e.g thereâs this post going around saying âfanfiction is terrible writing and the way you can tell is that if you replaced charactersâ names with random other names, no one would have an emotional connection to the characters or care about them any more. itâs just relying on the original work to make you feel thingsâÂ
yeah, no shit if you change the words around in a story, theyâll mean different things and people will have different reactions to them. if you change all the words in recipes from âflourâ to âthumbtacksâ, youâre going to get a different recipe too.
fanfiction isnât claiming to be original work because thatâs not what itâs trying to do. the whole point of it is to be a transformative medium that transforms an original work, so arguing that itâs not doing its job properly as an original work is like complaining that 2d animation isnât doing its job because itâs not 3d enough
the fact that something relies on your existing knowledge and emotional connection to a previous work doesnât mean that thing is bad. tons of published works use references to, for example, biblical events because many folks have established connections to those events and know what they mean. imagine getting mad at the divine comedy because if you changed all the references to the bible, it wouldnât make sense. or getting mad at young frankenstein because if you arenât familiar with horror movie tropes, itâs not funny
and then when you point out âthis argument is both dumb and not exclusive to fanfiction; not only is being an original work not what fanfiction is trying to do, but also lots of established works rely on intertextuality and itâs not a bad thingâ they just reply with some shit like âLOL ARE YOU COMPARING THE DIVINE COMEDY TO SOME 50K WORD VOLTRON LARRY OMEGAVERSE SEXFESTâ like uhhh.. no, and the fact that thatâs the only thing you can possibly associate with transformative works is 1, your own problem, and 2, clearly proof that you barely read the genre you have so many strong opinions about