I start grinding my teeth every time trans folks and allies use bioessentialism themselves to try to outwit trans sports bans. On a thread about trans people in sports, a trans woman tried to insist that since she started E, she's been so out of shape and frail and breathless, and a trans man was like "yeah now that I started T I have such an advantage over women and do not compete coed anymore" and I understand where this thought comes from, but it's both wrong and fucks us in the long run, not to mention both statements are utterly laced with misogyny!
The commentary was in relation to Isaac Ranson signing with the Aurora Football (soccer) Club--the women's semi-pro team. His ability to play for women's teams has been contingent upon him not being allowed to go on testosterone. He played for a women's college team--excelled actually--while being prevented from transitioning at all. The NCAA prevents you from being on T in women's college sports. The NWSL prevents you from being on T in women's pro soccer. The ICC prevents you from being on T in the olympics under the women's category.
Transphobes immediately shat themselves about fairness. Like they did for Mack Breggs a decade ago. Very few articles about the trans ban specify how the bans include language about hormones, so not only are trans men barred from competing among men, they are barred from medical transition entirely if they compete among women.
So when transphobes look at a trans man who cannot actually medically transition--his estrogen levels are in line with cis women--they complain, assuming his T levels are high. Then when it's revealed he's not on T, people still have a problem with him being there.
And it is so dangerous as trans people to take fascist tools to try to "gotcha" transphobes who are either motivated by transphobia and will not be happy no matter how trans people compete for as long as we are still there, or misogynists who are so extremely desperate to reinforce the narrative that being a woman means you are a weak frail thing and being a man means you are a thuggish brute. And wouldn't you know it, a huge portion of transphobic rhetoric combines the best of transphobia and misogyny into a neat little package.
It's the same as how the "bearded trans men in women's bathrooms show how silly bathroom bans are" ultimately does more damage than good: A good article about that.
When these selfies showing hyper-feminine or hyper-masculine gender presentations float to the top of social media timelines as they go viral, the images present narratives that have little bearing on the lives of trans people who are most affected. At best, bathroom selfies by cis-passing trans people open up discussion about the pitfalls of anti-trans bathroom legislation. But at worst, they perpetuate the myth that the issue of trans bathroom use can be solved by simply allowing only the people who “look” like the right gender to safely use the bathroom of their choice.
Many transphobes won't be "got" because they actually don't care about "women's safety" or "fairness" or whatever the talking point is, they do not want trans people to exist, OR, the ones you do catch in hypocrisy just tells them "you fool, you forgot to use misogyny!"
"Trans man isn't a threat cause his T levels are like cis women" is not a win! It tells them their measurement tools are right, their execution is just wrong, but the tools aren't right either! And you get people playing coed sports based on weight class smugly asserting that it would be "unfair" to compete against women. That's misogyny, bro!!!
You get trans women insisting they are now frail helpless creatures that pose no threat--I understand the need to appear disarming...but it's still misogyny.
We are just slowly replacing the misogynistic assumptions about birth sex with misogynistic assumptions about hormones and calling it a success, but not only is it not a success but many of the influential people in the discourse--politicians, sports committees, etc--are STILL of the opinion that sex assigned at birth is all there is.
This pivot just gives permission to create litmus tests. How much hormone is too much? Must everyone out themselves? Are we all prevented from medical transition? If we "look" like one thing regardless of what hormones say, how are we categorized? Are nonbinary and intersex people just cursed to to float like ghosts in the background, perpetually ignored by cis and trans people alike?
These moves are pioneered by cis passing medically-transitioned people who think we all just need to quickly hustle across to the other side and be indistinguishable from cis people and all will be well, but these sorts of litmus tests cannot even "correctly" identify cis women with bodily variance as women because our very standards of gender are racist intersexist exorsexist caricatures--we should NOT keep reinforcing the idea that we are all happy participants in that charade if we were only given the chance.