I think one thing that US Americans get wrong about the AbbƩ Faria in the 2002 adaptation of CoMC is from creating a false equivalence.
There is a logical thought process of: AbbƩ = man of God = moral influence. Following that logic, it makes sense that the AbbƩ would try to convince Dantes not to seek revenge. But the text gives us evidence that he is not that sort of holy man. For starters when he is explaining his own history, he talks about how he enjoyed his own revenge plot. Dumas was working off of a different equation. For Dumas, and I would argue other contemporary readers, abbƩ= trained by the church= much more educated than at least 75% of the population.
The 1700s and 1800s in Europe was a time of major social upheaval, especially in the realms of knowledge gathering and dispersal. In catholic areas (the Italian city states especially) the catholic church was still the main institution providing education. Of course that education came with a shit tone of caveats that sound restrictive to a modern audience, but at the time were accepted as fine.
US Americans have largely removed the church from education and made it the responsibility of the State, and created a story of religious callings to explain people who join religious leadership (tangent about usa major religions). To fit within those stories, the AbbƩ Faria was made into a moral priest with opinions about revenge/ forgiveness, because what other reason would there be to part of the catholic church? (Another tangent about attitudes in the usa about sex and religion).
In a modern adaptation, the AbbƩ could just as well be a PhD and have been a private tutor for some minor minor off branch of the Hapsburg family tree. The fact that he is an abbƩ is only important in the original story, because it tells us he is highly educated












