated with marginalised groups and not because it furthered ideas they opposed in their own right is simply wrong
Degenerate art - Wikipedia
You read that and you still think the focus was on artists for the sake of being artists and not what I already explained as being targeted? Even your response to me is to confused, stating that they were attacked for being artists and then immediately stating that it was for chauvinist political reasons (something *I* already brought up).
Your example is actually what *I* was referencing to make the point you didnât actually refute. It wasnât because they were artists but because of the political content of their art and who was making it as I already stated.
I was mirroring your words (which notably is not actually what was said in the tags). the tags said fascism comes for art. that is true. you disagreed and reached further than that, saying they didnât attack artists for being artists. i still disagree. let me explain.
Fascism, especially Nazi fascism, divided artists into âtraditionalâ and âcontemporaryâ and attacked anything that looked a little too contemporary for their traditional ideals. I consider âartâ to include the freedom of making new things and pushing at boundaries, both technical and ideological; if you are deplatforming, firing, killing, and destroying the art of artists who step outside that narrow box, including for crimes like âusing modern techniques and stylesâ, yeah, youâre attacking artists for being artists. even if some artists producing specific approved works are allowed under your fascist regime.
itâs a bit like saying they didnât attack academics for being academics. okay maybe they didnât in the strictest sense of the phrase, but being an academic under a fascist regime that is pushing overtly non-academic ideals and specific programmes like nazi science and medicine meant many had to choose between their integrity and their life in germany. if you were an academic of any quality, you had to curb your speech and research in order to remain safe. THAT is the attack on the profession, not the literal attacks on people for their ethnicity or ideology, but the violent suppression of the entire field. Germans didnât hate science or academics either â in fact they were so advanced that Russia and America both hoovered up all their Nazi scientists at the end of the war in two seperate named operations. yet scientists WERE attacked for furthering the field of science because their field became politicised by the nazi regime. itâs not necessarily that they produced political works, though many did, or that they themselves were jewish or gay, though many wereâ itâs also that those who did not label themselves openly enemies of the state at the beginning of the occupation then lived under the spectre of the Nazi regime which limited their output to what was deemed âacceptableâ, a tyranny which is itself an attack on the profession and those within it because an inherent aspect of academia involves challenging orthodox notions, and so people who were literally just doing their job were harmed for it, or would have been had they done it well
The reason I disagree with the vagueness is because they didnât censor people for painting trees in a park and lacking that specificity, you donât actually learn anything about why the Nazis targeted specific artists.
Itâs just not useful to have such a broad and non-specific description. The Nazis had a racist conspiratorial view of the world in which âJewish communismâ could contaminate the purity of the nation. They attacked âdegenerate artistsâ under that logic. Decontextualizing the racial and ideological elements of Nazi censorship adds a vagueness I donât think is useful because they werenât against the idea of art being producers of propaganda themselves, but instead saw art as a contested space for cultural and political dominance between their âmaster raceâ and the âdegenerate enemy racesâ who seek to destroy western civilization with communist revolution.
That was the point though. They didnât censor people painting trees in a park because such artwork specifically fitted within their political ideal. unless of course it was painted in a condemned style. but generally it was styles like cubism, dadaism, surrealism, etc that were banned. literally otto dix got sacked as a professor and retired to the country to paint landscapes so as to avoid further consequences. through the lens of nazification, there is no neutral art. what they policed was the style of expression and that dictated what art got kept, which artists were safe and which got to succeed, and which were literally hidden away or destroyed.
fair enough i suppose on it requiring more context and owing more to the specific identities of those harmed and policed by violence because of their identities and beliefs. but i suppose i think it is also just useful to point out that fascism really does come for art.
Saying âfascism comes for artâ is as vague as saying âthe Nazis hated literacy thatâs why they burned books.â In reality those books they burned in those infamous photos were of the research of Jewish doctor Magnus Hirschfeld on gay and trans people. Those book burnings were antisemitic, homophobic and transphobic. By reducing the specificity to âthey hated artâ or âthey hated booksâ we lose sight of the specific chauvinisms that animated the Nazis and brought them into power.
It may also lead you to being confused about modern day white nationalist movements. Their censorship very specifically targets particular groups. Itâs not writers writ large but writers about specific histories and experiences or from specific perspectives all related to oppressed groups.
This nonsense with 'The Nazis killed artists just for being artists!!' is reminding me of how (usually white) libs do this exact same shit with Nazi book burning - they'll see someone using a copy of Twilight for artwork or a library throwing out old books from the 1950s with the most racist depictions of Black people to take them out of circulation and replace with new diverse books by Black writers and artists, and start screaming about how this is just like how the Nazis burned ALL books just for being books, as if the Nazis were destroying anti-Black racist books rather than targeting Jewish thinkers and linking them to 'sexual degeneracy' of pure Aryan society.
No you see the Nazis werenât burning the research of Jewish doctor Magnus Hirschfeld on gay and trans people. They came after the omegaverse slashfics
Generative AI and the artist discussion is such a distraction from AIâs military and police applications or its role in automating hiring discrimination.
The Nazis didnât attack artists for being artists. They primarily targeted gay and Jewish artists for âdegeneratingâ the culture through their avant garde ideas.
They did not attack artists for the sake of them producing art. The Nazis literally produced their own art and films. They were not against art itself but Jewish art. They were very clear about that.
they literally did attack artists for being artists. they fired them for not producing art to their tastes. they went after art for being communist. nazis had a very specific idea of what sort of art was acceptable (modern art bad, historic art good) and the idea that art was ONLY bad because it was associated with marginalised groups and not because it furthered ideas they opposed in their own right is simply wrong
Degenerate art - Wikipedia
You read that and you still think the focus was on artists for the sake of being artists and not what I already explained as being targeted? Even your response to me is to confused, stating that they were attacked for being artists and then immediately stating that it was for chauvinist political reasons (something *I* already brought up).
Your example is actually what *I* was referencing to make the point you didnât actually refute. It wasnât because they were artists but because of the political content of their art and who was making it as I already stated.
I was mirroring your words (which notably is not actually what was said in the tags). the tags said fascism comes for art. that is true. you disagreed and reached further than that, saying they didnât attack artists for being artists. i still disagree. let me explain.
Fascism, especially Nazi fascism, divided artists into âtraditionalâ and âcontemporaryâ and attacked anything that looked a little too contemporary for their traditional ideals. I consider âartâ to include the freedom of making new things and pushing at boundaries, both technical and ideological; if you are deplatforming, firing, killing, and destroying the art of artists who step outside that narrow box, including for crimes like âusing modern techniques and stylesâ, yeah, youâre attacking artists for being artists. even if some artists producing specific approved works are allowed under your fascist regime.
itâs a bit like saying they didnât attack academics for being academics. okay maybe they didnât in the strictest sense of the phrase, but being an academic under a fascist regime that is pushing overtly non-academic ideals and specific programmes like nazi science and medicine meant many had to choose between their integrity and their life in germany. if you were an academic of any quality, you had to curb your speech and research in order to remain safe. THAT is the attack on the profession, not the literal attacks on people for their ethnicity or ideology, but the violent suppression of the entire field. Germans didnât hate science or academics either â in fact they were so advanced that Russia and America both hoovered up all their Nazi scientists at the end of the war in two seperate named operations. yet scientists WERE attacked for furthering the field of science because their field became politicised by the nazi regime. itâs not necessarily that they produced political works, though many did, or that they themselves were jewish or gay, though many wereâ itâs also that those who did not label themselves openly enemies of the state at the beginning of the occupation then lived under the spectre of the Nazi regime which limited their output to what was deemed âacceptableâ, a tyranny which is itself an attack on the profession and those within it because an inherent aspect of academia involves challenging orthodox notions, and so people who were literally just doing their job were harmed for it, or would have been had they done it well
The reason I disagree with the vagueness is because they didnât censor people for painting trees in a park and lacking that specificity, you donât actually learn anything about why the Nazis targeted specific artists.
Itâs just not useful to have such a broad and non-specific description. The Nazis had a racist conspiratorial view of the world in which âJewish communismâ could contaminate the purity of the nation. They attacked âdegenerate artistsâ under that logic. Decontextualizing the racial and ideological elements of Nazi censorship adds a vagueness I donât think is useful because they werenât against the idea of art being producers of propaganda themselves, but instead saw art as a contested space for cultural and political dominance between their âmaster raceâ and the âdegenerate enemy racesâ who seek to destroy western civilization with communist revolution.
Generative AI and the artist discussion is such a distraction from AIâs military and police applications or its role in automating hiring discrimination.
The Nazis didnât attack artists for being artists. They primarily targeted gay and Jewish artists for âdegeneratingâ the culture through their avant garde ideas.
They did not attack artists for the sake of them producing art. The Nazis literally produced their own art and films. They were not against art itself but Jewish art. They were very clear about that.
they literally did attack artists for being artists. they fired them for not producing art to their tastes. they went after art for being communist. nazis had a very specific idea of what sort of art was acceptable (modern art bad, historic art good) and the idea that art was ONLY bad because it was associated with marginalised groups and not because it furthered ideas they opposed in their own right is simply wrong
Degenerate art - Wikipedia
You read that and you still think the focus was on artists for the sake of being artists and not what I already explained as being targeted? Even your response to me is to confused, stating that they were attacked for being artists and then immediately stating that it was for chauvinist political reasons (something *I* already brought up).
Your example is actually what *I* was referencing to make the point you didnât actually refute. It wasnât because they were artists but because of the political content of their art and who was making it as I already stated.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
Can literally anyone explain why âgirlboss feminismâ is actually bad tho. Why is it bad for women to be strong and successful. Does anyone know or do we just hate women. No one says âboybossâ when the main character of an action movie is a guy who kills a bunch of dudes.
Also itâs shortsighted and illogical. If we were to change the social and civil laws that are unfair to women, women have to take over every influential position to make it happen. Because real effective change comes from having seats at the table, not from protesting outside the door or begging those in power to feel sympathy for us. I honestly think bashing that idea is psyop by men to discourage women from seeking more positions of power. Itâs not surprising to me that right after this, tradwives content became popular because women donât have to work and be a girlboss anymore. They should just let men lead the home and the country and itâs okay. If anything that tells me women are close to a breakthrough, all this resistance is because weâve hit a vital nerve in the patriarchal structure. We should go back to that instead of this current nonsensical movement.
The problem with it is that women becoming business owners and land owners does not change the global status of women overall as the underpaid toilers of the world. It is a bourgeois distortion of the universality of womenâs liberation. Some women cannot be liberated at the expense of most women and we call it a day.
Is it liberation for that womanâs migrant nanny being paid under the table that her employer is a CEO? Funny how âgirlbossâ feminismâs grand dream is to export their reproductive labor to women of a heavily exploited ethnic underclass and to be a head of a company that statistically pays her women employees less. What a farce!
Thatâs why a truly feminist politic would be socialist and revolutionary. Letâs face it, there are women who act as near equal partners in the financial exploitation of women including through the imperialist world economy.
Who speaks for them? They historically pick up rifles against our empire. Women have been major players and leaders in guerrilla movements against the empire that would make your âgirlboss feminismâ possible. These are women that seek to destroy the material basis for your fantasy.