when someone is spam liking your blog and all of a sudden their notes disappear and you know they got to the problematic posts and blocked you. thatโs right. get out
NASA

โ

@theartofmadeline
AnasAbdin
Not today Justin
styofa doing anything

ellievsbear

โฃ Chile in a Photography โฃ
Aqua Utopia๏ฝๆตทใฎๅบใง่จๆถใ็ดกใ
macklin celebrini has autism

Kaledo Art

Janaina Medeiros
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Stranger Things
sheepfilms

2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Show & Tell
Mike Driver
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
seen from Poland

seen from Japan
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from France
seen from United States

seen from India
@sandycheekscockvore
when someone is spam liking your blog and all of a sudden their notes disappear and you know they got to the problematic posts and blocked you. thatโs right. get out

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch โข No registration required โข HD streaming
Let's ambush mama! ๐ผ
"Why do Pallas cats always look grumpy?"
"Pallas kittens."
The sheer roundness of this kitten must be admired.
@barian-phoenix-nvbh
Harassing fictional characters over real people. Because I am insane and have a terribly overactive imagination.
Reading vaccine discussions make me feel so gaslit.
Before covid, vaccines were never discussed as being for the purpose of lessening the severity of an illness. They have always been to prevent infection. The polio vaccine doesn't make polio survivable, it makes it so you don't catch it. Cases of polio dropped.
Even when the covid vaccines were first released we were told it would prevent infection and therfore the spread. Only when that became obviously untrue did it shift over to "that's not actually what vaccines are for, they are to lessen the severity."
And when people say that to me in an exasperated tone as if that isn't a brand new idea from 4 years ago I want to scream.
There are literally decades of telling people the flu vaccine can lessen the severity of their illness. "I didn't know about this because I never previously read or pay attention to that type of material, therefore it didn't exist" is an argument from ignorance, and an early childhood level of superstition. If you had put as much effort into a Google search as you did making this post, you could have saved yourself from making this post.
Vaccine discussions don't make you gaslit. They make you insecure in your grasp of the world.
If defending flu vaccines is your best retort, then you've already given up the argument. Those years of flu vaccines being utter crap and often doing more harm than good are a textbook example of the exception that proves the rule.
The polio vaccine didn't "reduce your symptoms. It prevented polio.
Smallpox killed countless people over the millennia. The smallpox vaccine didn't "reduce your symptoms" when you contracted smallpox. It prevented you from getting it.
Same for rabies. And tetanus. And numerous other vaccines. It didn't "reduce your symptoms." It prevented you from getting the disease at all.
There's no vaccine for "the common cold" because it's a wide array of similar but not identical (and constantly changing) viruses. The flu is similar, but if you're lucky a given flu vaccine may protect you IF the flu you're exposed to is the one it's designed for. Covid is no different (well, aside from being a dangerous, untested, proven piece of biowarefare).
The medical and government authorities claiming that the Covid shot would prevent you from getting covid were lying. AT BEST, it would be similar to the flu vaccine. But that argument didn't support the draconian, tyrannical policies they wanted to impose. So they lied and lied and lied until everyone knew they were lying, and then they simply lied about what they'd lied about previously.
Are they for real getting rid of the haitians??!? ๐
"who's gonna physically abuse your grandpa in a nursing home? an english speaker??"
Construction workers? The whole reason so many of them came here on those temporary visas was because of an earthquake 16 years ago. How are they supposed to rebuild after the earthquake if all the construction workers leave the country?
Love when leftists loudly advertise how spoiled, lazy, entitled, and racist they are. Let's unpack the many implications
Expects other people, migrant or not, to take care of their elderly family. If you are walking through life expecting to one day put your folks in a home, you have failed. You're not even trying to succeed.
Expectations for brown migrants are in the dirt. Oh, you came here looking for a better life? Sorry, enjoy backbreaking labor at slave wages (they would never make these insulting sweeping generalizations about Asian immigrants).
Believes certain jobs are meant for a certain class of people, and that the average American is too soft to carry out low-class labor. Simultaneously, they also believe the average American is too stupid to carry out high-class ("sKiLlEd") labor and requires replacement.
The implicit reliance on slave labor is a bleak callback to pre-civil war sentiment among Democrats that the eradication of slavery would crash the economy. To that I say the same thing the abolitionists of the era repeated:
If the economy depends on slavery, let it perish.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch โข No registration required โข HD streaming
Despite years and years of evidence showing that it does the exact opposite, feminists still encourage women to hate men due to the flawed belief that misandry will supposedly help stop misogyny.
You absolute dumbass (Affectionate)
This is war. This is civil war. There is no political solution. Here's an image of a guy with gun. Here's a video of a violent crime. Doesn't it make you mad? Get angry. Here's a Sam Hyde meme. Here's more memes. Look at this guy in this movie. That's me. Like when a child sees superman and wants to be him. Except cool because I'm angry. Aaaaaaaa. People should be rising up in the streets rn. Im not doing that since it would be a bad idea but some hypothetical group of people should.
OK now you guys all get as angry as me and make your own posts saying the same stuff and be pointlessly angry all the time and post as if the posts are magic and can change things and aren't just us using social media as therapy and ruining everyone's timelines with a flood of garbage posts for days until we calm down
If we do this over and over enough times after every news story that upsets us we will save the west for sure

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch โข No registration required โข HD streaming
sony just announced that by 2028 they will no longer be selling any physical copies of games and that their future consoles will not have a disc drive. a lot of other companies are also slowly shifting towards this approach. while i know many are currently outraged and taking the approach of harassing companies on social media, the better course of action would really be to change your spending habits around gaming. if you're really upset about the shift towards no physical copies, then don't buy that digital game, don't buy the 1,000 dollar console that has no support for physical copies of games, don't play that live service game with microtransactions. don't let yourself forget in a month from now, two months from now, a year from now, when all the sudden a digital only or live service game is trending and it seems (this is a very important keyword here) like everyone is playing it and you have to get it to be cool with everyone. don't let yourself be influenced when your favorite streamer or youtuber or any kind of influencer picks up a digital only game or live service game and you feel sold on putting money into the very thing that just two months ago you swore you'd never support. you need to be aware of the cycle of advertisement and how easily companies shfit the narrative quietly without you noticing. they can pay anyone they want to make it seem like their product is the cool new thing everyone wants. they wait for you to forget and then they re-implement the very change they may have claimed they were going to reverse their decision on. we've seen this happen so many times with many companies, the most recent example i can give is with discord and their age verification. online outrage and high school kind of bullying doesn't create long term change. you need to put the work in the change your own habits and invest your money in places that align with your beliefs. because it doesn't matter how much you roasted that multi-billion dollar corporation in the QRTs, the only thing they care about is that they will get your money eventually. they are patient and they are conditioning you to be impatient and impulsive. don't let them be in control of your decisions in the long term.
of course this doesn't mean never ever try anything new, we don't want to go to the opposite end of the spectrum and be crippled by OCD, but we need to reach a medium where we can still use critical thinking to decide whether or not we're using our money wisely and if it's going towards the change we want to see in the world.
Sony just removed a bunch of "owned" movies and TV shows from people's libraries, so why wouldn't this happen with games in the future too?
Maybe, just maybe, if you didn't abuse the Hell out of your citizenry, you wouldn't feel the need to be afraid of what they had to say.
โThis product contains chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancerโ
Y'know, Iโm really glad it only causes cancer in California and not the real world tbh
reblog if youโre anti censorship and against harassing real people over fictional characters
Elon musk you are getting Raped, and yes, with a capital R.
Count your days.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch โข No registration required โข HD streaming
There's this recurring argument in certain circles and especially on tumblr that posing a risk to someone actively victimizing you in some way is always unacceptable, but particularly if it's 'disproportionate.' If someone breaks into your house and gets shot, that's disproportionate because they 'probably' weren't going to physically injure you (worse if they weren't themselves armed with a firearm, how dare you engage in an 'unfair' fight). If a mugger gets killed because their victim fights back that's disproportionate because how dare you value someone's life over the contents of your wallet. If a woman stabs her would-be rapist and he bleeds to death that's disproportionate because 'rape lasts a few minutes, death is permanent.' If someone's harassing you by smashing your mailbox and wrecks their own arm after you reinforce it that's disproportionate because hey, it's not like they broke your arm, just your possessions.
And I feel like an alien every time I encounter this sort of thing, because it's so antithetical to any kind of logic or self-consistent ethical framework I can wrap my brain around. It's taking the genuine virtues of mercy and valuing human life and blowing them out of proportion into grotesque parodies of themselves. The victim here is not the one responsible for the ultimate outcome.
Does that mean that we should approach everything with infinite escalation forever? Hell no! But that doesn't change that almost all 'disproportionate' escalation the victim performs is dwarfed by the act of trying to harm an innocent victim in the first place! If I take the 'total violence' of a situation from a 1 to a 3, I've tripled it, but if I take a previously non-violent situation and amp it up from 0.00000000001 to 1, I've scaled it by an insane degree that makes that factor of three look minuscule despite technically being a lesser net increase.
And it's never even applied consistently! The victim has agency and is responsible for their role in escalating things, but the aggressor isn't held to the same standard. They're infantilized, they're treated like an automaton, the damage they do is treated like a foregone conclusion when the entire situation could have been avoided by them simply not going out of their way to hurt someone else. Is the victim's choice to react when backed into a corner somehow less predictable than the attacker's choice to harm someone unprovoked?
It's like that old line from Lewis about the errors coming in complimentary pairs to keep you bickering about which one is worse and so slowly nudge you towards the other. Yes, vengefulness and mercilessness are the enemies of justice and goodness, as are callousness and indulgence.