Mainstream media will engage in some pretty impressive linguistic contortions to avoid using the terms "man" or "woman" to describe disabled adults -- "males" and "females" are the most popular alternatives (you sound like Ferengi), but there's plenty of referring to adults as "boys," "girls," "children," or (somehow worst of all) "kiddos." It's somewhat more socially acceptable to refer to adult women as "girls" than to refer to adult men as "boys," so disabled women are more likely to be called "girls," while disabled men are more likely to be called "males" (genderqueer/non-binary people continue not existing, of course). Then there's "Individuals," which is notable for being a positive and respectful term that they manage to turn into a dehumanizing one. I thought I'd heard them all, until I saw a mainstream newspaper article from a major city refer to a disabled man as a "38-year-old guy." GUY. A journalist wrote this. An editor approved it. "GUY."























