Radically Vegan

This one doesn’t contain any violence - it’s just a woman standing up against an entitled trans identified male and that should be applauded:

For clarity - this was the WOMENS world championships. 

 I repeat. Women’s. 

 Congratulations to the brave faces of silver & bronze. The world is gripped by a febrile madness. - @KTHopkins 

I was the 3rd place rider. It’s definitely NOT fair. - @jkwagnermd

https://twitter.com/jkwagnermd/status/1051794655698976773?s=21

They aren’t even pretending they aren’t perpetuating myths about women being worse than men at everything. They’re just straight up ignoring the achievements of female athletes, trans AND cis, to pretend that being a man makes you better at things.

Unlike literally everyone else I’ve argued with, I’m the only one here willing to accept women who don’t fit a strict physical standard.

The fact is that making a blanket statement regarding any gender is a deadly game of stereotypes, and pretending that trans women are better at sports because of some magical biological factor that doesn’t even exist is the bullshit argument.

Trans women are no different in athletic performance than cis women, and cis women are not terrible athletes incapable of being amazing because #weak bones.

See, again: disingenuous language. Because you already know what I’m talking about.. A female is one of two sexes in an allogamous sexually reproducing species. Female and male humans display a good deal of dimorphism between the phenotypes of the two sexes. Woman is the common word for an adult female human. 

Saying women are female is not holding them to any sort of specific physical standard never mind a “strict” one. What does even mean? What could possibly be strict about the category: “adult human of the female sex”. 

pretending that trans women are better at sports because of some magical biological factor that doesn’t even exist is the bullshit argument.

hey ladies i made a shitty lil infographic!

like, they call jan//elle mon//ae androgynous. the hell? that woman always wears a full face of make-up, hair ultra done, high heels and even her “suits” are ultra feminine?

ruby rose is just. do we even need to do this? i don’t think we need to. thanks.

someone just reblogged a pic of a girl with long hair and done eyebrows and lipgloss and went “aww a tomboy” like my god.

y’all are trying so hard with your whole “uwu our generation will end gender” but are more gender conforming than the generation of your mothers

the only thing we’re “reducing” is the difference between men and women to, yes, their body parts, so that society can move forward based on the understanding that along all axes except physical, men and women are the goddamn same, i.e the whole point of feminism, so that we can finally fucking convince people that there’s nothing inherent to women that makes them enjoy cooking, cleaning, spending hours of time and most of our disposable income being “pretty” and generally being submissive, once you divorce womanhood from biology that argument is completely lost because it places womanhood somewhere in the mind where those stereotypes and cultural norms suddenly become an inherent trait instead of an imposed construct

saying “women have vaginas” is not the same thing as saying “women are vaginas”

saying “only females are women” isn’t the same thing as saying “women are only females”

please learn the difference between classification and reductionism before you try to act like we’re stupid ignorant cis women who “just dont get it”

saying “womanhood is the experience of femaleness” is a statement based on material fact that acknowledges the indisputable reality of sex-based oppression and how it shapes the life experience of females

saying “womanhood is about having a feminine gender presentation/identifying with female gender roles/having a lady brain” are all just post-modern offshoots of patriarchal rhetoric

The fetus, at any time before 35 weeks gestation does not have the capacity to differentiate between ‘painful touch’ and ‘pleasant touch’. Even at 24 weeks, it doesn’t have the part of the brain that registers touch at all, therefore fetuses feel no pain whatsoever during an abortion. Even during the saline abortions that you falsely claim were ‘painful’ to the fetus on your blog.

The fetus relies fully on the body it is inside of to maintain it’s survival and function, thereby requiring that persons continuous consent to remain there, as the right to security of person was deemed more important that a right to life as seen in the supreme court cases in the USA of Roe V. Wade and McFall V. Shimp (In Canada the two cases that did this were Morgentaler, Smoling, and Scott v. Queen and Daigle V. Trembley).

The fetus does not have the capacity for conscious, purposeful, or controlled movement. All movement that a fetus makes is fully involuntary, and happen as a result of the nervous system forming, testing itself out, and testing limb movement in order to ensure everything is in place to ensure survival capability after birth -assuming it survives the pregnancy and birth. In fact, the first sparks of consciousness in homo sapiens happens at 5 months AFTER birth.

In places where abortions are legal and easily accessible, there are lower abortion rates. In places where abortions are illegal or heavily restricted there are more abortions. This is an across-board thing, a global pattern.

Lack of safe abortion access KILLS. An estimated 68,000  people per year die because of lack of access to safe abortions, and a uncounted millions are left with permanent health issues as a result. That’s an estimated 186 people who will die TODAY because they did not have safe access to an abortion. There are an estimated 19 million unsafe and illegal abortions performed annually.

Most abortions are NOT performed on teenagers who were sleeping around and did not use protection. The largest groups recieving abortions are ages 20-24 (33% of all abortions), non-hispanic white (36%), religious(37% identify as protestant and 28% identify as catholic, meaning over half of abortion recipients follow a sect of Christianity) , married or cohabiting (55%), have one or more children (61%), used protection (51%) and are below the poverty line (42% are 100% below the poverty line, and a further 27% are 100-199% below the poverty line. 69% of abortion recipients are below the poverty line). (source)

Abortion has no severe, long term effects on people who get them. There is no increase to breast cancer risks, there is no increased risk to ectopic pregnancies, there is not increased risk of pelvic inflammatory disease, there is no Post-Abortion Syndrome, there is no increased risk of abruptio placentae.

And finally there is the fact that organs, does not a person make. Most things on this planet have organs. Birds have organs, bees have organs, dogs, lions, bears, pigs, cows, and even individual cells have organs or organ-like components that keep them alive. The fetuses development level does not grant it rights because that is not how we grant rights.

For example, a lot of the times that I’ve heard about the ‘should trans “women” be allowed in x place’  I wonder if nobody notices that these trans “women” don’t want their own spaces. They want women’s spaces. And yeah, they say that ‘trans women are women’ but like??? Wouldn’t they be mad if a ‘cis’ woman came along and said that she wanted to take up x position that should belong a trans ‘woman’? The only conclusion is that they don’t want to live a life being themselves. They want to be us. 

They don’t want trans shelters, trans safe spaces, unisex bathrooms along side regular bathrooms, trans marches or any of that. They want women’s spaces.

Women’s shelters. Women’s spaces, women’s bathrooms, to be centered in women’s marches.

And the fact that they say radfems=incels is like?? What? Literally no radfem ever has ever said that she feels entitled to sex.

All of the articles that they show as evidence of evil terfiness is men killing trans people. That is terrible, all the people who are just trying to live their lives getting hurt, but to use them as a prop to shut down women is just plain wrong. The problem that trans “women” face is more to do with men than actual women.

Do you consider us 2nd wave or 4th wave?