RainbowJellyfi

Also me: Heehoo pupper

BABY?

BABIES?

its not objectification/creepy/gross its the same thing movie makers and mangakas do every day - cast real people they like and who fit the role they're writing as their lead character

its just fiction.

fanfic is just fans playing with each other. celebs should just stay out of it and let fans have their fun. but now they want to control what you say, control what you write, control what kind of reviews you can give, control what you imagine. Its gone too far. before you go read a fanfic you already know whats gonna be in it, so why would you read it?

personally i hate slash fic and shipping stuff, and i will never read it. as soon as i see that sort of thing i hit the 'back' button. i'm not gonna read it and then complain. i have had some of my own fanfic stories become so popular that the celebs themselves read them and then complained about them. i was just like...if you are sensitive do not read fanfic. its a free for all, and that is the way it should stay if you ask me. they are so nosy. what we write isn't for them its for other fans

i had a celeb get my story deleted and tell me his kid doesn't like my story because i called his wife a silly name. it was just a joke. and this is a HUGE star too. i was just like 'wow way to be a pussy." also why is his kid reading stories marked as mature? take your child self on and do some homework. what kinda raising is that? but this star had this whole fit about how i cant write about his wife and speak about her without respect, then two years later he announced that he cheated on her and they were getting a divorce

omg i HOLLERED. I was screaming. he was the one who didn't respect his wife and family, not me. I was just having fun writing fiction. none of it was real. his disrespect to her was real and the pain from that is gonna last forever.

oh and btw's he lost his next wife too Imao oh wait no that was a fiance now he has a new wife. point is; hes trash

anyway, my point is, celebrities: stay off fans' stories and off their twitters/tumblrs/instagrams. thats not your business

what i'm saying is when a celebrity takes photo or video for something they only consent for it to be used in certain ways. so then someone takes that footage and puts it in a porn when they never authorized that. that's illegal

when i write a fanfiction, its already obvious that its not describing real events, and it is explicitly stated on the story that this is a work of fiction, the star does not appear in it themselves. the story itself is my creation - the concepts, plot, dialogue, and the writing itself is all supplied by me. so it belongs to me. if a celebrity wants to sue me for writing a story about them they are suing me for using....the general idea of them? how is that a thing? thats not a thing.

no i dont see it that way at all. and i dont see it as bad at all. its just a story

the people who keep disliking my opinion on this are only feeling that way becuase they dont have an imagination, any talent, or any writing skills. I've written so many stories over the years since i was a kid - original and fanfic. I've written 3 books. I'm not saying they were great books, but I wrote them. And whether a story i create is original or fanfic, i write them the same way. theyre not really different at all. Its not like one story is a "real story" and the other is "sick exploitation" theyre the same.

people who dont write will never really understand the process of making something. They will always take things personally and say xyz is weird and gross because they dont understand the motivations, the process, or the meaning behind it.

the events that i put in a story are there to serve the plot that i created. people who dont write get upset because of events that were chosen but these events are devices and vehicles that we use in writing to get across our greater message and/or theme, and to trigger other events that come later. sometimes its about relationship progression, sometimes its about character growth, sometimes its about intensifying conflict. but there are reasons that we write what we write.

people who arent very bright will look at it in a very reductive way and say "its sick exploitation" kinda like how stupid people look at abstract art and say "a 5 year old could do that"

the fact that people dont value fanfiction or are unable to make a good fanfiction themselves does not make fanfiction "bad" or illegal. we already have too much censorship. people should stop trying to turn their personal tastes into laws. "i dont like it so it should be illegal"

um ok but no

This whole topic has taught me one thing though.....

I was thinking of writing a Kihyun fanfic today....after seeing him in that red suit....mmm mmm MMM! our boy was looking finger licking good!

so when i write it and it gets all popular i'll be sure to lock it down and make it fans only so he cant ever get his hamster paws on it 😂

kihyun looking for ways to get my story deleted:

[An image of a hamster at a keyboard.]

the Grinch is nonbinary & uses they/them pronouns

the Grinch is autistic

it takes place in the Jim Carrey movie universe, so the Grinch has two lesbian moms

(side note, in the movie it was implied the grinch was conceived at a swinger’s holiday party, but we don’t have to talk about that)

tony was a professional athlete who had a lucrative career appearing on cereal boxes

tony the tiger is divorced w/ kids

don’t show up on camera

can fly/scale walls

immune to bullets

can break into any safe by turning into fog or some bullshit

could probably hypnotize security guards as needed

This supposedly has to do with the fact that the original Celts were Iberian and their ancestors migrated across the strait of Gibraltar from Africa. The red-haired and pale look typically associated with Celtic identity likely comes from admixture from Germanic peoples. Remember that everyone’s ancestors came from Africa if you go far back enough.

Evidence of this phenotype can still be seen in some people today, particularly those from Wales and other western coastal regions. For example:

Welsh presenter Alex Jones

Welsh footballer Chris Coleman

Welsh actress Catherine Zeta-Jones who can notably pass for Hispanic.

English actor Ian McShane

It’s important to note that none of these people are immigrants or descended from immigrants. They all come from families native to the British Isles.

The take-home message here is A) don’t ever let anyone tell you British = pale and B) this

Cheddar Man was a Mesolithic hunter-gatherer whose bones were found in Cheddar Gorge, Somerset, UK. He’s about 10,000 years old and from his DNA, it is likely that he had dark skin and pale eyes. He’s not alone! Other hunter-gatherers found in Spain, dating from around 7,000 years ago, showed similar genetics.

And even when we move into the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition and into the Neolithic, we have evidence of Whitehawk Woman and Lola (discovered in the UK and Denmark, respectively) - also with dark skin and pale eyes. Lola is incredibly cool because all we know of her is the DNA left on the birch pitch “chewing gum” she left behind.

It goes to show that when Homo sapiens radiated out of Africa (around 45,000 years ago, but now is not the time to talk about Out-of-Africa vs. Multiregional Continuity vs. Assimilation models), the switch from dark skin to pale skin did not happen as quickly as previously thought.

There are so many different skin tones because of the balance between UV radiation, folate, and Vitamin D. High UV exposure usually means darker skin because folate, an essential vitamin for growth and development, can be found in the skin and breaks down under high UV. High UV also means you’re getting plenty of Vitamin D from the sun, which you need for calcium absorption, amongst other things. Yes, more melanin also equals more protection from skin cancer, but from a natural selection point of view that doesn’t matter as much as folate and Vitamin D.

When humans started moving into areas with weaker UV (aka higher latitudes), that could have triggered a shift to paler skin to allow for more Vitamin D synthesis - and because UV is weaker overall, there isn’t as much concern about folate breaking down, either. However, if you’re getting enough Vitamin D from your diet, that shift from darker to paler skin need not happen - Inuit populations are a great example of this, and so are these historical examples.

It was probably only when during a shift to intensive agriculture in Neolithic Europe - and other areas, but Europe’s the one losing its mind over dark-skinned hunter-gatherers - that natural selection kicked in and there was a change where genes like MC1R shifted from producing eumelanin (brown-black pigment) to pheomelanin (reddish-pink). Intensive agriculture meant more monocropping and less diversity in diet. The Vitamin D that was once coming from the diet now needed to come from Vitamin D synthesis within the skin.

Sources:

-Cheddar Man: Mesolithic Britain’s blue-eyed boy

-Hunter-gatherer European had blue eyes and dark skin

-This Is ‘Lola,’ a 5,700-Year-Old Woman Whose Entire Life Is Revealed in Her ‘Chewing Gum’

-Why does ‘Whitehawk Woman’ have dark skin?