Hag-afying as we speak

The movie revolves around Paul Kersey, a fairly wealthy man and a bleeding heart liberal. He hears about all the violent crime in the city and his heart goes out to the poor people but he's fairly well sheltered from it. He personally doesn't feel like he or anyone he cares about are in any real danger.

Yeah as if it’s not bad enough how they reacted to Charlie’s death they just have to go after his widow for not publicly grieving in a way they approve, which is definitely the next level of asshole.

I see that and I’m just sitting here thinking you people, who cheered for and celebrated the murder of Charlie Kirk, have the audacity to criticize his wife for not being sad enough?

Don't go to In-N-Out after claiming to be a fan then run around bitching and calling them all kinds of nasty names and tossing out pathetic threats because you couldn't get a chicken sandwich there.

If you ask you can get a rootbeer float because they have shakes and rootbeer, but they don't have chicken, likely never have and likely never will, go to Chick-fil-A for that.

^that is the audio from that twitter screenshot. God forbid a UN agent trust their own agency's verification process, especially since the report discusses the sexual violence in Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, and Ukraine. So no, Israel was not uniquely targeted.

Do you believe it is normal to ask the person who compiles UN findings to doubt UN findings? To spend their time doing all the work other agents have already done? When the report verified 9,788 cases of conflict-related sexual violence during 2025?? (x)

If you wanted to review the evidence you wouldn't be screenshotting a tweet to complain about the unique ~antisemitism~ of a report that features the infamous Sde Teiman rape (caught on camera and widely distributed alongside the "right to rape" protests that followed and the Israeli government dropping the charges against the rapists). If you want to review UN methodology you can view that here, with the 2009 Gaza Conflict Commission used as a relevant example (this guide was published in 2015).

In fact, let's go over their methodology together:

Information-gathering methods of the United Nations Fact-finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict (2009) (a) The review of reports of international organizations, including the United Nations; reports and other documentation, including affidavits, produced by non-governmental and civil society organizations (Palestinian, Israeli and international); media reports; and writings of academics and analysts on the conflict; (b) interviews with victims, witnesses and other persons having relevant information in keeping with established human rights methodology and in order to ensure both the safety and privacy of the interviewees and the integrity of the information provided, such interviews were conducted in private. The Mission decided not to interview children. The Mission conducted 188 individual interviews. Most interviews were conducted in person. if the Mission was unable to meet the relevant persons, interviews were conducted by telephone. Also in keeping with normal practice for this type of report and to continue to protect their safety and privacy, the names of the victims, witnesses and other sources are generally not explicitly referred to in the report and codes are used instead. The names of individuals who publicly testified at the hearings held by the Mission or who have explicitly agreed to be named are, however, identified; (c) Site visits to specific locations in Gaza where incidents had occurred. The Mission investigated 36 incidents in Gaza; (d) The analysis of video and photographic images, including satellite imagery provided by UNOSAT, and expert analysis of such images; (e) The review of medical reports about injuries to victims; (f) The forensic analysis of weapons and ammunition remnants collected at incident sites; (g) Meetings with a variety of interlocutors, including members of the diplomatic community, representatives of the parties concerned, NGOs, professional associations, military analysts, medical doctors, legal experts, scientists, United Nations staff; (h) invitations, through notes verbales, to United Nations Members States and United Nations agencies, departments and bodies to provide information relating to the Mission’s investigation requirements; (i) The wide circulation of a public call for written submissions from NGOs and other organizations and individuals interested in bringing information to the attention of the Mission. As a result, it received numerous submissions from organizations and individuals from israel, the Occupied Palestinian Territory and elsewhere in the world; (j) Public hearings in Gaza and in Geneva to hear: (i) victims and witnesses of violations; and (ii) individuals with specialized knowledge and expertise on the context and impact of the hostilities.

I genuinely don't know what other criteria they might have missed for these investigations. Despite how Special Representative Pramila Patten says she would never herself visit a torture camp, the UN specifically calls for site visits and yet "Israel continues to deny visas for OHCHR international staff (x).

^this article was published 2022.

Let's recap. You professionally misunderstood what Patten was saying and spread a lie that insinuated there was no fact-checking towards the sexual violence Palestinians experience. That is, full fucking stop, rape denial. And you did it to further the idea that the UN was unfairly "picking on" the Jewish State due to antisemitism, an extremely fucking annoying statement considering how stupidly easy it is to fact-check the original tweet. Hell, you don't even have to do that. You can just correctly understand "it's not the responsibility of my office to do any verification" implies a different office verifies the information.

You've got a whole wall of text here trying to argue that we should trust information the person presenting that information to the secretary general and ARGUING THAT THEY SHOULD BE ON THE BLACKLIST did not even bother to review themselves. And frankly, I don't give a fuck about any of it. Cuz she should fucking review the information, not openly announce she wouldn't review it to check that it's factual even if she was offered the chance to go to an Israeli detention center and verify it in person.

And I don't need to discredit the UN, they do that themselves. 🤣 I mean, 1500 of their unrwa workers are suspected of having Hamas ties. Not to mention the long history of their workers soliciting sex from women in the areas they're supposed to be helping.

A US probe into Hamas "ties" of people living in Gaza, where Hamas is the fucking government, is stupid. Ohhh links to the government as an aid organization? You don't say.

Tbh "they're saying they're raped by dogs obviously that's fake" as if Israel doesn't have a long history of using dogs to abuse Palestinians? As if a man with fucking down syndrome wasn't murdered by a fucking IDF dog (and I don't mean the soldier)

2) Hamas is also a designated terrorist organization. Being the government is irrelevant. If you, as an aid worker, have ties to terrorists that is a big fucking deal. Especially when they're currently doing what Hamas has been doing.

3) did you see the part of that incident where the dog attack was accidental and the soldiers only "left him to die" because they were currently under fire and chose to protect idf soldiers over one man? I'm suspecting you didn't. That or you dismissed that part as propaganda.

I also fail to see how this incident lends any credibility to the idea the idf is using dogs to rape people. Nevermind how impossible it is to actually train a dog to do that. Dogs are notoriously hard to train to breed with each other on command, and it's really not physically possible for a dog to penetrate a human without help, their genitalia is not built like ours. It's designed for a willing recipient (in whatever sense that means for dogs), meaning very little resistance to penetration. Which means it's not really built to penetrate either human "hole."

Hamas is only a designated terror organization if you're a white bitch. There's nothing "official" about Hamas' designation, it's literally western and western-aligned countries that designate them as such. The UN does not designate them a terrorist org. Probably because they're resisting people objectively worse than anything they could do. Any time you cling to Hamas as an "official designated terrorist org" you're just kinda doing western/American imperialism for them. How many genocides does the US have under its belt again? And I'm supposed to recognize its authority here? Lol.

I'm sorry that's INSANE spin of that story. Soldiers use dogs to physically threaten people -> dog attacks people. Soldiers: 😢 we had no idea that would happen.

"if you're a white bitch." I myself am Latina, I know several black people, other latinos, ethnic Jews and countless others who aren't white who fully believe them to be terrorists. So no, you're full of shit. 🤣

"resisting people objectively worse" is provably untrue, but also targetting civilians for murder, rape and kidnapping is not resistance. There is no law that permits any of those acts against civilians in the name of any cause, let alone "armed resistance."

The fact you are trying to argue Hamas are not terrorists is all anyone needs to see to know how fucking retarded you are.

And buddy, this specific case was an accident. This is literally a proven fact.

And I'm not a Nazi, nor an ethno-supremacist and I have seen no solid evidence whatsoever these rapes occurred, let alone ones committed by fucking dogs. Hearsay is not proof. "Activists" from the flotilla who claimed to have collapsed lungs yet were talking days after this supposed injury with no sign of any injury on their body is not proof of rape either. Especially when they were CAUGHT ON CAMERA faking being in a hospital bed in Turkey (after leaving on camera in Israel looking fine, all fist pumps and peace signs) then 12 hours later in Spain were looking fine and dandy.

Are you seriously doing "I have black friends" right now? And using the word r*tard? Okay 👍 get more nazi idc

No, I'm pointing out that I know for a fact non-whites view them as terrorists so it's total bullshit to try and claim only "white bitches" view them as terrorists. But sure, strawman me and call me a Nazi again. Why not. And buddy, I can call whoever I want a retard, okay? I'm autistic. I may hate the word, but if you're being retarded, I'm calling you a retard.

"manic rant." That sure is a convenient excuse to not have to address anything I said.

And buddy, there was no "video of gang rape." I've seen that video. Men huddled around someone while others hold up riot shields is not a video of a gang rape. There was no literally no fucking rape depicted in that video.

Edit:

Woooah you're saying you, a racist nazi who views Palestinians as subhuman, have a social circle of people who agree with you that Hamas is a terrorist group?? Colour me shocked. I was talking about countries. You know. States. How the majority of the world's nation-states don't view Hamas as a terrorist group.

"I'm autistic so I'm going to use a slur as an insult" woof. Nah, you're just an edgelord.

I love how you can't even pretend to have an actual response, you just act passive aggressive and deflect to Muh Report.

And also had to leave out the "haven't read it" part of the sentence.

When you were the one claiming she summarizes.

When you pick at kids, mentally abuse them and put them down, telling them they have problems, they develop them, this is a known fact.