Mike Driver
YOU ARE THE REASON

shark vs the universe

pixel skylines

if i look back, i am lost
taylor price
noise dept.
d e v o n
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

titsay

izzy's playlists!
Interview Vampire Daily

tannertan36
cherry valley forever
EXPECTATIONS
Sade Olutola


seen from Türkiye
seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from Mexico

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Vietnam

seen from Türkiye
seen from Canada
seen from Thailand
@theobule-caul

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
theres a reason u associate east asians with femininity and black people with masculinity and it has nothing to do with actual masculine or feminine “behavior” and everything to do with race science 😭 u have been taught race science, u haven’t unlearned race science 😭😭😭😭 READ A BOOK ABOUT RACISMMMM
in any discussion about bigotry in fandom there will inevitably be someone of the marginalized group in question who pipes up to be like well i don’t think it’s that big a deal, i don’t think it’s racist/sexist/homophobic/transphobic etc, and maybe you’re actually being the real bigot by accusing me of internalized bigotry. and of course the people not part of said group are more likely to side with the marginalized person who confirms their biases. and while this doesn’t just happen in fandom spaces it’s definitely exacerbated in them by the “oh it’s just for fun, just playing with dolls, it’s escapism” sort of attitude
media: we have an anti-authoritarian story for you!
me: sweet hit me with the good stuff
media: so there's this marginalized underclass of people, right?
me: okay
media: and they're like, stigmatized for something that's mostly an aspect of how they are born, or where they're from, or they're badly misunderstood, right?
me: yup, got it, I'm with ya
media: so these people are rebelling against the current social order, because it's the instrument of their suffering
me: oh good great sure
media: but also they're violent and deranged and need to be stopped
me: ...what
media: yeah they're going too far, they're trying to overthrow the system and assassinate the nice cop trying to help them and also they burned down an orphanage
me: ...why? would they burn down an orphanage??
media: extremism is bad
me: still not seeing what this has to do with their fight though???
media: also now they've shot a dog. oops they shot another dog
me: what?! why? I though their motive was to overthrow oppression??
media: yes but their suffering has also made them evil
me: ...???
media: don't worry though, the good guys will defeat them and restore the status quo
me: the status quo that's been killing people?
media: well it turns out it was only killing the kinds of awful people who burn down orphanages and shoot dogs :)
me: oh. this is actually a pro-authoritarian story, isn't it?
media: nooo of course not don't be sillyyyyyy we're super progressive look one of the cops is a black lady don't be sillyyyyyy
One of the things I struggle with re: the "let people like toxic ships" (or like toxic published romances, etc.) discourse is that I find it makes it difficult to have meaningful conversations about the content of those stories.
If I look at, for example, dark romance, it is a true statement for many dark romance stories to say that the story is portraying abuse as romance. That's not saying the story is evil or bad or shouldn't exist or is tempting women into abusive relationships or whatever, but it is factually accurate that, by most modern definitions of abuse, the story is portraying abuse and calling it romance.
Similar things can be said about some subset of "toxic ships" in fandom.
It is also true for both some subset of romance/fantasy/romantasy stories and some subset of fanfiction that they present fascists, war criminals, mass murderers, people espousing hateful beliefs, etc. as sympathetic, romantically appealing, and at times justified in their actions.
I read a book once where a love interest admits to the main character that he has an anger issue that creates magical deadly fire, and to handle this and keep him from hurting people he cares about, his staff set him loose on criminals for him to murder instead. This moment is presented sympathetically towards the man who talks about committing extrajudicial killings.
This is not universally true, I'm sure, but a lot of the "let people enjoy toxic ships" discourse I tend to see has an element of shutting down people talking about the "toxicity" of said ships. In my experience, people who like those ships generally don't actually want to engage with the fact that the story is presenting abuse as romance, or that one or more of the characters espouses hateful beliefs, or whatever. And while sometimes that means avoiding those discussions, other times it seems to mean going "let people enjoy toxic ships" whenever other people try to talk about the toxicity of said ships.
And maybe this is controversial of me, but I think if someone's ability to like a "toxic ship" requires them to not engage with the abuse or the war crimes or the fascism or the bigotry or whatever, that's not actually the problem of anyone who wants to talk about those things.
Obviously I'm not advocating for harassment or specifically targeting people who like these ships to bombard them with negativity, etc., but I think if you want to like a "toxic ship" you have to learn how to deal with other people talking about how toxic the ship is.
Part of what irritates me the most is the "we are immune to propaganda" vibe that often pops up.
"Women can all tell it's abusive and are too smart to internalize that that's what romance should look like."
I couldn't.
I wasn't.
As a teenager I read a ton of romance novels that, in hindsight, were presenting deeply abusive behavior as romantic or, at the very least, as forgiveable, and far fewer that showed healthy romantic and sexual relationships. I had no idea that what I was reading was abusive, because why would I? It was the model I had to work off of. It was validating itself. If they were all showing similar behavior and calling it romance, why would I think it was anything else?
Now I'm not saying that this created, whole cloth, my view growing up of romance or sex--but it was absolutely a contributing factor. It validated and reinforced a lot of the more heteronormative and patriarchal views on sex that otherwise existed around me. It called them romantic!
As wild as this will sound, Chapter 20 of Eclipse was genuinely revelatory to me because it was one of the first times I ever read a romance novel where the man turned down sex rather than pursuing it and presented waiting as a preferable option. Now, Stephenie Meyer and her books have some deeply conservative and unideal sexual politics in them--but almost every other romance novel I read as a teenager showed men pursuing sex, sometimes to the point of assault. This shaped my view on how men engage with sex with women.
I'm not saying dark romance will make you tumble headlong into an abusive relationship. I'm not saying liking ships involving bigots will turn you into a bigot. But research shows our perspectives and worldview are shaped by the media we consume. It has nothing to do with how smart or educated or knowledgeable or worldly you are. It is not an insult.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Saw this on Twitter and wanted to share.
The push for separating black/dark and white/light from being symbols of evil and good is part of a larger call for conscious language. We may not always realize that color affects us mentally and emotionally, but it’s been proven time and again.[...]
This bias poses a particular problem when it comes to racial stereotypes. If you see the color black as inherently bad, unclean, or evil, then that bias will likely seep into interactions with actual Black people. For example, in response to the character Rue (from The Hunger Games) being Black in the movie, one person tweeted, “Ew, I imagined her looking very innocent and cute”—as if a Black child isn’t innocent because of her skin tone.
Even sticking to dark/light instead of the more specific black/white can remain problematic because of their close associations with each other. The former terms still perpetuate the negative connotations of this trope.
-- Examining Bias in the Use of Dark/Light as Evil/Good in Fantasy, by Richelle Braswell
"I'm so traumatized by the cultural baggage of womanhood that I avoid stories that uplift or center female characters because they can NEVER subvert or defy that cultural baggage in a way that will ever satisfy me, and I argue with or attack fans who like uplifting and centering female characters instead of welcoming them into the supposedly-inclusive tent of fanspace, and I let it slide when people talk about female characters in demeaning or violent ways because I don't want to engage in negativity, but fandom is PROGRESSIVE ACTUALLY because we center queerness (but only when it's men and I personally can get off on stories about them)."
i think this captures the defining pathology of the collective social media psyche right now. we are in the thrall of people who are wantonly cruel but who also demand to be coddled at all times in every way
the big man is the masculine dom and the dom is the top and the little man is effeminate and transgender but fully passes as a cis man and has top surgery but since he doesnt have bottom surgery he literally has to be a bottom theres no way for someone with a vagina to top and the bottom is the sub and they are both uncomplicatedly homosexual with zero positive emotions for women and they both have adhd and autism but only the kind of autism that doesnt actually disable you and they also crossdress but in a specifically humiliating way (why would a MAN wear a DRESS??? 🤪🤪 etc.) and they live together in a big house that they can both effortlessly afford and they're married and have 2 kids a dog and a cat (because Big man is dog coded and Little man is cat coded) and neither of them have jobs or lasting damage from canon events they've been through or physical disabilities or PTSD that I cant turn into Angsty Ship Content and the sun has a big smiley face and birds are just V shapes on the paper it doesnt have to be more complicated than that you dont have to flesh them out. you dont have to. and if you think about it wouldn't it just be soooo much effort to draw a whole bird?? youre just having fun its mean to ask you for detail. and my teacher lives at the school and the bus driver lives in the bus and everything is exactly the same :)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
if you see criticism of racism within your community as criticism of the community as a whole then you have a racist community. sorry.
This is only tangentially related to my other post but sometimes I will see this either stated or implied "why would anyone ever want to read straight novels?" and it's like well sometimes I just want to read about a woman and straight novels are the easiest way to do that, and sometimes I want to read about a man and a woman together and straight novels are the easiest way to do that, and sometimes straight novels are fantastic or interesting or funny or devastating.
Nobody is required to read books about straight people. But there's this condescension that I see sometimes, or this pretending that reading only gay (primarily M/M) stories is somehow morally superior, and it really irritates me. Calling all straight romance/romantasy "hetslop" is frankly just as obnxious as people who call romantasy just "fairy porn."
to be honest i think there’s a large number of people who conflate the very real and widespread phenomenon that women tend to be written off as just mothers or love interests in order to diminish their importance in a given story with the fact that a huge reason they’re sent to narrative purgatory in this way is BECAUSE the labels of “mother” and “girlfriend/wife” are systematically devalued and seen as inherently inferior because they’re terms that have been associated with ownership and/or control over women. like the amount of people who’ve told me that a certain female character is uninteresting or badly written because she happened to have a kid or be a man’s girlfriend or sister just to find out she was actually fleshed out very well and carried significant narrative importance frustrates me soo bad. there’s a huge problem with how those roles (specifically “wife” and “mother”) are systematically devalued and yet also perpetuated as the only viable options for women to achieve their societal roles in the patriarchy but acknowledging the devaluation of those labels to begin with is an important discussion in itself.
sorry i'm still angry about this but if your excuse for not caring about female characters is because you're not sexually attracted to them you are exactly 0 degrees of rhetorical separation from a redditor whining about how his favourite video game is now "too woke" because the women don't show enough skin

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i think one of the worst things the left wing internet ever did was push the idea that oppression is basically a virtue, and being oppressed is a sign of your morality. it has made it like…impossible for some of you to hold the idea that most people are privileged in some ways and oppressed in others. AND a lot of you seem to have it in your mind that terrible people cannot be oppressed, and that oppressed people cannot do terrible things, which is a dangerous rhetoric to hold imo.
really i think the most insidious part of white supremacy is the way it will convince white people everything is actually About Them. being called out isn’t about you. poc expressing frustration at your behaviour isn’t about you. it’s about how you are affecting others. step one is literally just de-centre yourself from the conversation. anyone who’s not white has already had to learn this lesson the hard way and it gets tiring waiting for the rest of you to catch up