Pisces & Aries ascend / cusp at Pholus

Just felt like sharing this now-classic Womad post dispensing with this bullshit notion that misogyny is primarily learned. Summary: It's tough to explaining the commonality of male violence among young boys and male animals as simply a byproduct of the cosmetics aisle, porn, and religion, is it not? It's clearly biological.

both men and women know "love" is not real but they keep playing pretend to feel better about themselves. all foids want is to feel "fuckable" enough and all moids want is to fuck. "desirability" or "fuckability" is very important for bihet foids, it's the reason why they spend most of their money and time on trying to make themselves look better and younger and judging other women's appearances (intra-sexual competition). moids spend time and money on whores, the more he is attracted to a whore the more money he spends on her and women know this. males only get offended at a woman who doesn't want to split the bill if he doesn't think she's "fuckable" enough, foids know this too and it's why they get offended when males don't spend their money on them

males complain about "gold diggers" because they can't afford them. foids complain about "beauty standards" because it's what's stopping them from being "spoiled". once a woman becomes "fuckable" she no longer cares if other women suffer, she doesn't even care if she herself suffers at the hands of a man, because she already "won" for being "desirable"/"fuckable" and that's enough for bihet foids

not sure if it's okay to send you this but i wanted to share my thoughts with a fellow minded woman. i don't know many blackpill accounts yet

anyway it's a bleak reality we live in

I agree with you. These women say so themselves. They want to feel desirable. It makes them feel "empowered" because they think being fuckable and desired makes them have power over men.

It seems like the ultimate goal for other sex attracted people is to find someone they want to fuck and have a relationship with. Sex is what a relationship is for, for them. Incels and these women are pathetic.

Love is not real, true. They conflate love with finding someone attractive.

It's bleak, but it's true.

(87dvhnk on Tumblr, deactivated)

─────────────

it’s not rational behaviour, in fact they are perfectly aware most of the time it’s self harm, but ultimately they don’t care because of the dopamine they somehow get from partnering with males

many such cases, and i don’t have a lot of empathy for it for women who are above the age of 25. i think particularly in the west where these women are pro-actively choosing to partner with males, it really is in such ill taste to do so

This is my first post here, so figuring things out.

Anyway, have you ever wondered why human beings (especially men) have such large brains? Or why pregnancy is so especially challenging and risky for girls and women even in comparison to most other animals? The answer lies in the competitive nature of male genes!

The war between mother and baby for oxygen and nutrients that goes on in the womb is the subject of the fascinating yet horrifying article by evolutionary biologist Suzanne Sadedin linked above. Found it years ago on an old favorite blog of mine called No More Paper Towels. (The blog’s tag line is: “The Patriarchy is a goddamn mess, and I’m not cleaning it up.”) It reshaped my perspective on the nature of pregnancy and I think it just might do the same for yours, so wanted to share.

If every woman on this earth is fighting against every male on this earth males will always win. Males hold the upper hand in physical strength, as well as controlling majority of the world’s resources. That is the dark truth, and the sooner women accept that and decide which side they’re on the better.

The argument I always hear with this is “oh but we have guns! Physical strength isn’t everything in today’s world!” but who holds the majority of access to firearms and weapons?

Most feminists foam at the mouth when males make comments like “we could take this all away if we wanted”, but it is true, they could, and would.

Women before us pushed for the changes we have in the west today, but we are walking a fine line. Males ‘tolerated’ the rights we fought for so far, however I can guarantee if all women decided to stop sleeping with males and birthing children then they would force us into submission in a heartbeat, because they have the ability to.

The only way women will ever fully be free from patriarchy and nature’s suffering is through the extinction of the human species.

The question is, do you want to lie under your oppressor? Do you want to be a slave to males? Or do you want to die with dignity? Do you want to die knowing you never bowed down to males? That you fought for your freedom til the end?

Protect and love your children by not bringing them to this world.

Do not choose to do things women are forced into.

No woman is free under a flag.

Choose & worry about yourself first.

Sex is the root of all evil. Abstain.

Don't let other women make their problems your problem.

Focus on making a bag & getting resources.

Don't over explain yourself to others.

And why do men see it that way?

Sex between a man and a woman:

-most couples do doggystyle sex, were a woman is on all fours like a bitch (a female dog in heat), spreading her behind, so that the man can penetrate her, thrusting his penis into her vagina or anus

-most women perform blowjobs an men, the name itself is already a good indicator of what it is, let's not act like most people use the word "fellatio", the women has to shove something into her mouth, which is very big, try shoving a normal sized cucumber down your throat and see how you like it, blowjobs can cause the woman to gag, vomit and other things, men often have piss on their penis, because they don't wipe, which means women are often licking and sucking piss

-not just the first time of vagibal penetration, but rather the first times can be painful, uncomfortable or lead to bleeding, while there's the "g spot" which is the clitoris, most vaginal penetratuon by itself does not lead to orgams, which begs the question why women then desire vaginal penetration, that's probably caused by them being horny and the vagina getting wet and women report that there's this want for penetration that emerges, a kind of itch that needs to be satisfied

-in general a lot of sex acts that women do they must be trained for or need preparation, like anal for example

-when men ejaculate there's also urine coming out, which means women have male urine in or on their bodies

-sperm having chemicals that have for example a tiring effect on women among other things

-with porn sex acts such as anal, deepthroating, urine tract penetration, facial ejaculation and other things having become more common, it should be questioned why a lot of women are all too ready to perform these, despite the fact that they aren't getting much out of it and that they can even be harmful

-cunnilingus is often brought up, but why is something that men perform in order to boost their ego of what a good lover they are and that they will brag about to other men seen as an exception? Why would this act, that shows how desperate women are for a male body to have sex with, even though they could easily have multiple orgasms by masturbating, be seen as better than others?

-women get especially horny when they ovulate due to their hormones wanting them to get pregnant

-het men pretty much do not have to do any of these things, they stick their penis into the woman and that's it

I could go on, but I fully understand why men see sex as degrading for women. Because it is.

Radical feminists have pointed out in the past, that you can't really sexualize het men, because then they will be seen as gay. There was a post floating around a tumblr about how people tried to make a magazine similar to playboy, but with men and for women and it wasn't successfull, because the women saw the men as gay. Let's apply this to sex.

Imagine a man who is dominated by a domina. Of course this is not subversive considering the fact that men have these kind of fantasies, because once they put their clothes on and go outside, they're the ones who are powerful and not women and they could also easily rape the domina or kill her with their bare hands. But that's beside the point. The domina is using a strapon and he is an doggystyle position. She penetrates him and afterwards makes him lick and suck the strapon with all the motions that are typical for a blowjob. Because it was in his ass there's a bit of feces on the strapon, that he has to lick as well. (That's something women also do after having had anal sex.) Before all of this, the anus of the man also had to be prepared with lubricant, so that he can even take the strapon. Now imagine all the other things I listed being done to the man. Are you seriously telling me, that this isn't degrading? How is being penetrated and giving blowjobs not inherently degrading? Why are gay or bi men who do these things considered "bottom"? Why would the man in this example be considered submissive by most people?

Why are you not questioning wether this whole "it's only degrading because men see it so" even makes sense? Why are you using a typical post-modernist argument akin to "it's a social construct and therefor not real"?

Why are you not exermining and asking wether this is even true?

Why have you gotten to this conclusion, without any inquiry?

Why are you seeing sex between a man and a woman and these sex acts I described as neutral? Are they neutral? What is it saying about women that they want to be penetrated and give blowjobs? Why would men see this as degrading?

Why aren't you asking any of these questions?

Because at the end of the day, when it comes to a topic that you personally are biased to, you are like libfems. "I like it and I choose and I want it and therefor it shouldn't be evaluated and analyzed. If someone asks uncomfortable questions I will put fingers in my ears and be like "lalala" and I will cope, seethe and do mental gymnastics."

Bio essentialist feminists asked questions, were other feminists stopped asking, because it showed some uncomfortable trues about women.

Everything around het sex and women's inability to let go of wanting to have sex with men shows once again how submissive their nature is.

And it shows how women are unable to critically think, when it comes to their own desires.

As for me, I think blowjobs and getting penetrated are inherently degrading and I think having sex is inherently submissive, because you're submitting to your own hormones and your biology. Having sex is not rational. The need for sex is caused by puberty, hormones and the resulting hornyness which is why sex is not neutral to me.

Women submit to their own biology and that's the cause of a lot of their biases and the excuses that they make, not just in regards to sex, but many other things as well.

Going fourther it shows that this is the overarching cause of a lot of problems with humans in general. It's not heterosexuality that's the problem, but sexualities and human behaviour in general. Gay men watch porn, go to male prostitutes, can be pedophiles and so on. Same is true for lesbians. They also watch porn, create written or drawn porn, sexualize women, go to brothels (because of their loneliness among other things), are into BDSM and like gay men also have a desire for biological children, which is why they use surrogacy. Did you know that homosexual penguins take eggs from the bio parents when they die or that they even steal them and then hatch them? All humans are animals and homosexual people are no exception.

When you dare to point these kind of things out, you're called homophobic or lesbophobic.

I'm pointing out the truth and I don't care about any kind of -phobia or -ism nor any of the excuses and arguments made to deflect from the truth. "No real lesbian would do this!" "God forbid lesbians have sex!" Cope harder.