Hello, I'm Ryan Curtin. I am raising funds for surgery to treat my dog, Toby. To… Ryan Curtin needs your support for Help Toby Walk Again: S
I'm raising money for my dog's surgery, if you can please take a look. I don't want to get into family drama but they refuse to help with this, and I'm struggling to find a job. Even sharing will help immensely.
Unfortunate update. He doesn't have a herniated disc, it's degenerative myleopathy like the vet first said when this was starting. No treatment for it. He still has a year or two which is average for his breed. Any money from this will go to his continued care and comfort.
More positive update, with the money from the fundraiser we were able to get a custom wheelchair for him. After they got the balance adjusted right he was zooming for the first time in months!
(He's happy here I just got the picture as he was about to bark)
He was also moving his hips as he walked around which is a good sign. Again, thank you all for the help
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Is it bad that I feel slightly bad that I keep coming to the library to use its quietness and its desk space and its pleasant atmosphere for writing but I never check out books?
Why would you feel bad? You’re using the library for one of its intended purposes. The desks, WiFi, space etc are LITERALLY there for you to do exactly what you’re doing AND each time you go in you add to the foot traffic numbers that prove hey people are coming in to use our stuff mr. government so keep funding us.
I think it's a bit sad that with more and more public spaces vanishing, people are feeling bad about not "buying" stuff to "earn" their time at a library.
A library is like a park, you're allowed to just. Exist in it.
I check out books every 4 weeks, when the learning period from my current books is up, but I go much more frequently with my kid to just sit there and read to them, and that's okay. In my school days, we'd go and do our research for presentations there, just reading, never checking out.
So a year or so ago, we added some new desklets at our library, in areas where we noticed that people gravitated to but didn't have the right furnishing to use them in the way they wanted to.
The first few weeks of having the new furniture were absolutely filled with excited librarians whispering to each other, "Look! Someone's using the desklet in the back corner!" and "casually" walking by to enjoy the sight like wildlife researchers who had successfully baited a particularly elusive rare bird. Nobody cared if those people checked anything out or not. There was a need! We saw the need! We filled the need! Hooray!
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
One big problem with Skyrim is for doing the faction quests where they just absolutely run through at breakneck speed.
Like with the Companions; you do one little mission from Farkas right at the beginning to beat someone up (that's what I got at least), then it's immediately "Right, time for your trial".
No build up, no increase of reputation. Just right into it.
Yeah, that's why I prefer the guild quests in Oblivion. You had to do a side quest at each outpost before starting the questline proper. That's got some proper buildup.
Skyrim guild quests are pretty much a stereotypical Boomer's idea of how jobs work.
There's this recurring argument in certain circles and especially on tumblr that posing a risk to someone actively victimizing you in some way is always unacceptable, but particularly if it's 'disproportionate.' If someone breaks into your house and gets shot, that's disproportionate because they 'probably' weren't going to physically injure you (worse if they weren't themselves armed with a firearm, how dare you engage in an 'unfair' fight). If a mugger gets killed because their victim fights back that's disproportionate because how dare you value someone's life over the contents of your wallet. If a woman stabs her would-be rapist and he bleeds to death that's disproportionate because 'rape lasts a few minutes, death is permanent.' If someone's harassing you by smashing your mailbox and wrecks their own arm after you reinforce it that's disproportionate because hey, it's not like they broke your arm, just your possessions.
And I feel like an alien every time I encounter this sort of thing, because it's so antithetical to any kind of logic or self-consistent ethical framework I can wrap my brain around. It's taking the genuine virtues of mercy and valuing human life and blowing them out of proportion into grotesque parodies of themselves. The victim here is not the one responsible for the ultimate outcome.
Does that mean that we should approach everything with infinite escalation forever? Hell no! But that doesn't change that almost all 'disproportionate' escalation the victim performs is dwarfed by the act of trying to harm an innocent victim in the first place! If I take the 'total violence' of a situation from a 1 to a 3, I've tripled it, but if I take a previously non-violent situation and amp it up from 0.00000000001 to 1, I've scaled it by an insane degree that makes that factor of three look minuscule despite technically being a lesser net increase.
And it's never even applied consistently! The victim has agency and is responsible for their role in escalating things, but the aggressor isn't held to the same standard. They're infantilized, they're treated like an automaton, the damage they do is treated like a foregone conclusion when the entire situation could have been avoided by them simply not going out of their way to hurt someone else. Is the victim's choice to react when backed into a corner somehow less predictable than the attacker's choice to harm someone unprovoked?
Once again, a left-wing women with very little empathy for - or understanding of - men talks about "empathy" as a virtue (moral bludgeon).
Also, she's an e-minx, to put it politely. A lot of her account is just sexy pics.
...Dang.
Also, when I was trying to find this tweet, I found this;
I couldn't find the actual tweet, but right-wingers often say America should respond to school shootings with better school security and improved parenting. They've cheered cops who stopped school shooters.
Which anti-gun left-wingers ignore because it's any solution other than "more gun control".
And pretend the right only wants "thoughts and prayers" instead of "exploiting a tragedy to ram through gun control anti-gun lefties wanted to pass anyway".
Well, I say "pretend", but it's quite possible that they never left their bubble.
I assumed he was red-stringing here, but the cited reason is actually because of black students being scared of cops.
Some students and recent graduates say a police presence in schools gets in the way of an education for many Black students. The St. Paul sc
By a vote of 5 to 1, the school board decided against renewing a contract with the St. Paul Police Department. The nearly $775,000 contract,
The real irony is that any man who changes his views because some hot e-floozy thirst traps him is showing he didn't actually have moral convictions.
And also that Nate's trying to take the "moral high ground" by looking at a presumably left-wing terrorist attack, not actually disavowing it, and somehow making it about how the right are bad.
The real irony is that any man who changes his views because some hot e-floozy thirst traps him is showing he didn’t actually have moral convictions.
Meanwhile, not all the thirst-trapping in the world can change the fact that everyone and his cat knows nowadays that this is a surefire recipe for being viewed with contempt by every single woman in your life, and being guaranteed a permanent spot on the national friendzone register (or, even worse, the dreaded exploitationzone).
I couldn’t find the actual tweet, but right-wingers often say America should respond to school shootings with better school security and improved parenting. They’ve cheered cops who stopped school shooters.
they're not honest about any stance from the right. at all. not really dishonesty so much as "I'm gonna make up your position out of whole cloth instead of letting you speak for yourself and listening to you." it's infuriating. I've been met with vitriol for telling them that they don't know the stance of the right and never deigned to ask or listen. I was actually surprised when someone asked me what it was, cause in my time leaning right I've NEVER had anyone interested in hearing my stance when it came to politics. it was surprising but gotta say I felt a bit relieved in that moment. like wow, somebody is gonna let me speak for myself.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
throwback to my favorite image ive ever seen on this site. a perfect little melange of racism. i could write entire novels deconstructing this thing. its so bad it looped back around into absurdist comedy for me. thats my friend the floating buffalo shaman who has no religion
every so often i remember that most people probably dont know what i refer to when i mention my friend, the floating buffalo shaman who has no religion.
you've heard of death of the author, now get ready for death of the audience: where instead of basing your reaction on a thousand uninformed opinions online, you actually read the text and engage with it
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I feel like resident evil does a completely non-political version of the motte and bailey fallacy on a thematic level. this is by far at its worst in re9 but is found elsewhere in the series and in other media. death note is also one
it includes details that demand we take them seriously, that are only added so that we can take them seriously, and then it doesn't take itself seriously to the extent that if we DID take that seriously the fiction wouldn't work.
umbrella inc. is nonsensically evil, and the rhodes hill chronic care center is even more nonsensically evil than that. at least umbrella inc. was a very large company with secret facilities most employees didn't know about. rhodes hill is just the one place where every single person who works there is doing insanely evil shit to people with no remorse. how did he hire these people. what the fuck was his selection process. an even more pressing matter than "where are the toilets" is "how did nobody notice this when they visited their loved ones in hospice, as is a very very very common thing with people in hospice care"
and notes in this place go into great detail about the utterly horrific and violating things that rhodes hill did to the completely innocent and completely vulnerable people in their care. they clearly want you to take it seriously or else they would not have put it in there. they're performing brain surgery on people to change their personalities and make them monsters who are still aware of who they once were for, and I cannot stress this enough, literally no reason. you are supposed to be shocked and affected by this.
but if you were shocked and affected by this it would be so tragic you would not be able to play the game at all, much less spin-kick them and decapitate them with Leon's axe! taking the setup seriously and asking the question the game wants you to ask, "how could anyone be so evil as to do this?" results in the immediate and inevitable answer "they literally could not, this doesn't make any fucking sense and is not possible." it's a schlocky B-movie where things don't really have to make sense, why are you bothering with details, other than because we put them in for the purpose of you taking them seriously?
they want you to feel horrified by what Umbrella did to helpless children but also has them as all giggling red-eyed Spooky Zombie Killer Girls from a 2005 Newgrounds horror flash game. they want you to feel horrified by the industrial scale at which Gideon is processing bodies in the basement, they want you to take it seriously in terms of presenting how evil it is but not take it seriously in terms of "how the fuck does this make a lick of sense how does he have this many people from a medical center that is supposed to hold people for a long time."
also I will never be shocked or affected by finding out the company was evil and I will never be shocked or affected by finding out the company was actually really really evil and I will never be shocked or affected by finding out that the company was actually maximally evil. saying something is maximally evil is easy, it is so easy it is worth nothing. you have to do something that is not the easiest possible thing to impress me.
If I understand your complaint correctly, I think something similar happens in a lot of sci-fi movies with "cheap" spaceships (like Serenity or Millennium Falcon).
The set of a spaceship interior is built for set convenience and relatability and entertainment, and we accept an unrealistic layout as part of the suspension of disbelief because realistic spaceship sets would be annoying to produce and boring to watch in many ways, often in ways relating to gravity or air.
Then the show temporarily switches to treating the set as an exact representation with physical realism and a problem that has to be solved under the constraints of set placement, even though applying this standard elsewhere would result in the alleged spaceship vanishing in a puff of logic.
Speaking of Firefly and selectively taking its own setting seriously,
Wash: "Psychic? That sounds like something out of science fiction."
Zoe: "We live in a spaceship, dear."
The show takes place in the future 26th century. The setting has had spaceships for centuries by then. Imagine if Zoe's line was "We live in the New World, dear" today.
Can you give an example of the "suddenly taking the spaceship design totally seriously" thing?
Possibly a bit related: every single villain base in certain genres having a torture chamber full of pools of blood and gore and bodies that the villain just leaves lying around, and very rarely any other kind of horror.
A realistic interior of the Serenity, given its circumstances, would be something like: a small cramped habitation module, a cargo bay for the sort of cargo that can withstand extreme acceleration, a lot of fuel and engines. Access and maintenance to the latter would be by spacesuit.
The depicted interior has spacious, pressurized rooms everywhere, connected by large hallways, because that's what's easy to make on a set, and it means actors can walk around the ship and be seen by the audience with easy camera placement.
This makes no sense for a cheap vessel used by a man who can barely afford to keep flying and has the plot of taking odd jobs in desperation. He should be facing worse tradeoffs wrt living space and mass and so on.
At one point the gang is loading cows, who should die of broken bones and crushed organs during liftoff, unless Serenity has magic handwave rockets that can afford to lift slowly. And then they should die again of suffocation, unless Serenity has magic handwave amounts of spare oxygen, because each cow needs about as much oxygen as 5 humans. And then they should die again of the methane buildup -- you get the idea.
Shrug. It's a space western with space cowboys loading space cows on their space watership after the space civil war, it's a soft sci-fi setting that goes for aesthetics over realism. Oxygen is free. Cows go on ships. Gravity is a nonissue. Don't take it too seriously.
But we're asked to take the set very seriously in a later episode (Out of Gas) when there's a fire in the engine room, which quickly starts fireballing into adjacent rooms, and the crew responds by sealing off half the ship and venting everything connected to the engine room out the airlock. Now their engine isn't working, main power is out, most of the oxygen's gone and there's only a few man-hours left and the situation is desperate, both main and auxiliary life support are offline, so everyone but the captain abandons ship.
This episode's plot can only happen because of treating set design conveniences as the literal layout, such as:
having the anachronistic "engine room" in the first place,
giving the fire generous access to everyone else's oxygen,
making the emergency vent for the engine room go through the cargo bay,
having no spare parts aboard because spare parts are for real spaceships not studio sets,
not wearing a spacesuit because that would obscure the actor's face and make him harder to relate to,
forgetting that gravity isn't a default in space, if you experience gravity that suggests your engine is in fact on and thrusting
and generally ignoring the kind of things that set designers can casually ignore but spaceship builders and crew would have to confront.
("But they have artificial gravity!" fans may object. That creates new problems: either the gravity has absolute priority over the life support when it comes to limited backup power, which is retarded, or the gravity can work without power, which breaks the setting.)
You're right on the gravity (unless the ship is spinning it is not) but not necessarily the air and spacious rooms.
CO₂ scrubbers are real.
If they're using an absorbent-based capture scrubber, it would make plenty of sense to have the fire kill their scrubber supplies - or just generate enough CO₂, they don't have enough absorbent to solve the problem.
I don't think they are, though, not if they can scale up to transport cattle.
But there are other scrubbers - nuclear submarines IRL can stay submerged effectively indefinitely, their scrubbers work so long as there's nuclear power. If a fire kills their power, it'll kill their scrubbers in the exact same moment it generates a bunch of CO₂ (and CO) that they have to deal with.
In the same direction: Spacious room is precious in IRL space because you're optimizing for ΔV, and IRL military vehicles because nobody is optimizing for luxuries. IRL regular ships are kind of cramped but you can have large rooms. If you accept the sci fi engines, you can definitely launch a larger hab module.
They're taking liberties, sure, but it's not nearly so paradoxically handwaved-yet-important as Brazen's RE example.
And we know Mal bought the ship based on vibes, not practicality.
>having no spare parts aboard because spare parts are for real spaceships not studio sets,
Hang on. I distinctly recall that Kaylee had bought up the damaged part several times before that episode, and Mal kept pushing it down the priority list.
>making the emergency vent for the engine room go through the cargo bay,
Which is the largest exterior access on the ship, yes. Cargo bays generally have nothing but cargo. It's also right next to the engine room, and there's a non-zero chance a fire would start in the cargo bay itself.
Wait, I just checked Fandom, and it doesn't say the cargo bay is the 'official' vent for the engine room, just that it's what Mal used in the moment.
>not wearing a spacesuit because that would obscure the actor's face and make him harder to relate to,
Jamie rigged up a spacesuit in case Mal needs it, IIRC. And, again, Mal Reynolds. He does a lot of stupid, emotional things.
>or the gravity can work without power, which breaks the setting.)
...How? Maybe the gravity plates can hold a charge indefinetely without power, like a cellphone, but will eventually run out.