Angela/Angie. Catholic, pro-life and pro freedom. I write far too much dark fantasy to be healthy. Here if you need prayers, a listening ear, or want to ramble about Tolkien, fantasy in general, or writing! John 10:10: âI have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.â
I think Iâve been reading too much about early modern Europe because I just heard someone go âof course Christians donât think the communion wafer is actually the body of Christ, itâs a metaphorâ and I said out loud âgirl no they started wars about this.â
Which is kind of a pedantic thing to say! because absolutely thatâs a benign and perfectly reasonable statement in the year 2026 but for a second I felt like there was an absolutely gobsmacked 17th century Austrian priest watching over my shoulder
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I have to say, I think the biggest reason I'm catholic is the eucharist. Just... having the real physical presence of Christ exactly where you are, where you can worship him, adore him, just be with him... I couldn't ever leave the catholic church, because it would mean leaving the eucharist - Jesus - behind.
honest to god we've got to start naming the elderly as a vulnerable group & calling their disabilities, disabilities. we sugarcoat and distance these things by only calling them "elderly," "old & frail," etc. most of them are disabled.
too many people completely separate disability from themselves in their mind. it's something that happens to other people. other sad people i don't want to think about. are they really even people, it's too much to bear thinking about that happening to a person... those background characters over there. it would never be me, i can't cope with thinking about that possibility.
this mass denialism of the fragility of the human body (YOUR human body) has created a whole category separate from the disabled - the "elderly." since anyone can join it if they live long enough.. no they can't be disabled. that's scary, and worse it's political. so they are just "old." so what they lost their hearing, their mobility, their heart function? that's just how it goes for old people. as if that's not a person as real as you. as if you wouldn't be devastated if that happened to you today (and it can btw). as if you won't be when it's your turn to be old, and disabled.
simultaneously the disabled are dehumanized as not people, and the elderly are dehumanized as not disabled. so the illusion of disability as separate can be upheld.
My grandparents lived to 98 and 103. Read that againâ 98 and 103. My grandmother died 5 months ago and was born in 1923.
She was extremely wealthy. My grandfather left her millions. She paid about 13,000 a month for her care.
And her nurses abused her. She could do nothing. She could not speak for herself, feed herself, clothe herself, and the humiliation they made her endure was disgusting. When she tried to express discomfort, they gave her drugs to âkeep her calmâ (keep their shift easy). We fought like HELL to hold that fucking place accountable. The only reason we were aware is because we hired a private nurse on her behalf, too.
The elderly are a massive, extremely vulnerable, and disabled group. You cannot leave them out of your advocacy, you cannot leave them out of the conversation. âTheyâre loud, they smell, theyâre opinionated, theyâre rude, they make me uncomfortableâ. I donât care. I donât care! They need your advocacy too! I want you to think, if my grandmotherâ who was in the best retirement home she could afford, with a personally hired third-party nurse to step in where the other carers failed, had such abhorrent care⌠what about everyone else? What about all the elderly who donât have a support system?
But I'm old, and I need y'all to just listen to me a second. Ten seconds maybe.
Twenty years ago, thirty years ago, there were kids outside. 40 years ago I was among Those Screaming Kids Outside.
Suddenly, kids being outside became a PROBLEM.
Some dumb fucks started suing parents when their kids got injured at their homes. They started calling CPS on kids who were "unattended" outside and levying abuse charges.
We went from It Takes a Village, to I'll call the cops on you if you hang out at the mall for too long without buying something.
It went from Hanging Out at The Park with Your Friends, to getting escorted home because a group of teens was automatically a Gang, and Gangs were terrible and awful and no one wanted their property values to go down because of hooligans.
No big kids outside. No one to watch over the littler kids, so no little kids outside. Less kids outside, more kids inside.
And hey, hey - Look At ME - I loved video games and computers and I was not a fan of "Outside". But I walked down to the Blockbuster than was 3 miles away from my house, and I rode my bike through parks and I played basketball in the street, and now that's gone.
Sure, kids carve out space here and there where they can, but as a general rule, it's all gone. It's paved over, under surveillance, with "This will be exhibit A" signs plastered all over the place.
The cacophony of loud, irritating, barely contained children missing from the day to day sounds of society were the first sign of its death, frankly. I don't know how it lined up to happen so fast, I'm sure someone smarter than me could point to the assholes that got the ball rolling in the wrong direction.
But it's really eerie to be at my desk, at work, during the summer months, and there's not a sound on my residential street. It's fucking creepy.
This also actively contributes to the problem the anon was talking about! Kids who canât be left alone to do kid things = kids brought by parents to places inappropriate for kids because how else could they do literally anything when they are expected to be tied to their child umbilically at all times.
And kids who arenât allowed to have any freedom with parents who never get a break and are expected to helicopter them, will not learn how to exist in society without being annoying little pieces of shit.
the last time there was a big war without vaccines more people died from the flu than from the war. until extremely recently more people died from disease than from violence during every war, ever, for the whole of human history. ending vaccine mandates for soldiers really is shoving a live grenade down your pants to own the libs. very few policies could theoretically kill more US soldiers than this one
The United States has a volunteer military. Those who volunteer to serve should be afforded the respect to make their own medical decisions with informed consent. Even in the event of a draft, our government respects legitimate conscientious objectors to military serviceâit is wholly inconsistent to place such a high regard in oneâs beliefs as to potentially exempt him entirely from mandatory service while steamrolling the next manâs beliefs in order to violate his bodily integrity. If military readiness is the god upon whose altar all personal medical decisions must be sacrificed, why not simply remove every military volunteerâs appendix and gallbladder right at the recruiting office to avoid any possible complications later in the field? Why not sterilize every female recruit to avoid the possibility of pregnancy affecting her ability to carry out her duties?
The military has a duty to educate officers and enlisted as to the history and utility of vaccines in the military and the efficacy, safety, and risks of the vaccines currently recommended for those in the military versus the illnesses they are likely to face rather than treating them like lab rats on which to experiment vaccines and other prophylactics. Almost every war in which the United States has been engaged since the end of the Second World War has been a war of choice, not some titanic struggle for national or civilizational survival; in that context, it is wholly unethical to force volunteer servicemen to take pharmaceuticals that could cause grievous lifelong injuries or possibly kill them before they even render any service to their country. Or are the pharmaceutical contractors who presently supply the military so trustworthy as to have presumptive access to every servicemanâs veins over every possible objection?
While I think it's important to recognize the role vaccination has played in curbing some of the major diseases that plagued humanity, I also think it's extremely important to respect people's bodily autonomy, and by that I mean that I don't want to just grant a carte blanche to violate people's consent, to any new technology or drug that comes along and brands itself as a "vaccine".
As horrible as infectious disease has been throughout history, we also have to look at the major horrors that have been committed when the government violates people's consent for medical procedures.
And if you're mindful of the greater good then ask yourself: is generating mass ill-will for something society needs by violating people's consent really the best move long-term? This may sound idealistic, but i believe it's actually pragmatic as well.
Hey, can we just talk about OP's propaganda for a minute?
The last big war that was fought with any vaccinations was the American Revolution. The first smallpox vaccine was invented in 1796.
If you want to make the case that that wasn't really widespread, fine. Pasture published germ theory in the 1870s. By WW1, we have vaccines against cholera, bubonic plague, typhoid, tetanus, and diptheria.
We didn't have a vaccine for influenza in 1914 when WW1 started, because Spanish Flu didn't exist until 1918.
While Spanish Flu did kill more people then WW1, two years of the global pandemic happened after the war; they were not concurrent.
While it is called a "world war," WW1 was not really a world war. There were very few theaters outside of Europe and the Mediterranean Basin, and only 3% of the world population ever saw combat. Conversely, Spanish Flu spread through the Western Front and East Asia concurrently, then quickly spread through the Americas, Oceania, South and West Asia, and Africa. 3% of the population died, and 30% were infected. The number of people involved make the comparison apples to oranges.
The only number that I could find of people dying in WW1 from Spanish Flu was 43,000 of the 116,000 deaths of American troops only, which is 37%, and while that is very high, that's not more people dying from the flu than war.
I'm sure this is about Hegseth no longer requiring flu shots for service members if they're not in the field, but before covid, I remember the flu shot being regarded as the least reliable vaccine we had, which was why people referred to it as "the flu shot" and not "the flu vaccine." Anyone older than 16 should remember the arguments over calling the flu shot a vaccine at all because it did not provide permanent immunity against the flu.
(This is because there are multiple variants of influenza. It evolves very quickly and makes any attempted vaccination limited in its effectiveness. The current method is to take the most prevalent strain(s) from the previous year and use them in the flu shot. Which is the strain that most people already have T-cell immunity to for the next two years. This usually proves unhelpful.)
Which makes it ironic that they're bent out of shape over the flu shot no longer being required since it has never been proven to be an effective vaccine. Studies come out that "prove" the shot reduces the risk of getting the flu by 30% (which is not a vaccination), and others come out to show that people who get the shot are 40% more likely to develop the flu. It is, at best, dependent on which strain they use for influenza and which one is active that year.
The first flu vaccine introduced in 1945 (during WW2) was virtually ineffective, and the reduction in death due to disease was likely entirely due to the newly dynamic nature of warfare. Trenches that bred disease and field hospitals that spread them were no longer on the front lines of battle. Instead, injured soldiers were triaged, moved to a MASH unit, and then transported to an actual hospital in an actual city where they would recover away from the unsanitary conditions of a battlefield.
This is one reason why America has army bases around the world, so that they can get wounded soldiers to sanitary hospitals as soon as possible.
Let's please stop pretending that vaccines are the reason communicable disease is no longer the primary concern, not just of war but all of life. That is due to indoor plumbing, proper waste disposal, sanitation technologies, and high speed travel.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The Bread of Life Discourse
In John 6, a big crowd has gathered around Jesus and, being fed by His miracle of multiplying the bread and fish, they seek more signs... and more food. They suggest Jesus perform another sign, like calling down bread from heaven like Moses did for their ancestors in the desert. Jesus reminds them that the desert bread wasn't Moses's doing, but God's, and the bread God sends from heaven now is the true bread of life, which will satisfy men forever and give them eternal life. He calls Himself the true bread and says that those who eat His flesh and drink His blood will live forever. This is called the Bread of Life Discourse.
Try reading the full Bread of Life Discourse for yourself, or even the whole of John Chapter 6. It's got a bunch of Jesus's biggest hits, like multiplying food and walking on water!- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Phago vs TrogoIn John 6, verse 51, when Jesus tells the crowd that they must EAT His flesh to have eternal life, the original Greek translation uses the word PHAGO, which is a general term for eating or consuming food. In response, the Jews are rightfully confused and scandalized and argue with each other. "How can He give us His flesh to eat?" At this, Jesus doubles down and continues insisting they must EAT His flesh, and from verse 54 on, the Greek translation uses the word TROGO, which is a more visceral word that describes gnashing, crunching, chewing, or gnawing. It's a much more deliberate and physically evocative word. Very graphic. Very uncomfortable. With this, the crowd disperses, unable to accept this teaching. Even when left alone with His twelve apostles, He doesn't walk it back. He simply asks them if they want to leave Him too. Peter solemnly replies, "Master, who else could we go to? You have the words of eternal life." This strange teaching ends up planting important seeds, and combined with typological details from the Last Supper and the Crucifixion, it would develop into the Christian belief in the True Presence: the belief that Jesus is in some way made fully present in the bread of the Eucharist, and that by physically sharing in that bread, we share in His divine life.
For more on the Catholic perspective on the Bread of Life Discourse, see Catholic.com's article: The Real Presence, Part Two.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The Cartoon
In this cartoon, Jesus delivers His canon line about eating His flesh, and the Jews around Him argue. One man wonders, "Is He really saying to eat His flesh?" A second man (Philip, for the eagle-eyed) gives a half-hearted, "Yes?" because he's not entirely sure yet himself. A third man gives a confident, "Naw!" as in, "No, He can't possibly be saying that!" Jesus hears them and responds by repeating Philip's "yes" but as a declaration instead of a question. Then He repeats the other man's "naw," but instead of "naw," which means "no," He says "gnaw," which sounds the same but means "to break down by chewing." So "Yes? Naw!" becomes "Yes. GNAW." His use of the word "gnaw" is a nod to His use of the Greek word TROGO, and His frightening face is a nod to how little His response comforts His listeners in the actual story.
problem with tv shows today is i think a lot of them want to be movies. 90 minute episodes with full cgi and a plot so streamlined theres no time for filler is not a tv show to me. tv shows need a low budget so they can afford to send the characters on weird detours to flesh out the universe. its healthy. its good for the ecosystem. you need a show wiki writers and tv tropes cataloguers can sink their teeth into.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
One thing that worries me about the use of AI is whether or not it can worsen people's dementia and alzheimer's in the future. When my grandmother was first diagnosed, we got her math activity books. Now, my grandmother never had a formal education, but we did our best to keep her sharp, get her to do math and writing activity books, sudokus, playing board games that required some level of strategizing with her. Her family is prone to alzheimer's and dementia (both her siblings had it and deteriorated very very very quickly, which yeah, scares the shit out of me being her granddaughter) but she was the one whose mind lasted the longest, she only passed away two years ago, at 88, ten whole years after her initial diagnosis and sure, she had forgotten things, recipes and where she put her glasses and appointments, but she never forgot any of us, ten whole years in, she still remembered us. Now, this may have been luck, but doctors always said the constant mental work + companionship + medicine helped her a lot. So I'm thinking, these people who are now relying on AI for everything, from email-writing to thinking what's for dinner to casual conversations, I've even seen people rely on it to calculate what time they should leave their house if they need to be at a place at a specific time and their commute lasts X number of minutes. As if that's not... the simplest math operation possible? You shouldn't even need a calculator for that!!! Idk I don't know how long it'll take us to see the effects of this + exposure to brain-rotting short form content that is completely meaningless + people addicted to right-wing conspiracy style media. Idk I'm very worried. Please, read, read complicated books! Take up a book on philosophy and try to decipher it and make your own opinions on it, please buy a maths activity book and relearn how to do math, please get a hobby that involves lots of thinking and concentrating. PLEASE!!!
As a neurologist, Iâll give you the pretty name for it: cognitive reserve.
The way I explain it to my patients is that our neurons donât regenerate. They make connections with each other and thatâs it. If you donât use your brain, they make fewer connections and, if one of them dies, youâre gonna miss it, because that was the only one that knew how to do X. Now, if each one of them has many, many connections, you wonât notice the difference when one of them dies. The others pick up the slack.
As of 2024, 45% of dementia risk factors are modifiable. Relevant to this conversation, 5% for less education and 5% for social isolation.
We absolutely are going to see the reflection of this, but itâs gonna take decades and itâll be too late. So, for the love of your brain, pretend that itâs a muscle and make it work. People complain about âwhen am I ever gonna use this maths formula in my life?â Youâre not. Youâre teaching your brain to think logically. Those sinapses will be there for when you need to figure out your weekâs schedule. English classes taught me how to interpret data and how to convey it in this text so itâs clear and you understand what Iâm saying, not because I needed to justify why the curtain is blue.
Make your brain know how to do different things. Logic games, puzzles, taking care of a garden even if small, planning a churchâs event or birthday, learn a new instrument, learn a few words in another language, look at a calendar every day, do some manual labor if possible. Do not, I repeat, do not let your brain get rid of sinapses by letting AI do everything. Your brain uses 20% of your bodyâs energy â do you really think itâs going to maintain connexions that arenât in use?
Most cases of Alzheimerâs are sporadic, meaning no family history. Family history of a first-degree relative with Alzheimerâs starting before they were 80yo increases your risk in 2-3x on average.
TLDR: Yes. From the knowledge we have today, AI will increase the number and severity of dementia cases.
and EVEN WHEN things were more muted/neutral, the neutrality was OFFSET by ACCENT COLORS and HIGH CONTRAST between the wood tones and everything ELSE
ALSO AMERICAN COLONIAL INTERIORS POPPED OFF, Y'ALL (IN TERMS OF COLOR/COZINESS)
PEOPLE USED WHITEWASH AND COLORFUL TRIM OR EVEN JUST COLORFUL FURNITURE IF THEY COULD AFFORD TO DO SO
AND DON'T GET ME STARTED ON FRENCH AND BRITISH AND AMERICAN WALLPAPERS
"ELIZABETH" YOU CRY, "WHY ARE YOU BEING SO EXTRA THIS MORNING?! IT'S MONDAY"
Because, my friend, my war on GREIGE will NEVER end.
Historic interiors were filled with LIFE and LIGHT and COLOR. ALWAYS HAVE BEEN.
Part of the reason we don't see a lot of textile art is because, frankly, textiles tend to degrade over time - especially ones that had utility! And yes, pigments and weaving and dying all boosted the expense of things, when we were finally reliably block-printing fabrics and broad reams of paper, it was no longer just the wealthy who could afford pretty patterns!
In the Americas, a far wider variety of pigments also became available because of the abundance of... well, a shitton of flora and minerals, some of which weren't as common in Europe.
WHY THE HIGHLIGHTER COLORS? you ask.
CANDLES.
Those colors reflect candlelight and natural sunlight REALLY WELL.
Humans LOVE bright colors, it's NOT just a thing for kids. We live in a brilliant, vibrant, multifaceted world. We ALWAYS have.
(STOP MAKING YOUR HISTORIC SIMS 4 BUILDS BE BLAND. STOP IT.)
Pre-menstrual depression is always depicted as like "He He! I had a box of icecream bars and cried while watching the Titanic!" But in reality, it's more like, "I'm standing the edge of an abyss. There is nothing good inside of me, I'm filled with rage and desperation."
It's crazy that being told how to deal with that is never a part of anyone's menstrual sex education.
This has already been said in the notes, but if PMS causes extreme depression and even suicidal ideation, that is in fact something that most people do not experience and it can be treated
Like for the majority it really is "oh i'm hungrier and moodier than usual"
^this should be a part of sex education so the point still stands
I went to my doctor after I was walking to work one morning and saw a bus coming and actually took a step to throw myself in front of it before I pulled myself together. Later that day I started bleeding and was literally like someone flipped a switch and I didn't feel suicidal anymore. Which made me feel like I was loosing my mind because who goes from 'I want to throw myself in front of a bus' to 'I'm perfectly fine' just like that? I did some research, I went to the doctor and described my feelings, he looked me in the eye and gently asked what I thought it was, I said I'd read about PMDD and I thought it might be that, he said 'I think so too' and wrote a prescription.
If, before you get your period, you feel furiously angry, suicidal, irritated by every tiny thing to the point you want to murder someone, stuck in a black hole you'll never escape from. If you are experiencing extreme emotions for what seems like no good reason, especially if you get your period and those extreme emotions just go away. You're probably not just PMSing , you may have PMS's feral big sister PMDD and it's treatable.
Also this is something that can develop as you get older. So if you used to get normal PMS but what I wrote above sounds more like your norm now then don't just write it off as regular PMS.
If you havenât seen Wish yet and you love Disney, do not go see it. I am telling you now. It is ripping out the hearts of the Disney movies you love and then waving their corpses around as if celebrating those hearts.
Iâll explain why, again: the message of Wish? Awful. Anti-Disney.
But they've been doing this for a long time. Saying one thing with their movies, and saying another with their PR and Disney Parks Soundtracks.
I'll explain.
Main Idea of Disney's Wish (and the You Are the Magic theme park song and merch): "The power to make your wishes come true is in you."
â
Most Disney Movies' Idea on How to Have Wishes: "Do what's right, (trust a higher power) and something even more wonderful than what you wished will happen."
Don't try to argue with me about this. You have to look underneath the slogans and the sweater designs and the song titles to what the stories actually support to acknowledge this.
Because you canât say âdo whatâs rightâ has power unless you answer the question âwho gets to decide âwhatâs right?ââ (Which, coincidentally, is a question Wish brings up and then doesnât answer.)
Audiences of Disney used to accept that wishing on a star was much like prayer; thereâs something you long for, and itâs out of your hands, but you wish for it and you do what you know is right in the meantime. And youâre not crushed, youâre not downhearted, because somewhere in your mind you trust that the combo of those two thingsâwishing on a higher power and diligence to do whatâs goodâwill be what makes your wish come true.
Trust in a higher powerâCOMBINED WITH:
âdiligence to do whatâs good.
The Blue Fairy (higher power) gave Geppetto his wish specifically because he had demonstrated commitment to do good, whether he got what he wanted or not.
The Fairy Godmother (higher power) gave Cinderella her wish specifically because she kept on being kind and good to low creatures like mice and wicked stepsisters, whether she got what she wanted or not.
Do you know why that combo (higher power + diligence to do good) is impactful? Timeless? Important?
Because itâs selfless. You want something, but youâre not going to sacrifice doing the right thing to get it. Youâre not going to focus so hard on making what you want a reality, on your own, that you miss out on things that could be more important than what you want. And, youâre not so self-focused as to believe that if you donât do it, it wonât get done.
Jeez, thatâs the whole point of The Princess and the Frog!
Tiana wishes to have her own restaurant, and she believes that only her own hard work will grant that wish. She misunderstands her dadâs advice before he dies. She isnât willing to trust a higher power combined with her own diligence to do goodâshe only trusts her own ability.
Itâs not until she realizes that Ray, the character of faith, was right all along that she learnsâwhat she wished for was too self-focused. It wasnât complete without love. Something bigger than herself. And getting that was never going to happen just based on her own hard work.
But you know what? It was never going to happen just by a âhigher-powerâ flavored shortcut, either. Because Facilier offers her her wish if sheâll just trust him, no hard work needed. But what does she say?
Trust in a higher power + diligence to do whatâs right = selflessness, and getting more than you could have ever wished for. And if your wish is selfish, doing those two things will change your wish into something selfless.
More examples? Get âem while theyâre hot, in case Wish made you forget, just like the current #NotMyDisney executives have forgotten, what real Disney wishes are for.
Belle wishes to have adventures in the great wide somewhere--but when she's imprisoned and that chance is taken from her it's not reversed because she worked hard to make her wish come true. It's granted because she gave up her wish for her father: she just did the right thing, regardless of her wish. And in the end, she does get what she wished for, which is adventure in an enchanted castle...and much more, because she gets true love, a throne, and a castle full of friends.
How about the One Who Started It All? The one Wish is failing to pay genuine tribute to?
Snow White wishes for someone to love her, and he does--but when they're separated, she does not exercise power to make The Prince come back to her. Instead, she loves who she can where sheâs atâthe Dwarfs. In the meantime, she has faith that he will keep his promise, and that pure trust in a higher power outside of her control is a big contributing factor to why the Dwarfs come to love her, and learn from her...and in the end, even more than she could've wished happens. He does take her to his castle, but she also has seven new friends who also love her, and the Queen is dead. And she didnât need to use âthe power in herâ to work harder and get it done. She just needed to not focus so much on herself at all.
How about a male main character? One whoâs wish starts out selfish, but after learning to wish on a higher power and be diligent to do the right thing, gets more than he could wish for?
Aladdin wishes to be somebody different (somebody he believes Jasmine could love, somebody who lives in a palace and is respected and ânever has any troubles at all.â)âbut doing everything in his own power for that wish proves that it was selfish all along; so he switches to doing the right thing, regardless of if his wish comes true, and he gets even more than he couldâve wished. He gets real love with Jasmine, he gets his friend Genie, and he gets to be free from feeling âtrappedâ because he doesnât have to hide who he is anymore.
Or Simba?
Simba wishes to get to do whatever he wants as Kingâbut when Mufasa dies and heâs convinced itâs his fault, it isnât for that wish that he goes back to Pride Rock to confront his past and his Uncle. Itâs because he had an encounter with a higher powerâhis fatherâthat helped him to realize his wish was selfish all along. He gives up the selfish wish, and he goes back to take his place as king, not so he can do whatever he wants, but so that he can take self-sacrificial responsibility that comes with ruling. And because he just does the right thing, finally, he gets more than what he wished for.
How about something more recent? Zootopia.
Judy wishes to make the world a better place by proving she can be what she wants to be and catching bad guysâbut when she tries to make her wish happen on her own, in her own abilities, she fails and is forced to realize that she shouldâve been looking for help by understanding âbad guys,â like Nick. Itâs only after she humbled herself, admits sheâs wrong, and changes her wish from âproving I can be what I want and catching bad guysâ to âproving that understanding each other makes the world a better placeâ (much less self-focused) that her wish comes trueâand so much more. She does make the world a better place, and she does get to catch bad guys, but she also gets to befriend one who was a good guy all along, and become all-around more effective at her dream job.
This is how Disney always has been. Because itâs at the heart of good storytelling, and even life (not to get too dramatic.)
The power is not in you. Because itâs not about you. Self-sacrifice, faith, and doing the next right thing regardless of if you get your heartâs fondest desire is what makes more than just your wishes come true. And there has to be belief in a higher power to make that message powerful.
But Wish?
Not only is it bad at showing instead of telling. Not only is it lazy and soulless.
But itâs characters rip the Star out of the sky and say âdonât wish on this. Wish on yourself, to get what you wish for. You donât need a higher power. You donât even need to sacrifice to do whatâs goodâwhatever you do is good, because you are the one doing it.â
That is wrong. That is not true, and it is not powerful. Thereâs no sacrifice in focusing on or placing your trust totally in yourself, and it undoes every good thing Disney has done up until now.
And it undoes it on the 100th anniversary, and it flaunts Easter eggs of the very things itâs undoing.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I really wish the overused sentence âYou either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.â was less relevant but here we are