i hate when I see people try to reason why the Jedi couldn't free shmi by saying that it would've dragged them into a war with the hutts and slavers on tattooine and/or that it would've brought political unrest between the republic and the hutts and the outer rim.
like...are you seriously telling me that freeing one (1) single enslaved woman that's owned by some random guy would really have affected the entire galaxy and caused widespread unrest or war. It's not like shmi was still owned by gardulla or that she was owned by jabba. Besides, the Jedi could've literally just bought shmi from watto and there would be no need for any problems.
Also...the Jedi are supposed to be peacekeepers of the Galaxy. You know what goes against peace in the Galaxy?? Slavery. And it's not like the Jedi have never freed slaves before. One of the things Anakin asks Qui-gon in tpm is if he's there to free the slaves, so the Jedi obviously had a reputation for freeing enslaved people. There's many examples of Jedi freeing slaves in other media including in TCW when they freed the colony of Togruta people from the Zygerrian government, which would've had a much bigger effect than freeing one single woman from a toydarian junk dealer, especially because that took place during an actual war.
It's one thing to say that the Jedi somehow didn't know that Anakin's mom was still enslaved (which is...idk) because qui-gon died with that information, but to try to justify how they could've known but chose not to do anything is terrible.





















