This post is dedicated to criticizing McGonagall, because why not?
So, in The Prisoner of Azkaban, when remembering Pettigrew, Minerva cries and says that she was too strict with the poor boy who struggled with his studies — oh, how she regrets it now.
Nevertheless, that doesn’t stop her from treating Neville the exact same way, even though he is, to put it mildly, much nicer than the young Pettigrew, and there’s plenty to feel sorry for him about. Surely McGonagall knows what happened to Neville’s parents, so why not be a bit gentler with the boy? At the very least, she could not humiliate him.
"Longbottom, kindly do not reveal that you can't even perform a simple Switching Spell in front of anyone from Durmstrang!" Professor McGonagall barked at the end of one particularly difficult lesson, during which Neville had accidentally transplanted his own ears onto a cactus.
This moment made me incredibly angry. Maybe he does struggle with his studies (and quite a lot), but she had no right to humiliate him like that, especially in front of other students. That’s, at the very least, not pedagogical. In contrast, Lupin immediately comes to mind — he believed in Neville, praised him, and supported him in every possible way.


















