#(maybe.)

battat and friend

rehab is an intervention; its purpose is embedded in the word itself: rehabilitation. the program langdon is in—the physician-specific PHP—is designed to restore, protect, and guide clinicians through the realities of addiction while safeguarding their ability to practice safely. it is structured support, accountability, and remediation. it is not punitive. it is not a sentence.

and no matter what langdon says, his wife threatening divorce or the possibility of losing his children is not punishment either. these are natural consequences of his actions. framing them as punishment allows him to equate discomfort with moral reckoning—makes it so he’s almost sidestepping the harder, necessary work of true accountability. accountability is carried, not endured—it is owned and enacted in ways that honor those harmed, not just yourself. 

this misframing threads directly into his recovery. step 1 of the 12 steps—acknowledging powerlessness over addiction and the unmanageability of life—is foundational. langdon, however, frames his addiction as something tangential to his competence, rather than something that compromised it. he might be able to say the words, pass the step, and appear compliant, but emotionally he hasn’t fully absorbed how his choices distorted judgment, endangered patients, and undermined relationships. without confronting that impact, the patterns that caused harm remain active—and relapse is a real risk. recovery is internal; it demands honest appraisal, not selective denial or self-justifying narratives. 

step 9—making amends—requires ownership of harm, restitution, and respect for the readiness of those affected. the rooftop scene with robby illustrates the tension perfectly: langdon centers his own relief, forcing acknowledgment rather than respecting agency. true amends cannot be imposed. pressuring the harmed party transforms restitution into a performance for the wrongdoer’s comfort, not a repair for the harmed. recovery is measured not by speed, but by consistent, patient attention to those harmed, and the ongoing internal work that cannot be outsourced to words alone.

even before the santos confrontation, langdon’s conversation with al-hashimi highlights the same misframing. he describes what happened with santos as her ‘calling him out’ on things he wasn’t ready to face, but that isn’t accurate. his behavior toward her had been dismissive, obstructive, and undermining long before she even suspected anything. he treats accountability as external, a hurdle to survive, rather than a moral and relational obligation. attending rehab and maintaining sobriety are insufficient if he does not confront the ethical and relational impact of his choices; procedural compliance without integration leaves recovery fragile.

when langdon and santos finally talk, the weight of the truth becomes unavoidable. from the first shift onward, santos has carried the reality of langdon’s misconduct largely alone. she isn’t like robby, whose authority and position buffer him. she did not choose this burden; circumstance imposed it. for months, she has been a secret-keeper, navigating a workplace that sees only a sanitized version of events. that she must hold this truth, bear this weight, is exhausting, morally isolating, and nauseating—especially given how langdon treated her on day one.  

her insistence that he must “atone” is not about vengeance. it is exacting: she asks for honest, accountable action that recognizes the scope of his wrongdoing, acknowledges the harm he caused, and respects the weight she’s shouldered. that isn’t to say what she’s asking is necessarily fair or that she’s entitled to it! but it’s understandable that she seeks relief, that she wishes to be unburdened from this heavy of a secret.