Brett Caton's Fumblin' Tumblr

1. Do not do age verification.

Oh no I dropped my link, what a horrible thing! Sure hope this doesn't get reblogged until it reaches users from the UK and Brazil!

Problem is that generally doesn't matter to the perpetually offended.

If you put a black, quadriplegic, toddler, with downs syndrome in a game and people have the ability to hit them with a baseball bat, people will do that and there will be a competition with folks trying to see who can launch the kid the furthest.

Because they can,

But if Leftists want to mod in raiders in wheelchairs that you can use a flame thrower on, I am sure that that would be popular. Most players are happy to have representation of all minorities, as targets.

If there was one thing that surprised me when I was involved with a young female gamer who was a feminist, is that she was quite happy with torturing and killing her Sims.

Na, na, na, na-na-na-naa

Na-na-na-naa, hey, Jude

Na, na, na, na-na-na-naa

Na-na-na-naa, hey, Jude..

They literally got away with executing a man in broad daylight and murdered a woman cause she was rude to them.

Damn. That is a weird way of saying she hit a cop with her car.

Like the time they claimed the ICE agents weren't clearly cops by saying the ID patches were unreadable smudges.

...Based exclusively on one blurry, low-res video.

Of course, given how dedicated they are, I assume they're either a paid troll or just plain mental, so

are on the table.

Trying to drive your car with a cop reaching in the window automatically puts that cop in danger, and I don't think I've seen seen any of them acknowledge that.

So even if we ignore the cop who was already in front of her telling her to stop when she started moving forward, what she did still could've killed a cop.

Did the agent survive? Yes.

Did the driver survive? No.

What was the physical danger the driver faced? A firearm.

What was the physical danger the agent faced? A 2-ton SUV.

Was the agent within at least a few feet of the vehicle before it started moving? Yes.

Did shooting the driver immediately halt the momentum of the 2-ton vehicle? No.

Would there be a reasonable expectation that shooting the driver would immediately halt the momentum of a 2-ton vehicle? No.

Is getting out of the way of a moving vehicle the best way to not be hit by that moving vehicle? Yes.

Does getting out of the way of a moving vehicle require shooting a gun? No.

Is it possible that aiming and shooting a gun will actually delay getting out of the way of a moving vehicle? Yes.

Was the agent holding a gun in his right hand and a phone in his left hand? Yes.

Did he drop either his phone or his gun throughout the entire altercation? No.

Did he shoot her at least two more times through the driver's side window while he was next to the vehicle? Yes.

Were there other people near the agent when he fired his gun? Yes.

Was the vehicles accelerator pegged after he shot her? Yes.

Did that cause the vehicle to speed down a neighborhood street until it collided with other cars where its engine continued to redline even after it was stopped? Yes.

Was that a potential danger to the general public? Yes.

Taken from DarkMatter2525's analysis of the situation. These are the facts of the matter. Shooting her did not stop her vehicle and yet he still survived. Shooting her directly endangered surrounding officers and any civilians in the area.

I can see from a police standard, arguing this was a fair shoot based on self-defense due to the complicated nature of self-defense and policing in general. But the facts of the matter do not speak kindly towards Jonathan Ross's actions as an intelligent human being.

As far as her actions being on her, maybe, but she had pretty strong justifications for everything she did here as well when you consider the actual facts. ICE certainly is something worth opposing. Opposing it puts you in danger. ICE under Trump is not necessarily beholden to law and can basically do what they want to you, as far as we can tell. Would you want to be captured by what you viewed as the gestapo of a fascist government as a visible minority?

She did her best to avoid harming anyone to the point that her vehicle didn't end up harming anyone even without her controlling it anymore. Renee Good did put herself in danger though. Of course she did. By protesting a fascist government's state police. That's hardly something that I think anyone should be killed for. She's a hero.

In other words, he was close enough to make it extremely difficult to move out of the way in time.

The possibility people defending Good have consistently ignored.

Just like ignoring how she chose to drive forward with a cop directly in front of her. She backed up, and shifted into drive, and then hit the gas.

Y'all love to look for any excuse to hate on the cop, while ignoring the multiple extremely stupid decisions Good made which would not have ended well even if the cop did an acrobatic pirouette out of danger.

>Would there be a reasonable expectation that shooting the driver would immediately halt the momentum of a 2-ton vehicle? No.

I don't know about you, but if a car is coming directly at me and I don't think I have time to dodge, I rate my chances much higher if the driver's foot is off the gas pedal.

>Was that a potential danger to the general public? Yes.

So you'll get mad at the cops for shooting her and leaving the vehicle uncontrolled and therefore a danger to others, but not her for trying to drive away with multiple cops closely surrounding her, including one reaching into the car.

And, like I said, towards one right in front of her.

Interesting priorities.

>PS: Don't reblog my Israel posts again or you'll get more of these. Don't mistake me for one of you just because I'm not a leftist.

So you decided to come after a completely unreleated post just so you could own me, because I silently agreed with you?

I reblog posts from people I strongly disagree with on other various issues all the time. Left, right, center, authoritarian, libertarian, anarchist.

If you feel so strongly about this, I could just block you now so I never reblog any of your posts, even by accident, ever again.

We've all seen the footage. He had to take like 1-2 steps back. It was not at all difficult for him to get out of the way. In fact, that was already in my fucking post. He spent more time drawing his weapon than attempting to get out of the way.

I'm not ignoring the choices she made. It seems far more likely to me that she genuinely feared for her life than he did. She acted accordingly. Her merely trying to escape arrest doesn't justify her being executed and I know that's true because you guys rarely claim it does. Instead you twist the facts of what happened even though we've all seen the damn video from like 5 angles.

The car was not coming directly at him. He had time to dodge. You're just lying and it's fucking insane to me.

That's okay. I'll just block you anyway. It's the only way to guarauntee I don't forget your not-so-polite request not to reblog from you.

As I said, I get plenty of exposure to ideas I disagree with, all the time. I created this blog in the first place partially to keep those arguments off my main.

And I'm not a conservative, as much as bigots (Dawkins) would like to pigeonhole me.

But he never names the country where he can drive over a cop without consequences, and as I've said since the incident, all he has to do to prove us wrong is go to a police station in the non American country of his choice, and Livestream himself telling them he intends to jump in a car and drive at cops ...

and they better get out of the way and not fight back because otherwise they are Nazis who deserve to die.

I would laugh so hard at mitchfynde telling literal communists that they have to accept their place as broken bodies beneath his wheels.

ELO - Electric Light Orchestra (L-R: Mik Kaminski, Hugh McDowell, Melvyn Gale, Jeff Lynne, Richard Tandy, Kelly Groucutt and Bev Bevan) - Promo pic for 'Discovery', May 1979

Electric Light Orchestra

When the concentration camps were liberated (which to be absolutely clear was a side effect of a European war, nobody on any continent waged war to end the holocaust except for Jewish Partizans), and survivors attempted to return home they were met with pogroms because the neighbours who enthusiastically sold them out to the Nazis and packed them into cattle cars didn't expect to see any of them back and were hostile to the reality.

Antisemitic violence faded through the establishment by holocaust survivors of Jewish advocacy organisations and concerted efforts lobbying politicians and having legal protections passed by elected representatives.

-

So maybe support the organisations that were established by your radical forebears that made these legal changes happen... And don't trust a link that suggests that not voting in preference for accelerationist violence is a real strategy.

They were appointed by elected officials who were voted in.

What could have ended slavery? Voting. What could have prevented the holocaust? Voting. However, demagogues that liked to convince people not to vote kind of both kept slavery ongoing, as well as the holocaust.

Why did the south revolt? Because a voted in president made them think they would lose their slaves.

Also, OP is actually actively lying about the connection between 'riots' and the closing of the interment camps.

Indeed, it was actually ENTIRELY UNRELATED CIVIL LEGAL PROCEDURES that lead to the end of the camps. And it does not go without saying that the OTHER related case?

Actually determined the camps were LEGAL, and that the US government had the right to just exclude people from any region they wanted for any reason they felt necessary... they just couldn't contain them afterwards. Granted, everyone there is hates the Korematsu decision, but it's still a thing.

https://archive.is/a8pAM

Where are Parisians from? For two-thirds of them, the answer is not Paris

The French are rapidly becoming a minority, with Islamification and enshittification proceeding full steam ahead. Leftists want to enshittify the world, because they see "doctors and engineers" as being not-white and therefore superior. They ignore the fact that non-white countries don't accept them either. The "doctors and engineers" face camps or death if they try doing that in Asia, for example. https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/white-britons-minority-london-birmingham-DWzNKY_2/

Leftists have already conquered two English cities without a fight, and the recent resistance in Ireland was globally reported as white supremacists trying to oppress the poor "doctors and engineers" who just wanted a child to rape and a woman's face to splash with acid, they didnadoo nuffin, how dare you.

"the number of people who describe themselves as Christian in England and Wales also fell below 50 per cent for the first time, the ONS said.

Every other religion in the country has seen an increase or stayed the same, as the data also shows number of people identifying as Muslim has increased by 1.2 million to 3.9 million between 2011 and 2021." It always fascinates me that Leftists think Islamification will serve them well. Muslims kill their kind routinely. It's perfectly normal to see them being slowly tortured to death by stoning, or perhaps given a quick launch from the nearest building. But because they see Islam as not-white, they think it must be perfectly good, and only a bigot would oppose it.

Please know this sites hashtagging system is categorical and NOT clout based

Aka if I look up the “Wendell and Wild” tag, I should find clips, media, art and posts related to Wendell and wild ONLY. Same with any other random tag searched

If I spy a selfie, a random neighborhood, or any other kind of “insta” post trying to take likes for a popular hashtag, I’m reporting you for spam. Most other long term users will too and your acct will be fast tracked as a spam blogger and blocked.

On tumblr, what happens is that your post shows up when people set out to specifically find Wendall and Wild posts. Not to generally browse for any kind of content of interest. When people are browsing for general stuff it's almost always by hopping onto the dash for the blogs they follow, and they often find new blogs to follow by going into the tags that apply to their interest or the notes of posts that do.

But it's intentional stupidity. It's not that we "Allow Hate Speech". The fact is we don't arrest people for speech alone. (Direct calls to action in certain cases do not qualify) But the reality is that who decides what is hate speech? Explain why it is that Christianity is the only faith in Canada right now in which is considered "hateful" to pray near clinics. Yet Islam and (and to a lesser extent) Judaism, seen untouched. And here's the kicker. If Islam ever takes power in Canada what follows is (under your gate speech laws) any criticism of their faith. And any "modern progressive" views as most Muslims are disgusted by the LGBT.

By: Jenny Rees

Published: Aug 18, 2021

A man who reported his female partner to the police for coercive control has said not being taken seriously felt like another form of gaslighting.

Craig said his former partner "robbed me of my independence and slowly undermined my confidence".

He said police concluded no further action was possible after he reported her and she was not charged.

The Home Office said it expected all police forces to take allegations of domestic abuse seriously.

Charity Safer Wales said men were not always believed by agencies who may have no experience of the issue.

Craig - not his real name - said he feared men were still not recognised as victims of this type of abuse.

'Constant put-downs'

In his case, he claimed not all evidence was examined and some witnesses were not interviewed.

"People don't understand what coercive control is - it can be more damaging than a violent attack," he said.

"Bruises all heal, but this psychological abuse can be for life.

"It's like imprisoning someone, restricting everything they are. It destroys who they are - and that's not a gender-based thing. That can happen to anyone."

He said his former partner gained total control of his money: "If I objected, I would be told 'don't you trust me after all these years?'."

Craig said he was told to pursue his complaints through the civil courts or report it as a fraud, as organisations failed to see him as a victim of coercive control.

In the end he was supported by Welsh Women's Aid.

"Victims need to be listened to," he said. "If someone doesn't do that - especially the police, or someone in authority - victims are not being believed again."

Craig said at first he found it hard to make sense of what had happened to him and see it as abuse, which made writing a police report particularly challenging.

"She robbed me of my independence and slowly undermined my confidence with constant little put-downs," he said.

He added she would also gaslight him by denying things had happened, though he knew them to be true, and would use that confusion to control him.

"In social situations she'd whisper in my ear 'you sound like an idiot, no-one understood what you said, or 'your joke wasn't funny'," he said.

He said everything from how he washed, to how he made a cup of tea or drove the car was criticised and controlled, leaving him with complex post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

'Still frightened'

Many of the details of Craig's relationship resonate with Jack - whose name has also been changed for his protection.

"It's a bit like walking on quicksand," he said.

"You're never sure at any time where you are.

"I kept the pressure off by staying busy - I didn't stop tidying, cleaning, hoovering.

"But I'd be told I hadn't done the job right, or hadn't done it well enough.

"I would have a crushing feeling of being completely useless.

"I'm still frightened now and have a recurring nightmare of [her] standing over me, telling me I can't do something."

He said the constant gaslighting meant he lost confidence in his decision making at home, meaning everything was deferred back to his partner.

This was in sharp contrast to his high-pressured job where he made important decisions on an hourly basis.

"My friends and family have kept me alive," he said.

"There's been a couple times I seriously thought of taking my own life."

His experience differed to Craig's, he said the police took him seriously and were supportive when he told them of his experiences, though he had not pressed charges.

'Suffer in silence'

The charity Safer Wales runs the Dyn Project, supporting male victims of domestic abuse in Wales.

Simon Borja, from the charity, said: "I think for some men if they do present to agencies like the police, like the local authority, they may not be believed.

"But it can also be that the agency hasn't seen this before or aren't sure what to and we would ask them to get in touch with us because we will help men navigate the system as well. 

He said it was important victims' experiences were validated straight away as it can lead to many internalising the problem over time.

"We see lots of depression, alcohol or substance misuse, or not engaging with work, friends or their social networks like they used to.

"A lot of men tell us it feels like a pressure valve's been released when they do talk to us.

"There's more awareness now than there used to be and we do get more calls, but we also know that lots of men just sit and suffer in silence."

Both Jack and Craig agreed work was needed to raise the profile of men as victims, and increase the availability of support.

The Home Office said it was acting to support all victims and tackle perpetrators of controlling or coercive behaviour.

A spokesman said: "We expect all police forces to take allegations of domestic abuse seriously.

"The Domestic Abuse Act strengthened the legislation on controlling or coercive behaviour so that abusers can still be prosecuted even when they no longer live with their victims and introduced a range of additional measures.

"In addition, the Home Office funds the Men's Advice Line, run by Respect, to provide support to male victims of domestic abuse, and in 2019 we published the first ever cross-government Male Victims' Position Statement."

--

Abstract

One, for women, to report that a man was abusive.