SAVING FACE (2004)
dir. Alice Wu

titsay
AnasAbdin
Cosmic Funnies
Mike Driver
Sweet Seals For You, Always
d e v o n

★

roma★

izzy's playlists!
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
i don't do bad sauce passes
NASA
almost home
art blog(derogatory)
we're not kids anymore.
todays bird
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Kiana Khansmith

@theartofmadeline
$LAYYYTER

seen from Iraq

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Algeria

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Netherlands
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from China

seen from France

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Netherlands

seen from Italy
seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany

seen from Mexico
@wrybility
SAVING FACE (2004)
dir. Alice Wu

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
From How to Be Perfect by Ron Padgett
he’s literally snoopy. I love him
Throwback to when I put my name as Dante Alighieri on Academia.edu and received this email

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
hate when folk call the Sun “our nearest star” no you dweebs that’s OUR STAR! After everything she's done for you and you want to compare her to some lightyears away ass nobody called some shit like Guncho 785B? We're not spinning eternally around any old ball, we’re three deep in the window on board the Sol Train and she did NOT provide the catering, the itinerary and all the fuel to share credit with some two-bit Proxima Centauri hack. point to these nuts in a constellation while you're at it. i love the sun
can you tell the days are getting longer again
if manrico operacharacter has 100 fans i am one of them if manrico operacharacter has 50 fans i am one of them if manrico operacharacter has 1 fan that’s me if manrico operacharacter has no fans i have ceased to be of this earth. GODBLESS AND AMEN!!!
@girlscarpia i Will Indeed because for a while i too was thinking 'now WHY do i find manrico so endearing when most tenors get on my nerves to various extents?' and i THINK i have the answer as to what the appeal about manrico is and what, ideally, a trov production should do with this fellow.
the absolute tldr of the situation is this:
there's obviously way more than that but i thought that was very funny. also for the record i am a di luna enjoyer too, but unlike with manrico (who is like a golden retriever i am putting funny hats on) di luna is more akin to a baby sock i am putting in a wind tunnel just to watch it fly around like crazy.
SO. first we have to answer the question... why DOES leonora like manrico so much? what is her deal?? it isn't mentioned in the libretto but it's important to remember she's betrothed to count di luna to begin with. i think she doesn't really love manrico as like, a person she could marry and settle down with, but rather as an idea. to leonora, manrico symbolizes something outside of family contract and the cycles of repetition that embody the work. leonora ultimately wants the ability to choose over anything else, an option the world of the opera doesn't seem to acknowledge at all.
which is significant because the opera is all about choice and the perpetuation of cycles, largely brought on by family ties.
trovatore is often thought of as a revenge opera. and it very much is about revenge, just as most verdis are, but it's important to remember that verdi usually uses revenge as a language to mean something- it doesn't just exist for its own sake. in rigoletto, for example, characters use revenge to communicate social status and societal conformity. in trovatore, revenge is used to communicate the cycle of violence perpetuated by the characters. there's two distinct chains of this in the entire thing: acuzena's mother -> azucena -> manrico, the other di luna sr -> di luna jr.
manrico is fascinating in that, in some respects, while this chain is still sort of dominating his life (see the civil war situation and the moment where azucena is like YOU GOTTA KILL THE COUNT) he's... sort of rejecting it? or at least coming close to figuring out how to reject it. like for all his density (and maybe because of his density) i get the sense he doesn't go after count di luna because, oh-that's-the-guy-i-have-to-go-kill but rather, oh-that-guy-wants-MY-girlfriend-well-he-isn't-getting-her. which- remember, the dude is seventeen, and also his girlfriend clearly doesn't want this other guy (although his teenage impulsivity makes him almost believe it at times). this choice of action makes perfect sense when you remember he's seventeen. instead of going for the expectations of duty placed on him, he's choosing what makes sense to himself as a person, which is really significant. you see this also both times he spares di luna- it isn't a choice sprung of duty but of impulse, and ultimately impulse in trovatore is something much richer and more human than duty, because the human impulse is to save and protect rather than to exact vengeance. even when his mother is kidnapped, is manrico going after di luna's forces because He Expects They Will Kill Her And Therefore He Has To Exact Revenge? no! he's doing it because he wants to save his mother. and he still sees her as his mother even after he realizes they aren't blood related. the only other time a character expresses the desire to save in this way, rather than to get revenge, is when azucena mentions having attempted to save her mother before the whole baby-burning incident, and even then the fact that azucena failed to save her has sort of embittered her towards that concept since.
(i do think azucena cares about manrico, genuinely, and really does see him as a son; but the things that have happened to her have kind of fucked up her parenting skills so she does manipulate him around a bit. because she sees it as a survival tool. i think di luna sees manipulation as a survival tool too but i could talk about him another day.)
the one thing i keep seeing people dunk on manrico for is how when leonora saves him (for like. a few minutes) by marrying the count (and then McFucking Dying), he's like OMG HUSSY but honestly to be fair if i was wasting away in prison with my mom about to be executed and my mom was going PTSD apeshit and then my girlfriend busts in with the news she just married my freak HAWKFROST KINNIE BROTHER, and also i am like seventeen and already have regularly been exposed to the horrors of war, i also might not react to that in the best and healthiest frame of mind. not fully excusing him for that but i don't think you can write him off for that Forever and have that one moment define him.
ultimately the audience has to see manrico the same way leonora sees him: as potential for escape and choice. not fully realized potential, no; and perhaps potential that has been doomed from the very beginning, but potential. we have to believe in him. we have to believe in the deathless dream, the idea that there is more to this life than these cycles of abuse and trauma that dominate the world. i think it can be done, but it takes acting, and i think he has to look sort of vulnerable- we are putting all that responsibility in a seventeen year old after all, maybe us the audience are too perpetuating these cycles and putting too much on him. he has to be endearing and well-meaning and a wee bit silly. in the grand scheme of things when di luna kills him in the end he's holding an infant, all the potential lost, its umbilical cord strangled around its neck.
something abt him- the juxtaposition of his just really being a kid, and his position as potential sacrificed to the only way this all could have gone- the juxtaposition of his desire for impulse and freedom versus his loyalty and doglike attributes- makes me think of the poem space dog by alan shapiro, which is the best summation of manrico as a character in my mind:
also like. silly dumb football jock who likes music and kinda looks like a golden retriever and is just stupid enough that i as a lesbian feel completely unthreatened by him.
He's Nice
I’m sorry but this is the funniest Reddit post I’ve seen in a while
scariest part of every day is def the 15 minutes in the afternoon where my humors are balanced and it makes me think i'm ready to hold a prolonged conversation with anyone because sometimes i do try and then thirty seconds in i'm praying for spontaneous combustion to deliver me

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
the fuck man do i have a tumblr criminal record or some shit ??
I told a guy his total was 13.21 and he said “wish it were that year, could actually get some good music on the radio”
breaking news from the AP, our boys on the front have just sacked constantinople. take that, heretics. coming up next are the soothing lute dirges of bing crosby
the "i definitely do NOT have feelings for them in any way shape or form" while obviously crushing on them trope might be cliché to you. it's about being doomed from the start, the desperate denial of the starved self, the tragic inevitably of love to me tho
"i'm not in love with them" oh, honey. you are already so ruined. you have been ruined from the moment you met, and you will be ruined long after you part. your attempts to hide are futile. you cannot escape that which is everywhere and everything. love as a punishment, love as a death sentence. love as god.
If you have bodily autonomy, then there is always a chance that you will do something to your body that you will regret. This is not an argument for taking that autonomy away.
There is a much, much higher chance that someone who is not you will do something to your body that you regret.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Okay wait this brings up a point Dr. Richard D Wolff (americas leading Marxist economist) brought up in a lecture a while ago; economics needs an ethics review board.
Every other major discipline has an ethics review board. If you're a doctor and prescribe a patient a lethal dose of the wrong medicine, you get disciplined. If you're a biologist and commit animal cruelty, you get disciplined. If you're a psychologist and conduct an unethical study, you get disciplined. If you're an engineer and neglect safety standards when building a bridge, you get disciplined.
But if you're an economist and your policies actively harm people in a demonstrable way, nothing happens. It's all just a 'matter of opinion'
American and other western economists advised the Russian government on how to run the country following the end of the ussr and its estimated that the economic policies they recommended directly lead to the deaths of millions of people. And not a single economist so much as even lost their job.
Economics degrees also need courses on ethics and the real human impact of economic policies so that economists can learn how to avoid harm in the first place.
Recently, one of the most famous US economists posted a tweet sternly chiding the “hysteria” people were fostering in falsely claiming that inflation was bad in the United States. He included a graph that showed that in fact, prices for most things was down! Except for groceries and utilities. The things that people actually need for even basic survival. He did not seem to even understand that there could be any dissonance in his statement. At best, economists get so caught up in numbers that they lose sight of the human costs of everything involved. At worst, and indeed frequently, they actively contribute to making things worse for the people already at the biggest disadvantages.
real power is going outside knowing you look ugly and also knowing that if you chose to perform femininity in accordance with patriarchal standards you could look attractive, but genuinely prefering to look ugly and not feeling bad about it. feels good feels organic
True, honest, genuine power is going outside knowing you look gorgeous bc you don’t need to perform hyper femininity the way men want you to and that you can be stunning despite patriarchal ideals
i appreciate the intent but i actually made this post in direct response to the liberal feminist tendency to widen the parameters of “beauty” rather than challenging the concept itself and specifically the notion that women must be beautiful to be valuable, and as such my choice of words was very deliberate—i have no interest in being assured i am beautiful and a great deal of interest in existing without being told i must be such. this post is not self-deprecating and does not call for bathroom-stall platitudes. ugliness in women is threatening and i embrace that.
“I have no interest in being assured I am beautiful and a great deal of interest in existing without being told I must be such.”
POWERFUL