Hag-afying as we speak

So you'd rather have no rights? You'd rather have no say in government? You'd rather have absolute chaos, widespread death?

Your privilage is showing.

If you hate the USA so much, leave. Same with other western countries right now.

Hating your country, sure, I feel we have at one point. However, wanting it destroyed is another story. Not only does it show extreme first world privilege, it also shows that the propaganda from terrorist regimes has burrowed deep into your common sense.

Being from a country that I can be free in, that I can associate with who I want, I don't have to worry about bombs, women can wear whatever, I like having democratic rights like freedom of speech, and to voice my opinions.

But you forget that what you have in the western world, all those rights and freedoms, they are not as common elsewhere in the world. Every country has a different system and protects their laws and citizens differently, while it says about 160 countries have this right, the same amount is said to violate human rights at the same time.

Be careful what you wish for because it might just come true.

Sources:

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-with-freedom-of-speech

But it's intentional stupidity. It's not that we "Allow Hate Speech". The fact is we don't arrest people for speech alone. (Direct calls to action in certain cases do not qualify) But the reality is that who decides what is hate speech? Explain why it is that Christianity is the only faith in Canada right now in which is considered "hateful" to pray near clinics. Yet Islam and (and to a lesser extent) Judaism, seen untouched. And here's the kicker. If Islam ever takes power in Canada what follows is (under your gate speech laws) any criticism of their faith. And any "modern progressive" views as most Muslims are disgusted by the LGBT.

So the guy who financed the metoo movement and the Trump lawsuits was the one who actually went to the Island, and Ranch.

Oh yes, and so everyone knows, while the world had its sights on Epstein's Island, he also had a Ranch, known as Zorro Ranch.

Also, these are the code words to look out for in the files;

In a Christmas Eve 2014 email, LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman told Epstein he shipped gifts to his New York townhouse, including ice cream "for the girls" and "something that may strike your funny bone for the island," later revealed to be a small monster sculpture.

Investigators have long flagged "ice cream" as a term of interest in trafficking cases.

Authorities note it's commonly used as a grooming tool to build false trust with minors.

In some undercover FBI operations, "ice cream" and "sweets" have reportedly served as descriptors for a victim's age or innocence.

Federal investigators in recent DOJ filings have also flagged payments labeled "snacks" or "ice cream" between unrelated adults and minors as high-probability indicators of exploitation.

Hoffman claims he "only knew Epstein because of a fundraising relationship with MIT."

The files paint a different picture, with over 2500 mentions of his name, island visits, townhouse stays, and gift shipments to a home that doubled as a crime scene.

The historical argument whether it was a sacrifice or an offering - whether they killed captive people or people offered themselves for the sacrifice is an ongoing debate, but for crying out loud, WE KNOW IT IS TRUE

This is why I have never liked the decolonizer movement, at least not how it's been presented in Mexico - it tries to blackwash the Spaniards more than they already were.

Mexico sits in a weird spot in the Spanish Invasion narrative becaue Hernan Cortes saw what Columbus did and said "ew, no?" and mostly succeeded at not wanting to kill people! Also, like, literally EVERYBODY HATED THE MEXICA because they were FUCKING HORRIBLE PEOPLE! It is known that Cortes would've failed had it not been for Malintzin successfully negotiating an alliance with the Tlaxcalteca. But we also know that had Cortes failed, then it would've been fucking Pedro de Alvarado and now that bastard was probably even more cruel than Columbus ever were.

And yes, there were different attitudes from the Spaniards based on who had the crown - particularly with the Bourbons there was a stronger introduction of the caste system, while before it was less strong as there was a lot of early mestizaje. And it's not like I am trying to absolve the Spaniards - indigenous people are still feeling the effects of the Conquest.

The problem: their last name would be translated to Kalakutas. The friend's father tries to sidestep this somehow, but is rebuked by the immigration office, who point out that "kutas" is only a slur in Polish (being one of the many words for dick), and if he truly considered himself Lithuanian, he would have no problem with it.

I think of this every time some pagan or decolonizer tries to 'splain away human sacrifice, be it by Vikings, Aztecs, whatever. I'm sorry, I thought you wanted to repudiate the white, western, Christian morality? Why would you have a problem with human sacrifice then? The peoples you advocate for didn't consider every human life to be dignified and worth preserving.

🌷✨ Kawaii Shop✨🌷

Study for those interested

Oh yes it can. Sinclair Lewis was an American author, who coined this phrase in 1935. Fascism was on the rise throughout the world as a prelude to WW 2. Can it happen again? Can it happen here? You be the judge.

The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate the understanding of their own history. -- Sinclair Lewis

When Fascism comes to America it will be carrying the flag and wrapped in a cross. Sinclair Lewis

Fascism is a religion, the one thing it is not, is a political movement. -- Mussolini

Fascism is capitalism in decay. -- Lenin

Fascism is the ultimate expression of the failure of a democracy. -- Unknown.