Sherlock is a classic example of a show thatâs collapsing under the weight of unadressed trauma. Itâs easy to inflict trauma, but itâs hard to deal with it afterwards. So Sherlock (the show, not the character), doesnât. (though Sherlock the character also very much doesnât address his own trauma)
In my opinion it all goes back to what I refer to as The Original Sin, the way they dealt with Sherlockâs âsuicideâ and the reactions to his return.
First of all, the way Sherlock returned was so incredibly tone-deaf that I donât even have words for it. He made John watch him commit suicide, let him grieve for two years and then treated his return as a joke. Ouch.
And it would have been salvageable if the show didnât then treat Johnâs reaction as irrational. Everyoneâs dismissive of Johnâs anger, his understandable hurt, his feelings of betrayal. Mrs Hudson is fine right away, Lestrade is fine right away, even though nobody can tell me they werenât deeply affected by Sherlockâs âdeathâ. So Johnâs anger and hurt are depicted as irrational and extreme. And then Sherlock manipulates John into saying out loud that he forgives Sherlock, and thatâs it. John said he forgives Sherlock, so obviously he does and we can call bygones.
But the relationship is still broken. And it never gets fixed. John doesnât trust Sherlock anymore. And Sherlock never manages to win back that trust because he continues to manipulate John.
Both Sherlock and John never get the room to address their trauma, their grief and their broken trust. And the thing is, we feel it. The show never gets back to what it was in S1 and S2, because the central relationship is broken. They get moments in The Sign of Three, but even then, it just never is what it used to be. Because theyâre both so painfully careful around each other, because the certainty they once had of each other is gone.
And then the show turns Sherlock into martyr and John into an abuser and thatâs the last straw, the characters we once knew are gone, destroyed by their creatorsâ gleeful infliction of trauma upon trauma and complete unwillingness and lack of emotional honesty to ever face up to the consequences of their narrative choices.
It reminds me of what happened to Supernatural after S3, when Dean goes to hell and the show is never the same because all that trauma goes unaddressed. Dean turns into a joyless alcoholic martyr and Sam basically falls down the rabbit hole of addiction without anyone acknowledging that yes, thatâs also a trauma response. I noped out near the end of S5, because the torture porn was too much for me. Breaking and breaking and re-breaking your characters is only narratively satisfying if you give them a chance to learn, heal and be better afterwards.
But that would require a level of emotional honesty and sincerity that neither Mofftiss nor the Supernatural showrunners were capable of.