In this sense, the Skoptists are smart to want to undo the shame Adam and Eve put on all humanity according to their Scriptures. For those on the prosexual side that say the greater seal is too extreme and that Jesus died for our sins, they are forgetting an important piece. In the New Testament, it does say in multiple references that when humans go to Heaven, they will become eunuchs and devoid of their sexuality. Thus the Skoptics and related movements make the wise move of bringing Heaven to earth through their castrative measures instead of waiting till death. Other religions have provided similar arguments even if is just for the sake of maintaining celibacy, which a eunuch lifestyle will definitely facilitate.

Christianity's favored state is celibacy, but this has been long forgotten by most Christians. Valesians and Skoptsy are the most correct when it comes to christian interpretations. Jesus preached a friendship of humans through agapé, not a sexual relationship. Being one in Christ means we are all one and the same; there is no female or male, no jew or gentile.

Always push Genesis when having these discussions with them. Let them know a fruit could also be symbolic of a woman's vagina "the fruit's flesh" and how God making Eve pregnant for defiance was likely a sexual related punishment since there would of been no need to engage in sexual filth if they maintained their original immortality. It was likely the act Satan or the Serpent tempted the two to do, resulting in God saying "If you want to engage in a lustful act like this when clearly I made you immortal unlike the other animals that have to do it as part of nature, then I punish you with mortality like the rest and thus you and all those in further generations have to do it as well just to survive but it will hurt real bad!". Satan is the one that implanted sexuality into humans at the time of Genesis and thus sexuality is the reason why humans reject their Creator in favor of the Devil.

Marriage is a social construct and I doubt jesus would shoot down some magic light the second you sign you name on a dotted line on a marriage document to make that relation ok. In reality, marriage is simply a surrender to your fleshly sins since you are not strong enough to drown out your self and your nature.

From a more historical point of view, the the antisexual movement was originally rooted in Skopsyism since its founders were in Russia, where that faith occured. The more damage the modern sexual monstrosity does, the closer to Skopsyism its practioners in large part will follow as a rebuke of what they see and what they are personally experiencing. Sex is social construct. God created sex organs for reproduction and not for selfish or hedonistic reasons.

I'm reminded of a passage from the apocryphal "Gospel of Thomas"... a pseudopigraphical, pseudo-gnostic or pre-gnostic document from the 1st or early 2nd century levant purporting to be the sayings of Jesus... One aphorism that is not canonical has always stuck with me :

"7. Jesus says: "Blessed is the lion which a man eats so that the lion becomes a man. But cursed is the man whom a lion eats so that the man becomes a lion!""

When viewing the Holy Bible as a continuous cycle rather than a book that simply ends, one can recognize that the same Dream occurs repeatedly because Egotists commit the same actions which have the same consequences. The individual soul starts as a being who only knows good, is then approached by the temptation of lust to become like God through the sex act in which Bliss is promised. The soul becomes deluded, attempting to convince herself that she has achieved higher consciousness or "maturity" through sex. This leads the deluded soul into the darkness of ignorance and into depravity.

As the individual becomes more ignorant, he will conclude that his sexual knowledge is the Wisdom of God, becoming a deceiver of himself and others which allows him to justify his sadistic actions. The Egoic thought form that has emanated from sex is the opposite of God who is love, unity and compassion."

So what do women want ???? Women are the ones who hate chastity and purity the most yet simultaneously complain about rampant sexualization. What does "sexual independence" even mean ? Almost 60 years after the sexual revolution happened, we have all seen the disastrous aftereffects of this "independence" and where has that led us ? Naked females are everywhere, everything is sexualized, porn is more and more degrading and criminal, kinks are now considered normal, objectification can't be escaped. What is so wrong with wanting to be (or become) chaste or even having "never being touched" ? I genuinely want to understand. Why is this something that must be so heavily criticized ? Women's "liberation" will NEVER come through "sexual independence" (whatever that means), it can ONLY come through independence from sex and lust altogether.

The Only Women who will ever make a difference in This Desert of D*ck Demonism & Depravity are Pure Women. Ordinary Women have nothing to be proud of, especially when they worship their ugly worthless munchkins, the filthy karmic fruit of their lust loins.

Ancient Women have never been “wise,” they’ve only been whores, slaves, and witches, which did tremendous damage to others, for magic/sorcery are abominable in every way. Are women wise today ? Are women ever wise unless they’re 100% chaste ?! No. They’re whores and slaves today (and satanic witches, i.e. 100% enablers of the sadistic sadism of men). They were whores and slaves then, and the ones who were ruthless and malevolent and possessed by demonic spirits are not much different from the whores in “entertainment” today, i.e. The Satanic Industry.

My Girls need to understand History is not what males peddle, much less: what women fantasize about. History was savage, same as today is sadistic and savage, but today, thanks to The Influence of Christ and all miserable saints of The Dark Ages, there’s hope. They didn’t have hope in The Past, only superstition, magic, witchcraft, The Templars & Cunning.