guys the point is "reflect on how you have learned bigotry through exposure and you parrot it in your own works and in the fandoms you engage with without self awareness" not "tell me, specifically, what random motifs you think are evil"

on the flipside, to everyone adding notes about hooked noses, turbans + headscarves, nonwhite features and cultural clothing in general, mental and physical disorders, and surely others I've missed in recollection: you are entirely right and should say it.

Not here to argue but number 3 is because historically being overweight was a hallmark of the upper class. To be fat was a privilege that most poor people simply could not afford. The greedy boss is fat because he is greedy, this is literally one of the most cut and dry examples. Equating being fat with a moral failing is a much newer concept.

does anyone wanna hold hands until we feel a little braver

the reblog map is all of us holding hands btw

there's a jewish story about a rich man who goes to his rabbi to ask him about building an orphanage, and the rabbi is like "yeah duh go for it!!" and then later the rich guy comes back and is like "actually I've decided not to... I was just doing it for my own image and not coz I cared about orphans" and the rabbi was like "bitch the orphans don't care why you're building the orphanage!!!" and sometimes I wish I could say that to lefties who haven't unpacked their christian upbringing. sometimes motives don't matter!! who give a fuck why a politician wants to do a good thing? bitch the orphans don't!!

The thing with using 🍇 instead of just saying rape is that if you really need to avoid censors you could use phrases that already exist like forced upon or violated or something else. 🍇 is genuinely the worse possible thing to use when talking about a serious topic and no I never want to see anyone use it when talking about something that happens in real life. It’s genuinely so stupid

I am so fucking tired of seeing the terms “graped” or “unalived”. Like sure, if you’re a content creator who relies on views for income I can understand dancing around the specific words to avoid censorship. But Joe Schmoe with 30 followers on here doesn’t need to do that. Say the word! Unpack why you’re so afraid to use it! Never once have I been censored for loudly talking about rape and suicide. There isn’t some secret internet mafia waiting to cancel you for using bad words. Most TOS don’t give a fuck as long as you’re not fetishizing or glorifying the topics!

if billie eilish donating 11.5 million dollars for food inequity & climate changes is performative activism then i think we need more performative activism

i don't ever ride for her like that but all she said was why are you a billionaire? donate some, and i don't see how that is controversial at all. not only did she say it in presence of mark zuckerberg but also there is no female popstar among the top 50 billionaires but if the shoe fits!! also this is not to say millionaires are inherently good people but then the outrage & knee jerk reaction to defend after she called out billionaires is certainly interesting!

Sorry I said yippee when I heard you unbuckling your belt do you still think Im hot?

the holidays are never officially here until i see the christmas light extension cord of death by electricity and I have yet to see it.