survival mechanism they don’t emphasize enough is memorizing a poem. you memorize a poem you have a little lift raft for a variety of situations
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
dirt enthusiast

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
KIROKAZE
trying on a metaphor
h
Cosmic Funnies
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
YOU ARE THE REASON
Monterey Bay Aquarium
sheepfilms
Mike Driver
RMH
Sweet Seals For You, Always
d e v o n

if i look back, i am lost

blake kathryn
tumblr dot com

seen from China
seen from Tunisia
seen from Mexico
seen from Indonesia

seen from Bangladesh

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia

seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Moldova
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@r-osehips
survival mechanism they don’t emphasize enough is memorizing a poem. you memorize a poem you have a little lift raft for a variety of situations

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Andrea Calisi (Italian b.1968), The Bridge and the Blue Knight, 2026, Illustration
“One day there was an anonymous present sitting on my doorstep—Volume One of Capital by Karl Marx, in a brown paper bag. A joke? Serious? And who had sent it? I never found out. Late that night, naked in bed, I leafed through it. The beginning was impenetrable, I couldn’t understand it, but when I came to the part about the lives of the workers—the coal miners, the child laborers—I could feel myself suddenly breathing more slowly. How angry he was. Page after page. Then I turned back to an earlier section, and I came to a phrase that I’d heard before, a strange, upsetting, sort of ugly phrase: this was the section on “commodity fetishism,” “the fetishism of commodities.” I wanted to understand that weird-sounding phrase, but I could tell that, to understand it, your whole life would probably have to change. His explanation was very elusive. He used the example that people say, “Twenty yards of linen are worth two pounds.” People say that about every thing that it has a certain value. This is worth that. This coat, this sweater, this cup of coffee: each thing worth some quantity of money, or some number of other things—one coat, worth three sweaters, or so much money—as if that coat, suddenly appearing on the earth, contained somewhere inside itself an amount of value, like an inner soul, as if the coat were a fetish, a physical object that contains a living spirit. But what really determines the value of a coat? The coat’s price comes from its history, the history of all the people involved in making it and selling it and all the particular relationships they had. And if we buy the coat, we, too, form relationships with all those people, and yet we hide those relationships from our own awareness by pretending we live in a world where coats have no history but just fall down from heaven with prices marked inside. “I like this coat,” we say, “It’s not expensive,” as if that were a fact about the coat and not the end of a story about all the people who made it and sold it, “I like the pictures in this magazine.”A naked woman leans over a fence. A man buys a magazine and stares at her picture. The destinies of these two are linked. The man has paid the woman to take off her clothes, to lean over the fence. The photograph contains its history—the moment the woman unbuttoned her shirt, how she felt, what the photographer said. The price of the magazine is a code that describes the relationships between all these people—the woman, the man, the publisher, the photographer—who commanded, who obeyed. The cup of coffee contains the history of the peasants who picked the beans, how some of them fainted in the heat of the sun, some were beaten, some were kicked.For two days I could see the fetishism of commodities everywhere around me. It was a strange feeling. Then on the third day I lost it, it was gone, I couldn’t see it anymore.”
—
Wallace Shawn, The Fever
(To understand it, your whole life would probably have to change.)
i'm so glad i've lived to see a TVC adaptation that lets lestat de lioncourt say the words "serving cunt has its consequences"
What the fuck, Richard.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
in a church i visited for a wedding
EVERYBODY post your struggle/lazy/easy/low spoons go-to meals so when we all struggle next we can explore the notes.
Flavored brats/sausages with cheese or fruit etc can be delicious air-fried and plain, and wrapped in a paper towel and eaten by hand without dirtying plates and cutlery. (If you’re up to it, add buns/side/toppings to your ability level.)
someone on reddit shared texts of her and her husband's exclusive english dialect and it's beautiful
a linguist is analyzing it
Dedra Meero + Outfits in ANDOR Season 2
“What a thrill this season to think about what Dedra wears when she’s not dressed in her ISB uniform. That was a gift from Tony Gilroy. Denise and I really talked a lot about this. We get to see Dedra in her apartment. It’s so important to see that other side of her. She gets home. She’s probably super relieved to take off the armor of the ISB highly-tailored uniform. But, in a way, she just sort of changes into another version of that. The colors are the same. She slips into clothes that are more comfortable, but also in a structured and formal way. She keeps that rigidity even in her private life. She believes so much in her morality and ethics that I think she can’t ever let that slip. Her mentality is very black and white. I think she only wears ivory and black this whole season.” - Michael Wilkinson, Andor costume designer
Watching you lose your mind over The Wire has got me back on my bullshit, and I'm having a lot of fun tracking down critical readings. This article was really interesting, and seems like something you in particular might get a kick out of.
oh dude this fucking rocks. i printed this out at work yesterday so i could read and highlight it during my lunch break.
something that interested me a lot about season 1 of the wire was that we saw much more of the consequences of violence than the violence itself. and i think that helped the audience buy into what farber described here as the camera's evidential force. in season 1, the audience is introduced to the violence of the baltimore crime world largely through the surveillance and crime scene photographs traded between the cops and the characters like d'angelo. "as the major crimes detectives hone their craft . . . we as viewers gain much of our own plot knowledge and critical acumen through their investigation." the audience's critical acumen is measured against the police detail's mastery of surveillance, particularly photography. that mastery concerns actually taking the photos, of course, but also deploying them in an effective manner, like when mcnulty shows d'angelo wallace. we see the police's and the camera's power to document, corroborate, fabricate, and persuade. and as the audience develops this critical understanding of the cameras used within the narrative, we also develop a critical understanding of the cameras used to shape the narrative. the wire has this built-in sense of credibility given the past lives of david simon and ed burns, but the self-consciousness of the camera--especially in season 1--does a great job of inviting the audience to question the edges of whatever frame they present us with.
and speaking of david simon's former occupation, something i really loved about season 5 that i feel fits right in with farber's whole discussion was the emphasis on photography within the baltimore sun bullpen. (i think it was gus haynes who was always saying that stories need to run with "artwork"). david simon's journalism is obviously foundational to who he is as a fiction writer, but it's also foundational to who he is as a visual storyteller.
(on a tangentially related note, this article made me think a lot about the relationship between documentation/photography and post-modern performance artists. like, it's really cool how different iterations of the camera have been around for centuries, but it still feels like a tool specially crafted to examine post-modern landscapes. artists ranging from ana mendieta to richard long to gordon matta-clarke to the collective actions group (linking a really interesting read on their relationship to documentation) all understood the complicated implications of distilling their practices down to photographs, and they all did it masterfully. farber seems to have recognized something similar in the wire when discussing narrative frames vs. camera frames).

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOURSELF MEANS THAT YOU DON’T FALL FOR SHALLOW AND EASY SOLUTIONS
ADRIENNE RICH
which one is better (no nuance)
Pride and Prejudice (1995)
Pride and Prejudice (2005)
is it any surprise that ilya latent suicidal tendencies rozanov was a club rat in the early 2010s when every single song was a variation of Tonight Is Literally The Only Night Worth Being Alive We Are All Killing Ourselves Tomorrow
invisible cities
WE NEED UNDETECTABLE IMPERCEIVABLE CITIES NOW IF URBANISM IS EVER GLING TO SUCCEED
ThisisHowURBAN SPACESMustExistintheFuture
UnlessCitiesLookExactlyLikeThis...WellICan'tBeartoSayIt
the phrase "but i didn't mean to!" in the context of causing harm is kind of redundant to me, because almost nobody means to cause harm. most of us just want to do the right thing. and i don't mean that in a wishy-washy "oh, we're all good deep down" way, i mean that even people who regularly do the most heinous shit imaginable will have a way of justifying it to themselves. the world is not populated by hollywood sadists and psychopaths.
actually i have been thinking about this some more and i want to add on to it:
abuse in caregiving professions (like teaching or nursing) is not solely a result of power dynamics. it's also because people who go into those professions often have a idea of themselves as Good People, and are consequently incapable of recognising or acknowledging when they've hurt someone else. instead, they mentally put 'people who have inconvenienced me' into the Bad People box so they can freely abuse them while maintaining their moral high ground.
i read ross greene a lot when i was working with "difficult" or "behaviourally challenged" children. his refrain is "kids do well if they can" - meaning, in short, that most kids act out only when the demands of a situation exceed their capabilities. punishing them for this is not only cruel but also completely pointless, because they also don't want to be doing what they are doing.
a teacher who believes that there are two categories of people - Good People who Mean Well, and Bad People who Cause Problems on Purpose - is not going to see it that way. they're gonna put themselves in the first category, and the misbehaving kid in the second category. and once they have effectively depersoned the child and placed themselves on a pedestal, the world becomes simple again. because abuse is something that only Bad People do.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
temeraire meeting volly for the first time